Mediatiion Of Central Metaphors In Narrative Discourse

Word Count: 3522 |

To set out from the logical starting-point would require a foregrounding of the employed definition of the narrative from among all the various and discrepant definitions suggested for it. As H. Porter Abbot points out, the number of the events or actions and the necessity of a narrator are points of deviation. In that, some scholars raise the essentiality of the presence of at least two events or actions related causally for there to be a narrative. Furthermore, there is this camp of scholars who highlight the role of the narrator(s) as the inextricably constructive constituent(s) of the narrative. To use his quotation of Gerald Prince, “[A] dramatic performance representing (many fascinating) events does not constitute a narrative” and that is due to the lack of a narrator (12-13).
From the point of view of another camp of scholars including Abbot, which is also employed in this paper, one action or event would suffice to have a narrative and that a narrator is only one of the instruments involved in the narrative process (13). The sufficiency of one event or action does not exclude the possibility of having more of them. On the contrary, it allows for a general concept generative of more complex versions. Not surprisingly, the capability of a group of events to be summed up into one narrative which would unfold underpins the fact that one event or action is sufficient. Sound-bites inserted in film previews or citations in advertisements which mostly reveal an impregnated event to be unfolded are indicative of this fact.
The illustration of the narrator not as the indispensable constituent of the narrative can be best accounted for if we take some pieces of static arts such as painting – although some caricatures or comic strips use speech or comment balloons – or lyric poetry into consideration. Their engagement with narrative can be readily perceived through their potential to trigger narratives in the mind of the perceiver. For example, Rene Magritte’s painting The Fall has a great potential for arousing the narrative perception – the tendency to know not only what is there, but what happened – by triggering in the mind of the perceiver such allusions as to the myth of the Fall of Man and or inter-textually to the recurrent image of the man in hat dressed up in a suit in his other paintings, and also such questions as “Where do they fall down from?” or “Why do they fall dressed-up?”.
Every narrative – static cases included – comprises “story” and “narrative discourse”. N. J. Lowe recognizes the distinction made by Aristotle between story and its narrative presentation (7). It can be briefly proposed that “story is an event or sequence of events (the action), and narrative discourse is those events as represented” (Abbot 16). This differentiation between story and narrative discourse – how the story is conveyed – is very important in that the term story is most of the time used casually to refer to the narrative and to include the narrative discourse, too. However, the recognition of the distinctive narrative discourse contributes much to the identification of the mediating participants in the narration process which are otherwise ignored.
To approach the case from a more general point of view – because some examples of arts other than literature have already been included – that covers arts in general, Aristotle’s triple differentiae for the typology of arts in his Poetics as paraphrased by Lowe is sure appropriate: “What the things are, what the images are made of, and – a third criterion for the special case of narrative – how the image is created” (8). To consider this third criterion, in filmic representation, for example, the image is created by actors, scene, director, lighting, camera angle, etc. That is, a story is quiet dependent on the way it is represented, or more specifically, the way it is constructed.
A story cannot ever be seen or accessed in isolation from its representation; for one thing, it is existent and viable through the narrative discourse. It is always mediated by some other elements such as writing style, point of view, character’s interpretations, etc. One of the legible reasons suggested to justify this statement is that “they [stories] can be adapted” (Abbot 18). We can recognize the adaptation of a novel as a film or the reproduction of an exemplum as a beast fable, and identify a painting with a certain event. Moreover, we can identify the same story in a parody or a historical event in a poem. Even more interestingly, we can distinguish a full-fledged narrative as the expansion and foregrounding of a minor narrative out of a novel, which is the case with Jane Eyre and Jean Rhys’ Wide Sargasso Sea.
It is not only the story which is mediated. To make a daring generalization, all experience is mediated. Providing an imaginary situation might help concretize this point: suppose that you are a guest at some friends’ house whose television is on while you are having a conversation; the volume is, nevertheless, so low it makes no interruptions. Expectedly, you have the feeling that your hosts are not so interested in your conversation as to switch the television set off. Vexed with this event, after some days, you come across this aphoristic statement that “television is the modern hearth-fire.” You realize that extinguishing the fire in the fireplace for the mere reason of a conversation going on nearby is irrelevant. This experience is thus mediated and constructed in a different way.
As mentioned earlier, one of the ways in which a story is mediated is the writing style. For the sake of manageability, only metaphor is approached concerning the figurative style of writing. The classification of metaphor as the figurative use of language, which might imply that it is simply a deviation or departure from the literal or the standard, however, is challenged. I. A. Richards claims in his The Philosophy of Rhetoric that metaphor permeates all language and affects the ways we perceive and conceive the world (qtd. in Abrams 156). In like manner, yet from another approach, Donald Davidson brings metaphor from a position of deviation to a literal plane of language. He argues that metaphors are the meanings of the words as such. This paper, however, strives to maintain an eclectic view of metaphor.
At the face value, metaphor is a system which allows us to say in a variety of ways that “this” is another “that”; that is, to understand one thing is terms of another. As Lakoff and Johnson argue, “the essence of metaphor is understanding and experiencing one kind of thing in terms of another” (qtd. in Chandler 127). “Television is the modern hearth-fire,” for instance, is a metaphor in that we imply that television = modern hearth-fire. Obviously, this metaphor mediates the experience or concept of “television” by suggesting a relation to “hearth-fire”. It can be regarded as a means of rendering the unfamiliar, cognitively speaking as well as concretely, more familiar. Whenever equation marks are used or inferred, there are surely some conventions at work without which, the equation cannot make sense. For instance, we can understand a structurally interrogative utterance, “Can you give me a hand?” as a polite form of request; this is understood by the users of a language as H. P. Grice says through, among other factors, linguistic and cultural conventions ( Abrams 67). In like manner, returning to metaphor, our understanding of metaphor is enabled through some codes and conventions.
These codes, rhetorical codes, refer to “how” things (events) are represented (Chandler 124). This semiotic proposition fits well with the definition of the narrative discourse mentioned above. That supports the significance of figures of speech in narrative as playing a prominent role in mediating the story. To understand a metaphor at the level of its constituents, a resort to Saussurean linguistics might be clarifying.
In his revolutionary model, Saussure suggests that language is a signifying system, and that any signifying system is constructed of signs whose dyadic nature and the internal vertical alignment accounts for the signification. A sign consists of two interdependent parts, namely the “signifier” and the “signified”. Although Saussure himself insisted that both the signifier and the signified are purely psychological and neither is substance (18), eventually, linguists came to assign a more materialistic nature to the signifier making it the material form of the sign; that is, something that can be seen, touched, smelled, heard or tasted. On the other hand, signified maintains its classical definition as the concept to which the sign refers. For instance, bed as a sound pattern (the signifier) refers to a psychological concept as bed (the signified).
Saussure also elaborated on the way in which the signifier and the signified are related. He argues that the arbitrariness of sign is the utmost principle in it (26). Saussurean semioticians believe that there exists no intrinsic, direct or inevitable relationship between the signified and the signifier. The arbitrariness of this relationship means that the connection between the signifier and the concept to which it refers – between the sound pattern and the concept – is not transparent or natural. A certain sound pattern may refer to any concept as well as the concept to which it refers. For example, there is nothing “treeish” about the sound pattern of the word tree. They, of course, avoid alluding to any reference between the sign and an object in the outside world, and it should not be implied that being “treeish” means having similarities to the plant which is called tree. This principle of arbitrariness explains the possibility of interpretation. The fact that one signifier can refer to many signifieds (as in puns) or that one signified can be referred to by many signifiers (as in synonyms), is because the relation between these two constituents is not fixed.
Apart from the relationship between the signified and the signifier, there is a relationship between the signifieds and the signfiers of different signs. Thus, two amorphous and featureless planes are created. Louis Hjelmslev refers to the plane of signifiers as the plane of expression and that of the signifieds as the content. The arbitrary principles apply to these planes too. Some coding processes such as condensation and displacement which are at work in representation account for this arbitrariness.
He later modified his stance to include degrees of arbitrariness. What makes arbitrariness relative is the fact that some signs – to use his terminology – are “motivated”. For instance, compound nouns are motivated for they are to some extent determined by the real object. The word “screwdriver” refers to an object in the real world and is determined by the function of that object. Onomatopoeic words follow the same course and are motivated by the sounds present in the nature. However, none of them is exactly identical with the referent.
One more point needs be elaborated upon and that is the referent of the sign: if the definition of the signified is the concept to which the sign refers, then any referent in the existing world is excluded. The rationale behind it might be, as Sussane Langer represents, that in talking about things, we have the conception of them not the things themselves (19). For instance, upon hearing the word “Edison”, we do not stand up in homage to the inventor of the electricity. This counter-argument can be brought forth that in some certain cultures, contexts or discourses the sign is treated as the object or referent itself. In Islamic culture, in certain contexts, the utterance of the name of certain religious people entails certain reactions – either bodily, such as standing up to do homage to the referent, or oral citations – as if the referent was present. The history of the Jewish word “Yahweh” referring to God, is also worth mentioning. This word was at some time written in consonants only “YHWH”– a word to be, ironically, written and not read. To answer this counter-argument, the metaphor should preliminarily be approached as a sign.
Metaphor is made up of the combination of two signifieds from different signs to make a new sign. In other words, two elements from the plane of expression relate to each other one of which stands as the signifier. This fact leads to the generalization that, as Roland Barthes declares, “Humanity seems doomed to analogy” (125). That is, the moment a form is perceived, it is examined to resemble something else. This tendency to use figures and tropes reflects that our understanding of reality is relational. This substitution of signifieds and signifiers in producing a new sign defers from one trope to another and in terms of a metaphor, this substitution is based on unrelatedness. There is no resemblance between the two signifieds. In terms of literature, metaphor is a primary subject (tenor) in terms of a secondary subject (vehicle). In “Television is the modern hearth-fire”, television is the tenor which is understood in terms of hearth-fire which is the vehicle. If a metaphor is meant to be understood, it needs put an abstraction or unfamiliar object in terms of a well defined model.
Metaphors can take place in different media such as visual media. In filmic representation, the juxtaposing of two shots can create a metaphor. In advertisement, for instance, if a shot of fresh flowers are followed by a shot showing a deodorant, we understand that we will smell fresh as flowers with this product. Thus, the feature of flower is superimposed on the deodorant although there is no access to the real smell. It works in this way: a signifier – flower – is related to a concept – aromatic – by the virtue of its physical features; another signified – deodorant – refers to the same concept by showing the two images in sequence. It is as if two signifiers refer to the same signified as it is in the case of synonyms. This can be called visual metaphor in comparison to the verbal one.
So far, the importance of mediation in narrative discourse, the significance of tropes and figures of speech – in particular, metaphor – in this mediation, and the way metaphors work in terms of semiotics and literature have been introduced. Based on this information and with regard to the identification of visual metaphor, the logical course would be to declare a centrality for the metaphor in narrative. Redekop declares that narratives are always framed by some sort of central metaphor (4). As was already noted, metaphors play a prominent role in the shaping of reality by their mediation. Reality, however, can never fit the scope of this paper, but metaphors are significant in the shaping of narrative. What Saussure says about the immateriality if sign contributes to the concept of the transparency of a medium. When a medium – narrative discourse, for example – is frequently and fluently used, its reference to itself decreases and the awareness of it slides beneath the content or the message.
As for metaphor, which has an important role in narrative discourse, a central metaphor can make certain images related to it gain a degree of transparency – or conversely –and thus, act upon the course of the narration. For, the transparency makes the mediation capable of transformation and, as Chandler declares, “May modify our ends” (4). For example, the rhetorical question that begins Jeanette Winterson’s novel Written on the Body, “Why is the measure of love loss?” and its recurrence at crucial points (39) creates a central metaphor: “Loss is a measure.” In another sentence, “What you value reveals what you risk” (81) value assignment is introduced in terms of risk taking – which is more concrete. These two central metaphors can be held as contributing to the course of narration that leads to the protagonist’s abandonment of her lover (the risk of the eternal loss which is considered as measure) for the sake of her goodness and well-being (value assignment).
As the main concern of this paper is the novel Wide Sargasso Sea (WSS), the concept of metaphor can be distinguished from two aspects, namely those of inter-textuality and visual metaphor. As it was mentioned earlier, signs (words casually) are about object as their referents and not the objects as such. The identification of Bertha Mason in WSS with the Bertha Mason in Jane Eyre is metaphor in that there is a conventional relationship between the two. We understand and identify Rhys’ Bertha Mason in relation to Charlotte Bronte’s Bertha Mason. This relation, however, is not totally arbitrary, but motivated with resemblances to features of the latter. The system, to repeat the earlier definition, that allows us to say this is that, is metaphor (or figurative language in general). Thus, the way we see Bertha Mason in WSS (provided that the earlier text is read), is highly influenced by the context which is created in Jane Eyre by the relationships among the signs. Moreover, it affects the ways in which Rhys demonstrates Bertha. Consequently, this metaphor mediates the narrative discourse of WSS and, obviously, not only modifies, but determines the end.
More explicitly, visual metaphors can also be distinguished in WSS as central to the narrative discourse and as a result, the story. In discussing visual metaphors, the concept of transference is of paramount importance which is the carrying certain qualities from one sign over to another. While these signs need not be in the same clause, they typically happen in adjoining stretches of language. A visual metaphor which seems central in WSS is depicted in two clauses: “I [Bertha] let the dress fall on the floor, and looked from the fire to the dress and from the dress to the fire” (121). This sequence of looking from one object to the other, which equals the camera movement in filmic terms, transfers the qualities of these objects to each other.
In figurative language, and in particular, metaphor, the combination of two signifieds produces a new sign. In the case of the above mentioned visual metaphor, there is a symbol in place of the primary subject (tenor). Symbols or symbolic mode, as Chandler paraphrases Charles Pierce, “is a mode in which signifier does not resemble the signified but which is fundamentally arbitrary or purely conventional – so that the relationship must be learned” (Chandler 36-37). As for the case of the red dress in WSS, this mode must be taken into consideration. The red dress is closely related to the concept of identity. For instance, after the drastic visit paid by Richard to Bertha and her recovery from the short-term oblivion, she recalls (129):
I remember now that he did not recognize me. I saw him look at me and his eyes went first to
one corner and then to another, not finding what they expected. He looked at me and spoke to
me as though I were a stranger. What do you do when something happens to you like that?
Why are you laughing at me? ‘Have you hidden my red dress too? If I had been wearing that
he’d have known me?’
As it is clear, the red dress is closely identical with the concept of identity. This symbolic reference, however, is understood not in terms of any intrinsic resemblance or connection but constructed throughout the narrative by being motivated using the context. The vehicle of this visual metaphor is fire to which, the red dress’s value of identity is transferred.
This case of visual metaphor controls one of the narratives in WSS which can be summarized in this sentence: “Bertha puts the house on fire.” What leads Bertha to this end is the central metaphor which fosters the idea of the possibility to redeeming the identity through the accessible means of fire. Identifying the central metaphor makes the prediction of the course of the narrative possible to a certain degree. It, however, misses out on the details of the events and the sequence of them – story.
To conclude, if it is admitted that the rendering of reality is done by figures of speech which play a paramount role in the narrative discourse, then the identification of central metaphors or tropes in general, help the understanding of the ways in which certain codings are at work and the ways in which mediation can transform the end as well as communicate the message, if any.

Works Cited
Abbot, H. Porter. The Cambridge Introduction to Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 2002.
Abrams, M. H. A Glossary of Literary Terms. 7th ed. Boston: Heinle & Heinle, 1999.
Chandler, Daniel. Semiotics: The Basics. New York: Routledge, 2003.
Lowe, N. J. The Classical Plot and the Invention of Western Narrative. Cambridge: Cambridge
UP, 2000.
Redekop, Paul. The Mediator as Narrator: Practicing Narrative Mediation. Proc. of the Twelfth
Annual Symposium on Conflict Resolution. Winnipeg: U of Carleton, 2004.
Rhys, Jean. Wide Sargasso Sea. Ed. Angela Smith. London: Penguin, 2000.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Allegory Of American Pie By Don Mc Lean

Ask anyone what was the defining moment in the rock history of the 1960s was and all you will get is a one word answer: Woodstock. The three day rock festival that defined an era was only one of many music festivals of the '60s. But Woodstock has come to symbolize, "an era of peaceful, free- loving, drug- taking hippie youth, carefree before harsher realities hit..." (Layman 40). The Woodstock festival ended a century filled with many metamorphoses of rock'n'roll, from the era of pop music to the rebirth of folk music to the invention of acid rock. But some cynics say that rock'n'roll died with the death of Buddy Holly before the 60s even began. One such person is Don McLean. The poet behind the haunting epic song about the death of 'danceable' music, McLean wrote the ever popular song, "American Pie" (appendix 1). The most important song in rock'n'roll history, "American Pie", is the song about the demise of rock'n'roll after Buddy Holly's death and the heathenism of rock that resulted. Although McLean himself won't reveal any symbolism in his songs, "American Pie" is one of the most analyzed pieces of literature in modern society. Although not all of its secrets have been revealed, many "scholars" of the sixties will agree that the mystery of this song is one of the reasons it has become so successful- everyone wants to know the meanings of its allegories. Proof of "American Pie's" truth lies in the allegory of the song. Many People enjoy the song but have no idea what it means- Who is the Jester? What is the levee? When the deeper story is found, the importance of the song is unearthed. "American Pie" is not only a song, it is an epic poem about the course of rock'n'roll...

Carl Orffs Philosophies In Music Education

While Carl Orff is a very seminal composer of the 20th century, his greatest success and influence has been in the field of Music Education. Born on July 10th in Munich, Germany in 1895, Orff refused to speak about his past almost as if he were ashamed of it. What we do know, however, is that Orff came from a Bavarian family who was very active in the German military. His father's regiment band would often play through some of the young Orff's first attempts at composing. Although Orff was adamant about the secrecy of his past, Moser's Musik Lexicon says that he studied in the Munich Academy of Music until 1914. Orff then served in the military in the first world war. After the war, he held various positions in the Mannheim and Darmstadt opera houses then returned home to Munich to further study music. In 1925, and for the rest of his life, Orff was the head of a department and co-founder of the Guenther School for gymnastics, music, and dance in Munich where he worked with musical beginners. This is where he developed his Music Education theories. In 1937, Orff's Carmina Burana premiered in Frankfurt, Germany. Needless to say, it was a great success. With the success of Carmina Burana, Orff orphaned all of his previous works except for Catulli Carmina and the En trata which were rewritten to be acceptable by Orff. One of Orff's most admired composers was Monteverdi. In fact, much of Orff's work was based on ancient material. Orff said: I am often asked why I nearly always select old material, fairy tales and legends for my stage works. I do not look upon them as old, but rather as valid material. The time element disappears, and only the spiritual power remains. My...

Johann Sebastian Bach Biography

Throughout the history of music, many great composers, theorists, and instrumentalists have left indelible marks and influences that people today look back on to admire and aspire to. No exception to this idiom is Johann Sebastian Bach, whose impact on music was unforgettable to say the least. People today look back to his writings and works to both learn and admire. He truly can be considered a music history great. Bach, who came from a family of over 53 musicians, was nothing short of a virtuosic instrumentalist as well as a masterful composer. Born in Eisenach, Germany, on March 21, 1685, he was the son of a masterful violinist, Johann Ambrosius Bach, who taught his son the basic skills for string playing. Along with this string playing, Bach began to play the organ which is the instrument he would later on be noted for in history. His instruction on the organ came from the player at Eisenach's most important church. He instructed the young boy rather rigorously until his skills surpassed anyone?s expectations for someone of such a young age. Bach suffered early trauma when his parents died in 1695. He went to go live with his older brother, Johann Christoph, who also was a professional organist at Ohrdruf. He continued his younger brother's education on that instrument, as well as introducing him to the harpsichord. The rigorous training on these instruments combined with Bach?s masterful skill paid off for him at an early age. After several years of studying with his older brother, he received a scholarship to study in Luneberg, Germany, which is located on the northern tip of the country. As a result, he left his brother?s tutelage and went to go and study there. The teenage years brought Bach to several parts of Germany where he...

Michelangelo

Michelangelo was pessimistic in his poetry and an optimist in his artwork. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo?s poetry was pessimistic in his response to Strazzi even though he was complementing him. Michelangelo?s sculpture brought out his optimism. Michelangelo was optimistic in completing The Tomb of Pope Julius II and persevered through it?s many revisions trying to complete his vision. Sculpture was Michelangelo?s main goal and the love of his life. Since his art portrayed both optimism and pessimism, Michelangelo was in touch with his positive and negative sides, showing that he had a great and stable personality. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo Buonarroti was called to Rome in 1505 by Pope Julius II to create for him a monumental tomb. We have no clear sense of what the tomb was to look like, since over the years it went through at least five conceptual revisions. The tomb was to have three levels; the bottom level was to have sculpted figures representing Victory and bond slaves. The second level was to have statues of Moses and Saint Paul as well as symbolic figures of the active and contemplative life- representative of the human striving for, and reception of, knowledge. The third level, it is assumed, was to have an effigy of the deceased pope. The tomb of Pope Julius II was never finished. What was finished of the tomb represents a twenty-year span of frustrating delays and revised schemes. Michelangelo had hardly begun work on the pope?s tomb when Julius commanded him to fresco the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to complete the work done in the previous century under Sixtus IV. The overall organization consists of four large triangles at...

Oscar Wilde

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde was born in Dublin Ireland on October 16, 1854. He is one of the most talented and most controversial writers of his time. He was well known for his wit, flamboyance, and creative genius and with his little dramatic training showing his natural talent for stage and theatre. He is termed a martyr by some and may be the first true self-publicist and was known for his style of dress and odd behavior. Wilde, 1882 His Father, William Wilde, was a highly accredited doctor and his mother, Jane Francesca Elgee, was a writer of revolutionary poems. Oscar had a brother William Charles Kingsbury along with his father's three illegitimate children, Henry, Emily, and Mary. His sister, Isola Emily Francesca died in 1867 at only ten years of age from a sudden fever, greatly affecting Oscar and his family. He kept a lock of her hair in an envelope and later wrote the poem 'Requiescat' in her memory. Oscar and his brother William both attended the Protora Royal School at Enniskillen. He had little in common with the other children. He disliked games and took more interest in flowers and sunsets. He was extremely passionate about anything that had to do with ancient Greece and with Classics. Wilde during school years In 1871, he was awarded a Royal School Scholarship to Trinity College in Dublin and received many awards and earned the highest honor the college offered to an undergraduate, the Foundation Scholarship. In 1874, he also won the College's Berkley Gold Medal for Greek and was awarded a Demyship to Magdalen College, Oxford. After graduating from Oxford, Oscar moved to London with his friend Frank Miles, a well-known portrait painter of the time. In 1878 his poem Ravenna was published, for which he won the...

The History Of Greek Theater

Theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century BCE, with the Sopocles, the great writer of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, heroes and the ideals of life were depicted and glorified. It was believed that man should live for honor and fame, his action was courageous and glorious and his life would climax in a great and noble death. Originally, the hero's recognition was created by selfish behaviors and little thought of service to others. As the Greeks grew toward city-states and colonization, it became the destiny and ambition of the hero to gain honor by serving his city. The second major characteristic of the early Greek world was the supernatural. The two worlds were not separate, as the gods lived in the same world as the men, and they interfered in the men's lives as they chose to. It was the gods who sent suffering and evil to men. In the plays of Sophocles, the gods brought about the hero's downfall because of a tragic flaw in the character of the hero. In Greek tragedy, suffering brought knowledge of worldly matters and of the individual. Aristotle attempted to explain how an audience could observe tragic events and still have a pleasurable experience. Aristotle, by searching the works of writers of Greek tragedy, Aeschulus, Euripides and Sophocles (whose Oedipus Rex he considered the finest of all Greek tragedies), arrived at his definition of tragedy. This explanation has a profound influence for more than twenty centuries on those writing tragedies, most significantly Shakespeare. Aristotle's analysis of tragedy began with a description of the effect such a work had on the audience as a "catharsis" or purging of the emotions. He decided that catharsis was the purging of two specific emotions, pity and...

Scholarship Essay About Goals

Ever since I was a young kid I have always been interested with aircraft. I was so curious of how airplane's fly. I remember taking my toys apart to see how it works. As a kid I wanted to go to the airport to watch the airplanes land and fly and pondered how this happens. Other kids wanted to go to the amusement places. As I grew older I became more and more interested in aircraft and the technology behind it. I always involved myself with aviation early on. I read books and magazines on aviation, took museum tours, built model airplanes. When I was younger my father would take me to aircraft repair facilities where I would watch in great fascination. In my teens, went up to the military bases and befriended many soldiers involved with aircraft and asked them numerous questions. I got to meet many aeronautics engineers and borrowed their old textbooks and read them till the wee hours of the morning. As technology improved with information superhighway, I logged on the web. Stayed up for hours and hours searching through web pages and web pages of information about aircraft and technology. I started my elementary school in the Philippines, then we moved to U.S. and continued my high school education and graduated. Enrolled at the CCSF to pursue my college education and now I am in the 2nd year in CCSF taking aeronautics. My goal now is to obtain my AS degree from the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) so I can transfer to a University and get a Bachelors degree and to continue for my Masters degree in Aeronautics Engineering. I will strive hard to reach the peak level of my career which is a Professor and hopefully to be an aeronautic professor so...

Circus Circus Enterprises Case Studies

Executive Summary: Circus Circus Enterprises is a leader and will continue to be in the gaming industry. In recent years, they have seen a decline in profit and revenue; management tends to blame the decrease on continuing disruptions from remodeling, expansion, and increased competition. Consequently, Circus has reported decreases in its net income for 1997 and 1998 and management believes this trend will continue as competition heightens. Currently the company is involved in several joint ventures, its brand of casino entertainment has traditionally catered to the low rollers and family vacationers through its theme park. Circus should continue to expand its existing operations into new market segments. This shift will allow them to attract the up scale gambler. Overview Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc founded in 1974 is in the business of entertainment, with its core strength in casino gambling. The company?s asset base, operating cash flow, profit margin, multiple markets and customers, rank it as one of the gaming industry leaders. Partners William G. Bennett an aggressive cost cutter and William N. Pennington purchased Circus Circus in 1974 as a small and unprofitable casino. It went public in 1983, from 1993 to 1997; the average return on capital invested was 16.5%. Circus Circus operates several properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Laughlin, and one in Mississippi, as well as 50% ownership in three other casinos and a theme park. On January 31,1998 Circus reported net income of 89.9 million and revenues of 1.35 billion, this is a down from 100 million on 1.3 billion in 1997. Management sees this decline in revenue due to the rapid and extensive expansion and the increased competition that Circus is facing. Well established in the casino gaming industry the corporation has its focus in the entertainment business and has particularly a popular theme resort concept....

Effect Of Civil War On American Economy

The Economies of the North and South, 1861-1865 In 1861, a great war in American history began. It was a civil war between the north and south that was by no means civil. This war would have great repercussions upon the economy of this country and the states within it. The American Civil War began with secession, creating a divided union of sorts, and sparked an incredibly cataclysmic four years. Although the actual war began with secession, this was not the only driving force. The economy of the Southern states, the Confederacy, greatly if not entirely depended on the institution of slavery. The Confederacy was heavily reliant on agriculture, and they used the profits made from the sale of such raw materials to purchase finished goods to use and enjoy. Their major export was cotton, which thrived on the warm river deltas and could easily be shipped to major ocean ports from towns on the Mississippi and numerous river cities. Slavery was a key part of this, as slaves were the ones who harvested and planted the cotton. Being such an enormous unpaid work force, the profits made were extraordinarily high and the price for the unfinished goods drastically low in comparison; especially since he invention of the cotton gin in 1793 which made the work all that much easier and quicker. In contrast, the economical structure of the Northern states, the Union, was vastly dependent on industry. Slavery did not exist in most of the Union, as there was no demand for it due to the type of industrial development taking place. As the Union had a paid work force, the profits made were lower and the cost of the finished manufactured item higher. In turn, the Union used the profits and purchased raw materials to use. This cycle...

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Trade Embargoes

Although I am a strong critic of the use and effectiveness of economic sanctions, such as trade embargoes, for the sake of this assignment, I will present both their theoretical advantages and their disadvantages based upon my research. Trade embargoes and blockades have traditionally been used to entice nations to alter their behavior or to punish them for certain behavior. The intentions behind these policies are generally noble, at least on the surface. However, these policies can have side effects. For example, FDR's blockade of raw materials against the Japanese in Manchuria in the 1930s arguably led to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which resulted in U.S. involvement in World War II. The decades-long embargo against Cuba not only did not lead to the topple of the communist regime there, but may have strengthened Castro's hold on the island and has created animosity toward the United States in Latin America and much suffering by the people of Cuba. Various studies have concluded that embargoes and other economic sanctions generally have not been effective from a utilitarian or policy perspective, yet these policies continue. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Trade Embargoes Strengths Trade embargoes and other sanctions can give the sender government the appearance of taking strong measures in response to a given situation without resorting to violence. Sanctions can be imposed in conjunction with other measures to achieve conflict prevention and mitigation goals. Sanctions may be ineffective: goals may be too elusive, the means too gentle, or cooperation from other countries insufficient. It is usually difficult to determine whether embargoes were an effective deterrent against future misdeeds: embargoes may contribute to a successful outcome, but can rarely achieve ambitious objectives alone. Some regimes are highly resistant to external pressures to reform. At the same time, trade sanctions may narrow the...