Effects Of The WWII Atomic Bombs

Word Count: 1702 |

When the atomic bomb went off over Hiroshima on Aug. 6th,

1945, 70,000 lives were ended in a flash. To the American people who

were weary from the long and brutal war, such a drastic measure seemed

a necessary, even righteous way to end the madness that was World War

II. However, the madness had just begun. That August morning was the

day that heralded the dawn of the nuclear age, and with it came more

than just the loss of lives. According to Archibald MacLeish, a U.S.

poet, “What happened at Hiroshima was not only that a scientific

breakthrough . . . had occurred and that a great part of the

population of a city had been burned to death, but that the problem of

the relation of the triumphs of modern science to the human purposes

of man had been explicitly defined.” The entire globe was now to live

with the fear of total annihilation, the fear that drove the cold war,

the fear that has forever changed world politics. The fear is real,

more real today than ever, for the ease at which a nuclear bomb is

achieved in this day and age sparks fear in the hearts of most people

on this planet. According to General Douglas MacArthur, “We have had

our last chance. If we do not devise some greater and more equitable

system, Armageddon will be at our door.” The decision to drop the

atomic bomb on Japanese citizens in August, 1945, as a means to

bring the long Pacific war to an end was justified-militarily,

politically and morally.

The goal of waging war is victory with minimum losses on one’s

own side and, if possible, on the enemy’s side. No one disputes the

fact that the Japanese military was prepared to fight to the last man

to defend the home islands, and indeed had already demonstrated this

determination in previous Pacific island campaigns. A weapon

originally developed to contain a Nazi atomic project was available

that would spare Americans hundreds of thousands of causalities in an

invasion of Japan, and-not incidentally-save several times more than

that among Japanese soldiers and civilians. The thousands who have

died in the atomic attacks on Hiroshima and Nagasaki were far less

than would have died in an allied invasion, and their sudden deaths

convinced the Japanese military to surrender.

Every nation has an interest in being at peace with other

nations, but there has never been a time when the world was free of

the scourge of war. Hence, peaceful nations must always have adequate

military force at their disposal in order to deter or defeat the

aggressive designs of rogue nations. The United States was therefore

right in using whatever means were necessary to defeat the Japanese

empire in the war which the latter began, including the use of

superior or more powerful weaponry-not only to defeat Japan but to

remain able following the war to maintain peace sufficiently to

guarantee its own existence. A long, costly and bloody conflict is a

wasteful use of a nation’s resources when quicker, more decisive means

are available. Japan was not then-or later-the only nation America had

to restrain, and an all-out U.S. invasion of Japan would have risked

the victory already gained in Europe in the face of the palpable

thereat of Soviet domination.

Finally, we can never forget the maxim of Edmund Burke: “The

only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do

nothing.” The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor brought us into a war

which we had vainly hoped to avoid. We could no longer “do nothing”

but were compelled to “do something” to roll back the Japanese

militarists. Victims of aggression have every right both to end the

aggression and to prevent the perpetrator of it from continuing or

renewing it. Our natural right of self defense as well as our moral

duty to defeat tyranny justified our decision to wage the war and,

ultimately, to drop the atomic bomb. We should expect political

leaders to be guided by moral principles but this does not mean they

must subject millions of people to needless injury or death out of a

misplaced concern for the safety of enemy soldiers or civilians.

President Truman’s decision to deploy atomic power in Japan

revealed a man who understood the moral issues at stake and who had

the courage to strike a decisive blow that quickly brought to an end

the most destructive war in human history. Squeamishness is not a

moral principle, but making the best decisions at the time, given the

circumstances, is clear evidence that the decision maker is guided by


The atomic bomb was considered a “quick” and even economical

way to win the war; however, it was a cruel and unusual form of

punishment for the Japanese citizens. The weapon that we refer to as

“quick” was just the opposite. On one hand, it meant a quick end to

the war for the United States, and on the other hand, a slow and

painful death to many innocent Japanese. According to a book called

Hiroshima Plus 20 the effects of radiation poisoning are horrific,

ranging from purple spots on the skin, hair loss, nausea, vomiting,

bleeding from the mouth, gums, and throat, weakened immune systems, to

massive internal hemorrhaging, not to mention the disfiguring

radiation burns. The effects of the radiation poisoning continued to

show up until about a month after the bombing. In fact the bomb also

killed or permanently damaged fetuses in the womb. Death and

destruction are always a reality of war; however, a quick death is

always more humanitarian.

When this powerful nation called the United States dropped the

bomb, we sent out the official “go ahead” for the rest of the world

that nuclear weapons were a viable means of warfare. We unofficially

announced that it was O.K. to bomb women, children, and elderly

citizens. The thought that atomic weapons are needed to keep the peace

is exactly the idea that fueled the cold war. Albert Einstein said

in a speech, “The armament race between the U.S.A. and U.S.S.R.,

originally supposed to be a preventative measure, assumes hysterical

character. On both sides, the means of mass-destruction are perfected

with feverish haste . . . The H-bomb appears on the public horizon as

a probably attainable goal. Its accelerated development has been

solemnly proclaimed by the president.”

In short, according to Hiroshima Plus 20, by now, the military

has at least 50, 000 nuclear warheads in storage and ready with a

handful of people in charge of them. In the words of James Conant,

President of Harvard, “The extreme dangers to mankind inherent in the

proposal wholly outweigh any military advantage.”

Has the atomic bomb introduced “the fear of total annihilation

…that has forever changed world politics”? That seems to be the

main point of the argument against dropping the atomic bomb on

Japanese cities in August, 1945. Yet this judgment completely

abstracts from the concrete circumstances in which the decision was

made-a world exhausted by war; an implacable, cunning and ruthless

enemy; hundreds of thousands of casualties in an allied invasion of

Japan; permanent strategic considerations; and the like. In other

words, the reply fails to meet the argument for dropping the bomb and

changes the subject from “the immediate decision to the long-term

consequences of the decision.

But even if one grants the point about fear of annihilation,

it is not clear that the world has fundamentally changed nor that the

whole world is always in danger of nations from time immemorial. For

example, ancient Rome sacked Carthage, plowed it under and salted the

earth. Medieval and modern religious wars have annihilated millions.

More recently, there was Hitler’s genocidal six-million-death “final

solution to the Jewish problem,” and the Communists’ ten of millions

of mass murders continue to this day. All this has been done without

benefit of nuclear power.

Gen. MacArthur’s comments came at the beginning of the atomic

or nuclear age, and while the source and the judgment deserve respect,

experience has shown that nuclear power in Western hands deterred a

third world war and ultimately caused the collapse of the greatest

threat to world peace since World War II, namely, the Soviet Union.

But even during the much-decried “arms race” of the Cold War years,

both East and West refined their crude nuclear technology to suit the

requirements of waging war, e.g. targeting the enemy’s missiles,

aircraft and submarines, rather than putting all their eggs in the

nuclear annihilation basket. War is a terrible thing but the fear of

annihilation will curb even the greatest tyrants’ bloodlust.

In short, fear is part of the human condition and those

peaceful nations which learn to live with the destructive potential of

nuclear power are capable of great good. Great evil is more likely to

be the result of unchecked nuclear power in hands of lawless nations.

As ever, peace and safety depend upon military power being in the

right hands.

Works Cited

“Fifty Years Later”; Internet Document;


Finney, et. al. Hiroshima Plus 20. New York, New York; Delacorte; 1965

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Allegory Of American Pie By Don Mc Lean

Ask anyone what was the defining moment in the rock history of the 1960s was and all you will get is a one word answer: Woodstock. The three day rock festival that defined an era was only one of many music festivals of the '60s. But Woodstock has come to symbolize, "an era of peaceful, free- loving, drug- taking hippie youth, carefree before harsher realities hit..." (Layman 40). The Woodstock festival ended a century filled with many metamorphoses of rock'n'roll, from the era of pop music to the rebirth of folk music to the invention of acid rock. But some cynics say that rock'n'roll died with the death of Buddy Holly before the 60s even began. One such person is Don McLean. The poet behind the haunting epic song about the death of 'danceable' music, McLean wrote the ever popular song, "American Pie" (appendix 1). The most important song in rock'n'roll history, "American Pie", is the song about the demise of rock'n'roll after Buddy Holly's death and the heathenism of rock that resulted. Although McLean himself won't reveal any symbolism in his songs, "American Pie" is one of the most analyzed pieces of literature in modern society. Although not all of its secrets have been revealed, many "scholars" of the sixties will agree that the mystery of this song is one of the reasons it has become so successful- everyone wants to know the meanings of its allegories. Proof of "American Pie's" truth lies in the allegory of the song. Many People enjoy the song but have no idea what it means- Who is the Jester? What is the levee? When the deeper story is found, the importance of the song is unearthed. "American Pie" is not only a song, it is an epic poem about the course of rock'n'roll...

Carl Orffs Philosophies In Music Education

While Carl Orff is a very seminal composer of the 20th century, his greatest success and influence has been in the field of Music Education. Born on July 10th in Munich, Germany in 1895, Orff refused to speak about his past almost as if he were ashamed of it. What we do know, however, is that Orff came from a Bavarian family who was very active in the German military. His father's regiment band would often play through some of the young Orff's first attempts at composing. Although Orff was adamant about the secrecy of his past, Moser's Musik Lexicon says that he studied in the Munich Academy of Music until 1914. Orff then served in the military in the first world war. After the war, he held various positions in the Mannheim and Darmstadt opera houses then returned home to Munich to further study music. In 1925, and for the rest of his life, Orff was the head of a department and co-founder of the Guenther School for gymnastics, music, and dance in Munich where he worked with musical beginners. This is where he developed his Music Education theories. In 1937, Orff's Carmina Burana premiered in Frankfurt, Germany. Needless to say, it was a great success. With the success of Carmina Burana, Orff orphaned all of his previous works except for Catulli Carmina and the En trata which were rewritten to be acceptable by Orff. One of Orff's most admired composers was Monteverdi. In fact, much of Orff's work was based on ancient material. Orff said: I am often asked why I nearly always select old material, fairy tales and legends for my stage works. I do not look upon them as old, but rather as valid material. The time element disappears, and only the spiritual power remains. My...

Johann Sebastian Bach Biography

Throughout the history of music, many great composers, theorists, and instrumentalists have left indelible marks and influences that people today look back on to admire and aspire to. No exception to this idiom is Johann Sebastian Bach, whose impact on music was unforgettable to say the least. People today look back to his writings and works to both learn and admire. He truly can be considered a music history great. Bach, who came from a family of over 53 musicians, was nothing short of a virtuosic instrumentalist as well as a masterful composer. Born in Eisenach, Germany, on March 21, 1685, he was the son of a masterful violinist, Johann Ambrosius Bach, who taught his son the basic skills for string playing. Along with this string playing, Bach began to play the organ which is the instrument he would later on be noted for in history. His instruction on the organ came from the player at Eisenach's most important church. He instructed the young boy rather rigorously until his skills surpassed anyone?s expectations for someone of such a young age. Bach suffered early trauma when his parents died in 1695. He went to go live with his older brother, Johann Christoph, who also was a professional organist at Ohrdruf. He continued his younger brother's education on that instrument, as well as introducing him to the harpsichord. The rigorous training on these instruments combined with Bach?s masterful skill paid off for him at an early age. After several years of studying with his older brother, he received a scholarship to study in Luneberg, Germany, which is located on the northern tip of the country. As a result, he left his brother?s tutelage and went to go and study there. The teenage years brought Bach to several parts of Germany where he...


Michelangelo was pessimistic in his poetry and an optimist in his artwork. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo?s poetry was pessimistic in his response to Strazzi even though he was complementing him. Michelangelo?s sculpture brought out his optimism. Michelangelo was optimistic in completing The Tomb of Pope Julius II and persevered through it?s many revisions trying to complete his vision. Sculpture was Michelangelo?s main goal and the love of his life. Since his art portrayed both optimism and pessimism, Michelangelo was in touch with his positive and negative sides, showing that he had a great and stable personality. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo Buonarroti was called to Rome in 1505 by Pope Julius II to create for him a monumental tomb. We have no clear sense of what the tomb was to look like, since over the years it went through at least five conceptual revisions. The tomb was to have three levels; the bottom level was to have sculpted figures representing Victory and bond slaves. The second level was to have statues of Moses and Saint Paul as well as symbolic figures of the active and contemplative life- representative of the human striving for, and reception of, knowledge. The third level, it is assumed, was to have an effigy of the deceased pope. The tomb of Pope Julius II was never finished. What was finished of the tomb represents a twenty-year span of frustrating delays and revised schemes. Michelangelo had hardly begun work on the pope?s tomb when Julius commanded him to fresco the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to complete the work done in the previous century under Sixtus IV. The overall organization consists of four large triangles at...

Oscar Wilde

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde was born in Dublin Ireland on October 16, 1854. He is one of the most talented and most controversial writers of his time. He was well known for his wit, flamboyance, and creative genius and with his little dramatic training showing his natural talent for stage and theatre. He is termed a martyr by some and may be the first true self-publicist and was known for his style of dress and odd behavior. Wilde, 1882 His Father, William Wilde, was a highly accredited doctor and his mother, Jane Francesca Elgee, was a writer of revolutionary poems. Oscar had a brother William Charles Kingsbury along with his father's three illegitimate children, Henry, Emily, and Mary. His sister, Isola Emily Francesca died in 1867 at only ten years of age from a sudden fever, greatly affecting Oscar and his family. He kept a lock of her hair in an envelope and later wrote the poem 'Requiescat' in her memory. Oscar and his brother William both attended the Protora Royal School at Enniskillen. He had little in common with the other children. He disliked games and took more interest in flowers and sunsets. He was extremely passionate about anything that had to do with ancient Greece and with Classics. Wilde during school years In 1871, he was awarded a Royal School Scholarship to Trinity College in Dublin and received many awards and earned the highest honor the college offered to an undergraduate, the Foundation Scholarship. In 1874, he also won the College's Berkley Gold Medal for Greek and was awarded a Demyship to Magdalen College, Oxford. After graduating from Oxford, Oscar moved to London with his friend Frank Miles, a well-known portrait painter of the time. In 1878 his poem Ravenna was published, for which he won the...

The History Of Greek Theater

Theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century BCE, with the Sopocles, the great writer of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, heroes and the ideals of life were depicted and glorified. It was believed that man should live for honor and fame, his action was courageous and glorious and his life would climax in a great and noble death. Originally, the hero's recognition was created by selfish behaviors and little thought of service to others. As the Greeks grew toward city-states and colonization, it became the destiny and ambition of the hero to gain honor by serving his city. The second major characteristic of the early Greek world was the supernatural. The two worlds were not separate, as the gods lived in the same world as the men, and they interfered in the men's lives as they chose to. It was the gods who sent suffering and evil to men. In the plays of Sophocles, the gods brought about the hero's downfall because of a tragic flaw in the character of the hero. In Greek tragedy, suffering brought knowledge of worldly matters and of the individual. Aristotle attempted to explain how an audience could observe tragic events and still have a pleasurable experience. Aristotle, by searching the works of writers of Greek tragedy, Aeschulus, Euripides and Sophocles (whose Oedipus Rex he considered the finest of all Greek tragedies), arrived at his definition of tragedy. This explanation has a profound influence for more than twenty centuries on those writing tragedies, most significantly Shakespeare. Aristotle's analysis of tragedy began with a description of the effect such a work had on the audience as a "catharsis" or purging of the emotions. He decided that catharsis was the purging of two specific emotions, pity and...

Scholarship Essay About Goals

Ever since I was a young kid I have always been interested with aircraft. I was so curious of how airplane's fly. I remember taking my toys apart to see how it works. As a kid I wanted to go to the airport to watch the airplanes land and fly and pondered how this happens. Other kids wanted to go to the amusement places. As I grew older I became more and more interested in aircraft and the technology behind it. I always involved myself with aviation early on. I read books and magazines on aviation, took museum tours, built model airplanes. When I was younger my father would take me to aircraft repair facilities where I would watch in great fascination. In my teens, went up to the military bases and befriended many soldiers involved with aircraft and asked them numerous questions. I got to meet many aeronautics engineers and borrowed their old textbooks and read them till the wee hours of the morning. As technology improved with information superhighway, I logged on the web. Stayed up for hours and hours searching through web pages and web pages of information about aircraft and technology. I started my elementary school in the Philippines, then we moved to U.S. and continued my high school education and graduated. Enrolled at the CCSF to pursue my college education and now I am in the 2nd year in CCSF taking aeronautics. My goal now is to obtain my AS degree from the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) so I can transfer to a University and get a Bachelors degree and to continue for my Masters degree in Aeronautics Engineering. I will strive hard to reach the peak level of my career which is a Professor and hopefully to be an aeronautic professor so...

Circus Circus Enterprises Case Studies

Executive Summary: Circus Circus Enterprises is a leader and will continue to be in the gaming industry. In recent years, they have seen a decline in profit and revenue; management tends to blame the decrease on continuing disruptions from remodeling, expansion, and increased competition. Consequently, Circus has reported decreases in its net income for 1997 and 1998 and management believes this trend will continue as competition heightens. Currently the company is involved in several joint ventures, its brand of casino entertainment has traditionally catered to the low rollers and family vacationers through its theme park. Circus should continue to expand its existing operations into new market segments. This shift will allow them to attract the up scale gambler. Overview Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc founded in 1974 is in the business of entertainment, with its core strength in casino gambling. The company?s asset base, operating cash flow, profit margin, multiple markets and customers, rank it as one of the gaming industry leaders. Partners William G. Bennett an aggressive cost cutter and William N. Pennington purchased Circus Circus in 1974 as a small and unprofitable casino. It went public in 1983, from 1993 to 1997; the average return on capital invested was 16.5%. Circus Circus operates several properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Laughlin, and one in Mississippi, as well as 50% ownership in three other casinos and a theme park. On January 31,1998 Circus reported net income of 89.9 million and revenues of 1.35 billion, this is a down from 100 million on 1.3 billion in 1997. Management sees this decline in revenue due to the rapid and extensive expansion and the increased competition that Circus is facing. Well established in the casino gaming industry the corporation has its focus in the entertainment business and has particularly a popular theme resort concept....

Effect Of Civil War On American Economy

The Economies of the North and South, 1861-1865 In 1861, a great war in American history began. It was a civil war between the north and south that was by no means civil. This war would have great repercussions upon the economy of this country and the states within it. The American Civil War began with secession, creating a divided union of sorts, and sparked an incredibly cataclysmic four years. Although the actual war began with secession, this was not the only driving force. The economy of the Southern states, the Confederacy, greatly if not entirely depended on the institution of slavery. The Confederacy was heavily reliant on agriculture, and they used the profits made from the sale of such raw materials to purchase finished goods to use and enjoy. Their major export was cotton, which thrived on the warm river deltas and could easily be shipped to major ocean ports from towns on the Mississippi and numerous river cities. Slavery was a key part of this, as slaves were the ones who harvested and planted the cotton. Being such an enormous unpaid work force, the profits made were extraordinarily high and the price for the unfinished goods drastically low in comparison; especially since he invention of the cotton gin in 1793 which made the work all that much easier and quicker. In contrast, the economical structure of the Northern states, the Union, was vastly dependent on industry. Slavery did not exist in most of the Union, as there was no demand for it due to the type of industrial development taking place. As the Union had a paid work force, the profits made were lower and the cost of the finished manufactured item higher. In turn, the Union used the profits and purchased raw materials to use. This cycle...

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Trade Embargoes

Although I am a strong critic of the use and effectiveness of economic sanctions, such as trade embargoes, for the sake of this assignment, I will present both their theoretical advantages and their disadvantages based upon my research. Trade embargoes and blockades have traditionally been used to entice nations to alter their behavior or to punish them for certain behavior. The intentions behind these policies are generally noble, at least on the surface. However, these policies can have side effects. For example, FDR's blockade of raw materials against the Japanese in Manchuria in the 1930s arguably led to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which resulted in U.S. involvement in World War II. The decades-long embargo against Cuba not only did not lead to the topple of the communist regime there, but may have strengthened Castro's hold on the island and has created animosity toward the United States in Latin America and much suffering by the people of Cuba. Various studies have concluded that embargoes and other economic sanctions generally have not been effective from a utilitarian or policy perspective, yet these policies continue. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Trade Embargoes Strengths Trade embargoes and other sanctions can give the sender government the appearance of taking strong measures in response to a given situation without resorting to violence. Sanctions can be imposed in conjunction with other measures to achieve conflict prevention and mitigation goals. Sanctions may be ineffective: goals may be too elusive, the means too gentle, or cooperation from other countries insufficient. It is usually difficult to determine whether embargoes were an effective deterrent against future misdeeds: embargoes may contribute to a successful outcome, but can rarely achieve ambitious objectives alone. Some regimes are highly resistant to external pressures to reform. At the same time, trade sanctions may narrow the...