Capital Punishment: cruel and unusual punishment

The choice between life and death is one of the biggest issues in the world today, and the biggest factor for that issue is whether or not the death penalty is “cruel and unusual punishment.” The issue about capital punishment has many sides and each side is backed by many differentiated individuals, however most people bring about good reasoning’s for and against the death penalty. The death penalty argument can be approached from many different angles; the angles used in this paper are the main facts and information when it comes to the death penalty. In this paper the subjects are the history of the death penalty, the main people and cases for capital punishment, biases used when deciding for the death penalty, and the methods that are used today. I am here to prove to the reader that the death penalty is not “cruel and unusual punishment.”
The death penalty has been around for thousands of years extending all of the way back to Eighteenth Century B.C., but the differences between now and then are obvious. Back then death penalties were carried out by such means as crucifixion, drowning, beaten to death, burning alive, and impalement. Using methods such as these to carry out executions for the death penalty is a very severe type of cruel and unusual punishment, but back in Eighteenth Century B.C. this type of execution was considered to be normal. Death penalties did not slow down for a few centuries, in Sixteenth Century A.D. Henry VIII used some common methods like boiling, burning at the stake, hanging, beheading, drawing, and quartering. In Britain the death penalty was the answer for crimes such as marrying a Jew, not confessing to a crime, and even treason. By the 1700’s, 222 crimes were punishable by death in Britain, including stealing, cutting down a tree, and robbing a rabbit warren. These crimes hardly seemed bad enough to sentence individuals to death by the juries in Britain, so eventually the number of crimes punishable by death greatly decreased in the 1800’s. Britain was the greatest influence when it came to the American colonies adopting death penalty laws. When the European’s came to the new world they brought the practice for capital punishment. The first recorded execution in the new colonies was that of Captain George Kendall in the Jamestown colony of Virginia in 1608, he was thought to be a spy for Spain. In 1834, Pennsylvania was the first state to move the executions out of the public and into correctional facilities. This was a big step for capital punishment because no longer could the average civilian witness a death sentence carried out, and it also created more of a humane attitude towards the capital punishment argument. From 1920 to 1940 there was resurgence in the death penalty because of the writings of criminologists; in the 1930’s there were more executions than any other decade in American history. The death penalty enthusiasm started to become depleted during the 1950’s, and the fall in executions declined greatly due to public influence.
Since Eighteenth Century B.C. there have been many death convictions, but the public have not had a chance to see who the face is behind the crime. News and radio are the main factors towards the public getting the information they deserve; in the past one hundred years it is relatively easy for the average individual to hear about the latest capital punishment case. The four most important and most recent cases of America’s history involved Gary Gilmore, Ted Bundy, Karla Faye Tucker, and Timothy McVeigh. These individuals were given fair trials, and each one was convicted and sentenced to the death penalty due to their heinous crimes that each committed. All four are deceased by some type of lethal execution because of the crimes they have committed, and each person received what they deserved. Gary Gilmore was convicted of killing two individuals during a robbery; he shot both Bennie Bushnell and Max David Jenson. It took nearly a decade to convict Gary, but eventually he was killed by a firing squad just after 8 a.m. on Monday, January 17, 1977. To many people’s dismay, Mr. Gilmore more or less welcomed his death by saying, “let’s do it.” Gilmore, who had vowed not to flinch before the firing squad, sat calmly, a hood covering his head, as five anonymous gunmen armed with .30-caliber rifles took aim and fired. This type of execution was more common back in the 70’s, but eventually and gradually the electric chair took precedence in the killings of many on death row. The case and conviction of Ted Bundy was the next real big capital punishment trial in the United States. Mr. Bundy ultimately confessed to abducting and killing 23 women, but prosecutors say he could have been responsible for the killings of up to 100 individuals. Ted Bundy was put to death in Florida’s electric chair on January 24, 1989 after confessing to possibly a small portion of his killings. Mr. Bundy was a very educated man who could fool many people with his charm and smile, but his killings eventually caught up to him and he finally received what he deserved after a few years of murder. Bundy seemed confident he would be acquitted of the state kidnapping charges, but he was convicted as many thought he should. Prosecutors and investigators say Bundy began confessing to murders as the day of his execution approached in the hopes that, if he slowly gave out information, it would delay his punishment. This did not work in his favor at all; his sentence was carried out with great pleasure and relief to the public and the victim’s families at the scheduled time. In 1998 a women by the name of Karla Faye Tucker became the first woman executed in Texas since 1863 and the first in the nation since 1984. Tucker was convicted of hacking a man and women to death; she became a born-again Christian in prison, and was executed by lethal injection in Texas on Feb. 8, 1998. During the last days and weeks of her life, Tucker questioned her execution as a just method for punishment. Her transformation from a drug-addicted and violent teen-age prostitute to a born-again Christian was especially moving, but in the end she perished to her well-deserved death. Everyone knows Timothy McVeigh as the terrorist who was a major part of the Oklahoma City bombing killing 168 people. It was one of the most recent large scale bombings in America, and the main person the clues lead to was none other than Timothy McVeigh. He was executed by lethal injection on June 11, 2001, and became the first person in 38 years to be killed by the federal government.
All four individuals were sentenced to death for something horrible that they had done, but for every case there is always a fragment of doubt that surrounds the evidence. This fragment of doubt leads to the wrongfully accused; every wrongfully accused individual in the system is someone who essentially is murdered. The court system’s are supposed to prove the person guilty beyond reasonable doubt, but in some situations, “beyond reasonable doubt,” is not looked into too well. In three pretty recent cases James Adams, William Henry Anderson, and Everett Applegate were all wrongfully accused. All three of these men were convicted and sentenced to death, but the miraculous part was that each person had a pretty decent alibi to back up their innocence. James Adams was convicted of first-degree murder of his girlfriend, sentenced to death, and executed in 1984. There were witnesses that said James’ car was at his girlfriends, someone saw his car leave, and someone heard a voice inside the victims’ home. In the end, the truth was not discovered until a skilled investigator examined the case and found out that his girlfriend had borrowed his car, the person who said they saw him leave could not have been able to make out the individual in the car, and they found out that the voice inside the house was a woman’s voice. Even though these facts were brought to the judge months before Adams’ execution, he refused to grant even a short stay so that these questions could be answered. William Henry Anderson was convicted of rape of a white woman, sentenced to death, and executed in 1945 without an appeal having been made. The execution took place only five months after Anderson’s arrest, perhaps in part because the sheriff wrote to the governor, “I would appreciate special attention in this case before some sympathizing organization gets a hold of it” ( http://sun.soci.niu.edu/~critcrim/wrong/mike.list). Anderson’s sister and one of his co-workers said that he had been having a consensually intimate relationship with this white woman for about a year. Everett Applegate was convicted of murder of his own wife; he was sentenced to death in 1936. Another individual, Frances Q. Creighton, was said to have also been present at the crime and she had testified that she killed the victim by arsenic poisoning, at Applegate’s instigation. During the investigation Creighton also admitted to another previous murder, but this did not help Mr. Applegate on the stand when he was pleading his innocence. All of these men were wrongfully accused in different ways, but perhaps if they had the same person to help them throughout the process they might have had the chance to better their life. The person is Sister Helen Prejean, and she has been a big part of the death row inmates’ last days in the state of Louisiana. Sister Helen Prejean has witnessed five executions in Louisiana and today educates the public about the death penalty by lecturing, organizing and writing. She is a saint when it comes to death row inmates; she is able to see the side of people that not too many people can.
In the world of capital punishment there are many factors that can influence the judge and/or juries decision of whether or not to sentence the certain individual to death. There are four main factors when it comes to sentencing individuals; the four factors are age restriction, class biases, gender biases, and racial biases. The biggest and most recent controversial factor is the question on what age is the cut-off age for the death penalty, or otherwise known as the age restriction. Just recently the Supreme Court ruled 5-4 in the Roper v. Simmons case, which they declared that the penalty for anyone under the age of 18 is “unconstitutional” (Thomas R. Eddlem. “Supreme Arrogence.”). The five majority justices arrived at the opposite conclusion in the 1989 case Stanford v. Kentucky that the execution of 16- and 17-year-olds was not “cruel and unusual punishment.” This just proves how our nation is changing every day to try and make it fair on everyone that is convicted of a capital crime, and to give everyone the same chance at the life they deserve. Race and class biases pretty much go hand in hand because most of the people sentenced to death are on the lower rung of the latter in society. Also most of those individuals on the lower rung of society that are sentenced to death are African American males. The fact that there is a racist bias still lingering in the discussion about the death penalty perpetuates people to keep up on studies that would help prevent such racist acts. Recent studies in Philadelphia indicate that the odds of receiving a death sentence are nearly four times (3.9) higher if the defendant is black. Race is more likely to affect death sentencing than smoking affects the likelihood of dying from heart disease. Another study found that the key decision makers in death cases around the country are almost exclusively white men. Of the chief District Attorneys in counties using the death penalty in the United States, nearly 98% are white and only 1% are African-American. Gender biases do not play as important role in the capital punishment argument as class and race, but the fact is women are not sentenced to death nearly as much as men. Since the beginning of the colonial era, 20,000 people have been executed in America, but only 400 of them have been women. In the 23 years since the Supreme Court reinstated capital punishment, 5,569 total death sentences have been given out by courts. Of those 5,569 total death sentences, only 112 are women. Only one of the 112 women have been executed (Velma Barfield in 1984), compared with 301 men of the 5,569 sentences. A professor at Northwestern University named Leigh Beinen once stated that “Capital punishment is about portraying people as devils, but women are usually seen as less threatening” (http://www.abanet.org/irr/hr/genderbias.html).
Last but not least the methods used during the process of executing an individual today are much more humane than they were back in Eighteenth Century B.C.. The methods today do not carry the label of “cruel and unusual punishment,” because we all know that each death row inmate will probably get a better death than his/her victim. Some common methods used today when carrying out the death penalty include lethal injection, the gas chamber, and the electric chair. Lethal injection first came into the picture in 1977; the condemned person is usually strapped to a restraint and a member of the execution team positions several heart monitors on his skin. Two needles (one is a back-up) are then inserted into usable veins, usually in the inmate’s arms, then the execution takes place. The inmate does not even feel any pain because he/she is given a tranquilizer before the muscle failure drugs. The gas chamber is not as widely used today at all, but in some states it is used as a secondary method to either the electric chair or lethal injection. For this method the inmate is placed into a chair inside a chamber (the gas chamber), and a pail of sulfuric acid is placed below the chair. The warden then gives a signal to the executioner who flicks a lever that releases crystals of sodium cyanide into the pail. This causes a chemical reaction that releases hydrogen cyanide gas. The electric chair method is a little more grueling because it is a method that visibly dismembers the body of a human being. For this method the inmate is placed in a chair similar to the gas chamber chair, and then the guards have some precautionary actions before the electricity is run through the body. There is a sponge with saline placed under a metal skullcap-shaped electrode that is attached to the scalp and forehead. The electrode is the main source of the electricity; the sponge must not be too wet or the saline short-circuits the electric current and not too dry, as it would then have a very high resistance. A jolt of between 500 and 2000 volts, which lasts for about 30 seconds, is run through the inmate. After the body cools down doctors make sure that there is no heart beat, if there is still a heartbeat then executioner keeps running electricity through the body until the heart has stopped beating.
There is no telling where capital punishment will lead from here, but it has come a long way from Eighteenth Century B.C.. Almost all of the methods used 100 years ago are not still practiced today, which means the death penalty is becoming more and more humane with every passing year. Sure there are some who are convicted of crimes they did not commit, but if you look at the big picture you can see that there is more good than harm being done. Hopefully in the future our country, and even world, can devise a plan to make absolutely sure that each individual sentenced to death row is guilty, but until then the death penalty is the best conclusion to capital crimes. The pros and cons of this argument are both very good arguments, and each side of the argument should continue to proceed with research and studies. In the end, the thing you have to think about when arguing for or against the death penalty is whether or not the punishment fits the crime.

Work cited

Vogel, Richard D.. “Capital Punishment Update.”
Monthly Review. New York: Dec. 2004. Vol. 56, Iss. 7, p. 31-33 (3 pp.).

Carroll, Joseph. “Americans and the death penalty.”
The Gallup Poll Tuesday Briefing. Washington: Dec. 2004. p. 82-88.

Rayburn, Corey. “BETTER DEAD THAN R(AP)ED?: THE PATRIARCHIAL
RHETORIC DRIVING CAPITAL RAPE STATUES.”
St. John’s Law Review. Brooklyn: Fall 2004. Vol. 78, Iss. 4, p. 1119-1165 (47 pp.).

Scherer-Emunds, Meinrad. “Wrongful death.”
U.S. Catholic. Chicago: Apr. 2005. Vol. 70, Iss. 4, p. 28-32 (5 pp.).

Eddlem, Thomas R.. “Supreme Arrogence.”
The New American. Appleton: Apr. 4, 2005. Vol. 21, Iss. 7, p. 30-32 (3 pp.).

Anonymous. “Too Young to Die.”
The Nation. New York: Mar. 21, 2005. Vol. 280, Iss. 11, p. 3 (1 pp.).

Anderson, George M.. “The Other Side of the Death Penalty.”
America. New York: Mar. 14, 2005. Vol. 192, Iss. 9, p. 6-8 (3 pp.).

Death Penalty Curricula for High School. 1 Nov 2001. Michigan State University Comm
Tech Lab and Death Penalty Information Center.
.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Allegory Of American Pie By Don Mc Lean

Ask anyone what was the defining moment in the rock history of the 1960s was and all you will get is a one word answer: Woodstock. The three day rock festival that defined an era was only one of many music festivals of the '60s. But Woodstock has come to symbolize, "an era of peaceful, free- loving, drug- taking hippie youth, carefree before harsher realities hit..." (Layman 40). The Woodstock festival ended a century filled with many metamorphoses of rock'n'roll, from the era of pop music to the rebirth of folk music to the invention of acid rock. But some cynics say that rock'n'roll died with the death of Buddy Holly before the 60s even began. One such person is Don McLean. The poet behind the haunting epic song about the death of 'danceable' music, McLean wrote the ever popular song, "American Pie" (appendix 1). The most important song in rock'n'roll history, "American Pie", is the song about the demise of rock'n'roll after Buddy Holly's death and the heathenism of rock that resulted. Although McLean himself won't reveal any symbolism in his songs, "American Pie" is one of the most analyzed pieces of literature in modern society. Although not all of its secrets have been revealed, many "scholars" of the sixties will agree that the mystery of this song is one of the reasons it has become so successful- everyone wants to know the meanings of its allegories. Proof of "American Pie's" truth lies in the allegory of the song. Many People enjoy the song but have no idea what it means- Who is the Jester? What is the levee? When the deeper story is found, the importance of the song is unearthed. "American Pie" is not only a song, it is an epic poem about the course of rock'n'roll...

Carl Orffs Philosophies In Music Education

While Carl Orff is a very seminal composer of the 20th century, his greatest success and influence has been in the field of Music Education. Born on July 10th in Munich, Germany in 1895, Orff refused to speak about his past almost as if he were ashamed of it. What we do know, however, is that Orff came from a Bavarian family who was very active in the German military. His father's regiment band would often play through some of the young Orff's first attempts at composing. Although Orff was adamant about the secrecy of his past, Moser's Musik Lexicon says that he studied in the Munich Academy of Music until 1914. Orff then served in the military in the first world war. After the war, he held various positions in the Mannheim and Darmstadt opera houses then returned home to Munich to further study music. In 1925, and for the rest of his life, Orff was the head of a department and co-founder of the Guenther School for gymnastics, music, and dance in Munich where he worked with musical beginners. This is where he developed his Music Education theories. In 1937, Orff's Carmina Burana premiered in Frankfurt, Germany. Needless to say, it was a great success. With the success of Carmina Burana, Orff orphaned all of his previous works except for Catulli Carmina and the En trata which were rewritten to be acceptable by Orff. One of Orff's most admired composers was Monteverdi. In fact, much of Orff's work was based on ancient material. Orff said: I am often asked why I nearly always select old material, fairy tales and legends for my stage works. I do not look upon them as old, but rather as valid material. The time element disappears, and only the spiritual power remains. My...

Johann Sebastian Bach Biography

Throughout the history of music, many great composers, theorists, and instrumentalists have left indelible marks and influences that people today look back on to admire and aspire to. No exception to this idiom is Johann Sebastian Bach, whose impact on music was unforgettable to say the least. People today look back to his writings and works to both learn and admire. He truly can be considered a music history great. Bach, who came from a family of over 53 musicians, was nothing short of a virtuosic instrumentalist as well as a masterful composer. Born in Eisenach, Germany, on March 21, 1685, he was the son of a masterful violinist, Johann Ambrosius Bach, who taught his son the basic skills for string playing. Along with this string playing, Bach began to play the organ which is the instrument he would later on be noted for in history. His instruction on the organ came from the player at Eisenach's most important church. He instructed the young boy rather rigorously until his skills surpassed anyone?s expectations for someone of such a young age. Bach suffered early trauma when his parents died in 1695. He went to go live with his older brother, Johann Christoph, who also was a professional organist at Ohrdruf. He continued his younger brother's education on that instrument, as well as introducing him to the harpsichord. The rigorous training on these instruments combined with Bach?s masterful skill paid off for him at an early age. After several years of studying with his older brother, he received a scholarship to study in Luneberg, Germany, which is located on the northern tip of the country. As a result, he left his brother?s tutelage and went to go and study there. The teenage years brought Bach to several parts of Germany where he...

Michelangelo

Michelangelo was pessimistic in his poetry and an optimist in his artwork. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo?s poetry was pessimistic in his response to Strazzi even though he was complementing him. Michelangelo?s sculpture brought out his optimism. Michelangelo was optimistic in completing The Tomb of Pope Julius II and persevered through it?s many revisions trying to complete his vision. Sculpture was Michelangelo?s main goal and the love of his life. Since his art portrayed both optimism and pessimism, Michelangelo was in touch with his positive and negative sides, showing that he had a great and stable personality. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo Buonarroti was called to Rome in 1505 by Pope Julius II to create for him a monumental tomb. We have no clear sense of what the tomb was to look like, since over the years it went through at least five conceptual revisions. The tomb was to have three levels; the bottom level was to have sculpted figures representing Victory and bond slaves. The second level was to have statues of Moses and Saint Paul as well as symbolic figures of the active and contemplative life- representative of the human striving for, and reception of, knowledge. The third level, it is assumed, was to have an effigy of the deceased pope. The tomb of Pope Julius II was never finished. What was finished of the tomb represents a twenty-year span of frustrating delays and revised schemes. Michelangelo had hardly begun work on the pope?s tomb when Julius commanded him to fresco the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to complete the work done in the previous century under Sixtus IV. The overall organization consists of four large triangles at...

Oscar Wilde

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde was born in Dublin Ireland on October 16, 1854. He is one of the most talented and most controversial writers of his time. He was well known for his wit, flamboyance, and creative genius and with his little dramatic training showing his natural talent for stage and theatre. He is termed a martyr by some and may be the first true self-publicist and was known for his style of dress and odd behavior. Wilde, 1882 His Father, William Wilde, was a highly accredited doctor and his mother, Jane Francesca Elgee, was a writer of revolutionary poems. Oscar had a brother William Charles Kingsbury along with his father's three illegitimate children, Henry, Emily, and Mary. His sister, Isola Emily Francesca died in 1867 at only ten years of age from a sudden fever, greatly affecting Oscar and his family. He kept a lock of her hair in an envelope and later wrote the poem 'Requiescat' in her memory. Oscar and his brother William both attended the Protora Royal School at Enniskillen. He had little in common with the other children. He disliked games and took more interest in flowers and sunsets. He was extremely passionate about anything that had to do with ancient Greece and with Classics. Wilde during school years In 1871, he was awarded a Royal School Scholarship to Trinity College in Dublin and received many awards and earned the highest honor the college offered to an undergraduate, the Foundation Scholarship. In 1874, he also won the College's Berkley Gold Medal for Greek and was awarded a Demyship to Magdalen College, Oxford. After graduating from Oxford, Oscar moved to London with his friend Frank Miles, a well-known portrait painter of the time. In 1878 his poem Ravenna was published, for which he won the...

The History Of Greek Theater

Theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century BCE, with the Sopocles, the great writer of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, heroes and the ideals of life were depicted and glorified. It was believed that man should live for honor and fame, his action was courageous and glorious and his life would climax in a great and noble death. Originally, the hero's recognition was created by selfish behaviors and little thought of service to others. As the Greeks grew toward city-states and colonization, it became the destiny and ambition of the hero to gain honor by serving his city. The second major characteristic of the early Greek world was the supernatural. The two worlds were not separate, as the gods lived in the same world as the men, and they interfered in the men's lives as they chose to. It was the gods who sent suffering and evil to men. In the plays of Sophocles, the gods brought about the hero's downfall because of a tragic flaw in the character of the hero. In Greek tragedy, suffering brought knowledge of worldly matters and of the individual. Aristotle attempted to explain how an audience could observe tragic events and still have a pleasurable experience. Aristotle, by searching the works of writers of Greek tragedy, Aeschulus, Euripides and Sophocles (whose Oedipus Rex he considered the finest of all Greek tragedies), arrived at his definition of tragedy. This explanation has a profound influence for more than twenty centuries on those writing tragedies, most significantly Shakespeare. Aristotle's analysis of tragedy began with a description of the effect such a work had on the audience as a "catharsis" or purging of the emotions. He decided that catharsis was the purging of two specific emotions, pity and...

Scholarship Essay About Goals

Ever since I was a young kid I have always been interested with aircraft. I was so curious of how airplane's fly. I remember taking my toys apart to see how it works. As a kid I wanted to go to the airport to watch the airplanes land and fly and pondered how this happens. Other kids wanted to go to the amusement places. As I grew older I became more and more interested in aircraft and the technology behind it. I always involved myself with aviation early on. I read books and magazines on aviation, took museum tours, built model airplanes. When I was younger my father would take me to aircraft repair facilities where I would watch in great fascination. In my teens, went up to the military bases and befriended many soldiers involved with aircraft and asked them numerous questions. I got to meet many aeronautics engineers and borrowed their old textbooks and read them till the wee hours of the morning. As technology improved with information superhighway, I logged on the web. Stayed up for hours and hours searching through web pages and web pages of information about aircraft and technology. I started my elementary school in the Philippines, then we moved to U.S. and continued my high school education and graduated. Enrolled at the CCSF to pursue my college education and now I am in the 2nd year in CCSF taking aeronautics. My goal now is to obtain my AS degree from the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) so I can transfer to a University and get a Bachelors degree and to continue for my Masters degree in Aeronautics Engineering. I will strive hard to reach the peak level of my career which is a Professor and hopefully to be an aeronautic professor so...

Circus Circus Enterprises Case Studies

Executive Summary: Circus Circus Enterprises is a leader and will continue to be in the gaming industry. In recent years, they have seen a decline in profit and revenue; management tends to blame the decrease on continuing disruptions from remodeling, expansion, and increased competition. Consequently, Circus has reported decreases in its net income for 1997 and 1998 and management believes this trend will continue as competition heightens. Currently the company is involved in several joint ventures, its brand of casino entertainment has traditionally catered to the low rollers and family vacationers through its theme park. Circus should continue to expand its existing operations into new market segments. This shift will allow them to attract the up scale gambler. Overview Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc founded in 1974 is in the business of entertainment, with its core strength in casino gambling. The company?s asset base, operating cash flow, profit margin, multiple markets and customers, rank it as one of the gaming industry leaders. Partners William G. Bennett an aggressive cost cutter and William N. Pennington purchased Circus Circus in 1974 as a small and unprofitable casino. It went public in 1983, from 1993 to 1997; the average return on capital invested was 16.5%. Circus Circus operates several properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Laughlin, and one in Mississippi, as well as 50% ownership in three other casinos and a theme park. On January 31,1998 Circus reported net income of 89.9 million and revenues of 1.35 billion, this is a down from 100 million on 1.3 billion in 1997. Management sees this decline in revenue due to the rapid and extensive expansion and the increased competition that Circus is facing. Well established in the casino gaming industry the corporation has its focus in the entertainment business and has particularly a popular theme resort concept....

Effect Of Civil War On American Economy

The Economies of the North and South, 1861-1865 In 1861, a great war in American history began. It was a civil war between the north and south that was by no means civil. This war would have great repercussions upon the economy of this country and the states within it. The American Civil War began with secession, creating a divided union of sorts, and sparked an incredibly cataclysmic four years. Although the actual war began with secession, this was not the only driving force. The economy of the Southern states, the Confederacy, greatly if not entirely depended on the institution of slavery. The Confederacy was heavily reliant on agriculture, and they used the profits made from the sale of such raw materials to purchase finished goods to use and enjoy. Their major export was cotton, which thrived on the warm river deltas and could easily be shipped to major ocean ports from towns on the Mississippi and numerous river cities. Slavery was a key part of this, as slaves were the ones who harvested and planted the cotton. Being such an enormous unpaid work force, the profits made were extraordinarily high and the price for the unfinished goods drastically low in comparison; especially since he invention of the cotton gin in 1793 which made the work all that much easier and quicker. In contrast, the economical structure of the Northern states, the Union, was vastly dependent on industry. Slavery did not exist in most of the Union, as there was no demand for it due to the type of industrial development taking place. As the Union had a paid work force, the profits made were lower and the cost of the finished manufactured item higher. In turn, the Union used the profits and purchased raw materials to use. This cycle...

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Trade Embargoes

Although I am a strong critic of the use and effectiveness of economic sanctions, such as trade embargoes, for the sake of this assignment, I will present both their theoretical advantages and their disadvantages based upon my research. Trade embargoes and blockades have traditionally been used to entice nations to alter their behavior or to punish them for certain behavior. The intentions behind these policies are generally noble, at least on the surface. However, these policies can have side effects. For example, FDR's blockade of raw materials against the Japanese in Manchuria in the 1930s arguably led to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which resulted in U.S. involvement in World War II. The decades-long embargo against Cuba not only did not lead to the topple of the communist regime there, but may have strengthened Castro's hold on the island and has created animosity toward the United States in Latin America and much suffering by the people of Cuba. Various studies have concluded that embargoes and other economic sanctions generally have not been effective from a utilitarian or policy perspective, yet these policies continue. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Trade Embargoes Strengths Trade embargoes and other sanctions can give the sender government the appearance of taking strong measures in response to a given situation without resorting to violence. Sanctions can be imposed in conjunction with other measures to achieve conflict prevention and mitigation goals. Sanctions may be ineffective: goals may be too elusive, the means too gentle, or cooperation from other countries insufficient. It is usually difficult to determine whether embargoes were an effective deterrent against future misdeeds: embargoes may contribute to a successful outcome, but can rarely achieve ambitious objectives alone. Some regimes are highly resistant to external pressures to reform. At the same time, trade sanctions may narrow the...