New Terrors the presidents use of terror in his agenda

Word Count: 2081 |

President Bush has called upon the authority vested in his position and used his presidential powers to a higher capacity than any other president in United States history. Manipulating the system can be very difficult and time consuming for the President’s administration, but it is well worth pursuing to pass its own agenda. By securing an unprecedented amount of presidential power, and using meaningless rhetoric, Bush began to use his ultimate weapon. His ultimate power is within his title, and the rhetoric he publishes as this authority. When he makes a statement, the credibility of the American government is attached to the message. His ultimate weapon is the ability to abuse this position for the single minded agenda that his administration has pursued during his two terms in office. This ultimate weapon hurt his American constituents in many ways, with fear as a motive for this actions. The system of checks and balances must be steadily maintained to maximize efficiency of the system. If the President can become an all knowing and all achieving power, then he becomes not a representation of our country, but he will yield a totalitarian power upon his citizens. President Bush has used the threat of terrorism throughout his presidency to forward his own agenda; this stage was set at the turn of the last century where the threat of terrorism began.
Securing unprecedented amounts of presidential power began in the 2000 Presidential Election. Dialogue during this election between George W. Bush and Democratic candidate Al Gore was many times driven by the threat of terrorism. This was an easy win for Republican candidates because of their rhetoric within the Republican’s 2000 Presidential Platform. Chairman Governor Tommy Thompson was the head of this committee and as the platform states:
…we must prepare for the most dangerous threats as well as the most likely ones. Therefore the United States must be extremely vigilant about the possibility that future terrorists might use weapons of mass destruction, which are increasingly available and present an unprecedented threat to America. In many instances the military will have to rethink it traditional doctrine and begin to focus on counterterrorism, human intelligence gathering, and unconventional warfare. (“Republican”)
This flowery language within their platform gave the Republicans the upper hand and the eventual win to President George W. Bush, with 271 electoral votes. Democratic candidate John Kerry was also defeated in his 2004 race to the presidency, although he secured just under half of the popular vote (2000). What happened during these four years, the first term, that President Bush had in the White house? He began down the not so yellow brick road to a fight for the War on Terrorism, and while doing so began more of an extensive claim to unprecedented presidential power.
Most of what led to the unprecedented amount of power in the executive branch began on September 11th, 2001. This day will live in our minds forever, which is exactly the WMD, weapon of mass deception, which the Bush administration needed. The Washington Post named this day a disaster, and it was the same through everyone’s eyes (Grunwald). On this day, the World Trade Center Towers were destroyed in a terrorist attack, and in the next day’s Washington Post, hundreds were listed as dead, with a final count over 3000 in testimonials given to the Counterterrorism and Counterintelligence Committees (Watson). This incident began to foreshadow the events to come.
The first and most important response to the attacks on 9/11 was the instant attraction and direction toward declaring war on the people of Iraq. CBS News National Security Correspondent David Martin reported:
…barely five hours after American Airlines Flight 77 plowed into the Pentagon, Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld was telling his aides to come up with plans for striking Iraq — even though there was no evidence linking Saddam Hussein to the attacks. That’s according to notes taken by aides who were with Rumsfeld in the National Military Command Center on Sept. 11 – notes that show exactly where the road toward war with Iraq began… (Martin)
This news, unfortunately was not broken to the media until almost the one year anniversary of the World Trade Center bombings. The War in Iraq has had an unfortunate impact on our families, economy, and country as a whole. Wouldn’t it be nice if we would have foreseen the terrible price of this war? While some informed officials stood by helplessly during his fight to power, most did almost nothing to get in the way of this pursuit. With no connection between 9/11 and Iraq, the President grasped for any ground that he could think of. Terrorists. Any and all terrorists would be taken care of by the United States Armed Forces. Of course, the United States can rebuild a country, for it’s the Captain of the World Police. As of today, the Department of Defense has confirmed 3,835 deaths, two of which were confirmed just yesterday (Iraq). Iraq was an invasion done because the administration simply wanted to.
Another beastly example of unprecedented power was the ultimate passage of the PATRIOT Act. This act and its sister law, the FISA bill, led to the ability of our government to spy and wiretap without warrant, a direct infraction of our civil liberties granted to citizens by the Bill of Rights. Many cases of these infractions began with non-citizens also called enemy combatants. These enemy combatants were obviously not citizens and while using the negative stereotypes toward Muslim culture, a strong prejudice developed. The American Civil Liberties Union has relentlessly rooted for its repeal; barely a month after the attacks, this bills one-size fits all approach began its rampage through our judicial system. In addition, the ACLU continues to beg its audience of listeners to act now and call for its reform. (“Reform”) The PATRIOT Act continues to bring down our judicial system through its inadequate precedent, and infiltration of basic civil rights and freedoms.
Using fear as a motivator for voters is an unfair and unethical way to pass legislation before a public. Sociologists explain this phenomenon when exploring the latest political arena. Research that was done during the last few years shows that when the President makes an important announcement about a terrorist threat, his popularity rises. For instance, in a Gallup poll following the 9/11 attacks, a new widespread support
developed behind the president and his chosen administrators. A registered nurse is quoted as saying she supports a quick and just, because she believes it is required for American’s future safety, but wants to end it quickly. She, along with many other Americans, are concerned about the world her children will grow up in. The editor of the Gallup poll, Frank Newport, says “People are not only rallying around the president, they’re also rallying around the country (Benedetto A1).” Steven Ruggles, the Director of the Minnesota Population Center, has also theorized about the influence of terror threats and the president’s approval rating (Ruggles).
This can easily be explained by knowing some sociology basics. Professor Burbidge, a sociologist part of Maplewood’s social science department explained this very clearly when she said that in-groups are any groups that you belong to, and out-groups you do not. In-groups tend to instill loyalty and pride in its members so when an out-group threatens its power members have a tendency to band together (Burbidge). This would lead our American public to back any President in a time of crisis, not only George W. Bush. Without a clear mind at hand, our public cannot make rational decisions about anything, including homeland security and defense. This throws the system out of balance very quickly.
Although these impacts can be readily seen by Americans on their own soil, it is also seen impacting our allied countries, such as Great Britian. A civil rights group, Liberty, calls for the repeal of the Terrorism Act of 2000 and the power it has given its officials. Claims of restrictions on due process, and individual rights have been quashed under this new “terror threat” scenario (Liberty).
We still have not had any other attacks that would compare in magnitude to that of the World Trade Center attacks; this threat still looms closely in the air. The Department of Defense has created a colored system to alert the public when information has reached our government about an imminent attack. There are five colors of terrorism intensity, and while the government does not provide the information that has caused a terror alert change, security analysts like Bruce Schneier still continue to criticize it. “Warnings are based on ‘uncorroborated intelligence,’ and issued even though ‘there is no credible, specific information about targets or method of attack,’” he claims (Schneier). This is important information that is withheld from the public. Instead of giving the public more information to understand, the government should be upfront an honest with its constituents. With only a looming overhead threat of unknown terror, the American public are treated like deer in headlights only giving them a last moment to make an irrational and probably costly decision.
Without knowing the outcome of the Presidential Election in 2008, we will have poor future analysis on the current environment politically speaking. This is a huge determinate of many globally affecting issues that our constituents will need to be involved in. Their criticism and development of ideas is imperative to keep a strong united nation. We are the United States, after all. This election could set a global precedent on dealing with the War on Terror in the 21st Century. Whether our new agenda is boosted in a left or right-winged direction, we will begin to see the new path unraveling. Only the future will be revealed as time passes. Hopefully the public will realize that under this new threat of terror we have been manipulated and molded to thinking that the administration is always in the right. This use of political capital is unfair when its simply false threats declared to the public.

Worked Cited

“2000 Presidential Election.” Electoral Vote Totals. 2000. U.S. Electoral College. 24 Oct 2007 .
Benedetto, Richard and Patrick O’Driscoll. “Poll finds a united nation.” USA Today 16 Sep 2001: A1.
Burbidge, Stacy. “Social Construction of Reality.” Lecture. MCC Maple Woods, Kansas
City. 17 Aug 2007.
Grunwald, Michael. “Terrorists Hijack 4 Airliners, Destroy World Trade Center, Hit Pentagon; Hundreds Dead.” Washington Post 12 Sep. 2001: A01.
Iraq Coalition Casualty Count. Military Fatalities. 24 Oct. 2007. <>.
Liberty. “New Terrorism Act powers will make Britain less safe.” Press Release. 13 April
2006. 24 Oct 2007 .
Martin, David. “Plans for Iraq Attack Began on 9/11.” CBS News 4 Sep. 2002. 24 Oct 2007 .
“Reform the PATRIOT Act – Don’t Expand it!” The American Civil Liberties Union Online. 25 Sep. 2001. 24 Oct 2007 .
“Republican Platform 2000.” CNN News. 24 Oct 2007 .
Ruggles, Steven. “2004 Presidential Election Graphs.” Chart. University of Minnesota History Department 18 Oct. 2007. 24 Oct 2007 .
Schneier, Bruce. “Do Terror Alerts Work?” The Rake Magazine Online. Oct 2004. 24 Oct 2007 .
Watson, Dale. “The Terrorist Threat Confronting the United States: Interview with the Executive Assistant Director of the FBI over Counterterrorism and Counterintelligence.” Senate Select Committee on Intelligence. (2002): February 6.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Allegory Of American Pie By Don Mc Lean

Ask anyone what was the defining moment in the rock history of the 1960s was and all you will get is a one word answer: Woodstock. The three day rock festival that defined an era was only one of many music festivals of the '60s. But Woodstock has come to symbolize, "an era of peaceful, free- loving, drug- taking hippie youth, carefree before harsher realities hit..." (Layman 40). The Woodstock festival ended a century filled with many metamorphoses of rock'n'roll, from the era of pop music to the rebirth of folk music to the invention of acid rock. But some cynics say that rock'n'roll died with the death of Buddy Holly before the 60s even began. One such person is Don McLean. The poet behind the haunting epic song about the death of 'danceable' music, McLean wrote the ever popular song, "American Pie" (appendix 1). The most important song in rock'n'roll history, "American Pie", is the song about the demise of rock'n'roll after Buddy Holly's death and the heathenism of rock that resulted. Although McLean himself won't reveal any symbolism in his songs, "American Pie" is one of the most analyzed pieces of literature in modern society. Although not all of its secrets have been revealed, many "scholars" of the sixties will agree that the mystery of this song is one of the reasons it has become so successful- everyone wants to know the meanings of its allegories. Proof of "American Pie's" truth lies in the allegory of the song. Many People enjoy the song but have no idea what it means- Who is the Jester? What is the levee? When the deeper story is found, the importance of the song is unearthed. "American Pie" is not only a song, it is an epic poem about the course of rock'n'roll...

Carl Orffs Philosophies In Music Education

While Carl Orff is a very seminal composer of the 20th century, his greatest success and influence has been in the field of Music Education. Born on July 10th in Munich, Germany in 1895, Orff refused to speak about his past almost as if he were ashamed of it. What we do know, however, is that Orff came from a Bavarian family who was very active in the German military. His father's regiment band would often play through some of the young Orff's first attempts at composing. Although Orff was adamant about the secrecy of his past, Moser's Musik Lexicon says that he studied in the Munich Academy of Music until 1914. Orff then served in the military in the first world war. After the war, he held various positions in the Mannheim and Darmstadt opera houses then returned home to Munich to further study music. In 1925, and for the rest of his life, Orff was the head of a department and co-founder of the Guenther School for gymnastics, music, and dance in Munich where he worked with musical beginners. This is where he developed his Music Education theories. In 1937, Orff's Carmina Burana premiered in Frankfurt, Germany. Needless to say, it was a great success. With the success of Carmina Burana, Orff orphaned all of his previous works except for Catulli Carmina and the En trata which were rewritten to be acceptable by Orff. One of Orff's most admired composers was Monteverdi. In fact, much of Orff's work was based on ancient material. Orff said: I am often asked why I nearly always select old material, fairy tales and legends for my stage works. I do not look upon them as old, but rather as valid material. The time element disappears, and only the spiritual power remains. My...

Johann Sebastian Bach Biography

Throughout the history of music, many great composers, theorists, and instrumentalists have left indelible marks and influences that people today look back on to admire and aspire to. No exception to this idiom is Johann Sebastian Bach, whose impact on music was unforgettable to say the least. People today look back to his writings and works to both learn and admire. He truly can be considered a music history great. Bach, who came from a family of over 53 musicians, was nothing short of a virtuosic instrumentalist as well as a masterful composer. Born in Eisenach, Germany, on March 21, 1685, he was the son of a masterful violinist, Johann Ambrosius Bach, who taught his son the basic skills for string playing. Along with this string playing, Bach began to play the organ which is the instrument he would later on be noted for in history. His instruction on the organ came from the player at Eisenach's most important church. He instructed the young boy rather rigorously until his skills surpassed anyone?s expectations for someone of such a young age. Bach suffered early trauma when his parents died in 1695. He went to go live with his older brother, Johann Christoph, who also was a professional organist at Ohrdruf. He continued his younger brother's education on that instrument, as well as introducing him to the harpsichord. The rigorous training on these instruments combined with Bach?s masterful skill paid off for him at an early age. After several years of studying with his older brother, he received a scholarship to study in Luneberg, Germany, which is located on the northern tip of the country. As a result, he left his brother?s tutelage and went to go and study there. The teenage years brought Bach to several parts of Germany where he...


Michelangelo was pessimistic in his poetry and an optimist in his artwork. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo?s poetry was pessimistic in his response to Strazzi even though he was complementing him. Michelangelo?s sculpture brought out his optimism. Michelangelo was optimistic in completing The Tomb of Pope Julius II and persevered through it?s many revisions trying to complete his vision. Sculpture was Michelangelo?s main goal and the love of his life. Since his art portrayed both optimism and pessimism, Michelangelo was in touch with his positive and negative sides, showing that he had a great and stable personality. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo Buonarroti was called to Rome in 1505 by Pope Julius II to create for him a monumental tomb. We have no clear sense of what the tomb was to look like, since over the years it went through at least five conceptual revisions. The tomb was to have three levels; the bottom level was to have sculpted figures representing Victory and bond slaves. The second level was to have statues of Moses and Saint Paul as well as symbolic figures of the active and contemplative life- representative of the human striving for, and reception of, knowledge. The third level, it is assumed, was to have an effigy of the deceased pope. The tomb of Pope Julius II was never finished. What was finished of the tomb represents a twenty-year span of frustrating delays and revised schemes. Michelangelo had hardly begun work on the pope?s tomb when Julius commanded him to fresco the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to complete the work done in the previous century under Sixtus IV. The overall organization consists of four large triangles at...

Oscar Wilde

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde was born in Dublin Ireland on October 16, 1854. He is one of the most talented and most controversial writers of his time. He was well known for his wit, flamboyance, and creative genius and with his little dramatic training showing his natural talent for stage and theatre. He is termed a martyr by some and may be the first true self-publicist and was known for his style of dress and odd behavior. Wilde, 1882 His Father, William Wilde, was a highly accredited doctor and his mother, Jane Francesca Elgee, was a writer of revolutionary poems. Oscar had a brother William Charles Kingsbury along with his father's three illegitimate children, Henry, Emily, and Mary. His sister, Isola Emily Francesca died in 1867 at only ten years of age from a sudden fever, greatly affecting Oscar and his family. He kept a lock of her hair in an envelope and later wrote the poem 'Requiescat' in her memory. Oscar and his brother William both attended the Protora Royal School at Enniskillen. He had little in common with the other children. He disliked games and took more interest in flowers and sunsets. He was extremely passionate about anything that had to do with ancient Greece and with Classics. Wilde during school years In 1871, he was awarded a Royal School Scholarship to Trinity College in Dublin and received many awards and earned the highest honor the college offered to an undergraduate, the Foundation Scholarship. In 1874, he also won the College's Berkley Gold Medal for Greek and was awarded a Demyship to Magdalen College, Oxford. After graduating from Oxford, Oscar moved to London with his friend Frank Miles, a well-known portrait painter of the time. In 1878 his poem Ravenna was published, for which he won the...

The History Of Greek Theater

Theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century BCE, with the Sopocles, the great writer of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, heroes and the ideals of life were depicted and glorified. It was believed that man should live for honor and fame, his action was courageous and glorious and his life would climax in a great and noble death. Originally, the hero's recognition was created by selfish behaviors and little thought of service to others. As the Greeks grew toward city-states and colonization, it became the destiny and ambition of the hero to gain honor by serving his city. The second major characteristic of the early Greek world was the supernatural. The two worlds were not separate, as the gods lived in the same world as the men, and they interfered in the men's lives as they chose to. It was the gods who sent suffering and evil to men. In the plays of Sophocles, the gods brought about the hero's downfall because of a tragic flaw in the character of the hero. In Greek tragedy, suffering brought knowledge of worldly matters and of the individual. Aristotle attempted to explain how an audience could observe tragic events and still have a pleasurable experience. Aristotle, by searching the works of writers of Greek tragedy, Aeschulus, Euripides and Sophocles (whose Oedipus Rex he considered the finest of all Greek tragedies), arrived at his definition of tragedy. This explanation has a profound influence for more than twenty centuries on those writing tragedies, most significantly Shakespeare. Aristotle's analysis of tragedy began with a description of the effect such a work had on the audience as a "catharsis" or purging of the emotions. He decided that catharsis was the purging of two specific emotions, pity and...

Scholarship Essay About Goals

Ever since I was a young kid I have always been interested with aircraft. I was so curious of how airplane's fly. I remember taking my toys apart to see how it works. As a kid I wanted to go to the airport to watch the airplanes land and fly and pondered how this happens. Other kids wanted to go to the amusement places. As I grew older I became more and more interested in aircraft and the technology behind it. I always involved myself with aviation early on. I read books and magazines on aviation, took museum tours, built model airplanes. When I was younger my father would take me to aircraft repair facilities where I would watch in great fascination. In my teens, went up to the military bases and befriended many soldiers involved with aircraft and asked them numerous questions. I got to meet many aeronautics engineers and borrowed their old textbooks and read them till the wee hours of the morning. As technology improved with information superhighway, I logged on the web. Stayed up for hours and hours searching through web pages and web pages of information about aircraft and technology. I started my elementary school in the Philippines, then we moved to U.S. and continued my high school education and graduated. Enrolled at the CCSF to pursue my college education and now I am in the 2nd year in CCSF taking aeronautics. My goal now is to obtain my AS degree from the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) so I can transfer to a University and get a Bachelors degree and to continue for my Masters degree in Aeronautics Engineering. I will strive hard to reach the peak level of my career which is a Professor and hopefully to be an aeronautic professor so...

Circus Circus Enterprises Case Studies

Executive Summary: Circus Circus Enterprises is a leader and will continue to be in the gaming industry. In recent years, they have seen a decline in profit and revenue; management tends to blame the decrease on continuing disruptions from remodeling, expansion, and increased competition. Consequently, Circus has reported decreases in its net income for 1997 and 1998 and management believes this trend will continue as competition heightens. Currently the company is involved in several joint ventures, its brand of casino entertainment has traditionally catered to the low rollers and family vacationers through its theme park. Circus should continue to expand its existing operations into new market segments. This shift will allow them to attract the up scale gambler. Overview Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc founded in 1974 is in the business of entertainment, with its core strength in casino gambling. The company?s asset base, operating cash flow, profit margin, multiple markets and customers, rank it as one of the gaming industry leaders. Partners William G. Bennett an aggressive cost cutter and William N. Pennington purchased Circus Circus in 1974 as a small and unprofitable casino. It went public in 1983, from 1993 to 1997; the average return on capital invested was 16.5%. Circus Circus operates several properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Laughlin, and one in Mississippi, as well as 50% ownership in three other casinos and a theme park. On January 31,1998 Circus reported net income of 89.9 million and revenues of 1.35 billion, this is a down from 100 million on 1.3 billion in 1997. Management sees this decline in revenue due to the rapid and extensive expansion and the increased competition that Circus is facing. Well established in the casino gaming industry the corporation has its focus in the entertainment business and has particularly a popular theme resort concept....

Effect Of Civil War On American Economy

The Economies of the North and South, 1861-1865 In 1861, a great war in American history began. It was a civil war between the north and south that was by no means civil. This war would have great repercussions upon the economy of this country and the states within it. The American Civil War began with secession, creating a divided union of sorts, and sparked an incredibly cataclysmic four years. Although the actual war began with secession, this was not the only driving force. The economy of the Southern states, the Confederacy, greatly if not entirely depended on the institution of slavery. The Confederacy was heavily reliant on agriculture, and they used the profits made from the sale of such raw materials to purchase finished goods to use and enjoy. Their major export was cotton, which thrived on the warm river deltas and could easily be shipped to major ocean ports from towns on the Mississippi and numerous river cities. Slavery was a key part of this, as slaves were the ones who harvested and planted the cotton. Being such an enormous unpaid work force, the profits made were extraordinarily high and the price for the unfinished goods drastically low in comparison; especially since he invention of the cotton gin in 1793 which made the work all that much easier and quicker. In contrast, the economical structure of the Northern states, the Union, was vastly dependent on industry. Slavery did not exist in most of the Union, as there was no demand for it due to the type of industrial development taking place. As the Union had a paid work force, the profits made were lower and the cost of the finished manufactured item higher. In turn, the Union used the profits and purchased raw materials to use. This cycle...

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Trade Embargoes

Although I am a strong critic of the use and effectiveness of economic sanctions, such as trade embargoes, for the sake of this assignment, I will present both their theoretical advantages and their disadvantages based upon my research. Trade embargoes and blockades have traditionally been used to entice nations to alter their behavior or to punish them for certain behavior. The intentions behind these policies are generally noble, at least on the surface. However, these policies can have side effects. For example, FDR's blockade of raw materials against the Japanese in Manchuria in the 1930s arguably led to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which resulted in U.S. involvement in World War II. The decades-long embargo against Cuba not only did not lead to the topple of the communist regime there, but may have strengthened Castro's hold on the island and has created animosity toward the United States in Latin America and much suffering by the people of Cuba. Various studies have concluded that embargoes and other economic sanctions generally have not been effective from a utilitarian or policy perspective, yet these policies continue. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Trade Embargoes Strengths Trade embargoes and other sanctions can give the sender government the appearance of taking strong measures in response to a given situation without resorting to violence. Sanctions can be imposed in conjunction with other measures to achieve conflict prevention and mitigation goals. Sanctions may be ineffective: goals may be too elusive, the means too gentle, or cooperation from other countries insufficient. It is usually difficult to determine whether embargoes were an effective deterrent against future misdeeds: embargoes may contribute to a successful outcome, but can rarely achieve ambitious objectives alone. Some regimes are highly resistant to external pressures to reform. At the same time, trade sanctions may narrow the...