Progressivism Revival And Reform

Word Count: 2248 |

Ideas of reform are born in every generation like children, and like children, ideas need nurturing, education and time to mature. In time children become adults, reform ideas become movements, and each in their turn have offspring. The Progressive movement has an impressive genealogy. Its ancestry includes Jeffersonian Liberalism, pre-civil war social activists and abolitionists- Lincoln and emancipation.
After the war, reconstruction made way for expansion and further industrialization. The farmer, who had been encouraged to settle, grow and expand, fell on hard times. Faced with infestation, drought and debt the Midwest and Plains farmers came together under the Grange Movement. The traditionally conservative farmer appealed to the government against the railroads and the monopolistic control of pricing by merchants and suppliers. The Grange formed to lend support, information and provide a place to meet and discuss solutions. The focal point was the problem of economic depression. In the South and West the Farmer’s Alliance did the same. The Declaration of the National Grange (1874) shows the movement advancing from support to reform in action. The self-sustaining Granger rally “buy less, produce more” turned into the Alliance’s “less corn, more hell” (Mary Lease 1886). In 1889 “Agitation, education and cooperation…to overcome the impoverishment and bondage of so many” became the aims of the National Farmer’s Alliance and Industrial Union established by Charles Macune and William Lamb. From these early attempts at organization of the agrarian society came the partisan politics of the Populist Movement.
The Populist Party was the product of the union between the Farmer’s Alliance and the Knights of Labor. In 1890 they made their bid for power. They held the reins of the Kansas legislature and had their first senator, William Peffer, the Rustic Rasputin. Ignatius Donnelly, another colorful character, drafted the first Populist Platform in 1892.
The Populist Platform, presenting the common people (especially the farmers) was against the corruption of industry and government. This included but was not limited to the railroads, the banks, corporations, and any politician who supported them. Populists wanted free coinage of silver, graduated income taxes, restricted immigration, and the initiative and referendum. Their presidential candidate, James B. Weaver, polled 22 electoral votes and received more than 1,000,000 popular votes but lost to Democrat Grover Cleveland.
During the four years leading to the next presidential election the Populists cause fought against violence, fraud and intimidation from the outside and dissension from within. Divided in how best to get their reforms realized Populists formed into two factions, the Fusionists and the Midroaders. The Fusionists wanted to merge with the Democrats. They thought (correctly) a regional third party would not obtain power but their influence could force changes in the Democratic Platform. The Mid-Roaders believed the devious Democrats would not compromise but eradicate the third party threat. Joining them would assure this. Mid-Roaders were not what the name infers. They wished to be separate from both the Republicans and Democrats.
Mid-Roaders were really the radical Populists with higher expectations for their agenda of reforms.
The platform of 1896 favored more federal intervention to aid the economic situation of the farmer and the working class and eliminate corporate abuse and corruption. The main trust was money- the desire for National currency and free silver and gold. The (silver) Democrats shared the issue of free coinage. The Democratic convention nominated William Jennings Bryan on the free-silver platform. The hopes of National power for the Populists faded when they also indorsed Bryan. The Mid-Roaders presidential choice, Tom Watson, was nominated for vice-president but the Fusionists had bartered a deal with the Democrats and Watson was replaced with the Democratic choice, Arthur Sewall. The Populist Party was finished but the ideas survived to expand and become fecund. The agrarian populists would be the progenitor of the urban progressive.
About the time, the farmers were becoming unsettled and the Wild West was being tamed, other issues of reform were taking hold in other areas. Reformists had many names but most belonged to the family of the progressive. At the center of this family was the Economy. No matter how distantly related or how much of a black sheep all branches of the family could trace back to the Economy. Furthermore, in their diversity, most progressives had some common areas of concern and shared some general characteristics.
Most modern historians agree the progressive movement’s heart beat around Regulation of large corporations and monopolies, Efficiency, Democracy, and Social Justice which can be interpreted as Economy, Politics, Social Democracy, and Moral Purity. While not challenging the basis ideology of capitalism, progressives believed that the government needed purging; then to efficiently start working for the people and establish fairness in economic practices. The model progressive was a moralist needing to protect and educate the weak.
The diversity of issues and the division of how to accomplish the reforms was always a weakness in the progressive movement. The conservative camp had two sides. Pietistic social reformers sought to bring order and stability to society using the scientific approach combined with the benevolent enlightenment of the Social Gospel. The controlling elitist wanted a (oligarchy?) corporate capitalist state, social control through a strict moral code. The “other” progressive was the liberal idealist. They really wanted to place authority back into the hands of the people. These forward thinking activists were enthusiastic, more interracial and multi-classed than the conservatives. From this point progressivism becomes radical and moves towards socialism and anarchy (i.e. Eugene Debs and Emma Goldman).
Women played a major role in both conservative and liberal progressivism. In many ways they did not just step forward, they were pushed. Women had always been a vital working force in the agrarian community. By seeking suffrage, their voices added to the Populist Movement. The Women’s Suffrage Movement began before the Civil War. Unable to voice their opinions in temperance meetings, Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton established the National American Woman Suffrage Association later to merge and become the National American Woman Suffrage Association. Other notables were Carrie Chapman, Jane Addams and Alice Paul. The enfranchisement of women was ratified in 1920 (19th Amendment).
Temperance was a moral and social issue with women. Alcohol led to perdition! Frances Willard formed the religious based WCTU in 1874. The male oriented Anti-Saloon Movement came later in 1893. Prohibition passed with the 18th amendment in 1919 (repealed by the 21st amendment in 1933).
As the urban growth continued middle class (white) women found reason to come together in Woman’s Clubs. The clubs expanded from self-improvement socials to community reform. Women became crusaders for just about everything from suffrage to sanitation reform. Jane Addams, and many others, formed Settlement Houses. The women lived in the settlements among the working class communities. From these centers, they attempted to improve the standard of living for the less fortunate women and children by providing daycare, education, healthcare and counseling. Reforms in child labor led to the Children’s Bureau and the first woman (Julia Lathrop) in a federal agency. One reformer, Margaret Sanger left Hull House and nursing to become an advocate for birth control. The New Woman wanted control of her body and sexuality. The working class woman needed education to decrease family size or unwanted pregnancies.
The Progressive Party of 1912 had commonalties with the Populists. Economic issues, suspicion of the markets and aversion of big business, again at the center. William Allen White said progressivism was just populism that had “shaved it’s whiskers, washed it’s shirt, put on a derby and moved up to middle class.” Theodore Roosevelt’s New Nationalism favored broad social welfare (Wilson’s New Freedom did not) and increased regulation of big business (Wilson wanted small enterprise).
A good reform can also have a negative impact on society, sometimes intentional. Educational advocacy would raise the standards of the working class (the poor immigrant family), it could also alter the culture and family dynamic of upcoming generations. Melting pot or tossed salad? Americanization through public education? Another example of conservative (elitist) subjugation is the scientific efficiency of eugenics (i.e. birth control) and temperance (taking away primary sources of social comfort). Racial, ethic, and gender discrimination hindered progressivism.
With both the conservative and liberal factions ignoring or encouraging racism, the Progressive era could be dubbed as a “White Movement”. Fortunately, the black community raised its own great progressive leaders, clubs and organizations to which America is indebted. In honor, here are a few names-Booker T. Washington, W.E.B.DuBois, Revedy Randsom, Ida Tarbell, Ida Wells-Barnett, Mary Terrell, Mary Waring, and Lugenia Burns-Hope. There cannot be progress without civil rights and social justice.
Which division defined progressivism, conservative, liberal, idealist or radical? The Progressive Movement was a unique cohesion of many visions that brought action and awareness to the American people. The birth of the Progressive Movement was neither swift nor painless. Its brief high-life was dynamic but wrought with a multi-personality disorder. Its decline came suddenly with the economic revival of WWI but its demise is overstated, as the progressive resurrection is apparent today.

Works Cited

1. Blackmar, FrankW. “William Peffer: Father of Populism” from KANSAS, A Cyclopedia of State
History. Standard Publishing 1912, page 458

2. Bourne, Randolph. “Trans-National America” from Atlantic Monthly. 188, July 1916 pages 86-97

3. Edwards, Rebecca. 1896:The Peoples Party. “The Populists Party”. 2000

4. Franklin, Jimmie. Organization of American Historians. “Blacks and the Progressive Movement:
Emergence of a New Synthesis”.

5. Harvey, Paul. UCCS Department of History. “Urban and Progressive America, 1890-1920”.

6. Moyer, Bill. Common Dreams News Center. “This is Your Story-The Progressive Story of America. Pass In On.”

7. O’Leary, Wayne. Progressive Populist. “Distorting Progressive Legacy” Dec. 15, 2005

8. PBS American Experience. “Emma Goldman”.

9. Roosevelt, Theodore. The New Nationalism. August 31, 1910

10. Rothbard, Murray. “The Progressive Era and the Family”.

11. Schultz, Stanley K. American History 102. Lecture 11 “The Dawn of Liberalism”.

12. Simkin, John. Spartacus Educational. “Women’s Suffrage”.

13. Susan B. Anthony House. “Biography- Susan B. Anthony”.

14.The National Women’s History Museum. “Reforming the World: Women in the Progressive Era”.

15. The Platform of the Populist Party. July 24, 1896

16. Travel and History. “Ideas and Movements: The Progressive Movement 19th Century”.

17. Tryee, J. M. The Believer. “William Donnelly, Prince of Cranks”. August 2005

18. Wikiquote. “The Farmers Revolt and Populism”

19. Wilson, Woodrow. The Gutenberg Project. The New Freedom. January 26, 2005

20. W.W. Norton College Books. “Populists Party Platform (1892)”.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Allegory Of American Pie By Don Mc Lean

Ask anyone what was the defining moment in the rock history of the 1960s was and all you will get is a one word answer: Woodstock. The three day rock festival that defined an era was only one of many music festivals of the '60s. But Woodstock has come to symbolize, "an era of peaceful, free- loving, drug- taking hippie youth, carefree before harsher realities hit..." (Layman 40). The Woodstock festival ended a century filled with many metamorphoses of rock'n'roll, from the era of pop music to the rebirth of folk music to the invention of acid rock. But some cynics say that rock'n'roll died with the death of Buddy Holly before the 60s even began. One such person is Don McLean. The poet behind the haunting epic song about the death of 'danceable' music, McLean wrote the ever popular song, "American Pie" (appendix 1). The most important song in rock'n'roll history, "American Pie", is the song about the demise of rock'n'roll after Buddy Holly's death and the heathenism of rock that resulted. Although McLean himself won't reveal any symbolism in his songs, "American Pie" is one of the most analyzed pieces of literature in modern society. Although not all of its secrets have been revealed, many "scholars" of the sixties will agree that the mystery of this song is one of the reasons it has become so successful- everyone wants to know the meanings of its allegories. Proof of "American Pie's" truth lies in the allegory of the song. Many People enjoy the song but have no idea what it means- Who is the Jester? What is the levee? When the deeper story is found, the importance of the song is unearthed. "American Pie" is not only a song, it is an epic poem about the course of rock'n'roll...

Carl Orffs Philosophies In Music Education

While Carl Orff is a very seminal composer of the 20th century, his greatest success and influence has been in the field of Music Education. Born on July 10th in Munich, Germany in 1895, Orff refused to speak about his past almost as if he were ashamed of it. What we do know, however, is that Orff came from a Bavarian family who was very active in the German military. His father's regiment band would often play through some of the young Orff's first attempts at composing. Although Orff was adamant about the secrecy of his past, Moser's Musik Lexicon says that he studied in the Munich Academy of Music until 1914. Orff then served in the military in the first world war. After the war, he held various positions in the Mannheim and Darmstadt opera houses then returned home to Munich to further study music. In 1925, and for the rest of his life, Orff was the head of a department and co-founder of the Guenther School for gymnastics, music, and dance in Munich where he worked with musical beginners. This is where he developed his Music Education theories. In 1937, Orff's Carmina Burana premiered in Frankfurt, Germany. Needless to say, it was a great success. With the success of Carmina Burana, Orff orphaned all of his previous works except for Catulli Carmina and the En trata which were rewritten to be acceptable by Orff. One of Orff's most admired composers was Monteverdi. In fact, much of Orff's work was based on ancient material. Orff said: I am often asked why I nearly always select old material, fairy tales and legends for my stage works. I do not look upon them as old, but rather as valid material. The time element disappears, and only the spiritual power remains. My...

Johann Sebastian Bach Biography

Throughout the history of music, many great composers, theorists, and instrumentalists have left indelible marks and influences that people today look back on to admire and aspire to. No exception to this idiom is Johann Sebastian Bach, whose impact on music was unforgettable to say the least. People today look back to his writings and works to both learn and admire. He truly can be considered a music history great. Bach, who came from a family of over 53 musicians, was nothing short of a virtuosic instrumentalist as well as a masterful composer. Born in Eisenach, Germany, on March 21, 1685, he was the son of a masterful violinist, Johann Ambrosius Bach, who taught his son the basic skills for string playing. Along with this string playing, Bach began to play the organ which is the instrument he would later on be noted for in history. His instruction on the organ came from the player at Eisenach's most important church. He instructed the young boy rather rigorously until his skills surpassed anyone?s expectations for someone of such a young age. Bach suffered early trauma when his parents died in 1695. He went to go live with his older brother, Johann Christoph, who also was a professional organist at Ohrdruf. He continued his younger brother's education on that instrument, as well as introducing him to the harpsichord. The rigorous training on these instruments combined with Bach?s masterful skill paid off for him at an early age. After several years of studying with his older brother, he received a scholarship to study in Luneberg, Germany, which is located on the northern tip of the country. As a result, he left his brother?s tutelage and went to go and study there. The teenage years brought Bach to several parts of Germany where he...


Michelangelo was pessimistic in his poetry and an optimist in his artwork. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo?s poetry was pessimistic in his response to Strazzi even though he was complementing him. Michelangelo?s sculpture brought out his optimism. Michelangelo was optimistic in completing The Tomb of Pope Julius II and persevered through it?s many revisions trying to complete his vision. Sculpture was Michelangelo?s main goal and the love of his life. Since his art portrayed both optimism and pessimism, Michelangelo was in touch with his positive and negative sides, showing that he had a great and stable personality. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo Buonarroti was called to Rome in 1505 by Pope Julius II to create for him a monumental tomb. We have no clear sense of what the tomb was to look like, since over the years it went through at least five conceptual revisions. The tomb was to have three levels; the bottom level was to have sculpted figures representing Victory and bond slaves. The second level was to have statues of Moses and Saint Paul as well as symbolic figures of the active and contemplative life- representative of the human striving for, and reception of, knowledge. The third level, it is assumed, was to have an effigy of the deceased pope. The tomb of Pope Julius II was never finished. What was finished of the tomb represents a twenty-year span of frustrating delays and revised schemes. Michelangelo had hardly begun work on the pope?s tomb when Julius commanded him to fresco the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to complete the work done in the previous century under Sixtus IV. The overall organization consists of four large triangles at...

Oscar Wilde

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde was born in Dublin Ireland on October 16, 1854. He is one of the most talented and most controversial writers of his time. He was well known for his wit, flamboyance, and creative genius and with his little dramatic training showing his natural talent for stage and theatre. He is termed a martyr by some and may be the first true self-publicist and was known for his style of dress and odd behavior. Wilde, 1882 His Father, William Wilde, was a highly accredited doctor and his mother, Jane Francesca Elgee, was a writer of revolutionary poems. Oscar had a brother William Charles Kingsbury along with his father's three illegitimate children, Henry, Emily, and Mary. His sister, Isola Emily Francesca died in 1867 at only ten years of age from a sudden fever, greatly affecting Oscar and his family. He kept a lock of her hair in an envelope and later wrote the poem 'Requiescat' in her memory. Oscar and his brother William both attended the Protora Royal School at Enniskillen. He had little in common with the other children. He disliked games and took more interest in flowers and sunsets. He was extremely passionate about anything that had to do with ancient Greece and with Classics. Wilde during school years In 1871, he was awarded a Royal School Scholarship to Trinity College in Dublin and received many awards and earned the highest honor the college offered to an undergraduate, the Foundation Scholarship. In 1874, he also won the College's Berkley Gold Medal for Greek and was awarded a Demyship to Magdalen College, Oxford. After graduating from Oxford, Oscar moved to London with his friend Frank Miles, a well-known portrait painter of the time. In 1878 his poem Ravenna was published, for which he won the...

The History Of Greek Theater

Theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century BCE, with the Sopocles, the great writer of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, heroes and the ideals of life were depicted and glorified. It was believed that man should live for honor and fame, his action was courageous and glorious and his life would climax in a great and noble death. Originally, the hero's recognition was created by selfish behaviors and little thought of service to others. As the Greeks grew toward city-states and colonization, it became the destiny and ambition of the hero to gain honor by serving his city. The second major characteristic of the early Greek world was the supernatural. The two worlds were not separate, as the gods lived in the same world as the men, and they interfered in the men's lives as they chose to. It was the gods who sent suffering and evil to men. In the plays of Sophocles, the gods brought about the hero's downfall because of a tragic flaw in the character of the hero. In Greek tragedy, suffering brought knowledge of worldly matters and of the individual. Aristotle attempted to explain how an audience could observe tragic events and still have a pleasurable experience. Aristotle, by searching the works of writers of Greek tragedy, Aeschulus, Euripides and Sophocles (whose Oedipus Rex he considered the finest of all Greek tragedies), arrived at his definition of tragedy. This explanation has a profound influence for more than twenty centuries on those writing tragedies, most significantly Shakespeare. Aristotle's analysis of tragedy began with a description of the effect such a work had on the audience as a "catharsis" or purging of the emotions. He decided that catharsis was the purging of two specific emotions, pity and...

Scholarship Essay About Goals

Ever since I was a young kid I have always been interested with aircraft. I was so curious of how airplane's fly. I remember taking my toys apart to see how it works. As a kid I wanted to go to the airport to watch the airplanes land and fly and pondered how this happens. Other kids wanted to go to the amusement places. As I grew older I became more and more interested in aircraft and the technology behind it. I always involved myself with aviation early on. I read books and magazines on aviation, took museum tours, built model airplanes. When I was younger my father would take me to aircraft repair facilities where I would watch in great fascination. In my teens, went up to the military bases and befriended many soldiers involved with aircraft and asked them numerous questions. I got to meet many aeronautics engineers and borrowed their old textbooks and read them till the wee hours of the morning. As technology improved with information superhighway, I logged on the web. Stayed up for hours and hours searching through web pages and web pages of information about aircraft and technology. I started my elementary school in the Philippines, then we moved to U.S. and continued my high school education and graduated. Enrolled at the CCSF to pursue my college education and now I am in the 2nd year in CCSF taking aeronautics. My goal now is to obtain my AS degree from the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) so I can transfer to a University and get a Bachelors degree and to continue for my Masters degree in Aeronautics Engineering. I will strive hard to reach the peak level of my career which is a Professor and hopefully to be an aeronautic professor so...

Circus Circus Enterprises Case Studies

Executive Summary: Circus Circus Enterprises is a leader and will continue to be in the gaming industry. In recent years, they have seen a decline in profit and revenue; management tends to blame the decrease on continuing disruptions from remodeling, expansion, and increased competition. Consequently, Circus has reported decreases in its net income for 1997 and 1998 and management believes this trend will continue as competition heightens. Currently the company is involved in several joint ventures, its brand of casino entertainment has traditionally catered to the low rollers and family vacationers through its theme park. Circus should continue to expand its existing operations into new market segments. This shift will allow them to attract the up scale gambler. Overview Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc founded in 1974 is in the business of entertainment, with its core strength in casino gambling. The company?s asset base, operating cash flow, profit margin, multiple markets and customers, rank it as one of the gaming industry leaders. Partners William G. Bennett an aggressive cost cutter and William N. Pennington purchased Circus Circus in 1974 as a small and unprofitable casino. It went public in 1983, from 1993 to 1997; the average return on capital invested was 16.5%. Circus Circus operates several properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Laughlin, and one in Mississippi, as well as 50% ownership in three other casinos and a theme park. On January 31,1998 Circus reported net income of 89.9 million and revenues of 1.35 billion, this is a down from 100 million on 1.3 billion in 1997. Management sees this decline in revenue due to the rapid and extensive expansion and the increased competition that Circus is facing. Well established in the casino gaming industry the corporation has its focus in the entertainment business and has particularly a popular theme resort concept....

Effect Of Civil War On American Economy

The Economies of the North and South, 1861-1865 In 1861, a great war in American history began. It was a civil war between the north and south that was by no means civil. This war would have great repercussions upon the economy of this country and the states within it. The American Civil War began with secession, creating a divided union of sorts, and sparked an incredibly cataclysmic four years. Although the actual war began with secession, this was not the only driving force. The economy of the Southern states, the Confederacy, greatly if not entirely depended on the institution of slavery. The Confederacy was heavily reliant on agriculture, and they used the profits made from the sale of such raw materials to purchase finished goods to use and enjoy. Their major export was cotton, which thrived on the warm river deltas and could easily be shipped to major ocean ports from towns on the Mississippi and numerous river cities. Slavery was a key part of this, as slaves were the ones who harvested and planted the cotton. Being such an enormous unpaid work force, the profits made were extraordinarily high and the price for the unfinished goods drastically low in comparison; especially since he invention of the cotton gin in 1793 which made the work all that much easier and quicker. In contrast, the economical structure of the Northern states, the Union, was vastly dependent on industry. Slavery did not exist in most of the Union, as there was no demand for it due to the type of industrial development taking place. As the Union had a paid work force, the profits made were lower and the cost of the finished manufactured item higher. In turn, the Union used the profits and purchased raw materials to use. This cycle...

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Trade Embargoes

Although I am a strong critic of the use and effectiveness of economic sanctions, such as trade embargoes, for the sake of this assignment, I will present both their theoretical advantages and their disadvantages based upon my research. Trade embargoes and blockades have traditionally been used to entice nations to alter their behavior or to punish them for certain behavior. The intentions behind these policies are generally noble, at least on the surface. However, these policies can have side effects. For example, FDR's blockade of raw materials against the Japanese in Manchuria in the 1930s arguably led to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which resulted in U.S. involvement in World War II. The decades-long embargo against Cuba not only did not lead to the topple of the communist regime there, but may have strengthened Castro's hold on the island and has created animosity toward the United States in Latin America and much suffering by the people of Cuba. Various studies have concluded that embargoes and other economic sanctions generally have not been effective from a utilitarian or policy perspective, yet these policies continue. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Trade Embargoes Strengths Trade embargoes and other sanctions can give the sender government the appearance of taking strong measures in response to a given situation without resorting to violence. Sanctions can be imposed in conjunction with other measures to achieve conflict prevention and mitigation goals. Sanctions may be ineffective: goals may be too elusive, the means too gentle, or cooperation from other countries insufficient. It is usually difficult to determine whether embargoes were an effective deterrent against future misdeeds: embargoes may contribute to a successful outcome, but can rarely achieve ambitious objectives alone. Some regimes are highly resistant to external pressures to reform. At the same time, trade sanctions may narrow the...