The American Family Dynamically Adaptive Or Consistently Declining

Word Count: 2477 |

Joe Blommel
Debating American Family Life
Michael Hillary

The American Family: Dynamically Adaptive or Consistently Declining?

There has been much discussion concerning the contemporary American family and the ever-increasing complexity by which it is arranged. Some would argue that by simply drawing mainly on U.S. Census data, we could easily sketch the conclusion that there has been an extraordinarily steep declination associated with the American family since the 1960’s. Folks like David Popenoe are quick to identify the consequential attributes of this decline, characteristics, which he believes greatly contribute to many of the societal issues we face as a country today. Others, however, would argue that the American family is simply put, dynamic. It is an adaptable unit, one that is ever changing in order that it may keep pace with the lively and often unstable world with which we live. These two differing viewpoints of the American family have led to much debate concerning the impact the evolution of the family has had and will continue to have on the vitality and sustainability of American society
According to David Popenoe’s article American Family Decline, 1960-1990: A Review and Appraisal, he argues that families have lost functions, power, and authority, that familisim as a cultural value has diminished (Popenoe, 1993). Further, he believes that the recent family decline is much more serious than the decline of the past. He states that this is more serious than any decline in the past because what is breaking up is the nuclear family (Popenoe, 1993). How does Popenoe maintain his argument? Much of his evidence revolves around information available through the U.S. Census Bureau that dates back to 1960. He focuses on a few principal pieces that he feels demonstrates the greatest support for his argument including, number of children, marital roles, family structure and family dissolution, marriage, and non family living.
In reference to the number of children, Popenoe brings to light the traditional idea of the nuclear family that was brought forth with industrialization and urbanization. Popenoe states that one of the features that arose during this time frame was that families had fewer children than prior family types precisely because it valued, and wanted to do more for, each child (Popenoe, 1993). However, since about the late 1950’s, childbearing as an “ideal” has quickly become much less important and to some extent has fallen out of favor. This change is connected with a dramatic, and probably historically unprecedented, decrease in positive feelings toward parenthood and motherhood (Popenoe, 1993) Why are the ideals surrounding children so important? Popenoe argues the declination in the number of children “has significant ramifications for the priority our society gives to children”. Further, he believes that this decrease points to the attitude we have as a culture as to the importance of children in the overall scheme of life (Popenoe, 1993)
In reference to marital roles, it is evident that the majority of children today grow up in a far different atmosphere than did their parents and grandparents thirty or so years ago. Popenoe draws on the fact that the roles, which were thought of as traditional of the nuclear family, have completely changed. The era in which wives were expected to be full-time “housewife-mothers” while the husbands were the income earners seems to be going out of existence. Surely, there are instances in which women continue to play the traditional role, but the majority (59%) of women with children 6 to 17 years of age all are inhabitants of the labor market.
Popenoe points to family structure and marital dissolution as factor in the decline of the family as well. He reacts to these particulars by saying that we have “heavily discarded the basic structure of that family type—two natural parents who stay together for life” (Popenoe, 1993). He goes on to say that not only are we seeing the dissolve of the “traditional nuclear family”, but more threatening is the dissolution and rejection of the basic “nuclear family” in itself. Most alarming, according to Popenoe, is the intense rate at which single parent households have been growing in recent years, 90% of which are headed by women. Why is this number so high? Popenoe believes that one of the main causes for this increase is the wide acceptance of divorce, particularly divorce in which children are involved. “It is true,” according to Popenoe, “that divorce has replaced death as a dissolver of marriages.” (Popenoe, 1993). Finally, there are a greater number of families today that start with just one parent. In what has come to be known as the disappearing act by fathers, children are born out-of-wedlock in which the father then flees the scene. As of 1990, nearly a quarter of all children born are done so without the presence of a father.
From Popenoe’s view, it is clear that family instability has distinguished this era from other eras of the past. It is frightening to come to terms with the idea that a minority of children will grow up in a house with a two-parent family unhindered by marital interruption. Most importantly though, and Popenoe refers to this in his article, because the majority of children grow up in broken homes, they will in turn have a much higher chance as adults of having unstable marriages of their own. The future in this regard does not look bright (McLanahan & Bumpass, 1988).
On the topic of Marriage, Popenoe refers to the retreat from the institution to be another major trend of our time. Not only are people waiting until a later age to get married, but the proportion ever marrying has dropped as well. However, Popenoe feels it is important to point out that the proportion who ever marry and the median age of marriage have returned to the level that they stood at the end of the last century. Also, important to note is the fact that the older ones age at marriage, the less likely they are to end their relationship in divorce. This is true up until the age of about thirty. However, it does not track that societies that have an older average age at marriage have a low divorce rate. Sweden, for example, has the highest age of marriage, but simultaneously maintains the highest divorce rate in the world.
Popenoe’s most important work on this matter comes in the discussion of the psychological character of the marital relationship. He claims that the psychological understanding of marriage was once based on the constitution that a marital relationship was a social obligation, one that led to means for economic security and procreation. Today, marriage is understood as a means of propagating ones self-actualization. Moreover, there is no longer a set of societal standards, norms in which we entrust to the generations that follow. In a sense, marriage has become a faucet, that when it leaks, there is no necessity to fix it. Instead, just disregard and move on.
Finally, non-family living has had an impact on the decline of the family. According to his article, Popenoe it is the retreat from marriage presented in the paragraphs above that is largely to blame in the sharp increases we have seen in residential independence and non-marital cohabitation. He links individuals leaving their homes at an early age as a major factor in the tremendous increase in non-family households and non-family living. He also points out that the number of non-marital couples living together (cohabitation) is steadily increasing. There is a growing body of evidence that suggests that those who choose cohabitation before marriage will be much more prone to divorce.
In closing his argument, Popenoe strikingly states, “those who believe that the family has not declined must logically hold one of two positions—either that the family has strengthened, or that its institutional power within society has remained unchanged.” (Popenoe, 1993) He furthers this notion by making it clear that he believes one will be incredibly hard pressed to find data that would be accommodating of either of these two positions (Popenoe, 1993).
While folks like David Popenoe tend take a bleak approach when discussing both the current and future outlook of the American family, there is another perspective that describes it as dynamic, adaptive, and fully capable of providing balance in a society that is often unbalanced and in constant alteration. The diversity perspective offers a different way of discussing the ideas about the family. Instead of looking at the family form and comparing its functionality to that of the traditional nuclear family, the central task of the diversity perspective is to examine how changes in society affect family forms, family functioning, and family relationships (Zinn, Eitzen and Wells 2008). In response to Popenoe’s arguments, the diversity perspective asks that we take a closer look at the myths that are uncritically held without examination or scrutiny (Crosby, 1985). These myths are often bound with nostalgia, selective perception, and cultural values concerning what is typical and true about the family (Zinn, Eitzen and Wells 2008). It is these glorified myths that camouflage the unavoidable and certain predicaments that face each and every family, and in turn relieve the traditional nuclear family of its true ill characteristics, which in turn create a fictional narrative that never truly existed.
With respect to Popenoe’s first point of argument, the diversity perspective would instead try to understand what is changing in society that is creating this fundamental change in the attitude towards having large families. In looking back throughout history, especially during pre-industrial America, a large family was often seen as necessity in order that life proceeded. Large families were needed to work the farms and take care of the daily duties associated with the business of farming. Even with successful growing seasons, if there was a shortage of labor to work the land, no profits would be made for the season. Considering post-industrial America, because large families were no longer needed, many couples decided that it would not only be in their best interest, but also in the best interest of their children if they limited the number to a smaller amount. This provided the children with not only more resources, but also allowed for more selective attention per child. I think the diversity perspective would parallel and agree with my thoughts that the transition to a smaller family is one that should be considered an adaptation to a trend in which the greater society was going towards. It is once again this ability for families to adapt that renders them capable of survival. Maybe not in following the strict traditional myths that we have become accustom to, but in its own acclimatizing fashion.
In speaking of marital roles, it is evident that they have changed. Considering that even fifty years ago, Husbands were usually the sole bread winners and the overwhelming consensus was that the woman should be the homemaker-housewife, we have obviously done a complete one eighty. Women now are taking on a much greater influence in the household income. Not only does this effect the way in which family life is run (ie: fathers assuming responsibilities regarding upbringing of the children), but it has completely changed the environment, expectations, and in most cases, improved the acceptability of women stepping outside the boundaries of home to pursue other field of work. In other words, it has brought women a much greater freedom and along with that, more rights.
In furthering our understanding and dispelling the myths of the traditional nuclear family, we might be better able to understand why the family structures of today are vastly different from those of previous eras. Moreover, by undertaking a greater knowledge of the non-fictional form of the traditional family, we can better comprehend and recognize why it is that families function how they do today. For instance, we have been taught as a society that the traditional nuclear family is the best there ever was and the best there ever will be. However, the fact of the matter is, the families of the 1950’s were not the mystified units that they are portrayed to be. For example, we dispelled some myths about family life in class. We took a look at the myth of a stable and harmonious family of the past. This myth encompasses both the idea of marital roles and the institution and dissolution of marriage. Granted, the women’s roles were, for the most part, rigidly defined, but who’s to say they were happy with those roles. What is more, how do these roles then affect the attitudes and opinions towards not only herself, but also the marital relationship she is in. I guess I’m saying, maybe in restricting the women’s role to that of housewife/homemaker, we are repressing and not allowing for that individual to become self-actualized. To judge marriage of the past as better than contemporary marriage is to ignore historical changes (Zinn, Eitzen, and Wells 2008). Our challenge today is to avoid nostalgia for a mythic past and examine the real problems facing today’s families (Mintz, 2004). Further, on the divorce subject, it is important to understand that throughout history, families have experienced pressure from outside sources. There has always been desertion by spouses, illegitimate children, and certainly spouse and child abuse. Divorce rates were lower, but this does not mean that love was stronger in the past (Zinn, Eitzen, and Wells 2008).
In closing, when taking into perspective different viewpoints, it is always important to keep an open mind. David Popenoe brings up some legit and shocking statistics that undoubtedly has much relevance in today’s society. In remembering and reviewing the history of our society, we can hopefully gain great insight and knowledge in what has brought us to the point with which we stand as a society today. However, it is equally important to take a stance and allow for our own intelligence and ability to pick apart this complex web that history has entangled us in. It is not justified to simply pull from past experiences and assume that those same ideals and principles are going to rightfully apply today. It is imperative that we recognize the ever changing character of the human being and his ability to adapt to the needs and requests of not only society in its entirety, but also to the needs of the individual. Families of yesterday provided for yesterday. Families of today need to provide the needs of the present. Ever changing, ever dynamic, ever adaptable is the family unit!

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Allegory Of American Pie By Don Mc Lean

Ask anyone what was the defining moment in the rock history of the 1960s was and all you will get is a one word answer: Woodstock. The three day rock festival that defined an era was only one of many music festivals of the '60s. But Woodstock has come to symbolize, "an era of peaceful, free- loving, drug- taking hippie youth, carefree before harsher realities hit..." (Layman 40). The Woodstock festival ended a century filled with many metamorphoses of rock'n'roll, from the era of pop music to the rebirth of folk music to the invention of acid rock. But some cynics say that rock'n'roll died with the death of Buddy Holly before the 60s even began. One such person is Don McLean. The poet behind the haunting epic song about the death of 'danceable' music, McLean wrote the ever popular song, "American Pie" (appendix 1). The most important song in rock'n'roll history, "American Pie", is the song about the demise of rock'n'roll after Buddy Holly's death and the heathenism of rock that resulted. Although McLean himself won't reveal any symbolism in his songs, "American Pie" is one of the most analyzed pieces of literature in modern society. Although not all of its secrets have been revealed, many "scholars" of the sixties will agree that the mystery of this song is one of the reasons it has become so successful- everyone wants to know the meanings of its allegories. Proof of "American Pie's" truth lies in the allegory of the song. Many People enjoy the song but have no idea what it means- Who is the Jester? What is the levee? When the deeper story is found, the importance of the song is unearthed. "American Pie" is not only a song, it is an epic poem about the course of rock'n'roll...

Carl Orffs Philosophies In Music Education

While Carl Orff is a very seminal composer of the 20th century, his greatest success and influence has been in the field of Music Education. Born on July 10th in Munich, Germany in 1895, Orff refused to speak about his past almost as if he were ashamed of it. What we do know, however, is that Orff came from a Bavarian family who was very active in the German military. His father's regiment band would often play through some of the young Orff's first attempts at composing. Although Orff was adamant about the secrecy of his past, Moser's Musik Lexicon says that he studied in the Munich Academy of Music until 1914. Orff then served in the military in the first world war. After the war, he held various positions in the Mannheim and Darmstadt opera houses then returned home to Munich to further study music. In 1925, and for the rest of his life, Orff was the head of a department and co-founder of the Guenther School for gymnastics, music, and dance in Munich where he worked with musical beginners. This is where he developed his Music Education theories. In 1937, Orff's Carmina Burana premiered in Frankfurt, Germany. Needless to say, it was a great success. With the success of Carmina Burana, Orff orphaned all of his previous works except for Catulli Carmina and the En trata which were rewritten to be acceptable by Orff. One of Orff's most admired composers was Monteverdi. In fact, much of Orff's work was based on ancient material. Orff said: I am often asked why I nearly always select old material, fairy tales and legends for my stage works. I do not look upon them as old, but rather as valid material. The time element disappears, and only the spiritual power remains. My...

Johann Sebastian Bach Biography

Throughout the history of music, many great composers, theorists, and instrumentalists have left indelible marks and influences that people today look back on to admire and aspire to. No exception to this idiom is Johann Sebastian Bach, whose impact on music was unforgettable to say the least. People today look back to his writings and works to both learn and admire. He truly can be considered a music history great. Bach, who came from a family of over 53 musicians, was nothing short of a virtuosic instrumentalist as well as a masterful composer. Born in Eisenach, Germany, on March 21, 1685, he was the son of a masterful violinist, Johann Ambrosius Bach, who taught his son the basic skills for string playing. Along with this string playing, Bach began to play the organ which is the instrument he would later on be noted for in history. His instruction on the organ came from the player at Eisenach's most important church. He instructed the young boy rather rigorously until his skills surpassed anyone?s expectations for someone of such a young age. Bach suffered early trauma when his parents died in 1695. He went to go live with his older brother, Johann Christoph, who also was a professional organist at Ohrdruf. He continued his younger brother's education on that instrument, as well as introducing him to the harpsichord. The rigorous training on these instruments combined with Bach?s masterful skill paid off for him at an early age. After several years of studying with his older brother, he received a scholarship to study in Luneberg, Germany, which is located on the northern tip of the country. As a result, he left his brother?s tutelage and went to go and study there. The teenage years brought Bach to several parts of Germany where he...


Michelangelo was pessimistic in his poetry and an optimist in his artwork. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo?s poetry was pessimistic in his response to Strazzi even though he was complementing him. Michelangelo?s sculpture brought out his optimism. Michelangelo was optimistic in completing The Tomb of Pope Julius II and persevered through it?s many revisions trying to complete his vision. Sculpture was Michelangelo?s main goal and the love of his life. Since his art portrayed both optimism and pessimism, Michelangelo was in touch with his positive and negative sides, showing that he had a great and stable personality. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo Buonarroti was called to Rome in 1505 by Pope Julius II to create for him a monumental tomb. We have no clear sense of what the tomb was to look like, since over the years it went through at least five conceptual revisions. The tomb was to have three levels; the bottom level was to have sculpted figures representing Victory and bond slaves. The second level was to have statues of Moses and Saint Paul as well as symbolic figures of the active and contemplative life- representative of the human striving for, and reception of, knowledge. The third level, it is assumed, was to have an effigy of the deceased pope. The tomb of Pope Julius II was never finished. What was finished of the tomb represents a twenty-year span of frustrating delays and revised schemes. Michelangelo had hardly begun work on the pope?s tomb when Julius commanded him to fresco the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to complete the work done in the previous century under Sixtus IV. The overall organization consists of four large triangles at...

Oscar Wilde

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde was born in Dublin Ireland on October 16, 1854. He is one of the most talented and most controversial writers of his time. He was well known for his wit, flamboyance, and creative genius and with his little dramatic training showing his natural talent for stage and theatre. He is termed a martyr by some and may be the first true self-publicist and was known for his style of dress and odd behavior. Wilde, 1882 His Father, William Wilde, was a highly accredited doctor and his mother, Jane Francesca Elgee, was a writer of revolutionary poems. Oscar had a brother William Charles Kingsbury along with his father's three illegitimate children, Henry, Emily, and Mary. His sister, Isola Emily Francesca died in 1867 at only ten years of age from a sudden fever, greatly affecting Oscar and his family. He kept a lock of her hair in an envelope and later wrote the poem 'Requiescat' in her memory. Oscar and his brother William both attended the Protora Royal School at Enniskillen. He had little in common with the other children. He disliked games and took more interest in flowers and sunsets. He was extremely passionate about anything that had to do with ancient Greece and with Classics. Wilde during school years In 1871, he was awarded a Royal School Scholarship to Trinity College in Dublin and received many awards and earned the highest honor the college offered to an undergraduate, the Foundation Scholarship. In 1874, he also won the College's Berkley Gold Medal for Greek and was awarded a Demyship to Magdalen College, Oxford. After graduating from Oxford, Oscar moved to London with his friend Frank Miles, a well-known portrait painter of the time. In 1878 his poem Ravenna was published, for which he won the...

The History Of Greek Theater

Theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century BCE, with the Sopocles, the great writer of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, heroes and the ideals of life were depicted and glorified. It was believed that man should live for honor and fame, his action was courageous and glorious and his life would climax in a great and noble death. Originally, the hero's recognition was created by selfish behaviors and little thought of service to others. As the Greeks grew toward city-states and colonization, it became the destiny and ambition of the hero to gain honor by serving his city. The second major characteristic of the early Greek world was the supernatural. The two worlds were not separate, as the gods lived in the same world as the men, and they interfered in the men's lives as they chose to. It was the gods who sent suffering and evil to men. In the plays of Sophocles, the gods brought about the hero's downfall because of a tragic flaw in the character of the hero. In Greek tragedy, suffering brought knowledge of worldly matters and of the individual. Aristotle attempted to explain how an audience could observe tragic events and still have a pleasurable experience. Aristotle, by searching the works of writers of Greek tragedy, Aeschulus, Euripides and Sophocles (whose Oedipus Rex he considered the finest of all Greek tragedies), arrived at his definition of tragedy. This explanation has a profound influence for more than twenty centuries on those writing tragedies, most significantly Shakespeare. Aristotle's analysis of tragedy began with a description of the effect such a work had on the audience as a "catharsis" or purging of the emotions. He decided that catharsis was the purging of two specific emotions, pity and...

Scholarship Essay About Goals

Ever since I was a young kid I have always been interested with aircraft. I was so curious of how airplane's fly. I remember taking my toys apart to see how it works. As a kid I wanted to go to the airport to watch the airplanes land and fly and pondered how this happens. Other kids wanted to go to the amusement places. As I grew older I became more and more interested in aircraft and the technology behind it. I always involved myself with aviation early on. I read books and magazines on aviation, took museum tours, built model airplanes. When I was younger my father would take me to aircraft repair facilities where I would watch in great fascination. In my teens, went up to the military bases and befriended many soldiers involved with aircraft and asked them numerous questions. I got to meet many aeronautics engineers and borrowed their old textbooks and read them till the wee hours of the morning. As technology improved with information superhighway, I logged on the web. Stayed up for hours and hours searching through web pages and web pages of information about aircraft and technology. I started my elementary school in the Philippines, then we moved to U.S. and continued my high school education and graduated. Enrolled at the CCSF to pursue my college education and now I am in the 2nd year in CCSF taking aeronautics. My goal now is to obtain my AS degree from the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) so I can transfer to a University and get a Bachelors degree and to continue for my Masters degree in Aeronautics Engineering. I will strive hard to reach the peak level of my career which is a Professor and hopefully to be an aeronautic professor so...

Circus Circus Enterprises Case Studies

Executive Summary: Circus Circus Enterprises is a leader and will continue to be in the gaming industry. In recent years, they have seen a decline in profit and revenue; management tends to blame the decrease on continuing disruptions from remodeling, expansion, and increased competition. Consequently, Circus has reported decreases in its net income for 1997 and 1998 and management believes this trend will continue as competition heightens. Currently the company is involved in several joint ventures, its brand of casino entertainment has traditionally catered to the low rollers and family vacationers through its theme park. Circus should continue to expand its existing operations into new market segments. This shift will allow them to attract the up scale gambler. Overview Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc founded in 1974 is in the business of entertainment, with its core strength in casino gambling. The company?s asset base, operating cash flow, profit margin, multiple markets and customers, rank it as one of the gaming industry leaders. Partners William G. Bennett an aggressive cost cutter and William N. Pennington purchased Circus Circus in 1974 as a small and unprofitable casino. It went public in 1983, from 1993 to 1997; the average return on capital invested was 16.5%. Circus Circus operates several properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Laughlin, and one in Mississippi, as well as 50% ownership in three other casinos and a theme park. On January 31,1998 Circus reported net income of 89.9 million and revenues of 1.35 billion, this is a down from 100 million on 1.3 billion in 1997. Management sees this decline in revenue due to the rapid and extensive expansion and the increased competition that Circus is facing. Well established in the casino gaming industry the corporation has its focus in the entertainment business and has particularly a popular theme resort concept....

Effect Of Civil War On American Economy

The Economies of the North and South, 1861-1865 In 1861, a great war in American history began. It was a civil war between the north and south that was by no means civil. This war would have great repercussions upon the economy of this country and the states within it. The American Civil War began with secession, creating a divided union of sorts, and sparked an incredibly cataclysmic four years. Although the actual war began with secession, this was not the only driving force. The economy of the Southern states, the Confederacy, greatly if not entirely depended on the institution of slavery. The Confederacy was heavily reliant on agriculture, and they used the profits made from the sale of such raw materials to purchase finished goods to use and enjoy. Their major export was cotton, which thrived on the warm river deltas and could easily be shipped to major ocean ports from towns on the Mississippi and numerous river cities. Slavery was a key part of this, as slaves were the ones who harvested and planted the cotton. Being such an enormous unpaid work force, the profits made were extraordinarily high and the price for the unfinished goods drastically low in comparison; especially since he invention of the cotton gin in 1793 which made the work all that much easier and quicker. In contrast, the economical structure of the Northern states, the Union, was vastly dependent on industry. Slavery did not exist in most of the Union, as there was no demand for it due to the type of industrial development taking place. As the Union had a paid work force, the profits made were lower and the cost of the finished manufactured item higher. In turn, the Union used the profits and purchased raw materials to use. This cycle...

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Trade Embargoes

Although I am a strong critic of the use and effectiveness of economic sanctions, such as trade embargoes, for the sake of this assignment, I will present both their theoretical advantages and their disadvantages based upon my research. Trade embargoes and blockades have traditionally been used to entice nations to alter their behavior or to punish them for certain behavior. The intentions behind these policies are generally noble, at least on the surface. However, these policies can have side effects. For example, FDR's blockade of raw materials against the Japanese in Manchuria in the 1930s arguably led to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which resulted in U.S. involvement in World War II. The decades-long embargo against Cuba not only did not lead to the topple of the communist regime there, but may have strengthened Castro's hold on the island and has created animosity toward the United States in Latin America and much suffering by the people of Cuba. Various studies have concluded that embargoes and other economic sanctions generally have not been effective from a utilitarian or policy perspective, yet these policies continue. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Trade Embargoes Strengths Trade embargoes and other sanctions can give the sender government the appearance of taking strong measures in response to a given situation without resorting to violence. Sanctions can be imposed in conjunction with other measures to achieve conflict prevention and mitigation goals. Sanctions may be ineffective: goals may be too elusive, the means too gentle, or cooperation from other countries insufficient. It is usually difficult to determine whether embargoes were an effective deterrent against future misdeeds: embargoes may contribute to a successful outcome, but can rarely achieve ambitious objectives alone. Some regimes are highly resistant to external pressures to reform. At the same time, trade sanctions may narrow the...