King George

Everything deserves an explanation. This was no different for King George III’s disastrous ruling resulting in the American Revolution. King George III is credited for the American Revolution and all the disasters and deaths that went with it. However, King George III was merely a scapegoat. Like so many cases that still occur in modern times, such as African Americans taking blame for white men’s crimes, King George III was a scapegoat for the English government. While many may argue that because George III was King, he is solely responsible. This however is not the case as the government was made of many branches and leaders. King George III may have been King during the time of the American Revolution, but rather than blaming King George for what he did, blame should instead be placed upon his hereditary genetics, his ministers and advisers, and the propaganda against him in America.

Whether a big or small part, luck has its role in everything. Heredity is ninety nine percent luck. King George III was unfortunate, and a lack of luck had everything to do with his life. George III couldn’t decide how he wanted to be born. He couldn’t decide whether to be born stupid or smart, rich or poor, or a natural leader or a follower. The common misconception is that King George III was born into an environment among the most gifted, richest, and most luxurious men in the World. This, however, is not the case. George II was often known as “Poor Fred.” He possessed “a small talent for music, a mild interest in games, and little else.” George III’s mother, Queen Caroline, was a “common woman and hated her son”. King George III was as unlucky in his heredity as in his environment. King George III was described as a “tissue of childishness and falsehood.” Even George III’s friends despised him; nevertheless his enemies. George III was “very stupid, really stupid.” Had he been born in different circumstances, it is unlikely that he could have earned a living except as an unskilled manual laborer. Simply because George III was passed down the throne does not mean that he was capable of running the country. George III in society would have been merely an unskilled laborer. The British could not have counted on him to make decisions regarding money, politics, and life and death. No one should have had that big of expectations for such a feeble man. George III was simply unequipped to lead such a powerful country, and by being forced to do so, George III had to listen to his advisers, which lead to his unpopularity. King George was eleven years old before he could read and even in adulthood, never mastered grammar, spelling, or punctuation. In England, there was not a strong sense of bond between families. King’s often killed their sons among other cruel acts. George II’s father for example, hated his father. He was in fact placed under house arrest and was only freed after the Cabinet persuaded King George I to do so. The politics of hatred and the politics of betrayal became a part of the environment of the adolescence and early manhood of the Kings. Therefore, King George’s relatives and family wouldn’t help George. The type of environment that the English royalty lived in was cold and cruel. Parents typically didn’t care about their kids. George II and Queen Caroline felt as if they had no obligation to George III. Poor George III was on his own and in a hopeless future.

Every human being seeks to advance. To do so, one must be able to manipulate and deceive. This was the case with King George III’s advisers, ministers, and government officials. This was made especially easy because of George’s lack of knowledge and mental retardation. King George was not only influenced in political aspects, but also in his private life. He failed to marry a beautiful woman he liked. Instead, he married a common woman based on the advice of his mother’s friend, Lord Bute. King George’s failure to make such an important and simply decision that would change his life forever by himself even in his private life depicts an incompetent man; which is what King George III really was. There was no way King George III was not going to be manipulated by much smarter men in Parliament on important issues, such as the American Revolution. George III’s cabinet was constantly changing. He couldn’t hold on to a permanent set of men to help him make decisions. Every time it was someone different, causing his first ten years as King in political chaos. King George III would first sign for the stamp act, and then later repeal it. He was under the palms of his advisers and had no mental ability to assess situations for himself. King George’s troubled mind was further penetrated by John Wilkes. Wilkes supported the American cause and the hate between him and King George III was mutual. Wilkes had the support of many, if not just as many as George III did. With Wilkes in control of the Whip groups in Parliament, King George stood no chance after England had lost the war. The Whigs were able to make a public perception defaming the King and the royal power as a whole. King George’s crippled mind was in complete chaos by this time and couldn’t handle much more. George III gave in as Marquis of Rockingham, the leader of the Old Corps of Whigs and one of George III’s enemies, demanded that he give America their freedom and to give up royal power while increasing Parliaments. The Whigs struck full force on King George III and placed the full blame of the failure of England in the American Revolution on King George III; the perfect scapegoat. After all, who better to blame than the King, the sole ruler of England. So while the general public saw George III as a man of evil and a man of greed, the actions performed were that of Parliaments.

Propaganda decides much of life. Elections are mostly propaganda. Commercial propagandas are used to sell items. Propaganda decides much of daily life decisions. Propaganda played a major part in American’s hatred of King George III. Not all of Americans fully supported the War. American leaders needed to change this. In order to gain independence, America needed to have the full support of its people and to be justifiable. King George III became the answer. American leaders portrayed King George III as a tyrant who was responsible for all the actions that the English had done to harm America. The Declaration of Independence and Common Sense did just that. In both, America blamed King George III for America’s injustice and gained moral in Americans by redirecting public resentment towards King George III. This brilliant plan by Jefferson and Paine worked. Scapegoating in fact could be seen even earlier in American history such as in early colonial times when rich landowners started racism and presenting African Americans as inferior in order to prevent rebellions such as Bacon’s Rebellion. By redirecting the unassurance that many Americans had about the Revolution towards King George III’s tyranny and unjust, American leaders such as Jefferson and Paine were able to gain support for the American Revolution. King George III was not only seen as a man of evil in America, but also in his own country. King George III had few friends in England and was picked on by Parliament. King George III was truly a man of hopelessness.

s is the type of man that was running England. There simply was no way for a man of George III’s comprehension, his lack of knowledge, and his mental retardation, to run a country. King George had no support from his family; as per English tradition. He was by himself. This led to Parliament, seeing an opportunity to take control, to manipulate and deceive the man. King George III was confused and bombarded with many things he simply did not understand. He ended up caving in to the pressure and doing whatever Parliament told him to do. He was their puppet. Therefore, Parliament should be held responsible because it was Parliament that ulimately made the decision. King George III was hated everywhere. American leaders did a very effective job of portraying him as a tyrant who wanted no good for America and the English Parliament was able to depict him as an incompetent ruler who didn’t deserve all the royal power. King George III lived in chaos and is possibly the unluckiest man ever to rule England. While King George III was the ruler of England at the time of the American Revolution, it was not his fault that he was incompetent. King George III was born incompetent and was then made a puppet under Parliament and therefore, a man of such knowledge and retardation, should not be held to his current reputation as a villain. If historians are looking for blame, human nature and genetics, the English Parliament, and American leaders are to be blamed for the American Revolution and England’s disaster.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Allegory Of American Pie By Don Mc Lean

Ask anyone what was the defining moment in the rock history of the 1960s was and all you will get is a one word answer: Woodstock. The three day rock festival that defined an era was only one of many music festivals of the '60s. But Woodstock has come to symbolize, "an era of peaceful, free- loving, drug- taking hippie youth, carefree before harsher realities hit..." (Layman 40). The Woodstock festival ended a century filled with many metamorphoses of rock'n'roll, from the era of pop music to the rebirth of folk music to the invention of acid rock. But some cynics say that rock'n'roll died with the death of Buddy Holly before the 60s even began. One such person is Don McLean. The poet behind the haunting epic song about the death of 'danceable' music, McLean wrote the ever popular song, "American Pie" (appendix 1). The most important song in rock'n'roll history, "American Pie", is the song about the demise of rock'n'roll after Buddy Holly's death and the heathenism of rock that resulted. Although McLean himself won't reveal any symbolism in his songs, "American Pie" is one of the most analyzed pieces of literature in modern society. Although not all of its secrets have been revealed, many "scholars" of the sixties will agree that the mystery of this song is one of the reasons it has become so successful- everyone wants to know the meanings of its allegories. Proof of "American Pie's" truth lies in the allegory of the song. Many People enjoy the song but have no idea what it means- Who is the Jester? What is the levee? When the deeper story is found, the importance of the song is unearthed. "American Pie" is not only a song, it is an epic poem about the course of rock'n'roll...

Carl Orffs Philosophies In Music Education

While Carl Orff is a very seminal composer of the 20th century, his greatest success and influence has been in the field of Music Education. Born on July 10th in Munich, Germany in 1895, Orff refused to speak about his past almost as if he were ashamed of it. What we do know, however, is that Orff came from a Bavarian family who was very active in the German military. His father's regiment band would often play through some of the young Orff's first attempts at composing. Although Orff was adamant about the secrecy of his past, Moser's Musik Lexicon says that he studied in the Munich Academy of Music until 1914. Orff then served in the military in the first world war. After the war, he held various positions in the Mannheim and Darmstadt opera houses then returned home to Munich to further study music. In 1925, and for the rest of his life, Orff was the head of a department and co-founder of the Guenther School for gymnastics, music, and dance in Munich where he worked with musical beginners. This is where he developed his Music Education theories. In 1937, Orff's Carmina Burana premiered in Frankfurt, Germany. Needless to say, it was a great success. With the success of Carmina Burana, Orff orphaned all of his previous works except for Catulli Carmina and the En trata which were rewritten to be acceptable by Orff. One of Orff's most admired composers was Monteverdi. In fact, much of Orff's work was based on ancient material. Orff said: I am often asked why I nearly always select old material, fairy tales and legends for my stage works. I do not look upon them as old, but rather as valid material. The time element disappears, and only the spiritual power remains. My...

Johann Sebastian Bach Biography

Throughout the history of music, many great composers, theorists, and instrumentalists have left indelible marks and influences that people today look back on to admire and aspire to. No exception to this idiom is Johann Sebastian Bach, whose impact on music was unforgettable to say the least. People today look back to his writings and works to both learn and admire. He truly can be considered a music history great. Bach, who came from a family of over 53 musicians, was nothing short of a virtuosic instrumentalist as well as a masterful composer. Born in Eisenach, Germany, on March 21, 1685, he was the son of a masterful violinist, Johann Ambrosius Bach, who taught his son the basic skills for string playing. Along with this string playing, Bach began to play the organ which is the instrument he would later on be noted for in history. His instruction on the organ came from the player at Eisenach's most important church. He instructed the young boy rather rigorously until his skills surpassed anyone?s expectations for someone of such a young age. Bach suffered early trauma when his parents died in 1695. He went to go live with his older brother, Johann Christoph, who also was a professional organist at Ohrdruf. He continued his younger brother's education on that instrument, as well as introducing him to the harpsichord. The rigorous training on these instruments combined with Bach?s masterful skill paid off for him at an early age. After several years of studying with his older brother, he received a scholarship to study in Luneberg, Germany, which is located on the northern tip of the country. As a result, he left his brother?s tutelage and went to go and study there. The teenage years brought Bach to several parts of Germany where he...

Michelangelo

Michelangelo was pessimistic in his poetry and an optimist in his artwork. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo?s poetry was pessimistic in his response to Strazzi even though he was complementing him. Michelangelo?s sculpture brought out his optimism. Michelangelo was optimistic in completing The Tomb of Pope Julius II and persevered through it?s many revisions trying to complete his vision. Sculpture was Michelangelo?s main goal and the love of his life. Since his art portrayed both optimism and pessimism, Michelangelo was in touch with his positive and negative sides, showing that he had a great and stable personality. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo Buonarroti was called to Rome in 1505 by Pope Julius II to create for him a monumental tomb. We have no clear sense of what the tomb was to look like, since over the years it went through at least five conceptual revisions. The tomb was to have three levels; the bottom level was to have sculpted figures representing Victory and bond slaves. The second level was to have statues of Moses and Saint Paul as well as symbolic figures of the active and contemplative life- representative of the human striving for, and reception of, knowledge. The third level, it is assumed, was to have an effigy of the deceased pope. The tomb of Pope Julius II was never finished. What was finished of the tomb represents a twenty-year span of frustrating delays and revised schemes. Michelangelo had hardly begun work on the pope?s tomb when Julius commanded him to fresco the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to complete the work done in the previous century under Sixtus IV. The overall organization consists of four large triangles at...

Oscar Wilde

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde was born in Dublin Ireland on October 16, 1854. He is one of the most talented and most controversial writers of his time. He was well known for his wit, flamboyance, and creative genius and with his little dramatic training showing his natural talent for stage and theatre. He is termed a martyr by some and may be the first true self-publicist and was known for his style of dress and odd behavior. Wilde, 1882 His Father, William Wilde, was a highly accredited doctor and his mother, Jane Francesca Elgee, was a writer of revolutionary poems. Oscar had a brother William Charles Kingsbury along with his father's three illegitimate children, Henry, Emily, and Mary. His sister, Isola Emily Francesca died in 1867 at only ten years of age from a sudden fever, greatly affecting Oscar and his family. He kept a lock of her hair in an envelope and later wrote the poem 'Requiescat' in her memory. Oscar and his brother William both attended the Protora Royal School at Enniskillen. He had little in common with the other children. He disliked games and took more interest in flowers and sunsets. He was extremely passionate about anything that had to do with ancient Greece and with Classics. Wilde during school years In 1871, he was awarded a Royal School Scholarship to Trinity College in Dublin and received many awards and earned the highest honor the college offered to an undergraduate, the Foundation Scholarship. In 1874, he also won the College's Berkley Gold Medal for Greek and was awarded a Demyship to Magdalen College, Oxford. After graduating from Oxford, Oscar moved to London with his friend Frank Miles, a well-known portrait painter of the time. In 1878 his poem Ravenna was published, for which he won the...

The History Of Greek Theater

Theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century BCE, with the Sopocles, the great writer of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, heroes and the ideals of life were depicted and glorified. It was believed that man should live for honor and fame, his action was courageous and glorious and his life would climax in a great and noble death. Originally, the hero's recognition was created by selfish behaviors and little thought of service to others. As the Greeks grew toward city-states and colonization, it became the destiny and ambition of the hero to gain honor by serving his city. The second major characteristic of the early Greek world was the supernatural. The two worlds were not separate, as the gods lived in the same world as the men, and they interfered in the men's lives as they chose to. It was the gods who sent suffering and evil to men. In the plays of Sophocles, the gods brought about the hero's downfall because of a tragic flaw in the character of the hero. In Greek tragedy, suffering brought knowledge of worldly matters and of the individual. Aristotle attempted to explain how an audience could observe tragic events and still have a pleasurable experience. Aristotle, by searching the works of writers of Greek tragedy, Aeschulus, Euripides and Sophocles (whose Oedipus Rex he considered the finest of all Greek tragedies), arrived at his definition of tragedy. This explanation has a profound influence for more than twenty centuries on those writing tragedies, most significantly Shakespeare. Aristotle's analysis of tragedy began with a description of the effect such a work had on the audience as a "catharsis" or purging of the emotions. He decided that catharsis was the purging of two specific emotions, pity and...

Scholarship Essay About Goals

Ever since I was a young kid I have always been interested with aircraft. I was so curious of how airplane's fly. I remember taking my toys apart to see how it works. As a kid I wanted to go to the airport to watch the airplanes land and fly and pondered how this happens. Other kids wanted to go to the amusement places. As I grew older I became more and more interested in aircraft and the technology behind it. I always involved myself with aviation early on. I read books and magazines on aviation, took museum tours, built model airplanes. When I was younger my father would take me to aircraft repair facilities where I would watch in great fascination. In my teens, went up to the military bases and befriended many soldiers involved with aircraft and asked them numerous questions. I got to meet many aeronautics engineers and borrowed their old textbooks and read them till the wee hours of the morning. As technology improved with information superhighway, I logged on the web. Stayed up for hours and hours searching through web pages and web pages of information about aircraft and technology. I started my elementary school in the Philippines, then we moved to U.S. and continued my high school education and graduated. Enrolled at the CCSF to pursue my college education and now I am in the 2nd year in CCSF taking aeronautics. My goal now is to obtain my AS degree from the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) so I can transfer to a University and get a Bachelors degree and to continue for my Masters degree in Aeronautics Engineering. I will strive hard to reach the peak level of my career which is a Professor and hopefully to be an aeronautic professor so...

Circus Circus Enterprises Case Studies

Executive Summary: Circus Circus Enterprises is a leader and will continue to be in the gaming industry. In recent years, they have seen a decline in profit and revenue; management tends to blame the decrease on continuing disruptions from remodeling, expansion, and increased competition. Consequently, Circus has reported decreases in its net income for 1997 and 1998 and management believes this trend will continue as competition heightens. Currently the company is involved in several joint ventures, its brand of casino entertainment has traditionally catered to the low rollers and family vacationers through its theme park. Circus should continue to expand its existing operations into new market segments. This shift will allow them to attract the up scale gambler. Overview Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc founded in 1974 is in the business of entertainment, with its core strength in casino gambling. The company?s asset base, operating cash flow, profit margin, multiple markets and customers, rank it as one of the gaming industry leaders. Partners William G. Bennett an aggressive cost cutter and William N. Pennington purchased Circus Circus in 1974 as a small and unprofitable casino. It went public in 1983, from 1993 to 1997; the average return on capital invested was 16.5%. Circus Circus operates several properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Laughlin, and one in Mississippi, as well as 50% ownership in three other casinos and a theme park. On January 31,1998 Circus reported net income of 89.9 million and revenues of 1.35 billion, this is a down from 100 million on 1.3 billion in 1997. Management sees this decline in revenue due to the rapid and extensive expansion and the increased competition that Circus is facing. Well established in the casino gaming industry the corporation has its focus in the entertainment business and has particularly a popular theme resort concept....

Effect Of Civil War On American Economy

The Economies of the North and South, 1861-1865 In 1861, a great war in American history began. It was a civil war between the north and south that was by no means civil. This war would have great repercussions upon the economy of this country and the states within it. The American Civil War began with secession, creating a divided union of sorts, and sparked an incredibly cataclysmic four years. Although the actual war began with secession, this was not the only driving force. The economy of the Southern states, the Confederacy, greatly if not entirely depended on the institution of slavery. The Confederacy was heavily reliant on agriculture, and they used the profits made from the sale of such raw materials to purchase finished goods to use and enjoy. Their major export was cotton, which thrived on the warm river deltas and could easily be shipped to major ocean ports from towns on the Mississippi and numerous river cities. Slavery was a key part of this, as slaves were the ones who harvested and planted the cotton. Being such an enormous unpaid work force, the profits made were extraordinarily high and the price for the unfinished goods drastically low in comparison; especially since he invention of the cotton gin in 1793 which made the work all that much easier and quicker. In contrast, the economical structure of the Northern states, the Union, was vastly dependent on industry. Slavery did not exist in most of the Union, as there was no demand for it due to the type of industrial development taking place. As the Union had a paid work force, the profits made were lower and the cost of the finished manufactured item higher. In turn, the Union used the profits and purchased raw materials to use. This cycle...

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Trade Embargoes

Although I am a strong critic of the use and effectiveness of economic sanctions, such as trade embargoes, for the sake of this assignment, I will present both their theoretical advantages and their disadvantages based upon my research. Trade embargoes and blockades have traditionally been used to entice nations to alter their behavior or to punish them for certain behavior. The intentions behind these policies are generally noble, at least on the surface. However, these policies can have side effects. For example, FDR's blockade of raw materials against the Japanese in Manchuria in the 1930s arguably led to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which resulted in U.S. involvement in World War II. The decades-long embargo against Cuba not only did not lead to the topple of the communist regime there, but may have strengthened Castro's hold on the island and has created animosity toward the United States in Latin America and much suffering by the people of Cuba. Various studies have concluded that embargoes and other economic sanctions generally have not been effective from a utilitarian or policy perspective, yet these policies continue. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Trade Embargoes Strengths Trade embargoes and other sanctions can give the sender government the appearance of taking strong measures in response to a given situation without resorting to violence. Sanctions can be imposed in conjunction with other measures to achieve conflict prevention and mitigation goals. Sanctions may be ineffective: goals may be too elusive, the means too gentle, or cooperation from other countries insufficient. It is usually difficult to determine whether embargoes were an effective deterrent against future misdeeds: embargoes may contribute to a successful outcome, but can rarely achieve ambitious objectives alone. Some regimes are highly resistant to external pressures to reform. At the same time, trade sanctions may narrow the...