Seperate Spheres

Word Count: 1856 |

Should the ideology of “separate spheres” be seen as a description of social reality or a prescription for social reform?

The Industrial Revolution, especially the years from 1815 to 1900, saw huge growth and changes in the economy, population, agriculture, trade and lifestyle. The 19th century saw, more than ever before a growing preoccupation with the issues of gender, domesticity, morality and discipline. The family structure was changing, with emigration to the big cities for work and the ever increasing family size meant more men took on the role of main breadwinner while the women were expected to stay at home to raise the children and uphold the moral duties of the family. The conjugal family unit, with men and women operating in their separate spheres of work and home became the keystone for social stability. But the question to ask is how far did this ideology actually reflect family life at this time? The main focus for this ideal fell on the women with the majority of educational writing, religious sermons, pamphlets and magazines of the time telling them how to behave. These would always dwell on the importance of feminine, submissive roles, the dignity of motherhood and domestic perfection. This essay will predominantly explore the changing role of women in this time and whether they ascribed to this ideal. To do this each class of society needs to be looked at individually as some were more affected by the social moral code, and the education system than others. Also the historiography, as there is a variation in opinion between historians as to whether the theory of separate spheres was accepted as a positive improvement to the values of society or a set of rules to control and reform women, to which they would eventually rebel against.

A large majority of the women in Britain were working-class, and would need to work to survive and support their families. There was however also the huge pressure in the 19th century that they should also keep the perfect home and be responsible for raising the children. Some women worked up to 12 hours a day as domestic servants or in factories, and would then have to stay up all night washing, cleaning and preparing foods. From this point of view it would be seen that the ideology of separate spheres would have been crippling and unachievable for the working class woman. However they also took great pride in keeping their families “respectable” rather than “rough”. This was measured at a local level where status amongst neighbours was of up most importance. Although the standards were not as high as the middle and upper classes, to be supportive of your husband and care well for your children was the priority.

There is contradictory evidence of this though in some of the early pamphlets for the rights of women show. One, published by the Women’s freedom league pictures a working class women juggling her housework, squabbling children and preparing dinner whilst her husband relaxes in the pub. It holds the slogan: “ A man works from sun to sun, but a woman’s work is never done.” This is not the ideal image of the ‘angel in the home’ and was undoubtedly not for many working class women at this time.

For the middle classes, being able to afford to have your wife stay at home, fulfilling her domestic role, was the ultimate way to display a man’s wealth, success and pride. Although this standard of living would have seemed affluent to the majority of the nation, the male head of the family would have had a relatively usual job, possibly a shop owner, a bank clerk or a schoolteacher, and would have had an annual income of around £80 to £150. The middle class male had important social networking roles regarding business and politics, which the women would be supporters. These women had an equally important role in the creation of their husband’s social and therefore business reputation. It was said, “The talk of the town was almost as important as the smoke of the factory chimneys in creating a prosperous industrial economy” Here it can be seen that the separate sphere ideology was a reality that enriched the lives of those able to afford it. Carroll Smith Rosenburg reinforces this idea and argues that: “the women’s sphere had an essential integrity and dignity that grew out of women’s shared experiences and mutual affection…Most 18th and 19th century women lived within a world bounded by home church and the institution of visiting…” These women were not being weak, submissive and feeble but proactive in their communities. These women are not prescribed this behaviour but choose it, as it was beneficial to their family’s wellbeing.
The alternative argument is that women were submissive and supporters to their husbands, simply because they had no other choice. In society they didn’t exist legally once married. They became the property of their husband, along with any inheritance or children they had. They had so few rights in law that some say they were no more than prisoners in their own home. Activist Ray Strachey, who was writing in 1928, claims that it was the oppression of the private sphere for women that, “…operated as a pressure cooker generating pent up frustrations which eventually exploded as mass female politics…a female invasion of the male public sphere…” thus meaning that the ideology was prescribed by society and eventually rejected.

The elite, upper classes were the one area of society that was affected far less by the ‘public’, ‘private’ divide. The majority of aristocratic men, did not leave the house for work each morning as their riches were inherited, and the women would have had domestic servants to do the housework and child rearing, so the home was the shared sphere for both. The women also had far greater independence as they had their own wealth through inheritance that was protected for them by male trustee’s, usually elder family members. This did not mean that there was not a gender divide. The women were still expected to take on the role of moral guardian for the estate and the children but this would be in a managerial form rather than hands on. One famous example of this is in the advice book of the time: Isabella Beeton’s book of household management, the instructions of which could only have been followed by the elite classes.

“As with the Commander of an army, so it is with the mistress of a house. Of all those acquirements, which belong more to the feminine character, there are none which take higher rank than such as enter into the knowledge of household duties; for on these are perpetually dependant the happiness, comfort and well-being of a family”

So although there was still an ideal to be followed it was much easier for the elite. Delegating the chores of the house to others left much more leisure time, and public time, for both the men and women. The men devoted time to politics while the women would concern themselves with philanthropic work in the community. These women were the first to start the fight for all women’s rights to education and suffrage. In the case of the upper classes the separate spheres ideology was a loose set if ideas to be followed. There was a greater emphasis placed on people conducting themselves in an aristocratic manner, irrelevant of what sex they were.

Education was a huge reinforcement of the specific roles between the sexes. It was seen to ‘civilise’ the working classes and hoped to bestow them with middle class values. Boys were expected to be industrious and punctual and girls to be chaste and obedient. Academic achievement was not considered important for girls, as they were not seen to be born leaders. At best they would be taught philanthropy, and then only in the elite families. Education at this time seemed to be about progress for the boys in the changing industrial world but about social control for the girls. Some doctor’s even suggested that women were mentally and physically unsuitable for education. Too much thinking would over stretch their brains and would certainly render them infertile. With this sort of advice women had no option but to assume their given domestic role.
Historian Amanda Vickery has undertaken a huge amount of study in the area of the public and private spheres of the 19th century and has gone through many personal letters and diaries from the time to get an accurate picture as much social history was unrecorded officially. With the lack of women’s history it would be easy to conclude that they were not considered a significantly important part of everyday life, yet these personal, sentimental and honest anecdotes show that times had changed in the 19th century. Couples were marrying for love and companionship, where parents had far less control over their children’s choice of spouse. Vickery also found that especially in middle classes, seen as the most likely to conform to the ideal of separate spheres, the definitions of the gender roles varied widely with many men being involved in the home and family, and many women being expected to have a knowledge on politics, even if in just a supportive role towards their husbands.
The fact that there was a generally accepted set of rules for each gender is inescapable. For some their lives were enriched by these rules, while others were left feeling unvalued and ostracised from society.
A precise conclusion seems difficult to come by, as there are so many variables within people’s relationships, in the regions they live, and their wealth, which can affect their behaviour within society.
It becomes increasingly apparent that to separate the sexes into such specific roles is not going to prove successful for everyone. The differences in human beings mean that when people are given a set of rules, which they are prescribed to live their life by, some are bound to rebel, while others are happy to conform.
The ideology of separate spheres was reinforced through law, religion, politics and education, and seemed to be a virtuous and appropriate way to organise and reform society. It was also a reality that it was an ideology that existed in people’s consciousness as a way of life but not all chose to adhere to it. It was however only really affecting for the middle classes and those who could afford it and were happy with their position.


BEETON I, Isabella Beeton’s Book of Household Management, (1861) S.O. Beeton, England

MATTHEW C, The Nineteenth Century, The British Isles: 1851-1901, (Oxford 2000) Oxford University Press.

STEINBACH S, Women in England 1760-1914 A Social History, (London 2000) Weidenfeld and Nicholson, London.

WOJTCZAK H, Women of Victorian Sussex, (Hastings, Sussex, 2003) Hastings Press.

VICKERY A, Golden Age to Separate Spheres? A Review of the Categories and Chronology of English Women’s History, The Historical Journal, Vol.36, No.2 (Jun, 1993) pp.383-414

CLARK A, Review of VICKERY A, The Gentleman’s Daughter, Women’s lives in Georgian England, Institute of Historical Research, (1998) New Haven and London, Yale University Press.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Allegory Of American Pie By Don Mc Lean

Ask anyone what was the defining moment in the rock history of the 1960s was and all you will get is a one word answer: Woodstock. The three day rock festival that defined an era was only one of many music festivals of the '60s. But Woodstock has come to symbolize, "an era of peaceful, free- loving, drug- taking hippie youth, carefree before harsher realities hit..." (Layman 40). The Woodstock festival ended a century filled with many metamorphoses of rock'n'roll, from the era of pop music to the rebirth of folk music to the invention of acid rock. But some cynics say that rock'n'roll died with the death of Buddy Holly before the 60s even began. One such person is Don McLean. The poet behind the haunting epic song about the death of 'danceable' music, McLean wrote the ever popular song, "American Pie" (appendix 1). The most important song in rock'n'roll history, "American Pie", is the song about the demise of rock'n'roll after Buddy Holly's death and the heathenism of rock that resulted. Although McLean himself won't reveal any symbolism in his songs, "American Pie" is one of the most analyzed pieces of literature in modern society. Although not all of its secrets have been revealed, many "scholars" of the sixties will agree that the mystery of this song is one of the reasons it has become so successful- everyone wants to know the meanings of its allegories. Proof of "American Pie's" truth lies in the allegory of the song. Many People enjoy the song but have no idea what it means- Who is the Jester? What is the levee? When the deeper story is found, the importance of the song is unearthed. "American Pie" is not only a song, it is an epic poem about the course of rock'n'roll...

Carl Orffs Philosophies In Music Education

While Carl Orff is a very seminal composer of the 20th century, his greatest success and influence has been in the field of Music Education. Born on July 10th in Munich, Germany in 1895, Orff refused to speak about his past almost as if he were ashamed of it. What we do know, however, is that Orff came from a Bavarian family who was very active in the German military. His father's regiment band would often play through some of the young Orff's first attempts at composing. Although Orff was adamant about the secrecy of his past, Moser's Musik Lexicon says that he studied in the Munich Academy of Music until 1914. Orff then served in the military in the first world war. After the war, he held various positions in the Mannheim and Darmstadt opera houses then returned home to Munich to further study music. In 1925, and for the rest of his life, Orff was the head of a department and co-founder of the Guenther School for gymnastics, music, and dance in Munich where he worked with musical beginners. This is where he developed his Music Education theories. In 1937, Orff's Carmina Burana premiered in Frankfurt, Germany. Needless to say, it was a great success. With the success of Carmina Burana, Orff orphaned all of his previous works except for Catulli Carmina and the En trata which were rewritten to be acceptable by Orff. One of Orff's most admired composers was Monteverdi. In fact, much of Orff's work was based on ancient material. Orff said: I am often asked why I nearly always select old material, fairy tales and legends for my stage works. I do not look upon them as old, but rather as valid material. The time element disappears, and only the spiritual power remains. My...

Johann Sebastian Bach Biography

Throughout the history of music, many great composers, theorists, and instrumentalists have left indelible marks and influences that people today look back on to admire and aspire to. No exception to this idiom is Johann Sebastian Bach, whose impact on music was unforgettable to say the least. People today look back to his writings and works to both learn and admire. He truly can be considered a music history great. Bach, who came from a family of over 53 musicians, was nothing short of a virtuosic instrumentalist as well as a masterful composer. Born in Eisenach, Germany, on March 21, 1685, he was the son of a masterful violinist, Johann Ambrosius Bach, who taught his son the basic skills for string playing. Along with this string playing, Bach began to play the organ which is the instrument he would later on be noted for in history. His instruction on the organ came from the player at Eisenach's most important church. He instructed the young boy rather rigorously until his skills surpassed anyone?s expectations for someone of such a young age. Bach suffered early trauma when his parents died in 1695. He went to go live with his older brother, Johann Christoph, who also was a professional organist at Ohrdruf. He continued his younger brother's education on that instrument, as well as introducing him to the harpsichord. The rigorous training on these instruments combined with Bach?s masterful skill paid off for him at an early age. After several years of studying with his older brother, he received a scholarship to study in Luneberg, Germany, which is located on the northern tip of the country. As a result, he left his brother?s tutelage and went to go and study there. The teenage years brought Bach to several parts of Germany where he...


Michelangelo was pessimistic in his poetry and an optimist in his artwork. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo?s poetry was pessimistic in his response to Strazzi even though he was complementing him. Michelangelo?s sculpture brought out his optimism. Michelangelo was optimistic in completing The Tomb of Pope Julius II and persevered through it?s many revisions trying to complete his vision. Sculpture was Michelangelo?s main goal and the love of his life. Since his art portrayed both optimism and pessimism, Michelangelo was in touch with his positive and negative sides, showing that he had a great and stable personality. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo Buonarroti was called to Rome in 1505 by Pope Julius II to create for him a monumental tomb. We have no clear sense of what the tomb was to look like, since over the years it went through at least five conceptual revisions. The tomb was to have three levels; the bottom level was to have sculpted figures representing Victory and bond slaves. The second level was to have statues of Moses and Saint Paul as well as symbolic figures of the active and contemplative life- representative of the human striving for, and reception of, knowledge. The third level, it is assumed, was to have an effigy of the deceased pope. The tomb of Pope Julius II was never finished. What was finished of the tomb represents a twenty-year span of frustrating delays and revised schemes. Michelangelo had hardly begun work on the pope?s tomb when Julius commanded him to fresco the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to complete the work done in the previous century under Sixtus IV. The overall organization consists of four large triangles at...

Oscar Wilde

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde was born in Dublin Ireland on October 16, 1854. He is one of the most talented and most controversial writers of his time. He was well known for his wit, flamboyance, and creative genius and with his little dramatic training showing his natural talent for stage and theatre. He is termed a martyr by some and may be the first true self-publicist and was known for his style of dress and odd behavior. Wilde, 1882 His Father, William Wilde, was a highly accredited doctor and his mother, Jane Francesca Elgee, was a writer of revolutionary poems. Oscar had a brother William Charles Kingsbury along with his father's three illegitimate children, Henry, Emily, and Mary. His sister, Isola Emily Francesca died in 1867 at only ten years of age from a sudden fever, greatly affecting Oscar and his family. He kept a lock of her hair in an envelope and later wrote the poem 'Requiescat' in her memory. Oscar and his brother William both attended the Protora Royal School at Enniskillen. He had little in common with the other children. He disliked games and took more interest in flowers and sunsets. He was extremely passionate about anything that had to do with ancient Greece and with Classics. Wilde during school years In 1871, he was awarded a Royal School Scholarship to Trinity College in Dublin and received many awards and earned the highest honor the college offered to an undergraduate, the Foundation Scholarship. In 1874, he also won the College's Berkley Gold Medal for Greek and was awarded a Demyship to Magdalen College, Oxford. After graduating from Oxford, Oscar moved to London with his friend Frank Miles, a well-known portrait painter of the time. In 1878 his poem Ravenna was published, for which he won the...

The History Of Greek Theater

Theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century BCE, with the Sopocles, the great writer of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, heroes and the ideals of life were depicted and glorified. It was believed that man should live for honor and fame, his action was courageous and glorious and his life would climax in a great and noble death. Originally, the hero's recognition was created by selfish behaviors and little thought of service to others. As the Greeks grew toward city-states and colonization, it became the destiny and ambition of the hero to gain honor by serving his city. The second major characteristic of the early Greek world was the supernatural. The two worlds were not separate, as the gods lived in the same world as the men, and they interfered in the men's lives as they chose to. It was the gods who sent suffering and evil to men. In the plays of Sophocles, the gods brought about the hero's downfall because of a tragic flaw in the character of the hero. In Greek tragedy, suffering brought knowledge of worldly matters and of the individual. Aristotle attempted to explain how an audience could observe tragic events and still have a pleasurable experience. Aristotle, by searching the works of writers of Greek tragedy, Aeschulus, Euripides and Sophocles (whose Oedipus Rex he considered the finest of all Greek tragedies), arrived at his definition of tragedy. This explanation has a profound influence for more than twenty centuries on those writing tragedies, most significantly Shakespeare. Aristotle's analysis of tragedy began with a description of the effect such a work had on the audience as a "catharsis" or purging of the emotions. He decided that catharsis was the purging of two specific emotions, pity and...

Scholarship Essay About Goals

Ever since I was a young kid I have always been interested with aircraft. I was so curious of how airplane's fly. I remember taking my toys apart to see how it works. As a kid I wanted to go to the airport to watch the airplanes land and fly and pondered how this happens. Other kids wanted to go to the amusement places. As I grew older I became more and more interested in aircraft and the technology behind it. I always involved myself with aviation early on. I read books and magazines on aviation, took museum tours, built model airplanes. When I was younger my father would take me to aircraft repair facilities where I would watch in great fascination. In my teens, went up to the military bases and befriended many soldiers involved with aircraft and asked them numerous questions. I got to meet many aeronautics engineers and borrowed their old textbooks and read them till the wee hours of the morning. As technology improved with information superhighway, I logged on the web. Stayed up for hours and hours searching through web pages and web pages of information about aircraft and technology. I started my elementary school in the Philippines, then we moved to U.S. and continued my high school education and graduated. Enrolled at the CCSF to pursue my college education and now I am in the 2nd year in CCSF taking aeronautics. My goal now is to obtain my AS degree from the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) so I can transfer to a University and get a Bachelors degree and to continue for my Masters degree in Aeronautics Engineering. I will strive hard to reach the peak level of my career which is a Professor and hopefully to be an aeronautic professor so...

Circus Circus Enterprises Case Studies

Executive Summary: Circus Circus Enterprises is a leader and will continue to be in the gaming industry. In recent years, they have seen a decline in profit and revenue; management tends to blame the decrease on continuing disruptions from remodeling, expansion, and increased competition. Consequently, Circus has reported decreases in its net income for 1997 and 1998 and management believes this trend will continue as competition heightens. Currently the company is involved in several joint ventures, its brand of casino entertainment has traditionally catered to the low rollers and family vacationers through its theme park. Circus should continue to expand its existing operations into new market segments. This shift will allow them to attract the up scale gambler. Overview Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc founded in 1974 is in the business of entertainment, with its core strength in casino gambling. The company?s asset base, operating cash flow, profit margin, multiple markets and customers, rank it as one of the gaming industry leaders. Partners William G. Bennett an aggressive cost cutter and William N. Pennington purchased Circus Circus in 1974 as a small and unprofitable casino. It went public in 1983, from 1993 to 1997; the average return on capital invested was 16.5%. Circus Circus operates several properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Laughlin, and one in Mississippi, as well as 50% ownership in three other casinos and a theme park. On January 31,1998 Circus reported net income of 89.9 million and revenues of 1.35 billion, this is a down from 100 million on 1.3 billion in 1997. Management sees this decline in revenue due to the rapid and extensive expansion and the increased competition that Circus is facing. Well established in the casino gaming industry the corporation has its focus in the entertainment business and has particularly a popular theme resort concept....

Effect Of Civil War On American Economy

The Economies of the North and South, 1861-1865 In 1861, a great war in American history began. It was a civil war between the north and south that was by no means civil. This war would have great repercussions upon the economy of this country and the states within it. The American Civil War began with secession, creating a divided union of sorts, and sparked an incredibly cataclysmic four years. Although the actual war began with secession, this was not the only driving force. The economy of the Southern states, the Confederacy, greatly if not entirely depended on the institution of slavery. The Confederacy was heavily reliant on agriculture, and they used the profits made from the sale of such raw materials to purchase finished goods to use and enjoy. Their major export was cotton, which thrived on the warm river deltas and could easily be shipped to major ocean ports from towns on the Mississippi and numerous river cities. Slavery was a key part of this, as slaves were the ones who harvested and planted the cotton. Being such an enormous unpaid work force, the profits made were extraordinarily high and the price for the unfinished goods drastically low in comparison; especially since he invention of the cotton gin in 1793 which made the work all that much easier and quicker. In contrast, the economical structure of the Northern states, the Union, was vastly dependent on industry. Slavery did not exist in most of the Union, as there was no demand for it due to the type of industrial development taking place. As the Union had a paid work force, the profits made were lower and the cost of the finished manufactured item higher. In turn, the Union used the profits and purchased raw materials to use. This cycle...

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Trade Embargoes

Although I am a strong critic of the use and effectiveness of economic sanctions, such as trade embargoes, for the sake of this assignment, I will present both their theoretical advantages and their disadvantages based upon my research. Trade embargoes and blockades have traditionally been used to entice nations to alter their behavior or to punish them for certain behavior. The intentions behind these policies are generally noble, at least on the surface. However, these policies can have side effects. For example, FDR's blockade of raw materials against the Japanese in Manchuria in the 1930s arguably led to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which resulted in U.S. involvement in World War II. The decades-long embargo against Cuba not only did not lead to the topple of the communist regime there, but may have strengthened Castro's hold on the island and has created animosity toward the United States in Latin America and much suffering by the people of Cuba. Various studies have concluded that embargoes and other economic sanctions generally have not been effective from a utilitarian or policy perspective, yet these policies continue. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Trade Embargoes Strengths Trade embargoes and other sanctions can give the sender government the appearance of taking strong measures in response to a given situation without resorting to violence. Sanctions can be imposed in conjunction with other measures to achieve conflict prevention and mitigation goals. Sanctions may be ineffective: goals may be too elusive, the means too gentle, or cooperation from other countries insufficient. It is usually difficult to determine whether embargoes were an effective deterrent against future misdeeds: embargoes may contribute to a successful outcome, but can rarely achieve ambitious objectives alone. Some regimes are highly resistant to external pressures to reform. At the same time, trade sanctions may narrow the...