American Revolution Birth Of A Nation

Word Count: 1556 |

America is the land of the free, and the home of the brave, but it was not always so. The United States of America began as thirteen colonies controlled by the British government. When George III became King of England in 1760 no one in England or America saw independence in the future for the thirteen British colonies in North America (Foner and Garraty). Colonists were proud to be part of Great Britain and Britain’s successful empire (Andrews 186). “Only in retrospect do the irritations that arose in the course of Britain’s management of its vast empire appear to point toward revolution” (Foner and Garraty). The American Revolution included the war for independence and led to the birth of a nation: the United States of America.

Officials in England, though not happy about the boldness of the colonial legislatures after the French-Indian War, had no plan to make them change to be better English subjects (Foner and Garraty). The events that led to revolution in 1776 did not grow out of a British plan to control the colonies (Andrews 186). That came later, but at first Parliament was only trying to protect British interests and increase the size of their treasury; they just stumbled into the American controversy because they did not think about the consequences their actions would have on their relationship with the colonies. The British were surprised when in 1765 the colonies exploded in anger when Parliament hit them with new taxes (Foner and Garraty).

The French and Indian War cost Britain a lot of money because they helped the thirteen colonies win. Even though the British were protecting their interests when they helped the colonies win the war, the truth is that Colonial troops could not have won the French-Indian War without the support of British army (Marston 9). After the French and Indian war was over, the British government decided that they needed to keep the French, Spanish, and Indians from taking any of their territory so they sent a large army of British soldiers to North America to protect it (Marston 10). There was a problem with this plan. The British did not want to pay for it. Leaders in Britain felt that the colonies should pay for their own protection so the British government decided to impose new taxes on the colonies to fund their plan to put troops in North America (Morison xii).
First, the British passed the Sugar Act of 1764 and then the Stamp Act of 1765 (Morison xii).This just caused the colonies to get angry with England because they felt they were not being represented in the British Parliament even though they were paying taxes. The colonies began rioting so the British government repealed both Acts in 1766 (Marston 9). The Townshend Revenue Act was the next tax to be imposed by the British government. This Act was passed the next year in 1767 and put a tax on tea, and other things. This just caused more riots, and the British had to send 4,000 soldiers to control the riots. However, the British soldiers were not trained and just made things worse. On March 5, 1770, an angry mob attacked some British soldiers and the British soldiers fired into the crowd and killed three men and wounded five. This incident was called the “Boston Massacre” and was used to turn more people against the British. The British army was sent back to England, but the colonists anger did not go away even when the Townshend Act was partially repealed; there was still a tax on tea (Marston 11).

The British thought they had a right to tax the colonies so in 1773 they passed the Tea Act which put a second tax on tea (Marston 11). The reason they passed this act was to make money for the British East India Company. This just made the situation in the colonies worse. In December, 1773 when one of the British East India Company’s ships sailed into the Boston Harbor, a group of men dressed as Indians went on board the ship and dumped all the tea into the water. This was called the “Boston Tea Party” (Marston 12). This rebellion worried the British and they passed the Coercive Acts (called the Intolerable Acts by the colonists). The purpose of these laws was to restore order in Massachusetts, following the Boston Tea Party and other acts of rebellion. These new laws made the colonies so angry that colonies outside of New England began to turn against the British government (“Colonial America”). Up until this point, the colonists liked being part of the British empire (Marston 14). Perhaps the most important result of the Coercive Acts was the meeting of the First Continental Congress in Philadelphia, in September 1774 (“Colonial America”). The Congress was not trying to gain independence; it wanted to right the wrongs that had been inflicted on the colonies and hoped one voice of all the colonies would gain them a hearing in London (Marston 14).

The war started when Britain tried to destroy rebel military stores at Concord, Massachusetts. Fighting broke out in Boston on April 19, 1775, when rebel forces took over Boston and forced out the British troops in the Battle of Bunker Hill. Fighting then moved to New York and New Jersey, and then covered parts of Virginia and the Carolinas. Britain offered to pardon the rebels if they would surrender. The rebels, who now called themselves Americans, refused (Andrews 186). The Americans declared themselves independent on July 4, 1776 when Congress gathered again in the Second Continental Congress (“Colonial America”). Battles were fought from 1775 until the last battle of the war was won by the American navy in March 1783 in the Straits of Florida. Britain then recognized the independence of the U.S. east of the Mississippi River and gave Florida to Spain in the Treaty of Paris in September, 1783 (Morison 1).

The American war for independence was the longest war in the history of the United States until the Vietnam War. It involved most of Europe’s powerful countries in one way or another. The war touched every part of what had been British America, including not only the thirteen east coast colonies but also Canada and Native American country as well as the West Indies and the open Atlantic (Marston 10).

The war was just one part of the American Revolution. Changes in civil, cultural, social, and economic areas lasted over twenty-five years between 1764 when Britain raised colonial taxes to 1789 when the U.S. Constitution went into effect (Marston 11). “The sharp accent upon colonial rights after 1763, the rapid development of sectionalism within the armed revolt of the thirteen colonies, the declaration of American independence, and, finally, the creation of a new nation followed one after the other with almost breath-taking speed” (Gipson 5-6). The story of the war is just one part of the creation of the American Republic, but the war was the center of the American Revolution and the birth of a nation (Marston 11).
The roots of the American Revolution are deep. “Geography and climate, institutional developments, religion and race, and other factors beyond our ken, may have made the separation inevitable” (Morison xi). The American Revolution does not just belong to the history of America; it is an important part of world history. The American Revolutionary war destroyed the once powerful British empire and led to the creation of the now most powerful nation on the planet, the United States of America. The war was just part of America’s revolution, but it was certainly the beginning of freedom for the colonies. The mistakes by the British government led to the war (Wahlke x). The writers of the Declaration of Independence believed that freedom is a God-given right. Men are not meant to be captives to anything or anyone. There is little question that this country is great and powerful today because of that first struggle during the American Revolutionary war for the thing all men seek: freedom. “The freedom and happiness of man”. are the sole objects of all legitimate government” (Lipscomb 369). How fitting that these words of Thomas Jefferson appear on a plaque in the stairwell of the pedestal of the Statue of Liberty. Thomas Jefferson, who wrote most of the Declaration of Independence, helped to deliver a nation that is now considered by some the greatest nation on earth; a nation whose birth, like all births, was a struggle for freedom.

Works Cited

Andrews, Charles M. The Colonial Background of the American Revolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1931.
“Colonial America: Second Continental Congress 1775-1776” US, 15 May 2007 .
Foner, Eric and John A. Garraty. “Revolution.” The Reader’s Companion to American History Dec 1991. SIRS Researcher, 15 May 2007 .
Gipson, Lawrence. The Coming of the Revolution, 1763-1775. 1st ed. New York: Harper, 1954.
Lipscomb, Andrew A., ed. The Writings of Thomas Jefferson. Vol 12. 1904.
Marston, Daniel. The American Revolution, 1774-1783. New York: Routledge, 2003.
Morison, S. E., ed. Sources and Documents Illustrating the American Revolution, 1764-1788, and the Formation of the Federal Constitution. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1923.
Wahlke, John C., ed. The Causes of the American Revolution. Revised ed. Boston: D. C. Heath and Company, 1967.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Allegory Of American Pie By Don Mc Lean

Ask anyone what was the defining moment in the rock history of the 1960s was and all you will get is a one word answer: Woodstock. The three day rock festival that defined an era was only one of many music festivals of the '60s. But Woodstock has come to symbolize, "an era of peaceful, free- loving, drug- taking hippie youth, carefree before harsher realities hit..." (Layman 40). The Woodstock festival ended a century filled with many metamorphoses of rock'n'roll, from the era of pop music to the rebirth of folk music to the invention of acid rock. But some cynics say that rock'n'roll died with the death of Buddy Holly before the 60s even began. One such person is Don McLean. The poet behind the haunting epic song about the death of 'danceable' music, McLean wrote the ever popular song, "American Pie" (appendix 1). The most important song in rock'n'roll history, "American Pie", is the song about the demise of rock'n'roll after Buddy Holly's death and the heathenism of rock that resulted. Although McLean himself won't reveal any symbolism in his songs, "American Pie" is one of the most analyzed pieces of literature in modern society. Although not all of its secrets have been revealed, many "scholars" of the sixties will agree that the mystery of this song is one of the reasons it has become so successful- everyone wants to know the meanings of its allegories. Proof of "American Pie's" truth lies in the allegory of the song. Many People enjoy the song but have no idea what it means- Who is the Jester? What is the levee? When the deeper story is found, the importance of the song is unearthed. "American Pie" is not only a song, it is an epic poem about the course of rock'n'roll...

Carl Orffs Philosophies In Music Education

While Carl Orff is a very seminal composer of the 20th century, his greatest success and influence has been in the field of Music Education. Born on July 10th in Munich, Germany in 1895, Orff refused to speak about his past almost as if he were ashamed of it. What we do know, however, is that Orff came from a Bavarian family who was very active in the German military. His father's regiment band would often play through some of the young Orff's first attempts at composing. Although Orff was adamant about the secrecy of his past, Moser's Musik Lexicon says that he studied in the Munich Academy of Music until 1914. Orff then served in the military in the first world war. After the war, he held various positions in the Mannheim and Darmstadt opera houses then returned home to Munich to further study music. In 1925, and for the rest of his life, Orff was the head of a department and co-founder of the Guenther School for gymnastics, music, and dance in Munich where he worked with musical beginners. This is where he developed his Music Education theories. In 1937, Orff's Carmina Burana premiered in Frankfurt, Germany. Needless to say, it was a great success. With the success of Carmina Burana, Orff orphaned all of his previous works except for Catulli Carmina and the En trata which were rewritten to be acceptable by Orff. One of Orff's most admired composers was Monteverdi. In fact, much of Orff's work was based on ancient material. Orff said: I am often asked why I nearly always select old material, fairy tales and legends for my stage works. I do not look upon them as old, but rather as valid material. The time element disappears, and only the spiritual power remains. My...

Johann Sebastian Bach Biography

Throughout the history of music, many great composers, theorists, and instrumentalists have left indelible marks and influences that people today look back on to admire and aspire to. No exception to this idiom is Johann Sebastian Bach, whose impact on music was unforgettable to say the least. People today look back to his writings and works to both learn and admire. He truly can be considered a music history great. Bach, who came from a family of over 53 musicians, was nothing short of a virtuosic instrumentalist as well as a masterful composer. Born in Eisenach, Germany, on March 21, 1685, he was the son of a masterful violinist, Johann Ambrosius Bach, who taught his son the basic skills for string playing. Along with this string playing, Bach began to play the organ which is the instrument he would later on be noted for in history. His instruction on the organ came from the player at Eisenach's most important church. He instructed the young boy rather rigorously until his skills surpassed anyone?s expectations for someone of such a young age. Bach suffered early trauma when his parents died in 1695. He went to go live with his older brother, Johann Christoph, who also was a professional organist at Ohrdruf. He continued his younger brother's education on that instrument, as well as introducing him to the harpsichord. The rigorous training on these instruments combined with Bach?s masterful skill paid off for him at an early age. After several years of studying with his older brother, he received a scholarship to study in Luneberg, Germany, which is located on the northern tip of the country. As a result, he left his brother?s tutelage and went to go and study there. The teenage years brought Bach to several parts of Germany where he...


Michelangelo was pessimistic in his poetry and an optimist in his artwork. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo?s poetry was pessimistic in his response to Strazzi even though he was complementing him. Michelangelo?s sculpture brought out his optimism. Michelangelo was optimistic in completing The Tomb of Pope Julius II and persevered through it?s many revisions trying to complete his vision. Sculpture was Michelangelo?s main goal and the love of his life. Since his art portrayed both optimism and pessimism, Michelangelo was in touch with his positive and negative sides, showing that he had a great and stable personality. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo Buonarroti was called to Rome in 1505 by Pope Julius II to create for him a monumental tomb. We have no clear sense of what the tomb was to look like, since over the years it went through at least five conceptual revisions. The tomb was to have three levels; the bottom level was to have sculpted figures representing Victory and bond slaves. The second level was to have statues of Moses and Saint Paul as well as symbolic figures of the active and contemplative life- representative of the human striving for, and reception of, knowledge. The third level, it is assumed, was to have an effigy of the deceased pope. The tomb of Pope Julius II was never finished. What was finished of the tomb represents a twenty-year span of frustrating delays and revised schemes. Michelangelo had hardly begun work on the pope?s tomb when Julius commanded him to fresco the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to complete the work done in the previous century under Sixtus IV. The overall organization consists of four large triangles at...

Oscar Wilde

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde was born in Dublin Ireland on October 16, 1854. He is one of the most talented and most controversial writers of his time. He was well known for his wit, flamboyance, and creative genius and with his little dramatic training showing his natural talent for stage and theatre. He is termed a martyr by some and may be the first true self-publicist and was known for his style of dress and odd behavior. Wilde, 1882 His Father, William Wilde, was a highly accredited doctor and his mother, Jane Francesca Elgee, was a writer of revolutionary poems. Oscar had a brother William Charles Kingsbury along with his father's three illegitimate children, Henry, Emily, and Mary. His sister, Isola Emily Francesca died in 1867 at only ten years of age from a sudden fever, greatly affecting Oscar and his family. He kept a lock of her hair in an envelope and later wrote the poem 'Requiescat' in her memory. Oscar and his brother William both attended the Protora Royal School at Enniskillen. He had little in common with the other children. He disliked games and took more interest in flowers and sunsets. He was extremely passionate about anything that had to do with ancient Greece and with Classics. Wilde during school years In 1871, he was awarded a Royal School Scholarship to Trinity College in Dublin and received many awards and earned the highest honor the college offered to an undergraduate, the Foundation Scholarship. In 1874, he also won the College's Berkley Gold Medal for Greek and was awarded a Demyship to Magdalen College, Oxford. After graduating from Oxford, Oscar moved to London with his friend Frank Miles, a well-known portrait painter of the time. In 1878 his poem Ravenna was published, for which he won the...

The History Of Greek Theater

Theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century BCE, with the Sopocles, the great writer of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, heroes and the ideals of life were depicted and glorified. It was believed that man should live for honor and fame, his action was courageous and glorious and his life would climax in a great and noble death. Originally, the hero's recognition was created by selfish behaviors and little thought of service to others. As the Greeks grew toward city-states and colonization, it became the destiny and ambition of the hero to gain honor by serving his city. The second major characteristic of the early Greek world was the supernatural. The two worlds were not separate, as the gods lived in the same world as the men, and they interfered in the men's lives as they chose to. It was the gods who sent suffering and evil to men. In the plays of Sophocles, the gods brought about the hero's downfall because of a tragic flaw in the character of the hero. In Greek tragedy, suffering brought knowledge of worldly matters and of the individual. Aristotle attempted to explain how an audience could observe tragic events and still have a pleasurable experience. Aristotle, by searching the works of writers of Greek tragedy, Aeschulus, Euripides and Sophocles (whose Oedipus Rex he considered the finest of all Greek tragedies), arrived at his definition of tragedy. This explanation has a profound influence for more than twenty centuries on those writing tragedies, most significantly Shakespeare. Aristotle's analysis of tragedy began with a description of the effect such a work had on the audience as a "catharsis" or purging of the emotions. He decided that catharsis was the purging of two specific emotions, pity and...

Scholarship Essay About Goals

Ever since I was a young kid I have always been interested with aircraft. I was so curious of how airplane's fly. I remember taking my toys apart to see how it works. As a kid I wanted to go to the airport to watch the airplanes land and fly and pondered how this happens. Other kids wanted to go to the amusement places. As I grew older I became more and more interested in aircraft and the technology behind it. I always involved myself with aviation early on. I read books and magazines on aviation, took museum tours, built model airplanes. When I was younger my father would take me to aircraft repair facilities where I would watch in great fascination. In my teens, went up to the military bases and befriended many soldiers involved with aircraft and asked them numerous questions. I got to meet many aeronautics engineers and borrowed their old textbooks and read them till the wee hours of the morning. As technology improved with information superhighway, I logged on the web. Stayed up for hours and hours searching through web pages and web pages of information about aircraft and technology. I started my elementary school in the Philippines, then we moved to U.S. and continued my high school education and graduated. Enrolled at the CCSF to pursue my college education and now I am in the 2nd year in CCSF taking aeronautics. My goal now is to obtain my AS degree from the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) so I can transfer to a University and get a Bachelors degree and to continue for my Masters degree in Aeronautics Engineering. I will strive hard to reach the peak level of my career which is a Professor and hopefully to be an aeronautic professor so...

Circus Circus Enterprises Case Studies

Executive Summary: Circus Circus Enterprises is a leader and will continue to be in the gaming industry. In recent years, they have seen a decline in profit and revenue; management tends to blame the decrease on continuing disruptions from remodeling, expansion, and increased competition. Consequently, Circus has reported decreases in its net income for 1997 and 1998 and management believes this trend will continue as competition heightens. Currently the company is involved in several joint ventures, its brand of casino entertainment has traditionally catered to the low rollers and family vacationers through its theme park. Circus should continue to expand its existing operations into new market segments. This shift will allow them to attract the up scale gambler. Overview Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc founded in 1974 is in the business of entertainment, with its core strength in casino gambling. The company?s asset base, operating cash flow, profit margin, multiple markets and customers, rank it as one of the gaming industry leaders. Partners William G. Bennett an aggressive cost cutter and William N. Pennington purchased Circus Circus in 1974 as a small and unprofitable casino. It went public in 1983, from 1993 to 1997; the average return on capital invested was 16.5%. Circus Circus operates several properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Laughlin, and one in Mississippi, as well as 50% ownership in three other casinos and a theme park. On January 31,1998 Circus reported net income of 89.9 million and revenues of 1.35 billion, this is a down from 100 million on 1.3 billion in 1997. Management sees this decline in revenue due to the rapid and extensive expansion and the increased competition that Circus is facing. Well established in the casino gaming industry the corporation has its focus in the entertainment business and has particularly a popular theme resort concept....

Effect Of Civil War On American Economy

The Economies of the North and South, 1861-1865 In 1861, a great war in American history began. It was a civil war between the north and south that was by no means civil. This war would have great repercussions upon the economy of this country and the states within it. The American Civil War began with secession, creating a divided union of sorts, and sparked an incredibly cataclysmic four years. Although the actual war began with secession, this was not the only driving force. The economy of the Southern states, the Confederacy, greatly if not entirely depended on the institution of slavery. The Confederacy was heavily reliant on agriculture, and they used the profits made from the sale of such raw materials to purchase finished goods to use and enjoy. Their major export was cotton, which thrived on the warm river deltas and could easily be shipped to major ocean ports from towns on the Mississippi and numerous river cities. Slavery was a key part of this, as slaves were the ones who harvested and planted the cotton. Being such an enormous unpaid work force, the profits made were extraordinarily high and the price for the unfinished goods drastically low in comparison; especially since he invention of the cotton gin in 1793 which made the work all that much easier and quicker. In contrast, the economical structure of the Northern states, the Union, was vastly dependent on industry. Slavery did not exist in most of the Union, as there was no demand for it due to the type of industrial development taking place. As the Union had a paid work force, the profits made were lower and the cost of the finished manufactured item higher. In turn, the Union used the profits and purchased raw materials to use. This cycle...

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Trade Embargoes

Although I am a strong critic of the use and effectiveness of economic sanctions, such as trade embargoes, for the sake of this assignment, I will present both their theoretical advantages and their disadvantages based upon my research. Trade embargoes and blockades have traditionally been used to entice nations to alter their behavior or to punish them for certain behavior. The intentions behind these policies are generally noble, at least on the surface. However, these policies can have side effects. For example, FDR's blockade of raw materials against the Japanese in Manchuria in the 1930s arguably led to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which resulted in U.S. involvement in World War II. The decades-long embargo against Cuba not only did not lead to the topple of the communist regime there, but may have strengthened Castro's hold on the island and has created animosity toward the United States in Latin America and much suffering by the people of Cuba. Various studies have concluded that embargoes and other economic sanctions generally have not been effective from a utilitarian or policy perspective, yet these policies continue. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Trade Embargoes Strengths Trade embargoes and other sanctions can give the sender government the appearance of taking strong measures in response to a given situation without resorting to violence. Sanctions can be imposed in conjunction with other measures to achieve conflict prevention and mitigation goals. Sanctions may be ineffective: goals may be too elusive, the means too gentle, or cooperation from other countries insufficient. It is usually difficult to determine whether embargoes were an effective deterrent against future misdeeds: embargoes may contribute to a successful outcome, but can rarely achieve ambitious objectives alone. Some regimes are highly resistant to external pressures to reform. At the same time, trade sanctions may narrow the...