Ironic Benefits Of War

Word Count: 1775 |

Many American citizens in 1959 viewed the Vietnam War as a righteous battle against communism, similar to the Iraq War today however now many view this war as a necessary battle against terrorism. Looking at America’s overall goal in Vietnam, it is evident that we did not come close to keeping South Vietnam from collapsing, who fell to communist rule in 1975 (Frankum 210). America’s involvement in the conflicts of Vietnam and Iraq were so discordant that our government, people, and military were constricted. Yet both wars were fought with the knowledge that America may change the invaded nation, which brings a precarious question; what makes the government believe that they have the right to go into a country and change it to the way they want it to be? The government already has enough problems to fix in the homeland, wasting time trying to mend problems in other countries will never allow America to move forward as a unified country. The separation and disruption the Vietnam War caused in America is still very much in the public conscience, in various books and films, which makes one wonder, if America hadn’t set the standard of invading Vietnam, would troops be in Iraq today? America’s involvement in the Vietnam parallels the Iraq War with each war being as destructive, unjustified, invasive, and costly as the other. Despite America’s “noble intentions,” the Vietnam War proves to be the greatest challenge to American democratic idealism since the Civil War (Vietnam). The Vietnam and Iraq wars brought unnecessary pain and suffering during a time in which the country could have been improving.
The Vietnam War, also known as the Second Indochina War, contained ten years of America’s unnecessary commitment. The Vietnam War was a military battle fought in Vietnam from 1959 to 1975, involving the North Vietnamese and the National Liberation Front (NLF) in dispute with United States forces, and the South Vietnamese army. In total over 55,000 American servicemen were pronounced dead or listed as missing, the presidency had changed three times, and the American people waged antiwar battles at home against the United States government (Frankum 215). The Vietnam War is now known as the longest military conflict in United States history, so when looking at all the time spent there, many hope America accomplished the ambitious endeavor, sadly the answer is no. America entered Vietnam in 1965 with high hopes of keeping the Southern Vietnamese from falling to communism which it eventually did in 1975. Then twenty eight years later, on March 19, 2003, President George W. Bush invaded Iraq, with half of the nation already questioning his status in office and that same amount or even more uncertain as to what our objective was. After the attack on the World Trade Center President Bush became consumed by ridding the world of terrorism, one of his main targets being Iraq. However, Iraq had absolutely nothing to do with the attack on the World Trade Center, it was planned and executed by terrorists from Afghanistan (White). Bush even admitted on CNN during a news coverage in August of 2006 that “Iraq had nothing to do with 9/11”(Bush). In the same news coverage, Bush also stated the main reasons of invading Iraq was because they “had a lot of resentment” towards our country, had built up “hatred”, and possibly had weapons of mass destruction. Yet, after five years he finally admitted that Iraq never possessed weapons of such kind. Overall, America wasted large amounts of time and money on foreign soil, put America though turmoil at home because of attempts to fix countries half way across the world, and disunified the nation over continuous heated debates over both wars.
Our unwarranted involvement in Vietnam and Iraq was not only unjustified but it was not our government’s vexation to bear. By entering both countries, a large part of our nation’s population became divided due to the differences in opinions and objectives for each war. Vietnam was already waging war before America embarked, and yet America willingly went to war over the fear of communism, while ignoring the future of our country and how our own society and economy would end up. Likewise to the Vietnam War, America invaded Iraq on its own whim, however this time on the basis of ending terrorism. The United States is so respected because it is democratic and we make decisions as a people, instead of being controlled by one individual. However, both decisions to go to war were unjustified and radical; involvement in Vietnam had no outcome that could possibly better our country and Iraq War being fought today still causes damages to our country. The government also ignoring the fact that our supposed objective was to help the country they invaded yet in both instances they come out with no beneficial outcome. Not only were American citizens upset with entering both countries, the opposing countries also saw it as invasive. Many organizations against the wars were formed which divided the nation even more and eventually convinced many people that the decision to enter both wars were corrupt.
Out of both the Vietnam and Iraq wars, the only thing America gained was a bad economy. Not only returning from the wars but during each war the country’s economy struggled; deficit spending by the United States government lead to an increasing number of national debt and the devaluation of the U.S. dollar because of the need for war materials (White). It is evident that perfection in a government proves to be naïve, however if the government keeps ignoring essential aspects that can completely alter the economy, America would become completely disfunctional, which is exactly what we were after both wars. America is still recovering trillions of dollars of debt on a decision to better Vietnam and Iraq, even though a welcoming was not given by one of those countries.
Not only was the economy suffering, the people in America had to deal with casualties in families and widespread debt. Both wars cost vast amounts of money and lives that affected families nation wide. In the Iraq War 4,001 U.S. troops have so far been killed and 29,320 have been seriously wounded (White) contrasting with the Vietnam War that lost 58,000 U.S. troops were killed and 304,000 seriously wounded (Vietnam). However bad those numbers may seem, looking at the U.S. government’s spending in Iraq and Vietnam will make you cringe. For the Vietnam War the American government spent in total $150 billion (White) however for the Iraq War, they spent over $600 billion of U.S. tax payers funds, and President Bush has requested another $200 billion for 2008, which would bring the cumulative to a grand total of $800 billion, the average monthly spending in Iraq coming out to about $12 billion (White). The Vietnam War suffered in casualties opposed to debt in the Iraq War but both wars had and still have an extreme pull on the economy and left many in a struggle financially. As for all the veterans that survived the Vietnam War, they were left distraught with severe trauma that many could not get past. Some problems include; anxiety, depression, panic, rage, irritability, shame, guilt, and many more (Vietnam). These veterans suffered from post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) that left families, friends, and even doctors at a loss of how to cope with these men. More than two in three Vietnam veterans suffered from full or partial PTSD upon returning from Vietnam (Vietnam). Post traumatic stress disorder affected many soldiers in the Iraq War also, and are still occurring among many of the men still stationed there. Surveyor Dr. Matthew J. Friedman, executive director of the Department of Veterans Affairs’ National Center for PTSD, pulled a survey that showed one in eight Iraq War veterans have symptoms of PTSD, yet later stated that these estimates are conservative and it may be too early to determine the extent of mental problems (Returning).
Many argue that the Vietnam War was necessary to stop the spread of communism and the Iraq War was necessary to stop the spread of terrorism and restore their economy. It has been argued even further to say it was time well worth spending in Iraq and Vietnam. When analyzing these points one must understand that at that point in time America was deathly scared of communism and instilled an idea in their heads that if not for entering the war at that moment, then communism would make its way around to other countries and finally reach America. However, our government made the fatal mistake of failing to look in the long run and see that America was already a strong nation and by entering a war that would not certainly end communism the government weakened every aspect of the economy. In accordance, Iraq was completely uninvolved in the terrorist attack on 9/11, the accusation of concealing “weapons of mass destruction” was completely false, and having now realized that the only weapons they did have were from a purchase from the United States to them several years before.
America did not reach its overall goal in Vietnam or Iraq, however the government spent billions of dollars, lost thousands of young men and women lives, divided citizens in the home land, and put the economy through wide spread turmoil. What beneficial factor did we gain out of going to these wars? Sadly, there is no legitimate answer to that question. The Vietnam and Iraq Wars were fought with the intentions of bettering the invaded country, however we have yet to come out with a substantially improved state. Altogether, the American government’s unjustified and invasive behavior lead to an annihilative economy and distressed citizens. Hopefully one day our government will understand that we must fix home-land issues rather than wage war in foreign countries and will someday come to terms that they must engage a different approach in our foreign policy matters.


Bush, George W. Address. CNN. Presidential News Conference. The White House, Washington D.C. 23 Aug. 2006. 20 Mar. 2008 .
Frankum, Ronald. Vietnam War for Dummies. Wiley Inc, 2008.
“The Vietnam War- America’s Longest War.” Vietnam War. 2007. 13 Mar. 2008 .
White, Deborah. “Iraq War Results and Statistics.” About.Com. 9 Mar. 2008. 13 Mar. 2008 .

“1 in 8 Returning Soldiers Suffer From PTSD.” MSNBC. 2008. 20 Mar. 2008 .

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Allegory Of American Pie By Don Mc Lean

Ask anyone what was the defining moment in the rock history of the 1960s was and all you will get is a one word answer: Woodstock. The three day rock festival that defined an era was only one of many music festivals of the '60s. But Woodstock has come to symbolize, "an era of peaceful, free- loving, drug- taking hippie youth, carefree before harsher realities hit..." (Layman 40). The Woodstock festival ended a century filled with many metamorphoses of rock'n'roll, from the era of pop music to the rebirth of folk music to the invention of acid rock. But some cynics say that rock'n'roll died with the death of Buddy Holly before the 60s even began. One such person is Don McLean. The poet behind the haunting epic song about the death of 'danceable' music, McLean wrote the ever popular song, "American Pie" (appendix 1). The most important song in rock'n'roll history, "American Pie", is the song about the demise of rock'n'roll after Buddy Holly's death and the heathenism of rock that resulted. Although McLean himself won't reveal any symbolism in his songs, "American Pie" is one of the most analyzed pieces of literature in modern society. Although not all of its secrets have been revealed, many "scholars" of the sixties will agree that the mystery of this song is one of the reasons it has become so successful- everyone wants to know the meanings of its allegories. Proof of "American Pie's" truth lies in the allegory of the song. Many People enjoy the song but have no idea what it means- Who is the Jester? What is the levee? When the deeper story is found, the importance of the song is unearthed. "American Pie" is not only a song, it is an epic poem about the course of rock'n'roll...

Carl Orffs Philosophies In Music Education

While Carl Orff is a very seminal composer of the 20th century, his greatest success and influence has been in the field of Music Education. Born on July 10th in Munich, Germany in 1895, Orff refused to speak about his past almost as if he were ashamed of it. What we do know, however, is that Orff came from a Bavarian family who was very active in the German military. His father's regiment band would often play through some of the young Orff's first attempts at composing. Although Orff was adamant about the secrecy of his past, Moser's Musik Lexicon says that he studied in the Munich Academy of Music until 1914. Orff then served in the military in the first world war. After the war, he held various positions in the Mannheim and Darmstadt opera houses then returned home to Munich to further study music. In 1925, and for the rest of his life, Orff was the head of a department and co-founder of the Guenther School for gymnastics, music, and dance in Munich where he worked with musical beginners. This is where he developed his Music Education theories. In 1937, Orff's Carmina Burana premiered in Frankfurt, Germany. Needless to say, it was a great success. With the success of Carmina Burana, Orff orphaned all of his previous works except for Catulli Carmina and the En trata which were rewritten to be acceptable by Orff. One of Orff's most admired composers was Monteverdi. In fact, much of Orff's work was based on ancient material. Orff said: I am often asked why I nearly always select old material, fairy tales and legends for my stage works. I do not look upon them as old, but rather as valid material. The time element disappears, and only the spiritual power remains. My...

Johann Sebastian Bach Biography

Throughout the history of music, many great composers, theorists, and instrumentalists have left indelible marks and influences that people today look back on to admire and aspire to. No exception to this idiom is Johann Sebastian Bach, whose impact on music was unforgettable to say the least. People today look back to his writings and works to both learn and admire. He truly can be considered a music history great. Bach, who came from a family of over 53 musicians, was nothing short of a virtuosic instrumentalist as well as a masterful composer. Born in Eisenach, Germany, on March 21, 1685, he was the son of a masterful violinist, Johann Ambrosius Bach, who taught his son the basic skills for string playing. Along with this string playing, Bach began to play the organ which is the instrument he would later on be noted for in history. His instruction on the organ came from the player at Eisenach's most important church. He instructed the young boy rather rigorously until his skills surpassed anyone?s expectations for someone of such a young age. Bach suffered early trauma when his parents died in 1695. He went to go live with his older brother, Johann Christoph, who also was a professional organist at Ohrdruf. He continued his younger brother's education on that instrument, as well as introducing him to the harpsichord. The rigorous training on these instruments combined with Bach?s masterful skill paid off for him at an early age. After several years of studying with his older brother, he received a scholarship to study in Luneberg, Germany, which is located on the northern tip of the country. As a result, he left his brother?s tutelage and went to go and study there. The teenage years brought Bach to several parts of Germany where he...


Michelangelo was pessimistic in his poetry and an optimist in his artwork. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo?s poetry was pessimistic in his response to Strazzi even though he was complementing him. Michelangelo?s sculpture brought out his optimism. Michelangelo was optimistic in completing The Tomb of Pope Julius II and persevered through it?s many revisions trying to complete his vision. Sculpture was Michelangelo?s main goal and the love of his life. Since his art portrayed both optimism and pessimism, Michelangelo was in touch with his positive and negative sides, showing that he had a great and stable personality. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo Buonarroti was called to Rome in 1505 by Pope Julius II to create for him a monumental tomb. We have no clear sense of what the tomb was to look like, since over the years it went through at least five conceptual revisions. The tomb was to have three levels; the bottom level was to have sculpted figures representing Victory and bond slaves. The second level was to have statues of Moses and Saint Paul as well as symbolic figures of the active and contemplative life- representative of the human striving for, and reception of, knowledge. The third level, it is assumed, was to have an effigy of the deceased pope. The tomb of Pope Julius II was never finished. What was finished of the tomb represents a twenty-year span of frustrating delays and revised schemes. Michelangelo had hardly begun work on the pope?s tomb when Julius commanded him to fresco the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to complete the work done in the previous century under Sixtus IV. The overall organization consists of four large triangles at...

Oscar Wilde

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde was born in Dublin Ireland on October 16, 1854. He is one of the most talented and most controversial writers of his time. He was well known for his wit, flamboyance, and creative genius and with his little dramatic training showing his natural talent for stage and theatre. He is termed a martyr by some and may be the first true self-publicist and was known for his style of dress and odd behavior. Wilde, 1882 His Father, William Wilde, was a highly accredited doctor and his mother, Jane Francesca Elgee, was a writer of revolutionary poems. Oscar had a brother William Charles Kingsbury along with his father's three illegitimate children, Henry, Emily, and Mary. His sister, Isola Emily Francesca died in 1867 at only ten years of age from a sudden fever, greatly affecting Oscar and his family. He kept a lock of her hair in an envelope and later wrote the poem 'Requiescat' in her memory. Oscar and his brother William both attended the Protora Royal School at Enniskillen. He had little in common with the other children. He disliked games and took more interest in flowers and sunsets. He was extremely passionate about anything that had to do with ancient Greece and with Classics. Wilde during school years In 1871, he was awarded a Royal School Scholarship to Trinity College in Dublin and received many awards and earned the highest honor the college offered to an undergraduate, the Foundation Scholarship. In 1874, he also won the College's Berkley Gold Medal for Greek and was awarded a Demyship to Magdalen College, Oxford. After graduating from Oxford, Oscar moved to London with his friend Frank Miles, a well-known portrait painter of the time. In 1878 his poem Ravenna was published, for which he won the...

The History Of Greek Theater

Theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century BCE, with the Sopocles, the great writer of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, heroes and the ideals of life were depicted and glorified. It was believed that man should live for honor and fame, his action was courageous and glorious and his life would climax in a great and noble death. Originally, the hero's recognition was created by selfish behaviors and little thought of service to others. As the Greeks grew toward city-states and colonization, it became the destiny and ambition of the hero to gain honor by serving his city. The second major characteristic of the early Greek world was the supernatural. The two worlds were not separate, as the gods lived in the same world as the men, and they interfered in the men's lives as they chose to. It was the gods who sent suffering and evil to men. In the plays of Sophocles, the gods brought about the hero's downfall because of a tragic flaw in the character of the hero. In Greek tragedy, suffering brought knowledge of worldly matters and of the individual. Aristotle attempted to explain how an audience could observe tragic events and still have a pleasurable experience. Aristotle, by searching the works of writers of Greek tragedy, Aeschulus, Euripides and Sophocles (whose Oedipus Rex he considered the finest of all Greek tragedies), arrived at his definition of tragedy. This explanation has a profound influence for more than twenty centuries on those writing tragedies, most significantly Shakespeare. Aristotle's analysis of tragedy began with a description of the effect such a work had on the audience as a "catharsis" or purging of the emotions. He decided that catharsis was the purging of two specific emotions, pity and...

Scholarship Essay About Goals

Ever since I was a young kid I have always been interested with aircraft. I was so curious of how airplane's fly. I remember taking my toys apart to see how it works. As a kid I wanted to go to the airport to watch the airplanes land and fly and pondered how this happens. Other kids wanted to go to the amusement places. As I grew older I became more and more interested in aircraft and the technology behind it. I always involved myself with aviation early on. I read books and magazines on aviation, took museum tours, built model airplanes. When I was younger my father would take me to aircraft repair facilities where I would watch in great fascination. In my teens, went up to the military bases and befriended many soldiers involved with aircraft and asked them numerous questions. I got to meet many aeronautics engineers and borrowed their old textbooks and read them till the wee hours of the morning. As technology improved with information superhighway, I logged on the web. Stayed up for hours and hours searching through web pages and web pages of information about aircraft and technology. I started my elementary school in the Philippines, then we moved to U.S. and continued my high school education and graduated. Enrolled at the CCSF to pursue my college education and now I am in the 2nd year in CCSF taking aeronautics. My goal now is to obtain my AS degree from the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) so I can transfer to a University and get a Bachelors degree and to continue for my Masters degree in Aeronautics Engineering. I will strive hard to reach the peak level of my career which is a Professor and hopefully to be an aeronautic professor so...

Circus Circus Enterprises Case Studies

Executive Summary: Circus Circus Enterprises is a leader and will continue to be in the gaming industry. In recent years, they have seen a decline in profit and revenue; management tends to blame the decrease on continuing disruptions from remodeling, expansion, and increased competition. Consequently, Circus has reported decreases in its net income for 1997 and 1998 and management believes this trend will continue as competition heightens. Currently the company is involved in several joint ventures, its brand of casino entertainment has traditionally catered to the low rollers and family vacationers through its theme park. Circus should continue to expand its existing operations into new market segments. This shift will allow them to attract the up scale gambler. Overview Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc founded in 1974 is in the business of entertainment, with its core strength in casino gambling. The company?s asset base, operating cash flow, profit margin, multiple markets and customers, rank it as one of the gaming industry leaders. Partners William G. Bennett an aggressive cost cutter and William N. Pennington purchased Circus Circus in 1974 as a small and unprofitable casino. It went public in 1983, from 1993 to 1997; the average return on capital invested was 16.5%. Circus Circus operates several properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Laughlin, and one in Mississippi, as well as 50% ownership in three other casinos and a theme park. On January 31,1998 Circus reported net income of 89.9 million and revenues of 1.35 billion, this is a down from 100 million on 1.3 billion in 1997. Management sees this decline in revenue due to the rapid and extensive expansion and the increased competition that Circus is facing. Well established in the casino gaming industry the corporation has its focus in the entertainment business and has particularly a popular theme resort concept....

Effect Of Civil War On American Economy

The Economies of the North and South, 1861-1865 In 1861, a great war in American history began. It was a civil war between the north and south that was by no means civil. This war would have great repercussions upon the economy of this country and the states within it. The American Civil War began with secession, creating a divided union of sorts, and sparked an incredibly cataclysmic four years. Although the actual war began with secession, this was not the only driving force. The economy of the Southern states, the Confederacy, greatly if not entirely depended on the institution of slavery. The Confederacy was heavily reliant on agriculture, and they used the profits made from the sale of such raw materials to purchase finished goods to use and enjoy. Their major export was cotton, which thrived on the warm river deltas and could easily be shipped to major ocean ports from towns on the Mississippi and numerous river cities. Slavery was a key part of this, as slaves were the ones who harvested and planted the cotton. Being such an enormous unpaid work force, the profits made were extraordinarily high and the price for the unfinished goods drastically low in comparison; especially since he invention of the cotton gin in 1793 which made the work all that much easier and quicker. In contrast, the economical structure of the Northern states, the Union, was vastly dependent on industry. Slavery did not exist in most of the Union, as there was no demand for it due to the type of industrial development taking place. As the Union had a paid work force, the profits made were lower and the cost of the finished manufactured item higher. In turn, the Union used the profits and purchased raw materials to use. This cycle...

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Trade Embargoes

Although I am a strong critic of the use and effectiveness of economic sanctions, such as trade embargoes, for the sake of this assignment, I will present both their theoretical advantages and their disadvantages based upon my research. Trade embargoes and blockades have traditionally been used to entice nations to alter their behavior or to punish them for certain behavior. The intentions behind these policies are generally noble, at least on the surface. However, these policies can have side effects. For example, FDR's blockade of raw materials against the Japanese in Manchuria in the 1930s arguably led to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which resulted in U.S. involvement in World War II. The decades-long embargo against Cuba not only did not lead to the topple of the communist regime there, but may have strengthened Castro's hold on the island and has created animosity toward the United States in Latin America and much suffering by the people of Cuba. Various studies have concluded that embargoes and other economic sanctions generally have not been effective from a utilitarian or policy perspective, yet these policies continue. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Trade Embargoes Strengths Trade embargoes and other sanctions can give the sender government the appearance of taking strong measures in response to a given situation without resorting to violence. Sanctions can be imposed in conjunction with other measures to achieve conflict prevention and mitigation goals. Sanctions may be ineffective: goals may be too elusive, the means too gentle, or cooperation from other countries insufficient. It is usually difficult to determine whether embargoes were an effective deterrent against future misdeeds: embargoes may contribute to a successful outcome, but can rarely achieve ambitious objectives alone. Some regimes are highly resistant to external pressures to reform. At the same time, trade sanctions may narrow the...