Civil Wars

The Tennessee countryside leading from Nashville to Murfreesboro is rolling and rough. The roads in 1862, were poor and the battlefield selected was no better. The area was relatively flat with few imposing hills for artillery or observation. The terrain had rolling, low hills and shallow swales. The land was broken by numerous and sometimes large limestone croppings which in some way gave prominence to the land. It was heavily wooded with red cedars and pines, Black Cherry, American Elm, Orange Osage, Kentucky Coffeetree, oaks and maples. The coming of winter had caused the fruit of the Orange Osage and Coffeetree to fall from their branches, Mistletoe covered many of the leafless trees.
In some fields cotton still clung to their opened bolls on brown, shriveled plants. There were some open fields harvested of their corn. The most prominent feature of the area was the river running south to north through the intended battlefield. Stones River was more or less easy to wade across, but in many places its banks were steep and lined with trees. To Rosecrans’ advantage, the terrain did not lend itself well to the effective use of the somewhat superior Rebel cavalry. The dense cedars afforded some protection for both sides.

The full winter season had set into the Nashville Basin. December 30th saw a smattering of weather that had plagued the armies from the 26th of December, and would continue until January 4th as the Confederates retreated out the Wartrace and Shelbyville roads in a cold, winter rain. On this next to last day of the years, several diarists reported heavy showers, bitter cold, and ice on the river. It snowed on December 31st. The sun fought through the midst and fog on one day, January 1st, otherwise the sky was filled with low hanging, dark clouds. In a number of areas the water pooled and frost in the shallow limestone lined swales.

In the vernacular of the day, Colonel Sirwell announced, in his after action report, “The ball opened this morning [December 30th].” Miller’s brigade, as it marched into the assigned battle line, closed in on Crittenden’s Left Wing. they advanced and took a position to the right of General Palmer’s Second Division and proceeded through the cedars. Negley’s division had lined up its right with Sheridan’s division. Sheridan’s men had skirmished continuously during their march down the six mile long Wilkinson Pike from Stewart’s Creek. The Pioneer Brigade has busied themselves cutting roads through thick stands of cedar in order that Negley could easily move cannons, ammunition wagons, and ambulances. The Federal batteries commenced shelling the enemy as soon as they were in position. The Rebels did not respond immediately, but in their turn opened a corresponding deadly fire on the Yankees. The fight of the day would be with artillery and small skirmishes.

In the chilly morning mist Colonel Miller ordered skirmishes from the 78th Pennsylvania, the 19th Illinois and the 37th Indiana southward across Wilkinson Pike. At 8:30 A.M., Sirwell deployed his skirmishers as ordered; Martin McCanna’s Company B, and William Jack’s Company H, the selected companies moved into their positions. First Lieutenant McCanna, although new to his command, had the Colonel’s confidence. The youthful Captain William Cummins leading Company A and Company F were deployed as a reserve skirmish line. Captain Charles Gillespie had been replace by Acting Lieutenant Absolom Weaver as commander of Company F. Colonel Hull of the 37th Indiana had deployed companies D and E of his regiment as his skirmishers.

The Union skirmishers drove the Confederates southward across the Wilkinson Pike. Moving at the double-quick the Yankees soon adopted a style of Indian fighting. As they pursued the Rebels they frequently took advantage of the trees; stopping in safety they fired at retreating foe. The thrill of the chase quickly ended when a large Confederate force near the Giles Harding house and the brick kiln near it opened a blazing volley into the Union ranks. The Hoosier skirmishers leading the assault, took a fierce pounding. When the boys from Indiana began to falter, the 78th moved forward, passed them, and engaged the Rebels near the brick kiln east of the Harding home.

The regiment’s skirmishers exchanged deadly rounds with the enemy and drove them back. With a lull in the fighting, Sirwell was ordered to withdraw to make room for Colonel George Robert’s Illinois command of Sheridan’s Division. Phil Sheridan’s Third Division had fought their way into place. The 78th was ordered to lie in that position for some time and was eventually ordered to advance and remain on picket near the edge of dense woods. At noon, they were relieved by the 21st Ohio. The efforts of Sheridan’s and Negley’s brigades drove back the Confederates and brought about the occupation of the home, gin-house, and other out buildings belonging to Mr. Harding. General Negley wrote in his after action report that the 78th PA and the 19th IL admirably drove back the Confederates skirmishers.

In the annuals of warfare, many officers were noted to be drunkards, incompetent or both, and they did not fight. The most unusual and equally amusing incident related at the battle of Stones River concerned two Confederate officers that could not determine who the enemy was. Some words passed that led to blows, and though the bullets were flying thick and fast, here was seen the ludicrous spectacle of two Confederate officers engaged in a personal fight on the battlefield. Stanton had got Richmond’s thumb in his mouth, while Richmond was gnawing away at Stanton’s ear.
While the two Confederate attempted to settle their dispute, the sporadic skirmishing and cannon duels increased along the front between the Yankees and Rebels. The army commanders were feeling their way into a major battle.

Although many reports in the Official Record indicates there was little or no fighting for many brigades on the 30th, the fighting for Miller’s command was somewhat heated. Private James Meyers of the the 78th Company H was killed in the early skirmishing action near the Harding house. Colonel Miller lost about 20 killed and wounded during that day.

By the mid-afternoon the earlier flush of battle had worn off; the reality of combat had set in. By evening the clouds of the bleak, dreary day were swept away and the stars peeped out for a short time. Rosecrans’ and Bragg’s armies lay along a four mile front. From the bank of the Stones River to the north the lines extended southwesterly to the Franklin Turnpike, awaiting the coming fury. In the clear, dark, biting cold Negley’s division ended the day to the left of Sheridan’s division with their right flank resting onto he east-west Wilkinson pike at the junction of McFadden’s Lane. They were perpendicular to the pike and fronted south eastward while stretching approximately one-half mile in a covex line to the rough road leading north to McFadden’s Ford.

There is no mention of McFadden’s Lane within any of the after action reports on the battle of Stones River. However, it appears on all the maps made at the time. General Manigault drew the road on his map. In Captain Bickham’s book he refers to the road that today is named Van Cleve’s Lane as a “trace.”

Timothy Stanley’s brigade of Negley’s Division anchored the far right of the division on the Wilkinson Pike. His brigade ensconced in a cedar thicket butted against Robert’s brigade of Sheridan’s division. John Miller’s brigade anchored the far left of the division at a point on McFadden’s Lane, approximately one-half mile from the Nashville Turnpike and the railroad.

As the approach of Rosecrans’ army, Bragg had wasted no time in setting a well-defined line of battle. Bragg’s army was split into two corps. Lieutenant General Leonidas Polk commanded one and Lieutenant General William Hardee the other. Hardee’s corps as the left wind and Polk’s Corps as the center were ordered to the west side of the river. Major General John Breckenridge’s Division anchored the right flank. It remained posted on the east side of Stones River to afford protection to the town.

The armies rested fitfully after the day’s stinging fire fights, but Rosecrans was not resting. He began to shift his overall alignment once again. His grand design ws to have Crittenden attack Breckenridge, Bragg’s right. Thomas would move forward against “Bishop” Polk concurrently with Crittenden and McCook to hold his ground against Hardee and serve as anchor to the right wheel.

By capturing the high ground east of Stones River near McFadden’s Ford at Rosecrans’ left, Wood’s batteries would be able to enfilade the Rebels in front of Negley and Palmer. Negley’s right flank, that section, held by Timothy Stanley’s brigade, would be the pivot of the entire wheel movement. By crushing Bragg’s right flank with Crittenden’s assault, Rosecrans intended to sweep through Murfreesboro. In doing so, he would cut off any route of escape and destroy the Confederate army.

General Edward Kirk, another of Richard Johnson’s brigade commanders, was mortally wounded. The Right Wing fell back firing, but it was apparent to the retreating soldiers that nothing could stem the Butternut tide sweeping over them in the early morning light. As the skirmishers of the 78th PA fired into the attacking gray-butternut and lines fell back, they knew that they were in trouble. The confident Rebels sang as they moved forward. The Confederate drove the Yankees in the right wing out of their camps, overran gun emplacements, and killed hundreds of Union troops within the first half hour.

McCook’s two right divisions, those commanded by Brigadier General Jefferson Davis and Brigadier General Richard Johnson, did little to insure their troops from the suspected attacks. The insidious Davis endeavored to steady his division, but his excited manner and the impression that he was confused did little to inspire his fleeting troops. McCook’s brigades melted like snow in a summer sun. The Yankees had quickly broken and fled in terror.

Supposedly, McCook and Johnson were aware of the Confederate lines to their right, but did nothing to support that section on their front. General Johnson in his after action report stated that he reported the over extension of the Rebel left. He claimed that McCook relayed the same fact to him. Some adjustments were made to the Union right, but obviously not enough. In spite of his report, with a dawn attack expected, and with the fearful possibility of a flank attack, Johnson did little to help the situation. He made his headquarters over a mile back from his division. This headquarter position made it impossible to direct his division when they needed him the most.

Within an hour of Bragg’s fierce assault, one of McCook’s staff officers reported to Rosecrans that the Right Wing was under full attack; however Rosecrans was not told of Johnson’s rout or the rapid succession of events that drove Davis from the field, too. Rosey sent word back to McCook to make a stubborn stand.

Even as the sounds of battle heightened on his right, Rosey was still confident in his plan. the sounds of cannon and the battle cried did not yet indicate the degree of his problems; he continued pressing his attack on his left. Van Cleve’s two brigades supported by Wood’s division had forded Stones River. In Rosecrans’ mind the plan was developing well, or so he thought. General McCook had engaged Bragg’s left and Rosecrans’ rank and file moved to engage Breckenridge on the Confederate right flank. Now another staff officer arrived from McCook to report that the right was collapsing. Rosecrans evaluated his situation and quickly abandoned his plan. Phil Sheridan recorded that the color of Rosey’s ruddy face failed; he became anxious. His character was being tested to the limit. Neverthe less, Rosecrans quickly pulled himself together and went to work. He developed a defensive plan until he could counter stroke. He ordered the recall of Crittenden’s troops, which Confederate intelligence failed to notice. Rosey mounted his horse and galloped off to his right wing. He had to save his army. He was now on the defensive.

bibliography= myself

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Allegory Of American Pie By Don Mc Lean

Ask anyone what was the defining moment in the rock history of the 1960s was and all you will get is a one word answer: Woodstock. The three day rock festival that defined an era was only one of many music festivals of the '60s. But Woodstock has come to symbolize, "an era of peaceful, free- loving, drug- taking hippie youth, carefree before harsher realities hit..." (Layman 40). The Woodstock festival ended a century filled with many metamorphoses of rock'n'roll, from the era of pop music to the rebirth of folk music to the invention of acid rock. But some cynics say that rock'n'roll died with the death of Buddy Holly before the 60s even began. One such person is Don McLean. The poet behind the haunting epic song about the death of 'danceable' music, McLean wrote the ever popular song, "American Pie" (appendix 1). The most important song in rock'n'roll history, "American Pie", is the song about the demise of rock'n'roll after Buddy Holly's death and the heathenism of rock that resulted. Although McLean himself won't reveal any symbolism in his songs, "American Pie" is one of the most analyzed pieces of literature in modern society. Although not all of its secrets have been revealed, many "scholars" of the sixties will agree that the mystery of this song is one of the reasons it has become so successful- everyone wants to know the meanings of its allegories. Proof of "American Pie's" truth lies in the allegory of the song. Many People enjoy the song but have no idea what it means- Who is the Jester? What is the levee? When the deeper story is found, the importance of the song is unearthed. "American Pie" is not only a song, it is an epic poem about the course of rock'n'roll...

Carl Orffs Philosophies In Music Education

While Carl Orff is a very seminal composer of the 20th century, his greatest success and influence has been in the field of Music Education. Born on July 10th in Munich, Germany in 1895, Orff refused to speak about his past almost as if he were ashamed of it. What we do know, however, is that Orff came from a Bavarian family who was very active in the German military. His father's regiment band would often play through some of the young Orff's first attempts at composing. Although Orff was adamant about the secrecy of his past, Moser's Musik Lexicon says that he studied in the Munich Academy of Music until 1914. Orff then served in the military in the first world war. After the war, he held various positions in the Mannheim and Darmstadt opera houses then returned home to Munich to further study music. In 1925, and for the rest of his life, Orff was the head of a department and co-founder of the Guenther School for gymnastics, music, and dance in Munich where he worked with musical beginners. This is where he developed his Music Education theories. In 1937, Orff's Carmina Burana premiered in Frankfurt, Germany. Needless to say, it was a great success. With the success of Carmina Burana, Orff orphaned all of his previous works except for Catulli Carmina and the En trata which were rewritten to be acceptable by Orff. One of Orff's most admired composers was Monteverdi. In fact, much of Orff's work was based on ancient material. Orff said: I am often asked why I nearly always select old material, fairy tales and legends for my stage works. I do not look upon them as old, but rather as valid material. The time element disappears, and only the spiritual power remains. My...

Johann Sebastian Bach Biography

Throughout the history of music, many great composers, theorists, and instrumentalists have left indelible marks and influences that people today look back on to admire and aspire to. No exception to this idiom is Johann Sebastian Bach, whose impact on music was unforgettable to say the least. People today look back to his writings and works to both learn and admire. He truly can be considered a music history great. Bach, who came from a family of over 53 musicians, was nothing short of a virtuosic instrumentalist as well as a masterful composer. Born in Eisenach, Germany, on March 21, 1685, he was the son of a masterful violinist, Johann Ambrosius Bach, who taught his son the basic skills for string playing. Along with this string playing, Bach began to play the organ which is the instrument he would later on be noted for in history. His instruction on the organ came from the player at Eisenach's most important church. He instructed the young boy rather rigorously until his skills surpassed anyone?s expectations for someone of such a young age. Bach suffered early trauma when his parents died in 1695. He went to go live with his older brother, Johann Christoph, who also was a professional organist at Ohrdruf. He continued his younger brother's education on that instrument, as well as introducing him to the harpsichord. The rigorous training on these instruments combined with Bach?s masterful skill paid off for him at an early age. After several years of studying with his older brother, he received a scholarship to study in Luneberg, Germany, which is located on the northern tip of the country. As a result, he left his brother?s tutelage and went to go and study there. The teenage years brought Bach to several parts of Germany where he...


Michelangelo was pessimistic in his poetry and an optimist in his artwork. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo?s poetry was pessimistic in his response to Strazzi even though he was complementing him. Michelangelo?s sculpture brought out his optimism. Michelangelo was optimistic in completing The Tomb of Pope Julius II and persevered through it?s many revisions trying to complete his vision. Sculpture was Michelangelo?s main goal and the love of his life. Since his art portrayed both optimism and pessimism, Michelangelo was in touch with his positive and negative sides, showing that he had a great and stable personality. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo Buonarroti was called to Rome in 1505 by Pope Julius II to create for him a monumental tomb. We have no clear sense of what the tomb was to look like, since over the years it went through at least five conceptual revisions. The tomb was to have three levels; the bottom level was to have sculpted figures representing Victory and bond slaves. The second level was to have statues of Moses and Saint Paul as well as symbolic figures of the active and contemplative life- representative of the human striving for, and reception of, knowledge. The third level, it is assumed, was to have an effigy of the deceased pope. The tomb of Pope Julius II was never finished. What was finished of the tomb represents a twenty-year span of frustrating delays and revised schemes. Michelangelo had hardly begun work on the pope?s tomb when Julius commanded him to fresco the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to complete the work done in the previous century under Sixtus IV. The overall organization consists of four large triangles at...

Oscar Wilde

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde was born in Dublin Ireland on October 16, 1854. He is one of the most talented and most controversial writers of his time. He was well known for his wit, flamboyance, and creative genius and with his little dramatic training showing his natural talent for stage and theatre. He is termed a martyr by some and may be the first true self-publicist and was known for his style of dress and odd behavior. Wilde, 1882 His Father, William Wilde, was a highly accredited doctor and his mother, Jane Francesca Elgee, was a writer of revolutionary poems. Oscar had a brother William Charles Kingsbury along with his father's three illegitimate children, Henry, Emily, and Mary. His sister, Isola Emily Francesca died in 1867 at only ten years of age from a sudden fever, greatly affecting Oscar and his family. He kept a lock of her hair in an envelope and later wrote the poem 'Requiescat' in her memory. Oscar and his brother William both attended the Protora Royal School at Enniskillen. He had little in common with the other children. He disliked games and took more interest in flowers and sunsets. He was extremely passionate about anything that had to do with ancient Greece and with Classics. Wilde during school years In 1871, he was awarded a Royal School Scholarship to Trinity College in Dublin and received many awards and earned the highest honor the college offered to an undergraduate, the Foundation Scholarship. In 1874, he also won the College's Berkley Gold Medal for Greek and was awarded a Demyship to Magdalen College, Oxford. After graduating from Oxford, Oscar moved to London with his friend Frank Miles, a well-known portrait painter of the time. In 1878 his poem Ravenna was published, for which he won the...

The History Of Greek Theater

Theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century BCE, with the Sopocles, the great writer of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, heroes and the ideals of life were depicted and glorified. It was believed that man should live for honor and fame, his action was courageous and glorious and his life would climax in a great and noble death. Originally, the hero's recognition was created by selfish behaviors and little thought of service to others. As the Greeks grew toward city-states and colonization, it became the destiny and ambition of the hero to gain honor by serving his city. The second major characteristic of the early Greek world was the supernatural. The two worlds were not separate, as the gods lived in the same world as the men, and they interfered in the men's lives as they chose to. It was the gods who sent suffering and evil to men. In the plays of Sophocles, the gods brought about the hero's downfall because of a tragic flaw in the character of the hero. In Greek tragedy, suffering brought knowledge of worldly matters and of the individual. Aristotle attempted to explain how an audience could observe tragic events and still have a pleasurable experience. Aristotle, by searching the works of writers of Greek tragedy, Aeschulus, Euripides and Sophocles (whose Oedipus Rex he considered the finest of all Greek tragedies), arrived at his definition of tragedy. This explanation has a profound influence for more than twenty centuries on those writing tragedies, most significantly Shakespeare. Aristotle's analysis of tragedy began with a description of the effect such a work had on the audience as a "catharsis" or purging of the emotions. He decided that catharsis was the purging of two specific emotions, pity and...

Scholarship Essay About Goals

Ever since I was a young kid I have always been interested with aircraft. I was so curious of how airplane's fly. I remember taking my toys apart to see how it works. As a kid I wanted to go to the airport to watch the airplanes land and fly and pondered how this happens. Other kids wanted to go to the amusement places. As I grew older I became more and more interested in aircraft and the technology behind it. I always involved myself with aviation early on. I read books and magazines on aviation, took museum tours, built model airplanes. When I was younger my father would take me to aircraft repair facilities where I would watch in great fascination. In my teens, went up to the military bases and befriended many soldiers involved with aircraft and asked them numerous questions. I got to meet many aeronautics engineers and borrowed their old textbooks and read them till the wee hours of the morning. As technology improved with information superhighway, I logged on the web. Stayed up for hours and hours searching through web pages and web pages of information about aircraft and technology. I started my elementary school in the Philippines, then we moved to U.S. and continued my high school education and graduated. Enrolled at the CCSF to pursue my college education and now I am in the 2nd year in CCSF taking aeronautics. My goal now is to obtain my AS degree from the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) so I can transfer to a University and get a Bachelors degree and to continue for my Masters degree in Aeronautics Engineering. I will strive hard to reach the peak level of my career which is a Professor and hopefully to be an aeronautic professor so...

Circus Circus Enterprises Case Studies

Executive Summary: Circus Circus Enterprises is a leader and will continue to be in the gaming industry. In recent years, they have seen a decline in profit and revenue; management tends to blame the decrease on continuing disruptions from remodeling, expansion, and increased competition. Consequently, Circus has reported decreases in its net income for 1997 and 1998 and management believes this trend will continue as competition heightens. Currently the company is involved in several joint ventures, its brand of casino entertainment has traditionally catered to the low rollers and family vacationers through its theme park. Circus should continue to expand its existing operations into new market segments. This shift will allow them to attract the up scale gambler. Overview Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc founded in 1974 is in the business of entertainment, with its core strength in casino gambling. The company?s asset base, operating cash flow, profit margin, multiple markets and customers, rank it as one of the gaming industry leaders. Partners William G. Bennett an aggressive cost cutter and William N. Pennington purchased Circus Circus in 1974 as a small and unprofitable casino. It went public in 1983, from 1993 to 1997; the average return on capital invested was 16.5%. Circus Circus operates several properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Laughlin, and one in Mississippi, as well as 50% ownership in three other casinos and a theme park. On January 31,1998 Circus reported net income of 89.9 million and revenues of 1.35 billion, this is a down from 100 million on 1.3 billion in 1997. Management sees this decline in revenue due to the rapid and extensive expansion and the increased competition that Circus is facing. Well established in the casino gaming industry the corporation has its focus in the entertainment business and has particularly a popular theme resort concept....

Effect Of Civil War On American Economy

The Economies of the North and South, 1861-1865 In 1861, a great war in American history began. It was a civil war between the north and south that was by no means civil. This war would have great repercussions upon the economy of this country and the states within it. The American Civil War began with secession, creating a divided union of sorts, and sparked an incredibly cataclysmic four years. Although the actual war began with secession, this was not the only driving force. The economy of the Southern states, the Confederacy, greatly if not entirely depended on the institution of slavery. The Confederacy was heavily reliant on agriculture, and they used the profits made from the sale of such raw materials to purchase finished goods to use and enjoy. Their major export was cotton, which thrived on the warm river deltas and could easily be shipped to major ocean ports from towns on the Mississippi and numerous river cities. Slavery was a key part of this, as slaves were the ones who harvested and planted the cotton. Being such an enormous unpaid work force, the profits made were extraordinarily high and the price for the unfinished goods drastically low in comparison; especially since he invention of the cotton gin in 1793 which made the work all that much easier and quicker. In contrast, the economical structure of the Northern states, the Union, was vastly dependent on industry. Slavery did not exist in most of the Union, as there was no demand for it due to the type of industrial development taking place. As the Union had a paid work force, the profits made were lower and the cost of the finished manufactured item higher. In turn, the Union used the profits and purchased raw materials to use. This cycle...

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Trade Embargoes

Although I am a strong critic of the use and effectiveness of economic sanctions, such as trade embargoes, for the sake of this assignment, I will present both their theoretical advantages and their disadvantages based upon my research. Trade embargoes and blockades have traditionally been used to entice nations to alter their behavior or to punish them for certain behavior. The intentions behind these policies are generally noble, at least on the surface. However, these policies can have side effects. For example, FDR's blockade of raw materials against the Japanese in Manchuria in the 1930s arguably led to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which resulted in U.S. involvement in World War II. The decades-long embargo against Cuba not only did not lead to the topple of the communist regime there, but may have strengthened Castro's hold on the island and has created animosity toward the United States in Latin America and much suffering by the people of Cuba. Various studies have concluded that embargoes and other economic sanctions generally have not been effective from a utilitarian or policy perspective, yet these policies continue. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Trade Embargoes Strengths Trade embargoes and other sanctions can give the sender government the appearance of taking strong measures in response to a given situation without resorting to violence. Sanctions can be imposed in conjunction with other measures to achieve conflict prevention and mitigation goals. Sanctions may be ineffective: goals may be too elusive, the means too gentle, or cooperation from other countries insufficient. It is usually difficult to determine whether embargoes were an effective deterrent against future misdeeds: embargoes may contribute to a successful outcome, but can rarely achieve ambitious objectives alone. Some regimes are highly resistant to external pressures to reform. At the same time, trade sanctions may narrow the...