Controversy With War

Word Count: 1949 |

Controversy of War in Iraq
September 2001 was perhaps the most hectic and depressing month in our nation’s history because this marked the month when al-Qaeda crashed high jacked planes into the twin towers and the Pentagon. As a result President Bush decided to declare the war which is known today as “Operation: Iraqi Freedom.” War is defined for some as an armed conflict between two nations over a disputed situation, and is needed when there is nothing else that can be done; a natural occurrence that repeats it’s self through out time. While others feel that war is an unnecessary dispute, that leads to nothing but destruction, and that there are always other solutions that can be made; that peace should come before all else. The question at hand is whether or not war is the answer. The way I see it, war is the only next best thing to do.
“Ninety percent of Americans supported bombing the Taliban and al-Qaeda, according to many polls taken throughout the autumn of 2001.” (Hanson, XVII) Yet the educated and upscale class of America felt that we should have done very little military, but more discussion with the United Nations (UN) and our allies to convince al-Qaeda to stop the terrorist attacks or threats towards our country. This would only give Taliban and al-Qaeda more time to either hide whatever weapons they have or plot the next attack toward our nation. The beginning of the war was preceded by a forty-eight hour period that President Bush had given Saddam Hussein for a chance to comply with the U.N. and avoid war (Ridder). President Bush’s final attempts at peace were not accepted. Therefore he was forced to declare a war that would be controversial, yet legitimate.
Those people who were highly paid or leisured, both Republican and Democrat, have forgotten how often daily life is dangerous and that people can be wicked, and must be stopped only through physical strength. “And [Saddam] was convinced by the past restraint of the United States that the world’s sole superpower either could not or would not retaliate against him…” (Hanson, XVI) Of course, he was very wrong. This nation will not stand for his scandalous acts and will not wait for the next one to come. We must stop him and those who follow him.
According to Knight Ridder, a writer for the Tribune News Service, there are several good reasons to fight. “Saddam Hussein is a murderous tyrant who has used weapons of mass destruction against his own people and violated international obligations by barring weapons inspectors.” If he, Saddam Hussein, obtains a nuclear weapon, and hands it over to a terrorist who delivers it to a United States city, tens of thousands of people could die. It is obvious that he will stop if we do not stop him. The Iraqi people were in danger with this man as leader. They have no freedom and are murdered for no reason except for the mere pleasure of Hussein and his adherents. President Bush claims that one of the main objectives of winning this war is to completely rebuild Iraq and make it a safe place for people to live (Gates). To do this, the American troops must take Saddam Hussein out of power.
Bush’s Ex-Counterterrorism Chief, Richard Clarke also had plenty to say about the war and how it could have been prevented. He claimed that Bush didn’t believe that the war on terrorism was a top priority (Calabresi). Clarke alleged that Bush ignored the terrorist threat before 9/11. The Administration testified by stating it was an “important issue but not an urgent issue.” (Calabresi) Vice President Dick Cheney acknowledged that the administration could have been more attentive to the terrorist threat before September 11 (Kraft). But what exactly is Clarke trying to get at. Is he really against this war or is he just trying to sell his book. After his appearance on 60 Minutes a poll showed that 89 percent of people had heard about Clarke’s allegations and his book shot up to number 1 on Amazon’s best seller list (Calabresi). Therefore any information that he has given toward the Bush Administration can be false or hypocritical. As Massimo Calabresi stated in his article in Time magazine if we had tried to attack Afghanistan before September 11, it would have been “politically difficult”. At that time we weren’t sure if countries such as Pakistan, an ally to the Taliban, would have allowed the U.S. troops to set up their territory there.
Many claim that there is still no evidence that Saddam and al-Qaeda ever associated in attacking the U.S. together. In his address to the American people he explained how the evidence that they had so far the pointed the finger at al-Qaeda ( Either way military action against Iraq was approved in advance by a congressional resolution after September 11 (The Economist). Therefore if the President feels that Iraq helped al-Qaeda, then Iraq can and will be attacked. “Tonight we are a country awakened to danger and called to defend freedom. Our grief has turned to anger, and anger to resolution. Whether we bring our enemies to justice, or bring justice to our enemies, justice will be done,” was an excerpt from President Bush’s speeches made to the American people shortly after the attacks ( “Justice will be done,” those four simple words have brought so much power to what we have come to today. The troops are fighting as hard as they can to punish those who brought devastation to many families the day of September 11. What would you have done if it was you family member in that building or in one of those towers? Would you have let the murders go free, or the supporter for that matter? We, the people of the United States and our homeland, are like children to the President who will not sit back and watch as our nation is faced with danger.
During the gap between September 11 and October 7, “a variety of Americans continued to argue that we should not respond at all”, especially as the strength of the Taliban and the terrorist was broadcast around the world, along with threats of more chaos, and thousands of American lives ending soon (Hanson 53). Theoretically, peace has not been restored, so America can still fight for it. We have in the past helped Iraqi people to liberate them from their present government. In return we get attacked by people from their country. Why you may ask; because they want what we have that they can’t seem to get. Now because of their jealousy we must retaliate and put a stop to their destruction of land and murder of innocent people, and if war is the way to do it than so be it.
It was our ancestors who passed on to us that belief of battle and so just as they once did, we too must confront and annihilate these killers and the governments that have protected them and encouraged them. “The Greeks would instead answer that war is terrible but innate to civilization—and not always unjust or amoral if it is waged for good causes to destroy evil and save the innocent,” (Hanson, XV). This is one of the main reasons to fight this war; to “destroy evil [Taliban and al-Qaeda] and save the innocent [Iraqi civilians].”
Clarke is one of many that believe President Bush is only fighting this war to finish what his father started in the Gulf War against Iraq (Calabresi). During this war Saddam surrendered and agreed to abide by several rules the U.N. enforced for him (FRios). He soon began breaking those rules, but no one did much about it (FRios). “The Iraq war diverted U.S. efforts away from the fight against al-Qaeda, undermined global cooperation against terrorism and fueled Islamic extremism,” Clarke states, charging the Administration with intending to invade Iraq from the time it took office. The Administration responded by saying that “it can both fight terrorism and remove what it believes is a grave threat in Iraq.” (Calabresi) The thousands that lie dead today because of the attacks are proof that Iraq has posed a “grave threat” toward us. Therefore, the Administration must take immediate action. Bush officials believe that you must all together attack terrorist groups directly, lessen the number and availability of the terrorists’ allies, and change the environment that originates terrorism. In order to do so we have to set foot in their soil and act on these three main theories.
Funding for this war has taken away the funding for education, environment, and health care benefits are being cut for this war. “Education budget this year is a little more than ten percent of what the military budget is.” (Tahilani) It is estimated the cost of war with Iraq is already $60-$100 billion with on going billions for occupation and rebuilding Iraq (Ridder). Although this war has cost this nation a great deal of money, it has been worth it. Soldiers continue to serve our country and keep us protected. They have been able to avoid any further attacks up until know and will make sure they don’t happen again. My faith is strong toward this country and the decision our leader makes to shield us. It is a enormous honor to live in a nation where people have fought and/or are fighting and died for our protection and sovereignty.
My position remains the same, I believe we should be at war protecting our country and taking the weapons that can harm our country as well as the people in Iraq out of their possession. Luckily we have captured some of their supportors, but the fight is not over yet. “Our mission in this war is not to right the wrongs that cannot be righted given the limits of our wisdom and power, but rather to leave millions in Afghanistan and elsewhere better off than when we arrived, offering hope to other states that their towers will not be toppled and their citizens vaporized should a fanatical enclave decide to target their culture.” (Hanson, 16) These terrorist acted against America have been done because of who we are, our freedom, equality between sexes, but not for what we’ve done in the past.
Work Cited
“Address to a Joint Session of Congress and the American People.” The White House
20 Sept 2001. 14 Apr 2004.
Calabresi, Massimo, John F. Dickerson, and Daren Fonda. “The Truth of the Matter.” Time 5 Apr. 2004: 26-31
“Clarke grabs center stage at 9/11 hearing.” AP News Video. El Paso Times on the Web. 28 Mar. 2004. Audio transcript. 28 Mar. 2004. .
Gates, Robert M., “A Former CIA Chief on ‘Connecting the Dots’.” Time 19 Apr. 2003. 2 Apr. 2004.
Hanson, Victor Davis. An Autumn of War New York: Random House, 2003.
Hirsh, Michael, Mark Hosenball, and Sami Yousafzai. “Why Can’t We Get Him?” Newsweek 22 Sept. 2003: 24-28.
Kraft, Brooks. “I Don’t Hold [Clarke] in High Regard.” Time 5 Apr 2004: 37
“Putting his cards on the table; War with Iraq?” The Economist. 31 Apr. 2002 Student Resource Center Jefferson Library, El Paso, TX. 9 Apr. 2004
Ridder, Knight. “A war to wage?” Tribune News Service. 6 Aug. 2002 Student Resource Center Jefferson Library, El Paso, TX. 9 Apr. 2004.
Rios, Francisco. Personal Interview. 21 Mar. 2004.
Sarah, Leena. “Oil, Currency and the War on Iraq.” 2003. 2 Apr. 2004

Tahilani, Kavita. “U. Connecticut: U. Connecticut student government neutral in Iraq war debate.” InfoTrac Web Jefferson Library, El Paso, TX. 9 Apr. 2004

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Allegory Of American Pie By Don Mc Lean

Ask anyone what was the defining moment in the rock history of the 1960s was and all you will get is a one word answer: Woodstock. The three day rock festival that defined an era was only one of many music festivals of the '60s. But Woodstock has come to symbolize, "an era of peaceful, free- loving, drug- taking hippie youth, carefree before harsher realities hit..." (Layman 40). The Woodstock festival ended a century filled with many metamorphoses of rock'n'roll, from the era of pop music to the rebirth of folk music to the invention of acid rock. But some cynics say that rock'n'roll died with the death of Buddy Holly before the 60s even began. One such person is Don McLean. The poet behind the haunting epic song about the death of 'danceable' music, McLean wrote the ever popular song, "American Pie" (appendix 1). The most important song in rock'n'roll history, "American Pie", is the song about the demise of rock'n'roll after Buddy Holly's death and the heathenism of rock that resulted. Although McLean himself won't reveal any symbolism in his songs, "American Pie" is one of the most analyzed pieces of literature in modern society. Although not all of its secrets have been revealed, many "scholars" of the sixties will agree that the mystery of this song is one of the reasons it has become so successful- everyone wants to know the meanings of its allegories. Proof of "American Pie's" truth lies in the allegory of the song. Many People enjoy the song but have no idea what it means- Who is the Jester? What is the levee? When the deeper story is found, the importance of the song is unearthed. "American Pie" is not only a song, it is an epic poem about the course of rock'n'roll...

Carl Orffs Philosophies In Music Education

While Carl Orff is a very seminal composer of the 20th century, his greatest success and influence has been in the field of Music Education. Born on July 10th in Munich, Germany in 1895, Orff refused to speak about his past almost as if he were ashamed of it. What we do know, however, is that Orff came from a Bavarian family who was very active in the German military. His father's regiment band would often play through some of the young Orff's first attempts at composing. Although Orff was adamant about the secrecy of his past, Moser's Musik Lexicon says that he studied in the Munich Academy of Music until 1914. Orff then served in the military in the first world war. After the war, he held various positions in the Mannheim and Darmstadt opera houses then returned home to Munich to further study music. In 1925, and for the rest of his life, Orff was the head of a department and co-founder of the Guenther School for gymnastics, music, and dance in Munich where he worked with musical beginners. This is where he developed his Music Education theories. In 1937, Orff's Carmina Burana premiered in Frankfurt, Germany. Needless to say, it was a great success. With the success of Carmina Burana, Orff orphaned all of his previous works except for Catulli Carmina and the En trata which were rewritten to be acceptable by Orff. One of Orff's most admired composers was Monteverdi. In fact, much of Orff's work was based on ancient material. Orff said: I am often asked why I nearly always select old material, fairy tales and legends for my stage works. I do not look upon them as old, but rather as valid material. The time element disappears, and only the spiritual power remains. My...

Johann Sebastian Bach Biography

Throughout the history of music, many great composers, theorists, and instrumentalists have left indelible marks and influences that people today look back on to admire and aspire to. No exception to this idiom is Johann Sebastian Bach, whose impact on music was unforgettable to say the least. People today look back to his writings and works to both learn and admire. He truly can be considered a music history great. Bach, who came from a family of over 53 musicians, was nothing short of a virtuosic instrumentalist as well as a masterful composer. Born in Eisenach, Germany, on March 21, 1685, he was the son of a masterful violinist, Johann Ambrosius Bach, who taught his son the basic skills for string playing. Along with this string playing, Bach began to play the organ which is the instrument he would later on be noted for in history. His instruction on the organ came from the player at Eisenach's most important church. He instructed the young boy rather rigorously until his skills surpassed anyone?s expectations for someone of such a young age. Bach suffered early trauma when his parents died in 1695. He went to go live with his older brother, Johann Christoph, who also was a professional organist at Ohrdruf. He continued his younger brother's education on that instrument, as well as introducing him to the harpsichord. The rigorous training on these instruments combined with Bach?s masterful skill paid off for him at an early age. After several years of studying with his older brother, he received a scholarship to study in Luneberg, Germany, which is located on the northern tip of the country. As a result, he left his brother?s tutelage and went to go and study there. The teenage years brought Bach to several parts of Germany where he...


Michelangelo was pessimistic in his poetry and an optimist in his artwork. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo?s poetry was pessimistic in his response to Strazzi even though he was complementing him. Michelangelo?s sculpture brought out his optimism. Michelangelo was optimistic in completing The Tomb of Pope Julius II and persevered through it?s many revisions trying to complete his vision. Sculpture was Michelangelo?s main goal and the love of his life. Since his art portrayed both optimism and pessimism, Michelangelo was in touch with his positive and negative sides, showing that he had a great and stable personality. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo Buonarroti was called to Rome in 1505 by Pope Julius II to create for him a monumental tomb. We have no clear sense of what the tomb was to look like, since over the years it went through at least five conceptual revisions. The tomb was to have three levels; the bottom level was to have sculpted figures representing Victory and bond slaves. The second level was to have statues of Moses and Saint Paul as well as symbolic figures of the active and contemplative life- representative of the human striving for, and reception of, knowledge. The third level, it is assumed, was to have an effigy of the deceased pope. The tomb of Pope Julius II was never finished. What was finished of the tomb represents a twenty-year span of frustrating delays and revised schemes. Michelangelo had hardly begun work on the pope?s tomb when Julius commanded him to fresco the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to complete the work done in the previous century under Sixtus IV. The overall organization consists of four large triangles at...

Oscar Wilde

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde was born in Dublin Ireland on October 16, 1854. He is one of the most talented and most controversial writers of his time. He was well known for his wit, flamboyance, and creative genius and with his little dramatic training showing his natural talent for stage and theatre. He is termed a martyr by some and may be the first true self-publicist and was known for his style of dress and odd behavior. Wilde, 1882 His Father, William Wilde, was a highly accredited doctor and his mother, Jane Francesca Elgee, was a writer of revolutionary poems. Oscar had a brother William Charles Kingsbury along with his father's three illegitimate children, Henry, Emily, and Mary. His sister, Isola Emily Francesca died in 1867 at only ten years of age from a sudden fever, greatly affecting Oscar and his family. He kept a lock of her hair in an envelope and later wrote the poem 'Requiescat' in her memory. Oscar and his brother William both attended the Protora Royal School at Enniskillen. He had little in common with the other children. He disliked games and took more interest in flowers and sunsets. He was extremely passionate about anything that had to do with ancient Greece and with Classics. Wilde during school years In 1871, he was awarded a Royal School Scholarship to Trinity College in Dublin and received many awards and earned the highest honor the college offered to an undergraduate, the Foundation Scholarship. In 1874, he also won the College's Berkley Gold Medal for Greek and was awarded a Demyship to Magdalen College, Oxford. After graduating from Oxford, Oscar moved to London with his friend Frank Miles, a well-known portrait painter of the time. In 1878 his poem Ravenna was published, for which he won the...

The History Of Greek Theater

Theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century BCE, with the Sopocles, the great writer of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, heroes and the ideals of life were depicted and glorified. It was believed that man should live for honor and fame, his action was courageous and glorious and his life would climax in a great and noble death. Originally, the hero's recognition was created by selfish behaviors and little thought of service to others. As the Greeks grew toward city-states and colonization, it became the destiny and ambition of the hero to gain honor by serving his city. The second major characteristic of the early Greek world was the supernatural. The two worlds were not separate, as the gods lived in the same world as the men, and they interfered in the men's lives as they chose to. It was the gods who sent suffering and evil to men. In the plays of Sophocles, the gods brought about the hero's downfall because of a tragic flaw in the character of the hero. In Greek tragedy, suffering brought knowledge of worldly matters and of the individual. Aristotle attempted to explain how an audience could observe tragic events and still have a pleasurable experience. Aristotle, by searching the works of writers of Greek tragedy, Aeschulus, Euripides and Sophocles (whose Oedipus Rex he considered the finest of all Greek tragedies), arrived at his definition of tragedy. This explanation has a profound influence for more than twenty centuries on those writing tragedies, most significantly Shakespeare. Aristotle's analysis of tragedy began with a description of the effect such a work had on the audience as a "catharsis" or purging of the emotions. He decided that catharsis was the purging of two specific emotions, pity and...

Scholarship Essay About Goals

Ever since I was a young kid I have always been interested with aircraft. I was so curious of how airplane's fly. I remember taking my toys apart to see how it works. As a kid I wanted to go to the airport to watch the airplanes land and fly and pondered how this happens. Other kids wanted to go to the amusement places. As I grew older I became more and more interested in aircraft and the technology behind it. I always involved myself with aviation early on. I read books and magazines on aviation, took museum tours, built model airplanes. When I was younger my father would take me to aircraft repair facilities where I would watch in great fascination. In my teens, went up to the military bases and befriended many soldiers involved with aircraft and asked them numerous questions. I got to meet many aeronautics engineers and borrowed their old textbooks and read them till the wee hours of the morning. As technology improved with information superhighway, I logged on the web. Stayed up for hours and hours searching through web pages and web pages of information about aircraft and technology. I started my elementary school in the Philippines, then we moved to U.S. and continued my high school education and graduated. Enrolled at the CCSF to pursue my college education and now I am in the 2nd year in CCSF taking aeronautics. My goal now is to obtain my AS degree from the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) so I can transfer to a University and get a Bachelors degree and to continue for my Masters degree in Aeronautics Engineering. I will strive hard to reach the peak level of my career which is a Professor and hopefully to be an aeronautic professor so...

Circus Circus Enterprises Case Studies

Executive Summary: Circus Circus Enterprises is a leader and will continue to be in the gaming industry. In recent years, they have seen a decline in profit and revenue; management tends to blame the decrease on continuing disruptions from remodeling, expansion, and increased competition. Consequently, Circus has reported decreases in its net income for 1997 and 1998 and management believes this trend will continue as competition heightens. Currently the company is involved in several joint ventures, its brand of casino entertainment has traditionally catered to the low rollers and family vacationers through its theme park. Circus should continue to expand its existing operations into new market segments. This shift will allow them to attract the up scale gambler. Overview Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc founded in 1974 is in the business of entertainment, with its core strength in casino gambling. The company?s asset base, operating cash flow, profit margin, multiple markets and customers, rank it as one of the gaming industry leaders. Partners William G. Bennett an aggressive cost cutter and William N. Pennington purchased Circus Circus in 1974 as a small and unprofitable casino. It went public in 1983, from 1993 to 1997; the average return on capital invested was 16.5%. Circus Circus operates several properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Laughlin, and one in Mississippi, as well as 50% ownership in three other casinos and a theme park. On January 31,1998 Circus reported net income of 89.9 million and revenues of 1.35 billion, this is a down from 100 million on 1.3 billion in 1997. Management sees this decline in revenue due to the rapid and extensive expansion and the increased competition that Circus is facing. Well established in the casino gaming industry the corporation has its focus in the entertainment business and has particularly a popular theme resort concept....

Effect Of Civil War On American Economy

The Economies of the North and South, 1861-1865 In 1861, a great war in American history began. It was a civil war between the north and south that was by no means civil. This war would have great repercussions upon the economy of this country and the states within it. The American Civil War began with secession, creating a divided union of sorts, and sparked an incredibly cataclysmic four years. Although the actual war began with secession, this was not the only driving force. The economy of the Southern states, the Confederacy, greatly if not entirely depended on the institution of slavery. The Confederacy was heavily reliant on agriculture, and they used the profits made from the sale of such raw materials to purchase finished goods to use and enjoy. Their major export was cotton, which thrived on the warm river deltas and could easily be shipped to major ocean ports from towns on the Mississippi and numerous river cities. Slavery was a key part of this, as slaves were the ones who harvested and planted the cotton. Being such an enormous unpaid work force, the profits made were extraordinarily high and the price for the unfinished goods drastically low in comparison; especially since he invention of the cotton gin in 1793 which made the work all that much easier and quicker. In contrast, the economical structure of the Northern states, the Union, was vastly dependent on industry. Slavery did not exist in most of the Union, as there was no demand for it due to the type of industrial development taking place. As the Union had a paid work force, the profits made were lower and the cost of the finished manufactured item higher. In turn, the Union used the profits and purchased raw materials to use. This cycle...

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Trade Embargoes

Although I am a strong critic of the use and effectiveness of economic sanctions, such as trade embargoes, for the sake of this assignment, I will present both their theoretical advantages and their disadvantages based upon my research. Trade embargoes and blockades have traditionally been used to entice nations to alter their behavior or to punish them for certain behavior. The intentions behind these policies are generally noble, at least on the surface. However, these policies can have side effects. For example, FDR's blockade of raw materials against the Japanese in Manchuria in the 1930s arguably led to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which resulted in U.S. involvement in World War II. The decades-long embargo against Cuba not only did not lead to the topple of the communist regime there, but may have strengthened Castro's hold on the island and has created animosity toward the United States in Latin America and much suffering by the people of Cuba. Various studies have concluded that embargoes and other economic sanctions generally have not been effective from a utilitarian or policy perspective, yet these policies continue. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Trade Embargoes Strengths Trade embargoes and other sanctions can give the sender government the appearance of taking strong measures in response to a given situation without resorting to violence. Sanctions can be imposed in conjunction with other measures to achieve conflict prevention and mitigation goals. Sanctions may be ineffective: goals may be too elusive, the means too gentle, or cooperation from other countries insufficient. It is usually difficult to determine whether embargoes were an effective deterrent against future misdeeds: embargoes may contribute to a successful outcome, but can rarely achieve ambitious objectives alone. Some regimes are highly resistant to external pressures to reform. At the same time, trade sanctions may narrow the...