Juno And The Paycock Ireland In The Twentieth Century

Word Count: 4216 |

Seán O’Casey, the playwright, penned ‘Juno and the Paycock’ to provide an audience with an insight of what life was really like in this era in Ireland; it was a time when political extremism and a repression of the working class were at an all time high which he portrays through the struggles of the Boyle family. O’Casey’s own views on politics, family life and other problems affecting Ireland are also particularly evident throughout the play. He manipulates characters to show us the cultural, social and historical contexts of the play, therefore causing his contemporary audience and us, as present day viewers, to question motives and rethink our involvement with Ireland’s struggles. This is attained by contrasting narrow-minded, indoctrinated philosophies with a considerate sense of shared humanity, represented by a minority of characters, thus in turn showing that Ireland is in a dire state.
The storylines in ‘Juno and the Paycock’ were fuelled by O’Casey’s biographical details, born in Dublin in 1880 into a life of poverty and tenement living, we can see where the basis of the play stemmed. O’Casey has achieved an added sense of empathy from his audience when they realise that he in fact has lived the same lifestyle as the Boyle’s, and is showing a true reflection on what he feels of his childhood and his upbringing in this miserable reality of Twentieth Century Ireland. Residing in primarily Catholic Dublin at this time, would have been exceptionally difficult for O’Casey’s Protestant family; this religious segregation left him feeling a rather lonesome figure as political fanaticism had alienated the two ‘sides’ as seen professed in the play. Although O’Casey, in his later life, abandoned religion he has stressed its importance in the play to show how much influence the Church really had on the lives of Irish families as it has a significant effect on each character. O’Casey’s own mother was a huge influence in his life; with her caring and protective attitude towards her family we see that she is the origin of such constructs as Juno and Mrs. Tancred; seeing her and these characters as being strong-minded, independent, considerate women.
The playwright was involved in his earlier years with numerous organisations, none of which he viewed as reaching his prospects of what they should be. He was a member of the Irish Republican Brotherhood after falling out with the Gaelic League he was previously involved with for what he termed as ‘class reasons.’ However, O’Casey’s fiery Republicanism was not destined to last; he quickly lost his violent Nationalist enthusiasm due to the fact leaders such as Patrick Pearse whom thought a ‘blood sacrifice’ was needed in order to redeem Ireland; it was this bloody philosophy that made O’Casey see the error of his ways. He later joined the Citizen Army, though when the leaders began to formulate plans to liberate Ireland from British rule with the Nationalists O’Casey saw this as a betrayal of the workers and thus the Citizen Army too became involved with Nationalism. It is because of his involvement with these political organisations that O’Casey acquired his strong beliefs which are depicted in the speech, thoughts and actions of characters throughout the play.
O’Casey wrote ‘Juno and the Paycock’ during the Irish Civil War and the characters in the play are conventional constructs of the era. The Boyle family shows O’Casey’s personal scrutiny of Ireland and therefore the family as a whole is a microcosm of Ireland with each character portraying a different perception of the dramatist. The playwright depicts the struggles of the Irish nation through this family unit. We are never allowed to venture outside of the Boyle’s tenement home though we clearly see the different sectors of the Irish culture through the characters within this tenement building. We see how other nations don’t take notice of Ireland’s struggles through the fact that other people do not attempt to help the Boyle family, we notice that even Ireland’s ‘neighbour’ Britain leaves them to deal with their own problems as we can also gather from Bentham’s desertion of Mary in Act III – “The boyo that’s afther doin’ it to Mary done it to me as well,’ this phrase shows how the government of Britain and Ireland has abandoned every aspect of the Irish nation . This embodies the social and cultural differences between the two states, as the British saw the Irish people as barbaric savages.
From the very beginning of the play we see the dreadful circumstances that this family live in when the Boyle household is described; in the simple ‘two-roomed tenancy’ there is a range of mix-matched furniture, cheap ‘cretonne’ wall hangings, a traditional ‘galvanised bath,’ ‘a table and some chairs’ and ‘a dresser’ at the back. All these items and others noted are basic necessities and apart from ‘a few books’ there is little worth describing as luxuries. The books represent a passionate yearning on behalf of Mary to show how she would wish she were not in the situation in which she has been placed. This longing is later quashed in the play as we realise she is never going to achieve her dreams through Jack Boyle’s total ignorance in regards to the books Mary has read. ‘Buks only fit for chiselurs’ he incorrectly retorts to Joxer as they are serious social plays; though this is yet another instance where ‘Captain Boyle’ is attempting to show his intelligence, but we see he is actually professing his lack of knowledge.
Furthermore, another conspicuous feature positioned within their home is ‘the picture of the Virgin’ with the ‘votive light’ below which shows how the theme of religion is referred to in everyday life. We see the votive light as a sign of the family looking to Catholicism for protection, for so long as the light remains lit the shield of the Virgin Mary is evidently present, we see in Act III when it ‘gleams more redly than ever.’ This brighter light signifies the need for protection for all the family at the climactic point in the play. We are prepared from this description to see if the ritualistic religion they have been following has provided the protection needed for the entire Boyle family; as we see this is not the case as Johnny has not been saved by his religion, but rather become a martyr for it.
Contrastingly, in Act II the furnishings of the house have appeared to have changed dramatically as the Boyle’s equip their tenancy with new, more urbane fixtures which appears to make them of a higher social standing, though the irony in this statement is that with their attempts at sophistication they have actually made their tenement rooms look more ‘cheap’ and ‘vulgar’ than ever. This shows the truth of working-class life; once the stigma of poverty is there it cannot easily be erased even with the promise of money, because as O’Casey shows, no amount of money or possessions will ever expunge those years of scarcity and deprivation these characters (and Ireland as a whole) had to withstand. By trying to improve the outward appearance of their home the family is attempting to show that they are fit to be amongst people of a higher social class and that they want to raise themselves from the poverty they have unjustly become accustomed to. O’Casey presents this period of hope and dreaming as a rather ‘artificial’ time of the play, their hope is a façade they hide behind instead of succumbing to the reality of poverty.
Furthermore, as these constructs are taken to represent key movements at the time of writing, it could be said that they are insincere, that the rhetoric they base their entire beliefs on is luring them into a false sense of hope. Even in this period of relief in the novel, Juno still voices aspects of practicality as she says ‘I’m afraid we’re runnin’ into too much debt,’ we see that although there is the promise of money and she has momentarily believed that they would escape their destined life of poverty, Juno’s character still has maintained her motherly caution that she has had to adopt for her family. Through the deterioration of this hope-filled period we see that O’Casey is showing the despondency of even attempting to evade the bleak reality of poverty in 1920’s Ireland.
Poverty is a key theme in the play and it is represented through each of the characters in the play, in particular those within the Boyle family. Juno is badly affected by poverty as we can clearly see from the use of stage directions. The stage directions in Act I clearly show her as having the look of all the ‘women of the working-class’ as they all have a look of a ‘listless monotony’ which is expanded by saying that ‘were circumstances were favourable, she would probably be a handsome, active and clever woman,’ We are told by this that like other characters Juno is being held back by her social situation, were the conditions more in her favour her potential would not have been wasted, much like the poor women affected by the political situation in all of Ireland and even the country itself. Like other women of this period, Juno is shown as being the firm but fair figure in the household. In her matriarchal role we see her being the provider of the income and the person the others turn to when all goes wrong. If we consider Juno as a symbol of destitute Ireland we see that the country is being held back by the citizen’s within it; as they make no attempt to release themselves from their impoverished situation such as Jack Boyle. Even the characters that do try and achieve this for instance Mary, seem to be unsuccessful and we see that every attempt to escape leads to further devastation.
Additionally, we see that Mary is a character that has been deeply distressed by this insolvency. Mary is another female character whom is seen to be continually held back due to her setting within her tenement building and her underprivileged family. This particular construct is exposed in Act I as being a strong-minded, vain woman as we see her ‘lying on the back of a chair’ gazing into a mirror’; from this stance we see that her confidence radiates throughout the room showing a stark contrast to her reclusive brother. Her speech and mannerisms are tarnished by her surroundings. Mary is used to represent a new generation’s way philosophies rather than the dogmatic principles of the previous. Throughout the play Mary attempts to raise herself from the poverty she has been thrust into, as we can see from her involvement with Charles Bentham. She feels that Bentham will be her saviour from the same fortune as her mother and many women alike. This struggle only seems to unleash more problems for Mary and her mother to face, as she is abandoned by her lover and then is told she is pregnant. The playwright is emphasizing the theory that it senseless in trying to breakout of the setting as it will only cause worse problems than before; shown by Mary and Juno in the play. Mary tries for herself to beat poverty and loses, as other women have done and as Juno is an illustration of Ireland we see that how, after all this fighting over poverty, politics and oppression, Ireland will be left in a worse state of devastation since The Potato Famine of 1845.
In Act I we find out that Mary is a member of the Trade Union. By making note of her being on strike in aid of a person she doesn’t like, O’Casey remarks on how easy it was at the time to follow trends and to trust others opinions on matters that would affect their lives. Mary seems to be easily led; she puts a lot of trust into people as we can see with Bentham and Jerry. She relies on Jerry to inform her of the truth of how to get out of poverty but he too have been conned into believing that Labour will help them into realising their dreams. But in fact it is her involvement with this movement that seems to make her want to reach higher than O’Casey, as a playwright, is prepared to let her go. This also suggests that the principles of the whole organization are meaningless as the participants do not fully comprehend the motives of the group. Mary’s character presents us with a positive view of the future; we can tell she is an optimist though this idealism proves to be her downfall. Mary seems to stand by her word and her statement “a principle’s a principle” is repeated throughout the play, we see this statement as being empty, just like the jargon of the Labour Movement. With her previous actions and descriptions, it would lead us to believe that Mary is not in love with Bentham at all and that she is essentially using him for his money and as a chance for her to climb the social ladder and though she claims to love him with all “her heart and soul” O’Casey shows us that there is a possibility of this being untrue due to the aforementioned reasons. This suggests that the hope of rising out of poverty isn’t worth it because all they acquired was pain and heartache. Possibly O’Casey is trying to portray that the middle-class exploit the poorer citizens for their own use because they are effortlessly influenced, as a result of their enthusiasm to get out of their situation and into the middle-class environment.
Although Juno presents a sense of realism in light of the news of impending money, it is Jack Boyle that I feel presents the signs of realistic views when Juno has yielded to the excitement of all the fuss. Jack accepts what he has got and knows that he will not get anywhere by trying to get out of his current situation so he gives up trying, he has his suspicions about Bentham which are proven to be true. However, we see that as Boyle has given up all sense of hope of ever recovering from this penury so he lives in the ‘past’ he has created for himself as we see by him telling that he was a sailor, member of the Volunteers, a poet, a martyr, a philosopher, a scholar and seeing himself as the epitome of the perfect husband in his previous years – “If you leave me out a needle an’ thread I’ll sew it on meself” – here we see him acting as the ideal spouse he makes out to be. These are all invented to make him sound interesting as a ‘person’ but we see that he is a poseur; really they are a form of escapism for him. Instead of facing the reality as Juno has done, he has covered it up with lie upon lie about himself. It is through this that we see his dependency on Juno, even though this is a man who in his day “held the dying Commandant Kelly in his arms” depends on Juno to look after him. Boyle is the “Paycock” of the play’s title, this nickname in itself which Juno has called him more than once in the play tells us more about the character of Jack Boyle. The Juno of Roman mythology had a peacock that followed her. The markings on its feathers were said to be the ‘all-seeing’ eyes, which is ironic due to the fact that Boyle is himself trying to escape reality, therefore making him theoretically blind to the happenings of the world around.
In spite of the moments in which there is gentle reprieve in the play, there are constant reminders in which we see the Boyle’s insolvent situation being shown to be evident by other minor characters such as the Coal Vendor yelling “D’yez want any blocks?” which they must refuse. They have to buy goods ‘on tick’ and thus we are constantly reminded of how difficult it seems for them to escape their current financial woes.
Poverty might be at fault for the breakdown of the family unit, but it also creates few positives moments to show that not everything associated with poverty is bad. As we have seen, being poor makes people more determined, and though the characters of this particular family construct do not achieve what they set out to get, others do. For example; Mrs Madigan, the Boyle’s neighbour, unaffected by events surrounding her, glides in with a “beaming smile and a nodding head.” Maisie Madigan has proven that even though she is poor, she has made the best of a bad situation. Just as Juno has, she is able to overcome the hardships of her life however difficult it may be and care for her family like any mother should.
Political fanaticism plays a vital role in the lives of the Boyle family. The character of Juno is the most obvious hit one as we see he lives in constant fear of who comes knocking at the door, as he bides time awaiting his imminent destiny with a ‘tremulous look of indefinite fear in his eyes.’. Johnny is physically and emotionally maimed, he had already lost an arm in Ireland’s fight for independence and now we see him amid fears that he will be killed in a reprisal. Johnny is, however, the most direct link we have to the fighting on the streets outside. Through Johnny, O’Casey is trying to convey the blind fanaticism of those that hold that ‘no man can do enough for Ireland!’ He uses Johnny as an illustration of the sinful waste of useful energy and fervour spent on the cause of Irish sovereignty, as well as calling into question the entire concepts of heroism.
We see that O’Casey is not taking sides in this play as he condemns violence from every side. There are many different views presented with the main one being that the act of killing is a senseless, inane act that must be stopped. The deaths of Johnny and Bobby Tancred (Die-hards) are not overvalued or glorified in any way. With the death of Mrs. Manning’s son we see how O’Casey presents his opinion of neutrality to us as her son is a Free-State soldier. Though these men are all fighting for different ‘sides’ it is their unity as sons we see as being significant; they are not described to us as men they are described as sons of the women of Ireland. Each man represents a particular division of the men of Ireland, and each mother embodies the grieving mothers of those men who have all been so mercilessly mutilated for their country, the pity for these mourning mothers creates a sense of pathos in the play.
We are shown how the soldiers have been moulded into being so cold-hearted, callous beings; the cruelty of these men to one another was a theory thought by many authors of the time; W. B. Yeats for example wrote in his poem ‘Easter 1916’ ‘Too long a sacrifice can make a stone of the heart; we see this by the characterisation of the Young Man and The Irregulars. They have a lust for blood, as Parnell wanted with his sacrifice and will stop at nothing to achieve this. These men’s hearts have been hardened by leading this life and thus they exhibit no mercy to any of their victims. This creates an ominous tone to this part of the drama.
Seán O’Casey shows us that many people were affected by the fighting of the time. Johnny is a young man; full of life that has been left crippled by his involvement with the Die-hards, the dramatic imagery of Johnny on stage creating a visual impact upon the audience, revealing cause for an increased sense of sympathy and possibly even guilt. The fighting also affects Juno; as a mother and representing Ireland. As Johnny has the view that ‘Ireland only half free’ll never be at peace while she has a son left to pull the trigger,’ confirming a much adopted view of the time. Juno is involved in the fighting as she is left to deal with her son’s death, whereas Boyle just shrugs it off as yet another patriotic death, ‘them things, don’t affect us,’ this is another excuse for Boyle to hide himself away as he uses escapism once again to make us believe that he is not bothered about his son’s death. O’Casey shows us that the ideals of people in all these movements are ridiculed by these deaths, as each death brings them further and further away from them realising their dreams.
Bentham shows a classic reaction fro the English at the time; they disagreed with the barbaric guerrilla warfare that is being fought. He has no compassion of people; when Mrs. Tancred is in mourning over the death of her son Bentham calmly retorts ‘the only way to deal with a mad dog is to destroy him.’ in this one sentence, he tranquilly dismisses all the reasons that the Irish people have for fighting, we see that he has no compassion for the dead, or the living for that matter. This would have been the stereotypical reaction of many middle-class English citizens at the time. Bentham played a major part in the dissolution of the Boyle family and if we once again consider the family as a microcosm we surmise that O’Casey is portraying that England played a major part in the disintegration of Ireland. In a way O’Casey is showing his views through Bentham, though he isn’t quite as harsh as he does have sympathy for the victims and their families but does not agree with warfare. The Anglo-Irish Treaty could have played a part in this conflict of interests as O’Casey feels that against the loss of sons and the division of families, can the cause of Nationalism ever be justified. And all of this in O’Casey’s words ‘over a few words included within the Treaty.’
Religion is another key theme within this play; it is shown to be a vital aspect in many people’s lives in Twentieth Century Dublin. Johnny considers himself a Christian, yet his incessant jingoism which leads him to kill is not a trait of a Christian. He is a hypocrite, he tells that Mary has brought ‘disgrace’ on the family for getting pregnant yet he caused a man to be savagely murdered. This also shows what the rest of the population thought of a child out of wedlock; even Juno for a time admits that Mary is a ‘stupid girl’ for getting herself into this situation, thought she returns to her humanitarian ways after realising that there is nothing she can do and she must support her daughter. Before Johnny leaves the house to accept his fate he pleads ‘Sacred Heart of Jesus, have mercy on me,’ and as Johnny is being drawn to his death we hear the Hail Mary being said; we see his dependence on religion, his Catholicism brings his peace in his final hours, and we see his reliance on the protection of ‘The Virgin’ and the ‘votive light’ throughout the play.
Dissimilar to Johnny, Boyle has a very low opinion on matters associated with the church; he feels that the Church does nothing for him, so why should he do anything for it. Though when he has been promised money he prohibits Joxer to speak ill of Father Farrell in his presence, just like when Mary falls pregnant he seems to turn to religion for help. This could possibly to be to withhold his ‘reputation’ as he does care what people around him think, and the people surrounding Boyle care deeply about what the Lord feels about them. The women of the play I have noticed place much of their hopes in religion though just like the men’s empty principles they do not have any guarantees of salvation; both types of people are dominated by ethics of so-called ‘cults’ of the day.
The Labour movement is shown continually to have hollow principles with no real meaning to them. They are just learned off phrases which seem to fit with O’Casey’s view of the Labour movement. This movement is personified by Jerry Devine. He is a representative for the whole of the Labour party in the play and with his empty phrases has gotten Mary to fall for Labour’s hopes and ideals for the future. His lack of kindness to Mary at the end of the play is strongly evident as he almost disowns her for falling pregnant, even though just a while before he promised he would do anything to keep her. This shows how, as with the Labour Movement, Jerry has fulfilled his promises and then when it comes to the final moment where everyone can finally get the peace they wanted and to fulfil their dreams, they are shattered by the organisation. Mary – representing Ireland – shows how this ‘globe of beauty’ was an ‘ugly thing’ as well; we are shown that Ireland has been ruined with the people hoping and dreaming of the future and thinking things will automatically get better if they let the fighting run its course.
From the start the play has an ominous foreshadowing tone thrust upon it when the reference of Bobby Tancred is announced. Johnny gets agitated and we see this throughout the play and do not know why until later. We see through Boyle’s words what affect the deaths of soldiers has on the people when he utters that its ‘man’s inhumanity to man, makes countless thousands mourn’ from this we see the sheer enormity of the ‘state o’ chassis’ that Ireland is in. The form in this tragi-comedy results in the tragedy being heightened as we see that O’Casey lets some characters use jokes to make light of a bad situation, but once the Boyle ‘s troubles get worse there is no room for laughter.
‘Juno and the Paycock’ is a play that has a huge effect on modern viewers and particularly to an audience in this period. To see their situation shown by an ‘outsider’ to be as violent and corrupt as it is portrayed must have been appalling and almost definitely make them rethink their options and their involvement with such trauma which is what O’Casey intended to achieve. His portrayal of women bearing the bulk of the brunt makes it all the more tragic, as though in this play women are seen to be strong, they do have their weaknesses such as ‘love’ and the promise of money. O’Casey is showing how he feels that people should move on from their idealistic ways and focus more on the real situation in hand. Otherwise, the very country they are fighting to protect will be indefinitely destroyed by their disagreements. Thoughtless homicides will not help the situation to be resolved and thus Boyle is proved for the first time to be right ‘the whole world’s in a state o’ chassis.’

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Allegory Of American Pie By Don Mc Lean

Ask anyone what was the defining moment in the rock history of the 1960s was and all you will get is a one word answer: Woodstock. The three day rock festival that defined an era was only one of many music festivals of the '60s. But Woodstock has come to symbolize, "an era of peaceful, free- loving, drug- taking hippie youth, carefree before harsher realities hit..." (Layman 40). The Woodstock festival ended a century filled with many metamorphoses of rock'n'roll, from the era of pop music to the rebirth of folk music to the invention of acid rock. But some cynics say that rock'n'roll died with the death of Buddy Holly before the 60s even began. One such person is Don McLean. The poet behind the haunting epic song about the death of 'danceable' music, McLean wrote the ever popular song, "American Pie" (appendix 1). The most important song in rock'n'roll history, "American Pie", is the song about the demise of rock'n'roll after Buddy Holly's death and the heathenism of rock that resulted. Although McLean himself won't reveal any symbolism in his songs, "American Pie" is one of the most analyzed pieces of literature in modern society. Although not all of its secrets have been revealed, many "scholars" of the sixties will agree that the mystery of this song is one of the reasons it has become so successful- everyone wants to know the meanings of its allegories. Proof of "American Pie's" truth lies in the allegory of the song. Many People enjoy the song but have no idea what it means- Who is the Jester? What is the levee? When the deeper story is found, the importance of the song is unearthed. "American Pie" is not only a song, it is an epic poem about the course of rock'n'roll...

Carl Orffs Philosophies In Music Education

While Carl Orff is a very seminal composer of the 20th century, his greatest success and influence has been in the field of Music Education. Born on July 10th in Munich, Germany in 1895, Orff refused to speak about his past almost as if he were ashamed of it. What we do know, however, is that Orff came from a Bavarian family who was very active in the German military. His father's regiment band would often play through some of the young Orff's first attempts at composing. Although Orff was adamant about the secrecy of his past, Moser's Musik Lexicon says that he studied in the Munich Academy of Music until 1914. Orff then served in the military in the first world war. After the war, he held various positions in the Mannheim and Darmstadt opera houses then returned home to Munich to further study music. In 1925, and for the rest of his life, Orff was the head of a department and co-founder of the Guenther School for gymnastics, music, and dance in Munich where he worked with musical beginners. This is where he developed his Music Education theories. In 1937, Orff's Carmina Burana premiered in Frankfurt, Germany. Needless to say, it was a great success. With the success of Carmina Burana, Orff orphaned all of his previous works except for Catulli Carmina and the En trata which were rewritten to be acceptable by Orff. One of Orff's most admired composers was Monteverdi. In fact, much of Orff's work was based on ancient material. Orff said: I am often asked why I nearly always select old material, fairy tales and legends for my stage works. I do not look upon them as old, but rather as valid material. The time element disappears, and only the spiritual power remains. My...

Johann Sebastian Bach Biography

Throughout the history of music, many great composers, theorists, and instrumentalists have left indelible marks and influences that people today look back on to admire and aspire to. No exception to this idiom is Johann Sebastian Bach, whose impact on music was unforgettable to say the least. People today look back to his writings and works to both learn and admire. He truly can be considered a music history great. Bach, who came from a family of over 53 musicians, was nothing short of a virtuosic instrumentalist as well as a masterful composer. Born in Eisenach, Germany, on March 21, 1685, he was the son of a masterful violinist, Johann Ambrosius Bach, who taught his son the basic skills for string playing. Along with this string playing, Bach began to play the organ which is the instrument he would later on be noted for in history. His instruction on the organ came from the player at Eisenach's most important church. He instructed the young boy rather rigorously until his skills surpassed anyone?s expectations for someone of such a young age. Bach suffered early trauma when his parents died in 1695. He went to go live with his older brother, Johann Christoph, who also was a professional organist at Ohrdruf. He continued his younger brother's education on that instrument, as well as introducing him to the harpsichord. The rigorous training on these instruments combined with Bach?s masterful skill paid off for him at an early age. After several years of studying with his older brother, he received a scholarship to study in Luneberg, Germany, which is located on the northern tip of the country. As a result, he left his brother?s tutelage and went to go and study there. The teenage years brought Bach to several parts of Germany where he...


Michelangelo was pessimistic in his poetry and an optimist in his artwork. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo?s poetry was pessimistic in his response to Strazzi even though he was complementing him. Michelangelo?s sculpture brought out his optimism. Michelangelo was optimistic in completing The Tomb of Pope Julius II and persevered through it?s many revisions trying to complete his vision. Sculpture was Michelangelo?s main goal and the love of his life. Since his art portrayed both optimism and pessimism, Michelangelo was in touch with his positive and negative sides, showing that he had a great and stable personality. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo Buonarroti was called to Rome in 1505 by Pope Julius II to create for him a monumental tomb. We have no clear sense of what the tomb was to look like, since over the years it went through at least five conceptual revisions. The tomb was to have three levels; the bottom level was to have sculpted figures representing Victory and bond slaves. The second level was to have statues of Moses and Saint Paul as well as symbolic figures of the active and contemplative life- representative of the human striving for, and reception of, knowledge. The third level, it is assumed, was to have an effigy of the deceased pope. The tomb of Pope Julius II was never finished. What was finished of the tomb represents a twenty-year span of frustrating delays and revised schemes. Michelangelo had hardly begun work on the pope?s tomb when Julius commanded him to fresco the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to complete the work done in the previous century under Sixtus IV. The overall organization consists of four large triangles at...

Oscar Wilde

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde was born in Dublin Ireland on October 16, 1854. He is one of the most talented and most controversial writers of his time. He was well known for his wit, flamboyance, and creative genius and with his little dramatic training showing his natural talent for stage and theatre. He is termed a martyr by some and may be the first true self-publicist and was known for his style of dress and odd behavior. Wilde, 1882 His Father, William Wilde, was a highly accredited doctor and his mother, Jane Francesca Elgee, was a writer of revolutionary poems. Oscar had a brother William Charles Kingsbury along with his father's three illegitimate children, Henry, Emily, and Mary. His sister, Isola Emily Francesca died in 1867 at only ten years of age from a sudden fever, greatly affecting Oscar and his family. He kept a lock of her hair in an envelope and later wrote the poem 'Requiescat' in her memory. Oscar and his brother William both attended the Protora Royal School at Enniskillen. He had little in common with the other children. He disliked games and took more interest in flowers and sunsets. He was extremely passionate about anything that had to do with ancient Greece and with Classics. Wilde during school years In 1871, he was awarded a Royal School Scholarship to Trinity College in Dublin and received many awards and earned the highest honor the college offered to an undergraduate, the Foundation Scholarship. In 1874, he also won the College's Berkley Gold Medal for Greek and was awarded a Demyship to Magdalen College, Oxford. After graduating from Oxford, Oscar moved to London with his friend Frank Miles, a well-known portrait painter of the time. In 1878 his poem Ravenna was published, for which he won the...

The History Of Greek Theater

Theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century BCE, with the Sopocles, the great writer of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, heroes and the ideals of life were depicted and glorified. It was believed that man should live for honor and fame, his action was courageous and glorious and his life would climax in a great and noble death. Originally, the hero's recognition was created by selfish behaviors and little thought of service to others. As the Greeks grew toward city-states and colonization, it became the destiny and ambition of the hero to gain honor by serving his city. The second major characteristic of the early Greek world was the supernatural. The two worlds were not separate, as the gods lived in the same world as the men, and they interfered in the men's lives as they chose to. It was the gods who sent suffering and evil to men. In the plays of Sophocles, the gods brought about the hero's downfall because of a tragic flaw in the character of the hero. In Greek tragedy, suffering brought knowledge of worldly matters and of the individual. Aristotle attempted to explain how an audience could observe tragic events and still have a pleasurable experience. Aristotle, by searching the works of writers of Greek tragedy, Aeschulus, Euripides and Sophocles (whose Oedipus Rex he considered the finest of all Greek tragedies), arrived at his definition of tragedy. This explanation has a profound influence for more than twenty centuries on those writing tragedies, most significantly Shakespeare. Aristotle's analysis of tragedy began with a description of the effect such a work had on the audience as a "catharsis" or purging of the emotions. He decided that catharsis was the purging of two specific emotions, pity and...

Scholarship Essay About Goals

Ever since I was a young kid I have always been interested with aircraft. I was so curious of how airplane's fly. I remember taking my toys apart to see how it works. As a kid I wanted to go to the airport to watch the airplanes land and fly and pondered how this happens. Other kids wanted to go to the amusement places. As I grew older I became more and more interested in aircraft and the technology behind it. I always involved myself with aviation early on. I read books and magazines on aviation, took museum tours, built model airplanes. When I was younger my father would take me to aircraft repair facilities where I would watch in great fascination. In my teens, went up to the military bases and befriended many soldiers involved with aircraft and asked them numerous questions. I got to meet many aeronautics engineers and borrowed their old textbooks and read them till the wee hours of the morning. As technology improved with information superhighway, I logged on the web. Stayed up for hours and hours searching through web pages and web pages of information about aircraft and technology. I started my elementary school in the Philippines, then we moved to U.S. and continued my high school education and graduated. Enrolled at the CCSF to pursue my college education and now I am in the 2nd year in CCSF taking aeronautics. My goal now is to obtain my AS degree from the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) so I can transfer to a University and get a Bachelors degree and to continue for my Masters degree in Aeronautics Engineering. I will strive hard to reach the peak level of my career which is a Professor and hopefully to be an aeronautic professor so...

Circus Circus Enterprises Case Studies

Executive Summary: Circus Circus Enterprises is a leader and will continue to be in the gaming industry. In recent years, they have seen a decline in profit and revenue; management tends to blame the decrease on continuing disruptions from remodeling, expansion, and increased competition. Consequently, Circus has reported decreases in its net income for 1997 and 1998 and management believes this trend will continue as competition heightens. Currently the company is involved in several joint ventures, its brand of casino entertainment has traditionally catered to the low rollers and family vacationers through its theme park. Circus should continue to expand its existing operations into new market segments. This shift will allow them to attract the up scale gambler. Overview Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc founded in 1974 is in the business of entertainment, with its core strength in casino gambling. The company?s asset base, operating cash flow, profit margin, multiple markets and customers, rank it as one of the gaming industry leaders. Partners William G. Bennett an aggressive cost cutter and William N. Pennington purchased Circus Circus in 1974 as a small and unprofitable casino. It went public in 1983, from 1993 to 1997; the average return on capital invested was 16.5%. Circus Circus operates several properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Laughlin, and one in Mississippi, as well as 50% ownership in three other casinos and a theme park. On January 31,1998 Circus reported net income of 89.9 million and revenues of 1.35 billion, this is a down from 100 million on 1.3 billion in 1997. Management sees this decline in revenue due to the rapid and extensive expansion and the increased competition that Circus is facing. Well established in the casino gaming industry the corporation has its focus in the entertainment business and has particularly a popular theme resort concept....

Effect Of Civil War On American Economy

The Economies of the North and South, 1861-1865 In 1861, a great war in American history began. It was a civil war between the north and south that was by no means civil. This war would have great repercussions upon the economy of this country and the states within it. The American Civil War began with secession, creating a divided union of sorts, and sparked an incredibly cataclysmic four years. Although the actual war began with secession, this was not the only driving force. The economy of the Southern states, the Confederacy, greatly if not entirely depended on the institution of slavery. The Confederacy was heavily reliant on agriculture, and they used the profits made from the sale of such raw materials to purchase finished goods to use and enjoy. Their major export was cotton, which thrived on the warm river deltas and could easily be shipped to major ocean ports from towns on the Mississippi and numerous river cities. Slavery was a key part of this, as slaves were the ones who harvested and planted the cotton. Being such an enormous unpaid work force, the profits made were extraordinarily high and the price for the unfinished goods drastically low in comparison; especially since he invention of the cotton gin in 1793 which made the work all that much easier and quicker. In contrast, the economical structure of the Northern states, the Union, was vastly dependent on industry. Slavery did not exist in most of the Union, as there was no demand for it due to the type of industrial development taking place. As the Union had a paid work force, the profits made were lower and the cost of the finished manufactured item higher. In turn, the Union used the profits and purchased raw materials to use. This cycle...

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Trade Embargoes

Although I am a strong critic of the use and effectiveness of economic sanctions, such as trade embargoes, for the sake of this assignment, I will present both their theoretical advantages and their disadvantages based upon my research. Trade embargoes and blockades have traditionally been used to entice nations to alter their behavior or to punish them for certain behavior. The intentions behind these policies are generally noble, at least on the surface. However, these policies can have side effects. For example, FDR's blockade of raw materials against the Japanese in Manchuria in the 1930s arguably led to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which resulted in U.S. involvement in World War II. The decades-long embargo against Cuba not only did not lead to the topple of the communist regime there, but may have strengthened Castro's hold on the island and has created animosity toward the United States in Latin America and much suffering by the people of Cuba. Various studies have concluded that embargoes and other economic sanctions generally have not been effective from a utilitarian or policy perspective, yet these policies continue. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Trade Embargoes Strengths Trade embargoes and other sanctions can give the sender government the appearance of taking strong measures in response to a given situation without resorting to violence. Sanctions can be imposed in conjunction with other measures to achieve conflict prevention and mitigation goals. Sanctions may be ineffective: goals may be too elusive, the means too gentle, or cooperation from other countries insufficient. It is usually difficult to determine whether embargoes were an effective deterrent against future misdeeds: embargoes may contribute to a successful outcome, but can rarely achieve ambitious objectives alone. Some regimes are highly resistant to external pressures to reform. At the same time, trade sanctions may narrow the...