Same Sex Marriages proposed legalization

Word Count: 3013 |

The proposed legalization of same-sex marriage is one of the most
significant issues in contemporary American family law. Presently, it is one of
the most vigorously advocated reforms discussed in law reviews, one of the most
explosive political questions facing lawmakers, and one of the most provocative
issues emerging before American courts. If same-sex marriage is legalized, it
could be one of the most revolutionary policy decisions in the history of
American family law. The potential consequences, positive or negative, for
children, parents, same-sex couples, families, social structure public health,
and the status of women are enormous. Given the importance of the issue, the
value of comprehensive debate of the reasons for and against legalizing same-sex
marriage should be obvious. Marriage is much more than merely a commitment to
love one another. Aside from societal and religious conventions, marriage
entails legally imposed financial responsibility and legally authorized
financial benefits. Marriage provides automatic legal protections for the spouse,
including medical visitation, succession of a deceased spouse’s property, as
well as pension and other rights. When two adults desire to “contract” in the
eyes of the law, as well a perhaps promise in the eyes of the Lord and their
friends and family, to be responsible for the obligations of marriage as well as
to enjoy its benefits, should the law prohibit their request merely because they
are of the same gender? I intend to prove that because of Article IV of the
United States Constitution, there is no reason why the federal government nor
any state government should restrict marriage to a predefined heterosexual
relationship.
Marriage has changed throughout the years. In Western law, wives are now
equal rather than subordinate partners; interracial marriage is now widely
accepted, both in statute and in society; and marital failure itself, rather
than the fault of one partner, may be grounds for a divorce. Societal change
have been felt in marriages over the past 25 years as divorce rates have
increased and have been integrated into even upper class families.
Proposals to legalize same-sex marriage or to enact broad domestic
partnership laws are currently being promoted by gay and lesbian activists,
especially in Europe and North America. The trend in western European nations
during the past decade has been to increase legal aid to homosexual relations
and has included marriage benefits to some same-sex couples. For example, within
the past six years, three Scandinavian countries have enacted domestic
partnership laws allowing same-sex couples in which at least one partner is a
citizen of the specified country therefore allowing many benefits that
heterosexual marriages are given. In the Netherlands, the Parliament is
considering domestic partnership status for same-sex couples, all major
political parties favor recognizing same-sex relations, and more than a dozen
towns have already done so. Finland provides governmental social benefits to
same-sex partners. Belgium allows gay prisoners the right to have conjugal
visits from same-sex partners. An overwhelming majority of European nations have
granted partial legal status to homosexual relationships. The European
Parliament also has passed a resolution calling for equal rights for gays and
lesbians.
In the United States, efforts to legalize same-sex domestic partnership
have had some, limited success. The Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, Inc.
reported that by mid-1995, thirty-six municipalities, eight counties, three
states, five state agencies, and two federal agencies extended some benefits to,
or registered for some official purposes, same-sex domestic partnerships. In
1994, the California legislature passed a domestic partnership bill that
provided official state registration of same-sex couples and provided limited
marital rights and privileges relating to hospital visitation, wills and estates,
and powers of attorney. While California’s Governor Wilson eventually vetoed
the bill, its passage by the legislature represented a notable political
achievement for advocates of same-sex marriage.
The most significant prospects for legalizing same-sex marriage in the
near future are in Hawaii, where advocates of same-sex marriage have won a major
judicial victory that could lead to the judicial legalization of same-sex
marriage or to legislation authorizing same-sex domestic partnership in that
state. In 1993, the Hawaii Supreme Court, in Baehr v. Lewin, vacated a state
circuit court judgment dismissing same-sex marriage claims and ruled that
Hawaii’s marriage law allowing heterosexual, but not homosexual, couples to
obtain marriage licenses constitutes sex discrimination under the state
constitution’s Equal Protection Clause and Equal Rights Amendment.
The case began in 1991 when three same-sex couples who had been denied
marriage licenses by the Hawaii Department of Health brought suit in state court
against the director of the department. Hawaii law required couples wishing to
marry to obtain a marriage license. While the marriage license law did not
explicitly prohibit same-sex marriage at that time, it used terms of gender that
clearly indicated that only heterosexual couples could marry. The coupl sought
a judicial decision that the Hawaii marriage license law is unconstitutional,
as it prohibits same-sex marriage and allows state officials ro deny marriage
licenses to same-sex couples on account of the heterosexuality requirement.
Baehr and her attorney sought their objectives entirely through state law, not
only by filing in state rather than federal court, but also by alleging
exclusively violations of state law–the Hawaii Constitution. The state moved
for judgment on the pleadings and for dismissal of the complaint for failure to
state a claim; the state’s motion was granted in October, 1991. Thus, the
circuit court upheld the heterosexuality marriage requirement as a matter of law
and dismissed the plaintiffs’ challenges to it.
Yet recently the Circuit Court of Hawaii decided that Hawaii had
violated Baehr and her partner’s constitutional rights by the fourteenth
amendment and that they could be recognized as a marriage. The court found that
the state of Hawaii’s constitution expressly discriminated against homosexuals
and that because of Hawaii’s anti-discrimination law they must re evaluate the
situation. After the ruling the state immediately asked for a stay of judgment,
until the appeal had been convened, therefore putting off any marriage between
Baehr and her partner for at least a year.
By far Baehr is the most positive step toward actual marriage rights for
gay and lesbian people. Currently there is a high tolerance for homosexuals
throughout the United States and currently in Hawaii. Judges do not need the
popularity of the people on the Federal or circuit court level to make new
precedent. There is no clear majority that homosexuals should have marriage
rights in the general public, and yet the courts voted for Baehr. The judiciary
has its own mind on how to interpret the constitution which is obviously very
different then most of American popular belief. This is the principal reason
that these judges are not elected by the people, so they do not have to bow to
people pressure.
The constitutional rights argument for same-sex marriage affirms that
there is a fundamental constitutional right to marry, or a broader right of
privacy or of intimate association. The essence of this right is the private,
intimate association of consenting adults who want to share their lives and
commitment with each other and that same-sex couples have just as much intimacy
and need for marital privacy as heterosexual couples; and that laws allowing
heterosexual, but not same-sex, couples to marry infringe upon and discriminate
against this fundamental right. Just as the Supreme Court compelled states to
allow interracial marriage by recognizing the claimed right as part of the
fundamental constitutional right to marry, of privacy and of intimate
association so should states be compelled now to recognize the fundamental right
of homosexuals to do the same.
If Baehr ultimately leads to the legalization of same-sex marriage or
broad, marriage like domestic partnership in Hawaii, the impact of that
legalization will be felt widely. Marriage recognition principles derived from
choice-of-law and full-faith-and-credit rules probably would be invoked to
recognize same-sex Hawaiian marriages as valid in other states. The impact of
Hawaii’s decision will immediately impact marriage laws in all of the United
States. The full faith and credit clause of the U.S. Constitution provides that
full faith and credit shall be given to the “public acts, records, and judicial
proceedings of every other state.”
Marriage qualifies for recognition under each section:

1) creation of marriage is “public act” because it occurs pursuant to a
statutory scheme and is performed by a legally designated official, and because
a marriage is an act by the state;

2) a marriage certificate is a “record” with a outlined legal effect, showing
that a marriage has been validly contracted, that the spouses meet the
qualifications of the marriage statutes, and they have duly entered matrimony.
Public records of lesser consequence, such as birth certificates and automobile
titles have been accorded full faith and credit;

3) celebrating a marriage is a “judicial proceeding” where judges, court clerks,
or justices of the peace perform the act of marriage.

It would seem evident that if heterosexual couples use Article IV as a
safety net and guarantee for their wedlock then that same right should be given
to homosexual couples. This Article has often been cited as a reference point
for interracial marriages in the south when those states do not want to
recognize the legitimacy of that union by another state. As this is used for
that lifestyle, there is no logical reason it should be denied to perhaps
millions of homosexuals that want the opportunity to get married. The obstacles
being out in front of homosexual couples is in the name of the “normal” people
that actively seek to define their definition to all. It is these “normal”
people that are the definition of surplus repression and social domination. Yet
as they cling to the Constitution for their freedoms they deny those same
freedoms to not “normal” people because they would lose their social domination
and could be changed. Therefore it would seem they are afraid to change, and
have not accepted that the world does change.
Unfortunately the full faith and credit clause has rarely been used as
anything more then an excuse to get a quick divorce. A man wants a divorce yet
his wife does not or will not void their marriage. He then goes to Reno, Nevada,
buys a house and gets a job for six weeks. After that six weeks when he can
declare himself a legal resident he applies for a singular marriage void and
because Nevada law allows one side to void their marriage is they are a resident
of Nevada their marriage is now void. The man now moves back to his home state,
and upon doing so this state must now recognize the legitimacy that Nevada has
voided out the marriage. Even if the wife does not consent, the new state cannot
do anything about it. That is what usually full faith and credit is used under.
Legislation enacted by President Clinton from Senator Don Nickles of
Oklahoma called the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) has allowed individual states
to react differently to any intrusion of marriage that they feel is not proper.
DOMA states “marriage means only a legal union between one man and one woman as
husband and wife.” “Supporters of DOMA also claim clear constitutional warrant,
and that Congress is exercising its own authority under Article IV to prescribe
the manner in which the public acts, records, and judicial proceedings of every
other state, shall be proved.” However it would seem that by allowing individual
states to alter and change what the meaning of marriage is, it could create a
disaster if even heterosexuals want to wed. The underlying principle in DOMA is
that states now have the right to redefine what they feel is or is not
appropriate behavior and shall be allowed or illegal in their state. It is also
apparent that the signing of DOMA by President Clinton was more of a
presidential campaign gesture then an actual change in policy. While he has
shifted considerably from his platform in 1992 this move was specifically
designed to change his image among more conservative voters. It is also apparent
that this move did not work because a majority of conservative Americans still
voted for Bob Dole in the 1996 Presidential election. Clinton, now that he has
been re elected, partially under the front of a more moderate administration,
should seriously rethink its policy on social change and whether he wants to go
out as the President that denied hundred of thousands of people the opportunity
for equal rights.
In 1967 the Supreme Court announced that “marriage is one of the most
basic civil rights of man….essential to the pursuit of happiness.” Having the
highest court on the land make such a profound statement about something which
current politicians think they can regulate like phone or tv’s is something
short of appalling. For who is to say what happiness can be created from wedlock
but the people that are in the act itself, per couple, household and gender. The
Uniform Marriage and Divorce Act proclaim that “All marriages
contracted….outside this State that were valid at the time of the contract or
subsequently validated by the laws of the place in which they were
contracted…are valid in this State”. This Act has been enacted in seventeen
states and could be the foundation for full faith and credit if marriages were
to take place in other states.
However as much as the right wing conservatives wish to pursue an
aggressive anti-gay/lifestyle agenda the DOMA act has been widely criticized as
intensely unconstitutional. It is bias and discriminatory toward homosexuals and
there fore against the United States Constitution and once again the fourteenth
amendment proclaiming all citizens equal.
Fearing that the state may have to recognize same-gender marriages from
Hawaii, because of the controversy over DOMA the state legislatures of Arizona,
South Dakota, Utah, Oklahoma, Kansas, Idaho, and Georgia, have made preemptive
strikes and enacted state legislation which bars recognition of same-gender
marriages. Several other state legislatures, including Alabama, Arkansas,
California, Delaware, Louisiana, New Mexico, Kentucky, Maine, South Carolina and
Wisconsin, have attempted to enact similar legislation, but failed. After
Hawaiian marriages are brought to these states for enforcement, these laws will
lead each state into a potential separate constitutional challenge of its same-
gender marriage ban. Those cases could be the new foundation for a sweeping
change in popular American politics and thought and will perhaps pave the road
for increased awareness of this human rights issue.
Leaving aside, as government should, objections that may be held by
particular religions, the case against same-gender marriage is simply that
people are unaccustomed to it. Bigotry and prejudice still exist in our evolving
society, and traditionally people fear what is strange and unfamiliar to them.
One may argue that change should not be pushed along hastily. At the same time,
it is an argument for legalizing homosexual marriage through consensual politics
as in Denmark, rather than by court order, as may happen in Hawaii.

Works Cited
“Gay marriages should be allowed, state judge rules,” The Wall Street Journal,
Dec. 4, 1996, 1996

“Hawaii judge ends gay marriage ban,” New York Times, Dec. 4, 1996

“Hawaii ruling lifts ban on marriage of same-sex couples” Los Angeles Times,
Page 1A, 1996 Dec. 4, 1996

“Announcing same-sex unions,” The Boston Globe, Page 15A, Dec. 2, 1996
Bonauto, “Advising non-traditional families: A general
introduction,” OCT B. B.J. 10, September-October 1996,

Cox, Barbara “Same sex marriage and choice of law”, 1994 Wisconsin Law Review,

Gibson, “To love, honor, and build a life: A case for same-gender marriage,” 23-
SUM Hum. Rts. 22, Summer 1996,

Reidinger, Paul, American Bar Association Journal, Oct 1996

Stoddard, Thomas, “Gay marriages: Make them legal”, Current Issues and Enduring
Questions, Bedford Books, Boston, 1996

Wiener, “Same-sex intimate and expressive association: The pickering balancing
test or strict scrutiny?” 31 Harv. L. Rev. 561, Summer 1996

“In sickness and in health, in Hawaii and where else?: Conflict of laws and
recognition of same-sex marriages,” 109 Harv. L. Rev. 2038, June 1996

Levendosky, Charles, Greensboro News and Record, “Congressional Intrusion Into
Marriage Just Gets DOMA and DOMA”, May 20 1996

Baehr v.Miike, 910 P.2d 112 (Hawaii Jan 23, 1996)

Baehr v. Lewin, 852 P.2d 44, (Hawaii May 5, 1993)

Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), enacted 1996

Article IV, sec.1 United States Constitution

Handbook on Uniform State Laws, United States Code, Uniform Marriage and Divorce
Act

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Allegory Of American Pie By Don Mc Lean

Ask anyone what was the defining moment in the rock history of the 1960s was and all you will get is a one word answer: Woodstock. The three day rock festival that defined an era was only one of many music festivals of the '60s. But Woodstock has come to symbolize, "an era of peaceful, free- loving, drug- taking hippie youth, carefree before harsher realities hit..." (Layman 40). The Woodstock festival ended a century filled with many metamorphoses of rock'n'roll, from the era of pop music to the rebirth of folk music to the invention of acid rock. But some cynics say that rock'n'roll died with the death of Buddy Holly before the 60s even began. One such person is Don McLean. The poet behind the haunting epic song about the death of 'danceable' music, McLean wrote the ever popular song, "American Pie" (appendix 1). The most important song in rock'n'roll history, "American Pie", is the song about the demise of rock'n'roll after Buddy Holly's death and the heathenism of rock that resulted. Although McLean himself won't reveal any symbolism in his songs, "American Pie" is one of the most analyzed pieces of literature in modern society. Although not all of its secrets have been revealed, many "scholars" of the sixties will agree that the mystery of this song is one of the reasons it has become so successful- everyone wants to know the meanings of its allegories. Proof of "American Pie's" truth lies in the allegory of the song. Many People enjoy the song but have no idea what it means- Who is the Jester? What is the levee? When the deeper story is found, the importance of the song is unearthed. "American Pie" is not only a song, it is an epic poem about the course of rock'n'roll...

Carl Orffs Philosophies In Music Education

While Carl Orff is a very seminal composer of the 20th century, his greatest success and influence has been in the field of Music Education. Born on July 10th in Munich, Germany in 1895, Orff refused to speak about his past almost as if he were ashamed of it. What we do know, however, is that Orff came from a Bavarian family who was very active in the German military. His father's regiment band would often play through some of the young Orff's first attempts at composing. Although Orff was adamant about the secrecy of his past, Moser's Musik Lexicon says that he studied in the Munich Academy of Music until 1914. Orff then served in the military in the first world war. After the war, he held various positions in the Mannheim and Darmstadt opera houses then returned home to Munich to further study music. In 1925, and for the rest of his life, Orff was the head of a department and co-founder of the Guenther School for gymnastics, music, and dance in Munich where he worked with musical beginners. This is where he developed his Music Education theories. In 1937, Orff's Carmina Burana premiered in Frankfurt, Germany. Needless to say, it was a great success. With the success of Carmina Burana, Orff orphaned all of his previous works except for Catulli Carmina and the En trata which were rewritten to be acceptable by Orff. One of Orff's most admired composers was Monteverdi. In fact, much of Orff's work was based on ancient material. Orff said: I am often asked why I nearly always select old material, fairy tales and legends for my stage works. I do not look upon them as old, but rather as valid material. The time element disappears, and only the spiritual power remains. My...

Johann Sebastian Bach Biography

Throughout the history of music, many great composers, theorists, and instrumentalists have left indelible marks and influences that people today look back on to admire and aspire to. No exception to this idiom is Johann Sebastian Bach, whose impact on music was unforgettable to say the least. People today look back to his writings and works to both learn and admire. He truly can be considered a music history great. Bach, who came from a family of over 53 musicians, was nothing short of a virtuosic instrumentalist as well as a masterful composer. Born in Eisenach, Germany, on March 21, 1685, he was the son of a masterful violinist, Johann Ambrosius Bach, who taught his son the basic skills for string playing. Along with this string playing, Bach began to play the organ which is the instrument he would later on be noted for in history. His instruction on the organ came from the player at Eisenach's most important church. He instructed the young boy rather rigorously until his skills surpassed anyone?s expectations for someone of such a young age. Bach suffered early trauma when his parents died in 1695. He went to go live with his older brother, Johann Christoph, who also was a professional organist at Ohrdruf. He continued his younger brother's education on that instrument, as well as introducing him to the harpsichord. The rigorous training on these instruments combined with Bach?s masterful skill paid off for him at an early age. After several years of studying with his older brother, he received a scholarship to study in Luneberg, Germany, which is located on the northern tip of the country. As a result, he left his brother?s tutelage and went to go and study there. The teenage years brought Bach to several parts of Germany where he...

Michelangelo

Michelangelo was pessimistic in his poetry and an optimist in his artwork. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo?s poetry was pessimistic in his response to Strazzi even though he was complementing him. Michelangelo?s sculpture brought out his optimism. Michelangelo was optimistic in completing The Tomb of Pope Julius II and persevered through it?s many revisions trying to complete his vision. Sculpture was Michelangelo?s main goal and the love of his life. Since his art portrayed both optimism and pessimism, Michelangelo was in touch with his positive and negative sides, showing that he had a great and stable personality. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo Buonarroti was called to Rome in 1505 by Pope Julius II to create for him a monumental tomb. We have no clear sense of what the tomb was to look like, since over the years it went through at least five conceptual revisions. The tomb was to have three levels; the bottom level was to have sculpted figures representing Victory and bond slaves. The second level was to have statues of Moses and Saint Paul as well as symbolic figures of the active and contemplative life- representative of the human striving for, and reception of, knowledge. The third level, it is assumed, was to have an effigy of the deceased pope. The tomb of Pope Julius II was never finished. What was finished of the tomb represents a twenty-year span of frustrating delays and revised schemes. Michelangelo had hardly begun work on the pope?s tomb when Julius commanded him to fresco the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to complete the work done in the previous century under Sixtus IV. The overall organization consists of four large triangles at...

Oscar Wilde

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde was born in Dublin Ireland on October 16, 1854. He is one of the most talented and most controversial writers of his time. He was well known for his wit, flamboyance, and creative genius and with his little dramatic training showing his natural talent for stage and theatre. He is termed a martyr by some and may be the first true self-publicist and was known for his style of dress and odd behavior. Wilde, 1882 His Father, William Wilde, was a highly accredited doctor and his mother, Jane Francesca Elgee, was a writer of revolutionary poems. Oscar had a brother William Charles Kingsbury along with his father's three illegitimate children, Henry, Emily, and Mary. His sister, Isola Emily Francesca died in 1867 at only ten years of age from a sudden fever, greatly affecting Oscar and his family. He kept a lock of her hair in an envelope and later wrote the poem 'Requiescat' in her memory. Oscar and his brother William both attended the Protora Royal School at Enniskillen. He had little in common with the other children. He disliked games and took more interest in flowers and sunsets. He was extremely passionate about anything that had to do with ancient Greece and with Classics. Wilde during school years In 1871, he was awarded a Royal School Scholarship to Trinity College in Dublin and received many awards and earned the highest honor the college offered to an undergraduate, the Foundation Scholarship. In 1874, he also won the College's Berkley Gold Medal for Greek and was awarded a Demyship to Magdalen College, Oxford. After graduating from Oxford, Oscar moved to London with his friend Frank Miles, a well-known portrait painter of the time. In 1878 his poem Ravenna was published, for which he won the...

The History Of Greek Theater

Theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century BCE, with the Sopocles, the great writer of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, heroes and the ideals of life were depicted and glorified. It was believed that man should live for honor and fame, his action was courageous and glorious and his life would climax in a great and noble death. Originally, the hero's recognition was created by selfish behaviors and little thought of service to others. As the Greeks grew toward city-states and colonization, it became the destiny and ambition of the hero to gain honor by serving his city. The second major characteristic of the early Greek world was the supernatural. The two worlds were not separate, as the gods lived in the same world as the men, and they interfered in the men's lives as they chose to. It was the gods who sent suffering and evil to men. In the plays of Sophocles, the gods brought about the hero's downfall because of a tragic flaw in the character of the hero. In Greek tragedy, suffering brought knowledge of worldly matters and of the individual. Aristotle attempted to explain how an audience could observe tragic events and still have a pleasurable experience. Aristotle, by searching the works of writers of Greek tragedy, Aeschulus, Euripides and Sophocles (whose Oedipus Rex he considered the finest of all Greek tragedies), arrived at his definition of tragedy. This explanation has a profound influence for more than twenty centuries on those writing tragedies, most significantly Shakespeare. Aristotle's analysis of tragedy began with a description of the effect such a work had on the audience as a "catharsis" or purging of the emotions. He decided that catharsis was the purging of two specific emotions, pity and...

Scholarship Essay About Goals

Ever since I was a young kid I have always been interested with aircraft. I was so curious of how airplane's fly. I remember taking my toys apart to see how it works. As a kid I wanted to go to the airport to watch the airplanes land and fly and pondered how this happens. Other kids wanted to go to the amusement places. As I grew older I became more and more interested in aircraft and the technology behind it. I always involved myself with aviation early on. I read books and magazines on aviation, took museum tours, built model airplanes. When I was younger my father would take me to aircraft repair facilities where I would watch in great fascination. In my teens, went up to the military bases and befriended many soldiers involved with aircraft and asked them numerous questions. I got to meet many aeronautics engineers and borrowed their old textbooks and read them till the wee hours of the morning. As technology improved with information superhighway, I logged on the web. Stayed up for hours and hours searching through web pages and web pages of information about aircraft and technology. I started my elementary school in the Philippines, then we moved to U.S. and continued my high school education and graduated. Enrolled at the CCSF to pursue my college education and now I am in the 2nd year in CCSF taking aeronautics. My goal now is to obtain my AS degree from the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) so I can transfer to a University and get a Bachelors degree and to continue for my Masters degree in Aeronautics Engineering. I will strive hard to reach the peak level of my career which is a Professor and hopefully to be an aeronautic professor so...

Circus Circus Enterprises Case Studies

Executive Summary: Circus Circus Enterprises is a leader and will continue to be in the gaming industry. In recent years, they have seen a decline in profit and revenue; management tends to blame the decrease on continuing disruptions from remodeling, expansion, and increased competition. Consequently, Circus has reported decreases in its net income for 1997 and 1998 and management believes this trend will continue as competition heightens. Currently the company is involved in several joint ventures, its brand of casino entertainment has traditionally catered to the low rollers and family vacationers through its theme park. Circus should continue to expand its existing operations into new market segments. This shift will allow them to attract the up scale gambler. Overview Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc founded in 1974 is in the business of entertainment, with its core strength in casino gambling. The company?s asset base, operating cash flow, profit margin, multiple markets and customers, rank it as one of the gaming industry leaders. Partners William G. Bennett an aggressive cost cutter and William N. Pennington purchased Circus Circus in 1974 as a small and unprofitable casino. It went public in 1983, from 1993 to 1997; the average return on capital invested was 16.5%. Circus Circus operates several properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Laughlin, and one in Mississippi, as well as 50% ownership in three other casinos and a theme park. On January 31,1998 Circus reported net income of 89.9 million and revenues of 1.35 billion, this is a down from 100 million on 1.3 billion in 1997. Management sees this decline in revenue due to the rapid and extensive expansion and the increased competition that Circus is facing. Well established in the casino gaming industry the corporation has its focus in the entertainment business and has particularly a popular theme resort concept....

Effect Of Civil War On American Economy

The Economies of the North and South, 1861-1865 In 1861, a great war in American history began. It was a civil war between the north and south that was by no means civil. This war would have great repercussions upon the economy of this country and the states within it. The American Civil War began with secession, creating a divided union of sorts, and sparked an incredibly cataclysmic four years. Although the actual war began with secession, this was not the only driving force. The economy of the Southern states, the Confederacy, greatly if not entirely depended on the institution of slavery. The Confederacy was heavily reliant on agriculture, and they used the profits made from the sale of such raw materials to purchase finished goods to use and enjoy. Their major export was cotton, which thrived on the warm river deltas and could easily be shipped to major ocean ports from towns on the Mississippi and numerous river cities. Slavery was a key part of this, as slaves were the ones who harvested and planted the cotton. Being such an enormous unpaid work force, the profits made were extraordinarily high and the price for the unfinished goods drastically low in comparison; especially since he invention of the cotton gin in 1793 which made the work all that much easier and quicker. In contrast, the economical structure of the Northern states, the Union, was vastly dependent on industry. Slavery did not exist in most of the Union, as there was no demand for it due to the type of industrial development taking place. As the Union had a paid work force, the profits made were lower and the cost of the finished manufactured item higher. In turn, the Union used the profits and purchased raw materials to use. This cycle...

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Trade Embargoes

Although I am a strong critic of the use and effectiveness of economic sanctions, such as trade embargoes, for the sake of this assignment, I will present both their theoretical advantages and their disadvantages based upon my research. Trade embargoes and blockades have traditionally been used to entice nations to alter their behavior or to punish them for certain behavior. The intentions behind these policies are generally noble, at least on the surface. However, these policies can have side effects. For example, FDR's blockade of raw materials against the Japanese in Manchuria in the 1930s arguably led to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which resulted in U.S. involvement in World War II. The decades-long embargo against Cuba not only did not lead to the topple of the communist regime there, but may have strengthened Castro's hold on the island and has created animosity toward the United States in Latin America and much suffering by the people of Cuba. Various studies have concluded that embargoes and other economic sanctions generally have not been effective from a utilitarian or policy perspective, yet these policies continue. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Trade Embargoes Strengths Trade embargoes and other sanctions can give the sender government the appearance of taking strong measures in response to a given situation without resorting to violence. Sanctions can be imposed in conjunction with other measures to achieve conflict prevention and mitigation goals. Sanctions may be ineffective: goals may be too elusive, the means too gentle, or cooperation from other countries insufficient. It is usually difficult to determine whether embargoes were an effective deterrent against future misdeeds: embargoes may contribute to a successful outcome, but can rarely achieve ambitious objectives alone. Some regimes are highly resistant to external pressures to reform. At the same time, trade sanctions may narrow the...