Distinguish Between Narration Who Speaks And Focalization Who Sees In AT LEAST ONE Passage Of Things Fall Apart And Detail Ways In Which They May Interact Or Overlap

In this essay I will first define narration and focalization, explaining the meaning internal and external focalisation, and intradiegetic and extradiegetic forms of narration. I will then go on to support these definitions with examples from the text Things fall apart and using these examples I will point out both the similarities and differences between the forms of focalization and the forms of narration.
Firstly, narration, as already stated in the question, is ‘who speaks’, which is an accurate interpretation. The narrator tells the story and is the voice within the text, which most, if not all, books have. The narrator of Things fall apart is not a character within the story, but at the same time it is clear that the narrator is familiar with the Ibo culture from all of the background knowledge that is displayed throughout the novel, ‘The Feast of the New Yam was held every year before the harvest began, to honour the earth goddess and the ancestral spirits of the clan.”(Pg35) this shows the narrator’s knowledge of the Ibo tribe and its customs. The narrator of Things fall apart is a heterodiegetic because “A narrator who does not participate in the story is called ‘heterodiegetic’” (Genette 1972, pp. 255-6) and even though at times it seems that he could be a character within the book he clearly is not, “Di-go-go-di-go. It was the ekwe talking to the clan.” (Pg 113) here we see the narrator has recorded the sound, which suggests he can hear it within the text, which shows a slight homodiegetic element, but this is defined as “one who takes part in it, at least in some manifestation of his ‘self’”(pp. 255-6) and though the narrator recorded the sound, there was no manifestation of self within the text, so this recording of sound comes within focalization. The narrator here is clearly a narrator-focalizer, meaning that the narrator is viewing this scene through an anonymous character that plays no part in the main story, but this does not make the narrator a character.
The narrator also has an internal and external view, called intradiegetic and extradiegetic. Diegetic itself is defined as within or without the story, and extradiegetic is the voice outside the story. The external voice is not a character within the story, and can tell a lot more about characters and events. “It is precisely their being absent from the story and their higher narratorial authority in relation to it that confers on such narrators the quality which has often been called ‘omniscience’…the characteristics connoted by it are…relevant, namely: familiarity, in principle, with the character’s innermost thoughts and feelings; knowledge of past, present and future; presence in locations where the characters are supposed to be unaccompanied…and knowledge of what happens in several places at the same time” (Ewen 1974, pp. 144-6) these elements are clearly shown in Things fall apart in various places. The first of which is in relation to seeing the character’s innermost thoughts and feelings, “He could hardly imagine that Okonkwo was not his real father. He had never been fond of his real father, and at the end of three years he had become very distant indeed.” (Pg 56) as you can see these are thoughts that Ikemefuna is having just before he is killed, and they are thoughts that an intradiegetic narrator could not know about since an intradiegetic narrator would be part of the story, or would be a character within the narration. This narrator would speak in the first person, using ‘I’ to express themselves and being able to share only their own thoughts and feelings of the time, which would not necessarily be the same thoughts they have ‘now’ as they look back and relate their tale. This section may also be seen as character-focalization in the sense that we are seeing things from Ikemefuna’s point of view, and as we are seeing things through Ikemefuna’s eyes a this moment we may well see it as focalization. This narrator also has knowledge of the past, “As a young man of eighteen he had brought honour to his village by throwing Amalinze the Cat.” (Pg 3) this gives us knowledge of Okonkwo’s first achievement as a young man and also helps to build up his background. Knowledge of the present is also expressed, “The Feast of the New Yam was approaching…It was an occasion for giving thanks to Ani, the earth goddess and the source of all fertility.” (Pg 35) the approaching of the feast shows the story in the ‘present’ time within the narrative, speaking about things as they happen. There is not an explicit example of the future, but with the rise of Christianity and the death of Okonkwo towards the end of the novel it is perhaps hinted that the old ways of the Ibo people are coming to an end, “The story of this man who had killed a messenger and hanged himself would make interesting reading. One could almost write a whole chapter on him. Perhaps not a whole chapter but a reasonable paragraph, at any rate…He had already chosen the title of the book, after much thought: The Pacification of the Primitive Tribes of the Lower Niger.” (Pg 197) this shows the short-term goal of the Commissioner, which is to write a book about the tribes, but it also shows in the act of this writing that the Ibo people are part of the past to be recorded in a book and, as you can see from the title, the aim is to move away from the tribes and bring the people into modern times and religion. There is perhaps a slight irony expressed here since the Commissioner said he would perhaps dedicate a paragraph to Okonkwo, but this narrative has been mostly based on Okonkwo’s life within the tribe. This also shows character-focalization where we are seeing things from the Commissioner’s point if view and getting an opinion of how the missionaries see the Ibo people, which is clearly seen in the chosen title of the book, though the reader’s opinion of the people may be very different to the missionaries by the time they reach the end of the book, indeed it seems almost that this last character-focalization was placed here to create even more dislike for the missionaries and invoke pity and sympathy for the Ibo people. For presence in locations where the character is meant to be unaccompanied there is chapter eleven when Ekwefi follows the priestess, who has taken her daughter Ezinma because “Agbala wanted to see his daughter,” (pg 95) Ekwefi followed the priestess, Chielo, through the forest to another village and then to the caves where Agbala lived. This part of the novel is written from Ekwefi’s point of view, but this is focalization and will be spoken about in due course. Because the narration here is character-focalization, what Ekwefi sees, and is a point where narrative and focalization cross, we do not know, or rather the narrator chooses not to say, whether Ekwefi is truly spotted by Chielo, or what Chielo is thinking. We know Chielo feels she is followed from her out burst, “And then the priestess screamed. ‘Someone is walking behind me!’ she said. ‘Whether you are spirit or man, may Agbala shave your head with a blunt razor! May he twist your neck until you see your heels!’” (Pg 99) it is clear that Chielo knows she is followed in this instant, but there is no further indication that she continues to know she is followed. This may perhaps make the narrator seem a little more intradiegetic, but since the narrator is not a character and Ekwefi is not narrating this extract, but is merely a character-focalization, it is still extradiegetic. There is also a slight example of the narrator talking about events, which happen in many places at the same time. This occurs when Okonkwo has been banished form his tribe for seven years and flees to his mother’s village. While he is there we continue to hear of Okonkwo’s life, but there are also details of what is happening back in his home tribe while he is away, as well as the villages around it, “The missionaries had come to Umuofia. They had built their church there, won a handful of converts and were already sending evangelists to the surrounding towns and villages.” (pg 135) this is perhaps not a true example since the narration never leaves Okonkwo and goes to Umuofia to record things as they happen, this all comes as second hand knowledge from Obierika to Okonkwo, but it is the narrator’s choice to tell us this information therefore it can be viewed as part of the extradiegetic narrative. As stated before the narrator of Things fall apart is not intradiegetic at any point within the narrative because an intradiegetic narrator must either be a character within the story or a character watching the story. In both of these instances the character would refer to itself as ‘I’ when it spoke of itself, and would be aware of its existence within the story, but there are both character and narrator focalizers which allow the readers to gain the opinions and views of certain characters at certain points and to use this knowledge to help for their own opinions.
The narrator in Things fall apart also has two voices. One is an internal, or communal voice, the one that understands the tribe and seems almost part of it, and then there is an external voice, one that takes a more modern, or Christian, view on the goings on of the tribe, and this is perhaps the largest area where cross overs with focalization are common. Using chapter thirteen as an example, it is clear that near the beginning it is the communal voice speaking, “Now and again an ancestral spirit or egwugwu appeared from the underworld, speaking in a tremulous, unearthly voice and completely covered in raffia.” (Pg 114) this communal voice speaks of spirits and gives no explanation such as explaining that there were men dressed as spirits, because someone internal to the tribe would either truly believe that they were spirits or would not feel the need to explain it, and may also be seen as narrator-focalization because the description of the sound is very well done as if the narrator is there at the time, but since there is no ‘self’ expressed at any point the narrator is looking through the eyes of someone else within the story. The voice then becomes external later on in the chapter when Okonkwo’s gun goes off and accidentally kills Ezeudu’s sixteen-year-old son, “The only course open to Okonkwo was to flee from the clan. It was a crime against the earth goddess to kill a clansman, and a man who committed it must flee from the land.” The explanation here is very detached from the tribe and matter of fact in its tone. The fact that there is an explanation also shows that the voice is now external since the internal voice did not feel the need to explain what was happening and the external voice is trying to explain and justify the action.
Focalization, as stated within the question, is ‘who sees’ which is to say that the character being viewed is not the one telling the story, but is merely a part of it. Because sometimes the point of view is of a particular character, and in Things fall a part the narrator as well, the line between narration and focalization becomes blurred in places. “Focalization can be either external or internal to the story. External focalization is felt to be close to the narrative agent, and its vehicle is therefore called ‘narrator-focalizer’” (Bal 1977, p. 29) this is also shown in Things fall apart in chapter eleven, in fact it is very close to the communal narration. “Go-di-di-go-go-di-go. Di-go-go-di-go. It was the ekwe talking to the clan. One of the things every man learned was the language of the hollowed-out instrument. Diim! Diim! Diim! Boomed the cannon at intervals.” (Pg 113) as discussed earlier, this could perhaps be interpreted as homodiegetic but for the fact that the narrator is not a character within the novel and is not self aware within the story, it is in fact a narrator-focalizer. Here the narrator is seeing, or in this case hearing, through an anonymous character who is never seen or known as a character in the story. There are also internal focalizers, “As the term suggests, the locus of internal focalization is inside the represented events. This type generally takes the form of a character-focalizer…” here is where you see things from a character’s point of view within the narrative, “He had had the same kind of feeling not long ago, during the last harvest season. Every child loved the harvest season.” (Pg 58) Here we are a witness to Nwoye’s feelings, which could easily be seen as extradiegetic narrative since we are seeing inside the character, but at the same time this character-focalization is here to allow the reader to look inside of Nwoye and to ask them to see things from his point of view. There is also the feel of the external narrator further down, but still in Nwoye’s point of view, “…they heard the voice of an infant crying in the thick forest…Nwoye had heard that twins were put in earthenware pots and thrown away in the forest, but he had never yet come across them. A vague chill had descended on him and his head had seemed to swell, like a solitary walker at night who passes an evil spirit on the way.” (Pg 58) this voice if that of the external narrator in the fact that it speaks in a disapproving tone and says, quite accurately, that the children were thrown away where as the internal voice would have seen this as a good thing since twins were rumoured to bring bad luck and must be left in the forest for the good of the tribe. The narrator here is external, but the focalizer is Nwoye, and this is from his point of view, and from his almost horrified reaction it is clear that he, at least in part, shares the disapproval of the narrator. At times, as has been seen before, the character-focalization and external narrator have very similar views, which almost make them seem as one, but the character will often be restricted by its role in the story as to how vocal it is in its objection, “Obierika was a man who thought about things. When the will of the goddess had been done, he sat down in his obi and mourned his friend’s calamity. Why should a man suffer so grievously for an offence he had committed inadvertently? But although he thought for a long time he found no answer. He was merely led into greater complexities.” (Pg 117-118) Here we can see Obierika has doubts about the banishment of Okonkwo and cannot find a reason for it. The reason, or lack of it, may be clear to the reader and the external narrator, but because Obierika is a character, internal to the tribe and its beliefs and way of life, he cannot object, not only due to fear of the goddess and her wrath, but because for him it is a way of life and has been that way since he was born, so unlike the reader and external narrator he does not have the freedom or knowledge to look at it and say it is wrong.
In conclusion the difference between narration (‘who speaks’) and focalization (‘who sees’) has been clearly depicted and explained in many forms. Looking back it is clear how very close focalization and narration come to crossing over, particularly in relation to the internal or communal voice of the narrator and the narrator-focalizer, just as the external narrator comes very close to some of the opinions of the character-focalizers, but there are also differences between the narrator and the focalizer, namely the fact that the narrator is extradiegetic and so has no role within the story where the focalizer looks very closely at the characters.

Bibliography

· Narrative Fiction, Shlomith Rimmon-Kenan, Routledge, 2002
· Things fall apart, Chinua Achebe, Penguin books, (Penguin red classic) 2006

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Allegory Of American Pie By Don Mc Lean

Ask anyone what was the defining moment in the rock history of the 1960s was and all you will get is a one word answer: Woodstock. The three day rock festival that defined an era was only one of many music festivals of the '60s. But Woodstock has come to symbolize, "an era of peaceful, free- loving, drug- taking hippie youth, carefree before harsher realities hit..." (Layman 40). The Woodstock festival ended a century filled with many metamorphoses of rock'n'roll, from the era of pop music to the rebirth of folk music to the invention of acid rock. But some cynics say that rock'n'roll died with the death of Buddy Holly before the 60s even began. One such person is Don McLean. The poet behind the haunting epic song about the death of 'danceable' music, McLean wrote the ever popular song, "American Pie" (appendix 1). The most important song in rock'n'roll history, "American Pie", is the song about the demise of rock'n'roll after Buddy Holly's death and the heathenism of rock that resulted. Although McLean himself won't reveal any symbolism in his songs, "American Pie" is one of the most analyzed pieces of literature in modern society. Although not all of its secrets have been revealed, many "scholars" of the sixties will agree that the mystery of this song is one of the reasons it has become so successful- everyone wants to know the meanings of its allegories. Proof of "American Pie's" truth lies in the allegory of the song. Many People enjoy the song but have no idea what it means- Who is the Jester? What is the levee? When the deeper story is found, the importance of the song is unearthed. "American Pie" is not only a song, it is an epic poem about the course of rock'n'roll...

Carl Orffs Philosophies In Music Education

While Carl Orff is a very seminal composer of the 20th century, his greatest success and influence has been in the field of Music Education. Born on July 10th in Munich, Germany in 1895, Orff refused to speak about his past almost as if he were ashamed of it. What we do know, however, is that Orff came from a Bavarian family who was very active in the German military. His father's regiment band would often play through some of the young Orff's first attempts at composing. Although Orff was adamant about the secrecy of his past, Moser's Musik Lexicon says that he studied in the Munich Academy of Music until 1914. Orff then served in the military in the first world war. After the war, he held various positions in the Mannheim and Darmstadt opera houses then returned home to Munich to further study music. In 1925, and for the rest of his life, Orff was the head of a department and co-founder of the Guenther School for gymnastics, music, and dance in Munich where he worked with musical beginners. This is where he developed his Music Education theories. In 1937, Orff's Carmina Burana premiered in Frankfurt, Germany. Needless to say, it was a great success. With the success of Carmina Burana, Orff orphaned all of his previous works except for Catulli Carmina and the En trata which were rewritten to be acceptable by Orff. One of Orff's most admired composers was Monteverdi. In fact, much of Orff's work was based on ancient material. Orff said: I am often asked why I nearly always select old material, fairy tales and legends for my stage works. I do not look upon them as old, but rather as valid material. The time element disappears, and only the spiritual power remains. My...

Johann Sebastian Bach Biography

Throughout the history of music, many great composers, theorists, and instrumentalists have left indelible marks and influences that people today look back on to admire and aspire to. No exception to this idiom is Johann Sebastian Bach, whose impact on music was unforgettable to say the least. People today look back to his writings and works to both learn and admire. He truly can be considered a music history great. Bach, who came from a family of over 53 musicians, was nothing short of a virtuosic instrumentalist as well as a masterful composer. Born in Eisenach, Germany, on March 21, 1685, he was the son of a masterful violinist, Johann Ambrosius Bach, who taught his son the basic skills for string playing. Along with this string playing, Bach began to play the organ which is the instrument he would later on be noted for in history. His instruction on the organ came from the player at Eisenach's most important church. He instructed the young boy rather rigorously until his skills surpassed anyone?s expectations for someone of such a young age. Bach suffered early trauma when his parents died in 1695. He went to go live with his older brother, Johann Christoph, who also was a professional organist at Ohrdruf. He continued his younger brother's education on that instrument, as well as introducing him to the harpsichord. The rigorous training on these instruments combined with Bach?s masterful skill paid off for him at an early age. After several years of studying with his older brother, he received a scholarship to study in Luneberg, Germany, which is located on the northern tip of the country. As a result, he left his brother?s tutelage and went to go and study there. The teenage years brought Bach to several parts of Germany where he...

Michelangelo

Michelangelo was pessimistic in his poetry and an optimist in his artwork. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo?s poetry was pessimistic in his response to Strazzi even though he was complementing him. Michelangelo?s sculpture brought out his optimism. Michelangelo was optimistic in completing The Tomb of Pope Julius II and persevered through it?s many revisions trying to complete his vision. Sculpture was Michelangelo?s main goal and the love of his life. Since his art portrayed both optimism and pessimism, Michelangelo was in touch with his positive and negative sides, showing that he had a great and stable personality. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo Buonarroti was called to Rome in 1505 by Pope Julius II to create for him a monumental tomb. We have no clear sense of what the tomb was to look like, since over the years it went through at least five conceptual revisions. The tomb was to have three levels; the bottom level was to have sculpted figures representing Victory and bond slaves. The second level was to have statues of Moses and Saint Paul as well as symbolic figures of the active and contemplative life- representative of the human striving for, and reception of, knowledge. The third level, it is assumed, was to have an effigy of the deceased pope. The tomb of Pope Julius II was never finished. What was finished of the tomb represents a twenty-year span of frustrating delays and revised schemes. Michelangelo had hardly begun work on the pope?s tomb when Julius commanded him to fresco the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to complete the work done in the previous century under Sixtus IV. The overall organization consists of four large triangles at...

Oscar Wilde

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde was born in Dublin Ireland on October 16, 1854. He is one of the most talented and most controversial writers of his time. He was well known for his wit, flamboyance, and creative genius and with his little dramatic training showing his natural talent for stage and theatre. He is termed a martyr by some and may be the first true self-publicist and was known for his style of dress and odd behavior. Wilde, 1882 His Father, William Wilde, was a highly accredited doctor and his mother, Jane Francesca Elgee, was a writer of revolutionary poems. Oscar had a brother William Charles Kingsbury along with his father's three illegitimate children, Henry, Emily, and Mary. His sister, Isola Emily Francesca died in 1867 at only ten years of age from a sudden fever, greatly affecting Oscar and his family. He kept a lock of her hair in an envelope and later wrote the poem 'Requiescat' in her memory. Oscar and his brother William both attended the Protora Royal School at Enniskillen. He had little in common with the other children. He disliked games and took more interest in flowers and sunsets. He was extremely passionate about anything that had to do with ancient Greece and with Classics. Wilde during school years In 1871, he was awarded a Royal School Scholarship to Trinity College in Dublin and received many awards and earned the highest honor the college offered to an undergraduate, the Foundation Scholarship. In 1874, he also won the College's Berkley Gold Medal for Greek and was awarded a Demyship to Magdalen College, Oxford. After graduating from Oxford, Oscar moved to London with his friend Frank Miles, a well-known portrait painter of the time. In 1878 his poem Ravenna was published, for which he won the...

The History Of Greek Theater

Theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century BCE, with the Sopocles, the great writer of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, heroes and the ideals of life were depicted and glorified. It was believed that man should live for honor and fame, his action was courageous and glorious and his life would climax in a great and noble death. Originally, the hero's recognition was created by selfish behaviors and little thought of service to others. As the Greeks grew toward city-states and colonization, it became the destiny and ambition of the hero to gain honor by serving his city. The second major characteristic of the early Greek world was the supernatural. The two worlds were not separate, as the gods lived in the same world as the men, and they interfered in the men's lives as they chose to. It was the gods who sent suffering and evil to men. In the plays of Sophocles, the gods brought about the hero's downfall because of a tragic flaw in the character of the hero. In Greek tragedy, suffering brought knowledge of worldly matters and of the individual. Aristotle attempted to explain how an audience could observe tragic events and still have a pleasurable experience. Aristotle, by searching the works of writers of Greek tragedy, Aeschulus, Euripides and Sophocles (whose Oedipus Rex he considered the finest of all Greek tragedies), arrived at his definition of tragedy. This explanation has a profound influence for more than twenty centuries on those writing tragedies, most significantly Shakespeare. Aristotle's analysis of tragedy began with a description of the effect such a work had on the audience as a "catharsis" or purging of the emotions. He decided that catharsis was the purging of two specific emotions, pity and...

Scholarship Essay About Goals

Ever since I was a young kid I have always been interested with aircraft. I was so curious of how airplane's fly. I remember taking my toys apart to see how it works. As a kid I wanted to go to the airport to watch the airplanes land and fly and pondered how this happens. Other kids wanted to go to the amusement places. As I grew older I became more and more interested in aircraft and the technology behind it. I always involved myself with aviation early on. I read books and magazines on aviation, took museum tours, built model airplanes. When I was younger my father would take me to aircraft repair facilities where I would watch in great fascination. In my teens, went up to the military bases and befriended many soldiers involved with aircraft and asked them numerous questions. I got to meet many aeronautics engineers and borrowed their old textbooks and read them till the wee hours of the morning. As technology improved with information superhighway, I logged on the web. Stayed up for hours and hours searching through web pages and web pages of information about aircraft and technology. I started my elementary school in the Philippines, then we moved to U.S. and continued my high school education and graduated. Enrolled at the CCSF to pursue my college education and now I am in the 2nd year in CCSF taking aeronautics. My goal now is to obtain my AS degree from the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) so I can transfer to a University and get a Bachelors degree and to continue for my Masters degree in Aeronautics Engineering. I will strive hard to reach the peak level of my career which is a Professor and hopefully to be an aeronautic professor so...

Circus Circus Enterprises Case Studies

Executive Summary: Circus Circus Enterprises is a leader and will continue to be in the gaming industry. In recent years, they have seen a decline in profit and revenue; management tends to blame the decrease on continuing disruptions from remodeling, expansion, and increased competition. Consequently, Circus has reported decreases in its net income for 1997 and 1998 and management believes this trend will continue as competition heightens. Currently the company is involved in several joint ventures, its brand of casino entertainment has traditionally catered to the low rollers and family vacationers through its theme park. Circus should continue to expand its existing operations into new market segments. This shift will allow them to attract the up scale gambler. Overview Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc founded in 1974 is in the business of entertainment, with its core strength in casino gambling. The company?s asset base, operating cash flow, profit margin, multiple markets and customers, rank it as one of the gaming industry leaders. Partners William G. Bennett an aggressive cost cutter and William N. Pennington purchased Circus Circus in 1974 as a small and unprofitable casino. It went public in 1983, from 1993 to 1997; the average return on capital invested was 16.5%. Circus Circus operates several properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Laughlin, and one in Mississippi, as well as 50% ownership in three other casinos and a theme park. On January 31,1998 Circus reported net income of 89.9 million and revenues of 1.35 billion, this is a down from 100 million on 1.3 billion in 1997. Management sees this decline in revenue due to the rapid and extensive expansion and the increased competition that Circus is facing. Well established in the casino gaming industry the corporation has its focus in the entertainment business and has particularly a popular theme resort concept....

Effect Of Civil War On American Economy

The Economies of the North and South, 1861-1865 In 1861, a great war in American history began. It was a civil war between the north and south that was by no means civil. This war would have great repercussions upon the economy of this country and the states within it. The American Civil War began with secession, creating a divided union of sorts, and sparked an incredibly cataclysmic four years. Although the actual war began with secession, this was not the only driving force. The economy of the Southern states, the Confederacy, greatly if not entirely depended on the institution of slavery. The Confederacy was heavily reliant on agriculture, and they used the profits made from the sale of such raw materials to purchase finished goods to use and enjoy. Their major export was cotton, which thrived on the warm river deltas and could easily be shipped to major ocean ports from towns on the Mississippi and numerous river cities. Slavery was a key part of this, as slaves were the ones who harvested and planted the cotton. Being such an enormous unpaid work force, the profits made were extraordinarily high and the price for the unfinished goods drastically low in comparison; especially since he invention of the cotton gin in 1793 which made the work all that much easier and quicker. In contrast, the economical structure of the Northern states, the Union, was vastly dependent on industry. Slavery did not exist in most of the Union, as there was no demand for it due to the type of industrial development taking place. As the Union had a paid work force, the profits made were lower and the cost of the finished manufactured item higher. In turn, the Union used the profits and purchased raw materials to use. This cycle...

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Trade Embargoes

Although I am a strong critic of the use and effectiveness of economic sanctions, such as trade embargoes, for the sake of this assignment, I will present both their theoretical advantages and their disadvantages based upon my research. Trade embargoes and blockades have traditionally been used to entice nations to alter their behavior or to punish them for certain behavior. The intentions behind these policies are generally noble, at least on the surface. However, these policies can have side effects. For example, FDR's blockade of raw materials against the Japanese in Manchuria in the 1930s arguably led to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which resulted in U.S. involvement in World War II. The decades-long embargo against Cuba not only did not lead to the topple of the communist regime there, but may have strengthened Castro's hold on the island and has created animosity toward the United States in Latin America and much suffering by the people of Cuba. Various studies have concluded that embargoes and other economic sanctions generally have not been effective from a utilitarian or policy perspective, yet these policies continue. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Trade Embargoes Strengths Trade embargoes and other sanctions can give the sender government the appearance of taking strong measures in response to a given situation without resorting to violence. Sanctions can be imposed in conjunction with other measures to achieve conflict prevention and mitigation goals. Sanctions may be ineffective: goals may be too elusive, the means too gentle, or cooperation from other countries insufficient. It is usually difficult to determine whether embargoes were an effective deterrent against future misdeeds: embargoes may contribute to a successful outcome, but can rarely achieve ambitious objectives alone. Some regimes are highly resistant to external pressures to reform. At the same time, trade sanctions may narrow the...