Lenin’s Role In The Bolshevik Consolidation Of Power

Word Count: 1530 |

i) Lenin’s role in the Bolshevik consolidation of power.

The Coalition government, that had been in place since the February Revolution of 1917, had to face more and more problems. The Kornilov Affair and the July Days did not go to their best interest, and their popularity was simply going down the sewer by October. It was exactly that month that Lenin thought the time to be right for a Bolshevik takeover. So in October 1917 the Bolsheviks replaced the Coalition Government. This is known as the October Revolution. However, all the problems the Coalition Government faced did not disappear and on top of that Lenin was facing huge opposition from the Soviets, which even became a civil war.

The Bolsheviks overcame the struggles of the first 6 months after the October Revolution by simply giving in into the worker’s and peasant’s requests. This was one of the party’s policies that were based on Lenin’s April thesis. To be exact the April thesis included legitimating the peasant’s seizure of land. The Land decree states further that land could not be bought sold or rented as it belonged to the entire people. Although the peasantry has been taking over these estates anyway, it was still a good strategic move to make by Lenin because he got the peasants by his side and it makes him credible. The next decree that the Sovnarkom (of whom Lenin was the chairman) passed was the Workers Control Decree, which gave the workers total control over the factories, which was also Lenin’s plan and was stated in his April Thesis. The other main decree was the Peace decree, where the Bolsheviks and Germany agreed on peace terms. This also was Lenin’s intent from the start and was not only stated in the April Thesis but was also stressed by Lenin.

There was still a lot of opposition from the bourgeoisie and the former Coalition Government. Lenin took care of that problem by introducing “class warfare”, which was basically legitimating that the bourgeoisie was terrorised by the proletariat and the Cheka. He did also purge the civil servants by the use of the Cheka, as they usually were unwilling to co-operate with the Bolsheviks. He took care of his political opposition by holding the Constituent Assembly but dissolving it after a day.
Due to the civil war and the lack of industrial products the peasants did not send grain to the cities although the soldiers and workers need the food. At this time War Communism was introduced, by Lenin and happily agreed to by most of the other Bolsheviks. With it came Grain requisitioning, which was that special requisitioning squads were send to the country side to collect the grain from the peasants, who very soon did not grow anything anymore. Private trade unions were banned too, not enough consumer goods were produced and a huge black market developed. Industry was nationalised and managed by so called “specialists” that were basically the former owners of the factories. This was an important measure to do, as the workers produced an enormous chaos by giving them massive pay rises. Labour discipline was introduced. This meant that coming too late or being absent will be fined, and Internal Passports, to stop urban-rural migration, and Workbooks, which were needed for rations, were introduced. Also an important part to War Communism was the Red Terror, which was that anyone could be arrested for being a bourgeois or for counter-revolutionary action. No one knew what was meant by “counter-revolutionary action” and therefore it was very effective as no one would come to the idea of saying anything negative about those times.

After the Bolsheviks had won the Civil War the Russian industry and agriculture was in ruins. So Lenin persuaded the other members of the Politbureau to pass the New Economic Policy (NEP), this policy re-introduced private trade and low-scale private enterprises (like shoe making). Grain requisitioning was abolished and replaced by a “tax in favour” (then later to a tax in money because of the scissors crisis) which was that a certain percentage of grain belonged to the government and the rest to the peasants, any surplus they had was allowed to be sold openly on the market. This was a step back to capitalism and not liked by many Bolsheviks, but Lenin argued that it was only a temporary solution.

Therefore we can conclude that Lenin did play a very important role in the Consolidation of Bolshevik power, as it was due to him that the Soldiers in the civil war had enough supplies of food due to grain requisitioning. He was also important because it was to him that Russia dropped out of the “Great” war and that the Russian economy revived under the NEP.

ii) Was Lenin a dictator by intent or by circumstance?

Lenin surely worked towards a takeover as we can see from his actions. These included the April Thesis that had brought the Bolsheviks a great deal of popularity, as they specially wanted to give in into the Russian population’s request (land, bread and an end to the war). Especially Lenin’s speaking abilities contribute to the fact that he was a dictator by intent. This is shown in the following quote by a time witness and Historian N.N. Sukhanov*: “Lenin was a very good orator, not an orator of the consummate, or of the luminous image…, but an orator enormous impact and power…”. Without his talent he wouldn’t have been able to persuade the Bolshevik party to accept his April Thesis, to take over the Russian government and to introduce the New Economic Policy, which all was crucial for the Bolsheviks gaining and staying in power. Lenin’s contribution to the war is of great value in this argument too. Trotsky was on the front fighting and taking care every thing goes by plan. Lenin however was sitting back in Petrograd (later Moscow) and took care of the “day to day” business, which included taking care that war communism was going by plan too. As the civil war was fought on two fronts (the internal and the open front) it was crucial for the Bolsheviks to stay in power and especially for Lenin to stay dictator that war communism (and especially class warfare) were going as planed. As Lenin believed once the middle class and his political opposition was gone then there would be no problem keeping Russia under his control.
However there were many circumstances that made the time ideal for anyone to take power. One of these circumstances was that the Soviet and the Provisional Government were unwilling to make any kinds of concessions that might have saved their support from the Russian population. Another circumstance was the Kornilov affair where Alexander Kerensky (the head of the Provisional Government) called on a former tsarist General called Kornilov to restore law and order in the streets of Petrograd. Kornilov saw this as a perfect opportunity to try a putsch and marched with his men to Petrograd. The Provisional Government called on the Bolsheviks to prevent the putsch, which happened due to the rail workers union and Bolshevik spies. The interesting part to the Kornilov affair was that Kerensky had banned the Bolsheviks and Bolshevik newspapers the year before. So Kerensky and the Provisional Government lost a lot of support. As we can see the Bolsheviks were the only opposition to a weak and unsupported government, due to the mistakes of the provisional government. Even when the Provisional Government and the Soviet had the last chance to restore their power in Russia they failed (this was due to the civil war). They lost badly against the Bolsheviks, although these were fighting on 4 fronts (the polish army, the Denikin Army [Whites], the Kolchak army [Whites] and the Yudenich army [also whites]). This is due to the good location the Bolsheviks had (they were controlling the cities and all communication routes) and the not unified armies of the Whites (Provisional Government and the soviet).

As we can see, it is a hard question to answer whether Lenin was a Dictator by intent or by circumstance. Even Historians disagree about it. R. Service for example wrote in his Book “Lenin: Individual and Politics in the October Revolution”*² that “There were other mighty factors at work as well in Russia in 1917. The conditions for a seizure of power with the sanctions of exhausted workers, war-weary soldiers and angry peasants could hardly have been more favourable…”. C. Read states in his book “From Tsar to Soviet: The Russian People and their Revolution”*³ that “…the ‘Bolshevik’ structure of the party boiled down to Lenin’s domination of it.” However I believe that it was more the circumstances that made Lenin a dictator, as due to all the mistakes the Coalition Government and especially Kerensky made everyone would have been able to seize power, it was just a lucky circumstance for Lenin that he was there during the time.

Word count: 1496
Characters (without spaces): 7330
Characters (with spaces): 8825
*- Communist Russia under Lenin and Stalin. Page 133. Source 8.12
*²- Communist Russia under Lenin and Stalin. Page 133. Source 8.13
*³- Communist Russia under Lenin and Stalin. Page 133. Source 8.10

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Allegory Of American Pie By Don Mc Lean

Ask anyone what was the defining moment in the rock history of the 1960s was and all you will get is a one word answer: Woodstock. The three day rock festival that defined an era was only one of many music festivals of the '60s. But Woodstock has come to symbolize, "an era of peaceful, free- loving, drug- taking hippie youth, carefree before harsher realities hit..." (Layman 40). The Woodstock festival ended a century filled with many metamorphoses of rock'n'roll, from the era of pop music to the rebirth of folk music to the invention of acid rock. But some cynics say that rock'n'roll died with the death of Buddy Holly before the 60s even began. One such person is Don McLean. The poet behind the haunting epic song about the death of 'danceable' music, McLean wrote the ever popular song, "American Pie" (appendix 1). The most important song in rock'n'roll history, "American Pie", is the song about the demise of rock'n'roll after Buddy Holly's death and the heathenism of rock that resulted. Although McLean himself won't reveal any symbolism in his songs, "American Pie" is one of the most analyzed pieces of literature in modern society. Although not all of its secrets have been revealed, many "scholars" of the sixties will agree that the mystery of this song is one of the reasons it has become so successful- everyone wants to know the meanings of its allegories. Proof of "American Pie's" truth lies in the allegory of the song. Many People enjoy the song but have no idea what it means- Who is the Jester? What is the levee? When the deeper story is found, the importance of the song is unearthed. "American Pie" is not only a song, it is an epic poem about the course of rock'n'roll...

Carl Orffs Philosophies In Music Education

While Carl Orff is a very seminal composer of the 20th century, his greatest success and influence has been in the field of Music Education. Born on July 10th in Munich, Germany in 1895, Orff refused to speak about his past almost as if he were ashamed of it. What we do know, however, is that Orff came from a Bavarian family who was very active in the German military. His father's regiment band would often play through some of the young Orff's first attempts at composing. Although Orff was adamant about the secrecy of his past, Moser's Musik Lexicon says that he studied in the Munich Academy of Music until 1914. Orff then served in the military in the first world war. After the war, he held various positions in the Mannheim and Darmstadt opera houses then returned home to Munich to further study music. In 1925, and for the rest of his life, Orff was the head of a department and co-founder of the Guenther School for gymnastics, music, and dance in Munich where he worked with musical beginners. This is where he developed his Music Education theories. In 1937, Orff's Carmina Burana premiered in Frankfurt, Germany. Needless to say, it was a great success. With the success of Carmina Burana, Orff orphaned all of his previous works except for Catulli Carmina and the En trata which were rewritten to be acceptable by Orff. One of Orff's most admired composers was Monteverdi. In fact, much of Orff's work was based on ancient material. Orff said: I am often asked why I nearly always select old material, fairy tales and legends for my stage works. I do not look upon them as old, but rather as valid material. The time element disappears, and only the spiritual power remains. My...

Johann Sebastian Bach Biography

Throughout the history of music, many great composers, theorists, and instrumentalists have left indelible marks and influences that people today look back on to admire and aspire to. No exception to this idiom is Johann Sebastian Bach, whose impact on music was unforgettable to say the least. People today look back to his writings and works to both learn and admire. He truly can be considered a music history great. Bach, who came from a family of over 53 musicians, was nothing short of a virtuosic instrumentalist as well as a masterful composer. Born in Eisenach, Germany, on March 21, 1685, he was the son of a masterful violinist, Johann Ambrosius Bach, who taught his son the basic skills for string playing. Along with this string playing, Bach began to play the organ which is the instrument he would later on be noted for in history. His instruction on the organ came from the player at Eisenach's most important church. He instructed the young boy rather rigorously until his skills surpassed anyone?s expectations for someone of such a young age. Bach suffered early trauma when his parents died in 1695. He went to go live with his older brother, Johann Christoph, who also was a professional organist at Ohrdruf. He continued his younger brother's education on that instrument, as well as introducing him to the harpsichord. The rigorous training on these instruments combined with Bach?s masterful skill paid off for him at an early age. After several years of studying with his older brother, he received a scholarship to study in Luneberg, Germany, which is located on the northern tip of the country. As a result, he left his brother?s tutelage and went to go and study there. The teenage years brought Bach to several parts of Germany where he...


Michelangelo was pessimistic in his poetry and an optimist in his artwork. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo?s poetry was pessimistic in his response to Strazzi even though he was complementing him. Michelangelo?s sculpture brought out his optimism. Michelangelo was optimistic in completing The Tomb of Pope Julius II and persevered through it?s many revisions trying to complete his vision. Sculpture was Michelangelo?s main goal and the love of his life. Since his art portrayed both optimism and pessimism, Michelangelo was in touch with his positive and negative sides, showing that he had a great and stable personality. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo Buonarroti was called to Rome in 1505 by Pope Julius II to create for him a monumental tomb. We have no clear sense of what the tomb was to look like, since over the years it went through at least five conceptual revisions. The tomb was to have three levels; the bottom level was to have sculpted figures representing Victory and bond slaves. The second level was to have statues of Moses and Saint Paul as well as symbolic figures of the active and contemplative life- representative of the human striving for, and reception of, knowledge. The third level, it is assumed, was to have an effigy of the deceased pope. The tomb of Pope Julius II was never finished. What was finished of the tomb represents a twenty-year span of frustrating delays and revised schemes. Michelangelo had hardly begun work on the pope?s tomb when Julius commanded him to fresco the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to complete the work done in the previous century under Sixtus IV. The overall organization consists of four large triangles at...

Oscar Wilde

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde was born in Dublin Ireland on October 16, 1854. He is one of the most talented and most controversial writers of his time. He was well known for his wit, flamboyance, and creative genius and with his little dramatic training showing his natural talent for stage and theatre. He is termed a martyr by some and may be the first true self-publicist and was known for his style of dress and odd behavior. Wilde, 1882 His Father, William Wilde, was a highly accredited doctor and his mother, Jane Francesca Elgee, was a writer of revolutionary poems. Oscar had a brother William Charles Kingsbury along with his father's three illegitimate children, Henry, Emily, and Mary. His sister, Isola Emily Francesca died in 1867 at only ten years of age from a sudden fever, greatly affecting Oscar and his family. He kept a lock of her hair in an envelope and later wrote the poem 'Requiescat' in her memory. Oscar and his brother William both attended the Protora Royal School at Enniskillen. He had little in common with the other children. He disliked games and took more interest in flowers and sunsets. He was extremely passionate about anything that had to do with ancient Greece and with Classics. Wilde during school years In 1871, he was awarded a Royal School Scholarship to Trinity College in Dublin and received many awards and earned the highest honor the college offered to an undergraduate, the Foundation Scholarship. In 1874, he also won the College's Berkley Gold Medal for Greek and was awarded a Demyship to Magdalen College, Oxford. After graduating from Oxford, Oscar moved to London with his friend Frank Miles, a well-known portrait painter of the time. In 1878 his poem Ravenna was published, for which he won the...

The History Of Greek Theater

Theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century BCE, with the Sopocles, the great writer of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, heroes and the ideals of life were depicted and glorified. It was believed that man should live for honor and fame, his action was courageous and glorious and his life would climax in a great and noble death. Originally, the hero's recognition was created by selfish behaviors and little thought of service to others. As the Greeks grew toward city-states and colonization, it became the destiny and ambition of the hero to gain honor by serving his city. The second major characteristic of the early Greek world was the supernatural. The two worlds were not separate, as the gods lived in the same world as the men, and they interfered in the men's lives as they chose to. It was the gods who sent suffering and evil to men. In the plays of Sophocles, the gods brought about the hero's downfall because of a tragic flaw in the character of the hero. In Greek tragedy, suffering brought knowledge of worldly matters and of the individual. Aristotle attempted to explain how an audience could observe tragic events and still have a pleasurable experience. Aristotle, by searching the works of writers of Greek tragedy, Aeschulus, Euripides and Sophocles (whose Oedipus Rex he considered the finest of all Greek tragedies), arrived at his definition of tragedy. This explanation has a profound influence for more than twenty centuries on those writing tragedies, most significantly Shakespeare. Aristotle's analysis of tragedy began with a description of the effect such a work had on the audience as a "catharsis" or purging of the emotions. He decided that catharsis was the purging of two specific emotions, pity and...

Scholarship Essay About Goals

Ever since I was a young kid I have always been interested with aircraft. I was so curious of how airplane's fly. I remember taking my toys apart to see how it works. As a kid I wanted to go to the airport to watch the airplanes land and fly and pondered how this happens. Other kids wanted to go to the amusement places. As I grew older I became more and more interested in aircraft and the technology behind it. I always involved myself with aviation early on. I read books and magazines on aviation, took museum tours, built model airplanes. When I was younger my father would take me to aircraft repair facilities where I would watch in great fascination. In my teens, went up to the military bases and befriended many soldiers involved with aircraft and asked them numerous questions. I got to meet many aeronautics engineers and borrowed their old textbooks and read them till the wee hours of the morning. As technology improved with information superhighway, I logged on the web. Stayed up for hours and hours searching through web pages and web pages of information about aircraft and technology. I started my elementary school in the Philippines, then we moved to U.S. and continued my high school education and graduated. Enrolled at the CCSF to pursue my college education and now I am in the 2nd year in CCSF taking aeronautics. My goal now is to obtain my AS degree from the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) so I can transfer to a University and get a Bachelors degree and to continue for my Masters degree in Aeronautics Engineering. I will strive hard to reach the peak level of my career which is a Professor and hopefully to be an aeronautic professor so...

Circus Circus Enterprises Case Studies

Executive Summary: Circus Circus Enterprises is a leader and will continue to be in the gaming industry. In recent years, they have seen a decline in profit and revenue; management tends to blame the decrease on continuing disruptions from remodeling, expansion, and increased competition. Consequently, Circus has reported decreases in its net income for 1997 and 1998 and management believes this trend will continue as competition heightens. Currently the company is involved in several joint ventures, its brand of casino entertainment has traditionally catered to the low rollers and family vacationers through its theme park. Circus should continue to expand its existing operations into new market segments. This shift will allow them to attract the up scale gambler. Overview Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc founded in 1974 is in the business of entertainment, with its core strength in casino gambling. The company?s asset base, operating cash flow, profit margin, multiple markets and customers, rank it as one of the gaming industry leaders. Partners William G. Bennett an aggressive cost cutter and William N. Pennington purchased Circus Circus in 1974 as a small and unprofitable casino. It went public in 1983, from 1993 to 1997; the average return on capital invested was 16.5%. Circus Circus operates several properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Laughlin, and one in Mississippi, as well as 50% ownership in three other casinos and a theme park. On January 31,1998 Circus reported net income of 89.9 million and revenues of 1.35 billion, this is a down from 100 million on 1.3 billion in 1997. Management sees this decline in revenue due to the rapid and extensive expansion and the increased competition that Circus is facing. Well established in the casino gaming industry the corporation has its focus in the entertainment business and has particularly a popular theme resort concept....

Effect Of Civil War On American Economy

The Economies of the North and South, 1861-1865 In 1861, a great war in American history began. It was a civil war between the north and south that was by no means civil. This war would have great repercussions upon the economy of this country and the states within it. The American Civil War began with secession, creating a divided union of sorts, and sparked an incredibly cataclysmic four years. Although the actual war began with secession, this was not the only driving force. The economy of the Southern states, the Confederacy, greatly if not entirely depended on the institution of slavery. The Confederacy was heavily reliant on agriculture, and they used the profits made from the sale of such raw materials to purchase finished goods to use and enjoy. Their major export was cotton, which thrived on the warm river deltas and could easily be shipped to major ocean ports from towns on the Mississippi and numerous river cities. Slavery was a key part of this, as slaves were the ones who harvested and planted the cotton. Being such an enormous unpaid work force, the profits made were extraordinarily high and the price for the unfinished goods drastically low in comparison; especially since he invention of the cotton gin in 1793 which made the work all that much easier and quicker. In contrast, the economical structure of the Northern states, the Union, was vastly dependent on industry. Slavery did not exist in most of the Union, as there was no demand for it due to the type of industrial development taking place. As the Union had a paid work force, the profits made were lower and the cost of the finished manufactured item higher. In turn, the Union used the profits and purchased raw materials to use. This cycle...

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Trade Embargoes

Although I am a strong critic of the use and effectiveness of economic sanctions, such as trade embargoes, for the sake of this assignment, I will present both their theoretical advantages and their disadvantages based upon my research. Trade embargoes and blockades have traditionally been used to entice nations to alter their behavior or to punish them for certain behavior. The intentions behind these policies are generally noble, at least on the surface. However, these policies can have side effects. For example, FDR's blockade of raw materials against the Japanese in Manchuria in the 1930s arguably led to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which resulted in U.S. involvement in World War II. The decades-long embargo against Cuba not only did not lead to the topple of the communist regime there, but may have strengthened Castro's hold on the island and has created animosity toward the United States in Latin America and much suffering by the people of Cuba. Various studies have concluded that embargoes and other economic sanctions generally have not been effective from a utilitarian or policy perspective, yet these policies continue. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Trade Embargoes Strengths Trade embargoes and other sanctions can give the sender government the appearance of taking strong measures in response to a given situation without resorting to violence. Sanctions can be imposed in conjunction with other measures to achieve conflict prevention and mitigation goals. Sanctions may be ineffective: goals may be too elusive, the means too gentle, or cooperation from other countries insufficient. It is usually difficult to determine whether embargoes were an effective deterrent against future misdeeds: embargoes may contribute to a successful outcome, but can rarely achieve ambitious objectives alone. Some regimes are highly resistant to external pressures to reform. At the same time, trade sanctions may narrow the...