Euthanasia Not A Step Down The Slippery Slope

Word Count: 3325 |

Physician-Assisted Suicide and Euthanasia Are Not Steps Down a Slippery Slope
Life and death, one can not exist without the other. No person can live without someday having to face death and no person can die without having lived. The following information should assist you to consider the rights, that as citizens of the United States, we should have when facing issues which surround the treatment that involves the end of life care. All people should be entitled to their beliefs and also should have the right to make individual choices that could affect them if they are faced with a life threatening injury or terminal illness.
The pro-choice stance regarding physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia is not about advocating death. These beliefs are more about striving for ways to make better end of life care available and the right to make decisions which pertain to our individual being. Legalizing physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia in all of our states would not become steps down a slippery slope.
Working as a nurse for twenty-five years, I have compassionately cared for many individuals at the time of their deaths. I realize that illness, injury, and death are never easy subjects to discuss, but the importance of talking about these issues can not be stressed enough. These types of discussions are important so that the decisions which face us in regards to these matters will be left in the hands of those to which these decisions pertain and to those persons closest to them. Not all the choices that I wish to discuss are legal at this time. The options of euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide need to be taken into consideration for the possible reformation of our existing laws which have to do with the end of life affairs. At this time in the United States, Oregon is the only state that has passed laws legalizing physician-assisted suicide.
Having a clear understanding of what euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide mean is important. Michael Manning, M.D. says in his book Euthanasia and Physician-Assisted Suicide: Caring or Killing, that physician-assisted suicide is, “A physician providing medications or other means to a patient with the understanding that the patient intends to commit suicide.” Euthanasia can be defined as bringing about a gentle and an easy death (“Euthanasia”). The act of euthanasia can be either voluntary or non-voluntary and it can also be considered a passive or an active act.
According to Thomas Fuchs, M.D., Ph.D. in an article he wrote for the journal, Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, voluntary active euthanasia means that a clearly competent person makes a voluntary request to be assisted in the dying process. An example of this type of euthanasia would be giving a lethal injection to a person at his or her request. Passive euthanasia entails letting a person die by withdrawing or withholding a life sustaining treatment, such as the act of removing a person from a ventilator or withholding artificial nutrition and hydration. The act is considered non-voluntary when a person can not actively express his or her wishes; this may be due to severe brain damage or because a person is in a persistent vegetative state (Fuchs).
Having a living will in place makes issues surrounding serious illness and death much easier on everyone because it makes our wishes about the type of health care we would or would not want known to others in the event of a terminal illness or a life threatening injury. The Ohio Department of Health states that a living will lets our doctor and our loved ones know the extent of treatment we would wish to receive should we be in a condition that has left us unable to communicate. A person can do this by putting in writing what is called an advanced directive. This can be done by obtaining the proper forms from a doctor, attorney, or there are also state specific forms available on the Ohio Department of Health website (Ohio Department of Health).
The reasoning behind the slippery slope theory usually entails the Hitler-Nazi Germany experience. Some people believe that euthanasia and physician-assisted suicide would lead to the possibility of this type of an experience reoccurring. However, according to Derek Humphrey, the founder of the Hemlock Society, there is no connection between these cases. The only commonality is the name euthanasia, which is the name that was used to describe what Hitler and the Nazis used their death camps for. In these cases the name stands for quite two different policies. The Nazi program of euthanasia was neither voluntary nor based on compassion. This program was motivated by the desire to remove specific groups of human beings that the Nazis considered to be useless, foul animals and to preserve the purity of the Volk and hence resulted in a vicious and racist ideology that was already firmly in place (Humphry).
Americans fought to stop the Nazis and the vile torture of these human beings. Our American society saw this racist ideology as incomprehensible and despicable. Citizens of the United States would never tolerate such appalling acts to take place in our country. Although, some people do believe that if physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia were legalized for the terminally and chronically ill, then the gradual extension of these practices would widen to other groups of patients, such as those individuals with developmental disabilities, the mentally ill, and the elderly.
If physician-assisted suicide and euthanasia were to be legalized throughout the U.S., there would have to be mandatory regulations put in place and over seen by a regulatory agency, as in the case with the Oregon Death With Dignity Act. This would insure that legislation would have to be voted on before anyone other than those patients who meet specific criteria could employ these practices.
As a heath care worker, I cannot stress enough how important it is to document and make known to our families and our loved ones the choices we would want if we were faced with a serious illness or injury. When determining the extent of treatment we would want to receive we need to consider our values, such as how important independence and self sufficiency are to us. According to an article written by the staff at MayoClinic.Com, we should ask ourselves the following questions: What would make my life not worth living? Do I want life saving treatment or life sustaining treatment? These are important key issues to address when putting advanced directives in place (Mayo Clinic).
Patients and/or families deserve a clear and complete understanding of the proposed therapy options that are available to them should they be faced with terminal illness or a serious injury. During my career while caring for those faced with such difficult decisions, I have found that some patients and/or families will want to know all the details, while others will prefer to forego the details and rely solely on his or her physician’s specific advice. Life-sustaining treatment should be discussed in the following realistic terms: the problem the treatment will address, what the treatment or procedure will involve, what the prognosis will be with and without treatment, and what the benefits and the burdens of the treatment will be.
When inserting a feeding-tube in a patient who is in a persistent vegetative state, it will not prevent aspiration, it will not stop all the effects of malnutrition, nor will it improve survival or function. Insertion of the feeding-tube also causes a serious risk of infection as well as the risk of other serious complications. Like all procedures, a tube- feeding should not be considered an inevitable procedure, this is an optional choice. I have found that there are several misperceptions that are common among patients and/or families when they are making this consideration. A family may believe that a lack of appetite and poor oral intake is causing the current disability; they assume that, “if only Dad got more fluids and nutrition then he would be stronger or get better.” In cases that are doubtful, a monitored trial of hydration may well be warranted. However, artificial hydration may worsen physical symptoms such as edema, breathlessness, diarrhea, vomiting or incontinence in someone who is terminally ill.
Near the end of life I have found that patients and families may be concerned that the lack of fluids and food will cause suffering. Through the knowledge that I have gained at seminars on caring for seriously ill patients, I now know that dehydration is a common and natural part of the dying process. Offering good mouth-care may be a better solution then attempting to give oral fluids. Trying to reverse a natural process often leads to substantial discomfort, and the outcome will remain futile. When a patient is not hungry or thirsty then providing artificial fluids and nutrition will not relieve the symptoms and may actually end up causing more problems Some patients make a conscious choice to stop eating and drinking. This choice is a natural part of the dying process in someone who is terminally ill.
According to Richard J. Ackermann, M.D., a professor of family medicine at the Mercer University School of Medicine, performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on hospitalized patients is usually an ineffective measure. Only 6 to 17 percent of patients usually survive to discharge. Many of these survivors die during the next few months or are left with a poor quality of life. Patients with malignancy, sepsis, pneumonia or renal failure have even lower survival rates. More than 90 percent of all hospital deaths now occur without CPR being performed. Dr. Ackermann feels that all physicians should review the overall medical condition of a patient and the context in which CPR is being discussed with the patient and/or the family. He feels that engaging in a discussion that focuses only on the CPR and the do not resuscitate (DNR) status may leave the patient and/or the family confused and anxious.
Dr. Ackermann says he explains these procedures in clear and understandable language to his patients by asking them: “If you should die despite our current therapy, do you want us to use extreme measures? Do you want CPR performed? Do you want us to press on your chest and put a tube in your lungs to try to get your heart and breathing started again?” This doctor says that by discussing CPR initially as “starting the heart” or “putting on a breathing machine” implies a false sense of reversibility, or suggests that those heart and lung functions are isolated problems. These practices need to be discussed in context with the patient’s medical condition and prognosis. Patients and their families need to know that in patients with advanced illness, circulation and breathing stop because of the relentless progression of disease (Ackermann).
As technology has increased the capacity to sustain life, it has created the need for critical examination of when such treatments are and are not appropriate. The assumption that health care professionals have an obligation to prolong life is a misconception. Doctors and nurses have an obligation to their patient to relieve suffering which does not have anything to do with prolonging the dying process. It has become increasingly recognized that patients and families have an essential role to play in their health care decision making. The concept of informed consent includes the right of the patient to refuse treatment, even life sustaining treatments. Yet the decision to forego life sustaining treatment, particularly a decision to withdraw a treatment that may be already sustaining the patient’s life, poses significant psychological difficulties for providers, patients and families. The bottom line is that we need to plan ahead so that these decisions are not left to be made during a time of tragic circumstances, which is an especially difficult time to make such types of decisions.
No matter how difficult it is for a patient or family to hear a prognosis that says a serious illness or injury will not end in a recovery, I have always felt that they have the right to know the truth. I have cried many times along with my patients and their families as this reality has sunk in. In the cases of serious injury, such as that of a head injury, a person can be left brain dead or in a persistent vegetative state. This does not mean that their life has to become fruitless. The end of one life can save the lives of many others through organ donation.
The decision of organ donation is another important matter we should all discuss with our loved ones if it is a choice we would make for ourselves. A person can also have his or her decision to be an organ donor put on their driver’s license, but it is still a good idea to talk about these wishes with those closest to us. After being counseled on the severity of a brain injury and given a patient’s dismal prognosis, a family may choose to withdraw mechanical life support. A family may also then choose to have the patient’s organs donated.
I have gained a personal insight into how difficult this type of tragic situation can be. My twenty seven year old nephew, Michael, sustained a severe traumatic brain and spinal cord injury that the doctors assured us would leave him in a persistent vegetative state. Although, he was not considered to be brain dead because he was still left with some brainstem functioning. The brainstem regulates functions such as heartbeat, respiration, and temperature. We were told by the doctors that he would more than likely be paralyzed from the neck down and that he would never regain consciousness. He was left with virtually no chance for recovery from his injuries.
Michael’s parents and brothers, after several hours of heart wrenching discussions, finally decided to have the life support machines removed and to donate his organs. This is what we all believed that Michael would have wanted. The protocol for this to take place required that my nephew would have to stop breathing within one hour of being removed from a ventilator in order for his organs to remain viable. The doctors explained to us that if he were actually brain dead then he could have been left on the life support until the organs were taken, but this was not the case in Michael’s situation. Our family was told that it could take Michael anywhere from a couple of minutes to a few hours to stop breathing on his own. This form of organ donation is known as non-heart-beating organ donation. Michael was removed from the ventilator and we waited for him to die as we prayed that he would go quickly and his struggle would end.
Our family was told after one hour that Michael had continued to breath on his own and his organs were no longer viable for donation. Michael was returned to a room in the ICU where we continued to wait for his imminent death. There are no words to describe how it felt to sit helplessly as we watched Michael’s every gasping breath as he seized continuously and sweated profusely. He was given large doses of morphine and we assured that he was in no pain. As a health care professional who knew that the seizures and the sweating were being caused due to Michael’s head injury, it was still very hard for me to convince myself that he was not in pain. How would we ever really know how much he could feel? Another hour and twenty minutes passed before Michael took his final breath.
After witnessing Michael’s demise and watching other patients throughout my nursing career who suffered relentlessly until the moment of there deaths, I can only say that I believe there should be a quicker and more humane alternative to a death that is so inevitable. Michael was going to die, that was inevitable, whether it was two minutes or two hours should have made no difference. Had there been a choice available to give Michael a medication to immediately stop his heartbeat and his breathing there would have been no reason for him to struggle to for breath as we watched and wondered if he was in pain. If Michael had been left on the ventilator, he could have lived for years in a persistent vegetative state that would have left him to suffer the inevitable complications that this condition brings with it. Ultimately the outcome would have been the same and possibly this could have been done in a time frame that would have left his organs viable for donation.
Great strides have taken place in dealing with the end of life issues in regards to pain control and providing optimum comfort measures for the dying. Hospice organizations have been pioneers in this area and they provide a wonderful service to those patients who want it. After many years as a nurse, I have found that not all pain and suffering can be medically controlled. Also, who is to say that everyone would want to live in a drug induced state in order to control their suffering? I have been told by several patients that I have cared for that they would rather not be in a state that has left them unaware of their surroundings and to have other people left caring for their most personal needs. All people and should be left with alternatives as to when their suffering should end.
Due to the rapid advancement of medical technology and capacities to extend life, the issue of physician-assisted suicide is much more pressing then it has been in the past. A poll done by the San Francisco Chronicle in March of 2006 showed that 69% of registered voters said they believed that incurably ill people should have the right to ask for and receive life-ending medication. This poll conducted over a two week period ending February 26, 2006, found support among virtually all political, ethnic, and social groups. This included groups who identified themselves as major religious organizations (San Francisco Chronicle). Yet, Oregon is the only state that has passed a law to making physician-assisted suicide legal. According to the Oregon Department of Human Services, the Death With Dignity Act was passed in 1994 and reaffirmed in 1997.
This Act allows a doctor to prescribe a lethal dose of medication to a terminally ill person who has been found of sound mind. The person must be an adult (18 years or older), a resident of Oregon, able to make and communicate their health care decisions, have a terminal illness that will lead to death within six months, this diagnosis must be made be the physician prescribing the medication and then the diagnosis and prognosis must be confirmed by a consulting physician. If either physician believes that the patient’s judgment is impaired than the patient must be referred for a psychological evaluation. The prescribing physician is also required to inform the patient of all the feasible alternatives to assisted suicide such as comfort care, hospice care, and pain control (Oregon Department of Human Services).
The physician takes an oath to preserve life. Medical technology has now progressed far beyond its readiness to deal with the ethical issues it has now presented us with.There are also many types of pain and suffering that at this time can not be relieved. Such an oath in essence than becomes an oath to preserve the suffering of many patients when there is no hope for recovery or relief from agony.
The debate over physician assisted suicide will continue to evolve rapidly over the next several years. It is my hope you will use the information which I have presented to assist you in making an informed choice regarding such personal health care decisions. Physician-assisted suicide does not advocate death as suggested by the slippery slope theory. This pro-choice stance is more about striving for better alternatives pertaining to the end of life care issues and the right of all individuals to make decisions that affect any aspect of our private lives.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Allegory Of American Pie By Don Mc Lean

Ask anyone what was the defining moment in the rock history of the 1960s was and all you will get is a one word answer: Woodstock. The three day rock festival that defined an era was only one of many music festivals of the '60s. But Woodstock has come to symbolize, "an era of peaceful, free- loving, drug- taking hippie youth, carefree before harsher realities hit..." (Layman 40). The Woodstock festival ended a century filled with many metamorphoses of rock'n'roll, from the era of pop music to the rebirth of folk music to the invention of acid rock. But some cynics say that rock'n'roll died with the death of Buddy Holly before the 60s even began. One such person is Don McLean. The poet behind the haunting epic song about the death of 'danceable' music, McLean wrote the ever popular song, "American Pie" (appendix 1). The most important song in rock'n'roll history, "American Pie", is the song about the demise of rock'n'roll after Buddy Holly's death and the heathenism of rock that resulted. Although McLean himself won't reveal any symbolism in his songs, "American Pie" is one of the most analyzed pieces of literature in modern society. Although not all of its secrets have been revealed, many "scholars" of the sixties will agree that the mystery of this song is one of the reasons it has become so successful- everyone wants to know the meanings of its allegories. Proof of "American Pie's" truth lies in the allegory of the song. Many People enjoy the song but have no idea what it means- Who is the Jester? What is the levee? When the deeper story is found, the importance of the song is unearthed. "American Pie" is not only a song, it is an epic poem about the course of rock'n'roll...

Carl Orffs Philosophies In Music Education

While Carl Orff is a very seminal composer of the 20th century, his greatest success and influence has been in the field of Music Education. Born on July 10th in Munich, Germany in 1895, Orff refused to speak about his past almost as if he were ashamed of it. What we do know, however, is that Orff came from a Bavarian family who was very active in the German military. His father's regiment band would often play through some of the young Orff's first attempts at composing. Although Orff was adamant about the secrecy of his past, Moser's Musik Lexicon says that he studied in the Munich Academy of Music until 1914. Orff then served in the military in the first world war. After the war, he held various positions in the Mannheim and Darmstadt opera houses then returned home to Munich to further study music. In 1925, and for the rest of his life, Orff was the head of a department and co-founder of the Guenther School for gymnastics, music, and dance in Munich where he worked with musical beginners. This is where he developed his Music Education theories. In 1937, Orff's Carmina Burana premiered in Frankfurt, Germany. Needless to say, it was a great success. With the success of Carmina Burana, Orff orphaned all of his previous works except for Catulli Carmina and the En trata which were rewritten to be acceptable by Orff. One of Orff's most admired composers was Monteverdi. In fact, much of Orff's work was based on ancient material. Orff said: I am often asked why I nearly always select old material, fairy tales and legends for my stage works. I do not look upon them as old, but rather as valid material. The time element disappears, and only the spiritual power remains. My...

Johann Sebastian Bach Biography

Throughout the history of music, many great composers, theorists, and instrumentalists have left indelible marks and influences that people today look back on to admire and aspire to. No exception to this idiom is Johann Sebastian Bach, whose impact on music was unforgettable to say the least. People today look back to his writings and works to both learn and admire. He truly can be considered a music history great. Bach, who came from a family of over 53 musicians, was nothing short of a virtuosic instrumentalist as well as a masterful composer. Born in Eisenach, Germany, on March 21, 1685, he was the son of a masterful violinist, Johann Ambrosius Bach, who taught his son the basic skills for string playing. Along with this string playing, Bach began to play the organ which is the instrument he would later on be noted for in history. His instruction on the organ came from the player at Eisenach's most important church. He instructed the young boy rather rigorously until his skills surpassed anyone?s expectations for someone of such a young age. Bach suffered early trauma when his parents died in 1695. He went to go live with his older brother, Johann Christoph, who also was a professional organist at Ohrdruf. He continued his younger brother's education on that instrument, as well as introducing him to the harpsichord. The rigorous training on these instruments combined with Bach?s masterful skill paid off for him at an early age. After several years of studying with his older brother, he received a scholarship to study in Luneberg, Germany, which is located on the northern tip of the country. As a result, he left his brother?s tutelage and went to go and study there. The teenage years brought Bach to several parts of Germany where he...


Michelangelo was pessimistic in his poetry and an optimist in his artwork. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo?s poetry was pessimistic in his response to Strazzi even though he was complementing him. Michelangelo?s sculpture brought out his optimism. Michelangelo was optimistic in completing The Tomb of Pope Julius II and persevered through it?s many revisions trying to complete his vision. Sculpture was Michelangelo?s main goal and the love of his life. Since his art portrayed both optimism and pessimism, Michelangelo was in touch with his positive and negative sides, showing that he had a great and stable personality. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo Buonarroti was called to Rome in 1505 by Pope Julius II to create for him a monumental tomb. We have no clear sense of what the tomb was to look like, since over the years it went through at least five conceptual revisions. The tomb was to have three levels; the bottom level was to have sculpted figures representing Victory and bond slaves. The second level was to have statues of Moses and Saint Paul as well as symbolic figures of the active and contemplative life- representative of the human striving for, and reception of, knowledge. The third level, it is assumed, was to have an effigy of the deceased pope. The tomb of Pope Julius II was never finished. What was finished of the tomb represents a twenty-year span of frustrating delays and revised schemes. Michelangelo had hardly begun work on the pope?s tomb when Julius commanded him to fresco the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to complete the work done in the previous century under Sixtus IV. The overall organization consists of four large triangles at...

Oscar Wilde

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde was born in Dublin Ireland on October 16, 1854. He is one of the most talented and most controversial writers of his time. He was well known for his wit, flamboyance, and creative genius and with his little dramatic training showing his natural talent for stage and theatre. He is termed a martyr by some and may be the first true self-publicist and was known for his style of dress and odd behavior. Wilde, 1882 His Father, William Wilde, was a highly accredited doctor and his mother, Jane Francesca Elgee, was a writer of revolutionary poems. Oscar had a brother William Charles Kingsbury along with his father's three illegitimate children, Henry, Emily, and Mary. His sister, Isola Emily Francesca died in 1867 at only ten years of age from a sudden fever, greatly affecting Oscar and his family. He kept a lock of her hair in an envelope and later wrote the poem 'Requiescat' in her memory. Oscar and his brother William both attended the Protora Royal School at Enniskillen. He had little in common with the other children. He disliked games and took more interest in flowers and sunsets. He was extremely passionate about anything that had to do with ancient Greece and with Classics. Wilde during school years In 1871, he was awarded a Royal School Scholarship to Trinity College in Dublin and received many awards and earned the highest honor the college offered to an undergraduate, the Foundation Scholarship. In 1874, he also won the College's Berkley Gold Medal for Greek and was awarded a Demyship to Magdalen College, Oxford. After graduating from Oxford, Oscar moved to London with his friend Frank Miles, a well-known portrait painter of the time. In 1878 his poem Ravenna was published, for which he won the...

The History Of Greek Theater

Theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century BCE, with the Sopocles, the great writer of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, heroes and the ideals of life were depicted and glorified. It was believed that man should live for honor and fame, his action was courageous and glorious and his life would climax in a great and noble death. Originally, the hero's recognition was created by selfish behaviors and little thought of service to others. As the Greeks grew toward city-states and colonization, it became the destiny and ambition of the hero to gain honor by serving his city. The second major characteristic of the early Greek world was the supernatural. The two worlds were not separate, as the gods lived in the same world as the men, and they interfered in the men's lives as they chose to. It was the gods who sent suffering and evil to men. In the plays of Sophocles, the gods brought about the hero's downfall because of a tragic flaw in the character of the hero. In Greek tragedy, suffering brought knowledge of worldly matters and of the individual. Aristotle attempted to explain how an audience could observe tragic events and still have a pleasurable experience. Aristotle, by searching the works of writers of Greek tragedy, Aeschulus, Euripides and Sophocles (whose Oedipus Rex he considered the finest of all Greek tragedies), arrived at his definition of tragedy. This explanation has a profound influence for more than twenty centuries on those writing tragedies, most significantly Shakespeare. Aristotle's analysis of tragedy began with a description of the effect such a work had on the audience as a "catharsis" or purging of the emotions. He decided that catharsis was the purging of two specific emotions, pity and...

Scholarship Essay About Goals

Ever since I was a young kid I have always been interested with aircraft. I was so curious of how airplane's fly. I remember taking my toys apart to see how it works. As a kid I wanted to go to the airport to watch the airplanes land and fly and pondered how this happens. Other kids wanted to go to the amusement places. As I grew older I became more and more interested in aircraft and the technology behind it. I always involved myself with aviation early on. I read books and magazines on aviation, took museum tours, built model airplanes. When I was younger my father would take me to aircraft repair facilities where I would watch in great fascination. In my teens, went up to the military bases and befriended many soldiers involved with aircraft and asked them numerous questions. I got to meet many aeronautics engineers and borrowed their old textbooks and read them till the wee hours of the morning. As technology improved with information superhighway, I logged on the web. Stayed up for hours and hours searching through web pages and web pages of information about aircraft and technology. I started my elementary school in the Philippines, then we moved to U.S. and continued my high school education and graduated. Enrolled at the CCSF to pursue my college education and now I am in the 2nd year in CCSF taking aeronautics. My goal now is to obtain my AS degree from the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) so I can transfer to a University and get a Bachelors degree and to continue for my Masters degree in Aeronautics Engineering. I will strive hard to reach the peak level of my career which is a Professor and hopefully to be an aeronautic professor so...

Circus Circus Enterprises Case Studies

Executive Summary: Circus Circus Enterprises is a leader and will continue to be in the gaming industry. In recent years, they have seen a decline in profit and revenue; management tends to blame the decrease on continuing disruptions from remodeling, expansion, and increased competition. Consequently, Circus has reported decreases in its net income for 1997 and 1998 and management believes this trend will continue as competition heightens. Currently the company is involved in several joint ventures, its brand of casino entertainment has traditionally catered to the low rollers and family vacationers through its theme park. Circus should continue to expand its existing operations into new market segments. This shift will allow them to attract the up scale gambler. Overview Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc founded in 1974 is in the business of entertainment, with its core strength in casino gambling. The company?s asset base, operating cash flow, profit margin, multiple markets and customers, rank it as one of the gaming industry leaders. Partners William G. Bennett an aggressive cost cutter and William N. Pennington purchased Circus Circus in 1974 as a small and unprofitable casino. It went public in 1983, from 1993 to 1997; the average return on capital invested was 16.5%. Circus Circus operates several properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Laughlin, and one in Mississippi, as well as 50% ownership in three other casinos and a theme park. On January 31,1998 Circus reported net income of 89.9 million and revenues of 1.35 billion, this is a down from 100 million on 1.3 billion in 1997. Management sees this decline in revenue due to the rapid and extensive expansion and the increased competition that Circus is facing. Well established in the casino gaming industry the corporation has its focus in the entertainment business and has particularly a popular theme resort concept....

Effect Of Civil War On American Economy

The Economies of the North and South, 1861-1865 In 1861, a great war in American history began. It was a civil war between the north and south that was by no means civil. This war would have great repercussions upon the economy of this country and the states within it. The American Civil War began with secession, creating a divided union of sorts, and sparked an incredibly cataclysmic four years. Although the actual war began with secession, this was not the only driving force. The economy of the Southern states, the Confederacy, greatly if not entirely depended on the institution of slavery. The Confederacy was heavily reliant on agriculture, and they used the profits made from the sale of such raw materials to purchase finished goods to use and enjoy. Their major export was cotton, which thrived on the warm river deltas and could easily be shipped to major ocean ports from towns on the Mississippi and numerous river cities. Slavery was a key part of this, as slaves were the ones who harvested and planted the cotton. Being such an enormous unpaid work force, the profits made were extraordinarily high and the price for the unfinished goods drastically low in comparison; especially since he invention of the cotton gin in 1793 which made the work all that much easier and quicker. In contrast, the economical structure of the Northern states, the Union, was vastly dependent on industry. Slavery did not exist in most of the Union, as there was no demand for it due to the type of industrial development taking place. As the Union had a paid work force, the profits made were lower and the cost of the finished manufactured item higher. In turn, the Union used the profits and purchased raw materials to use. This cycle...

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Trade Embargoes

Although I am a strong critic of the use and effectiveness of economic sanctions, such as trade embargoes, for the sake of this assignment, I will present both their theoretical advantages and their disadvantages based upon my research. Trade embargoes and blockades have traditionally been used to entice nations to alter their behavior or to punish them for certain behavior. The intentions behind these policies are generally noble, at least on the surface. However, these policies can have side effects. For example, FDR's blockade of raw materials against the Japanese in Manchuria in the 1930s arguably led to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which resulted in U.S. involvement in World War II. The decades-long embargo against Cuba not only did not lead to the topple of the communist regime there, but may have strengthened Castro's hold on the island and has created animosity toward the United States in Latin America and much suffering by the people of Cuba. Various studies have concluded that embargoes and other economic sanctions generally have not been effective from a utilitarian or policy perspective, yet these policies continue. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Trade Embargoes Strengths Trade embargoes and other sanctions can give the sender government the appearance of taking strong measures in response to a given situation without resorting to violence. Sanctions can be imposed in conjunction with other measures to achieve conflict prevention and mitigation goals. Sanctions may be ineffective: goals may be too elusive, the means too gentle, or cooperation from other countries insufficient. It is usually difficult to determine whether embargoes were an effective deterrent against future misdeeds: embargoes may contribute to a successful outcome, but can rarely achieve ambitious objectives alone. Some regimes are highly resistant to external pressures to reform. At the same time, trade sanctions may narrow the...