The Civil Right Movement

Through out the history of African American people struggle for freedom, the struggle took many forms of riots, rebels by leaders who differed in methods but had the same aims. The nonviolent form took the struggle into a new era of struggle techniques. The nonviolent approach which shaped the struggle in 1950’s and 1960’s led the blacks to get their civil rights. The approach was orchestrated by Martin Luther King Jr., mostly in Alabama and Georgia. King’s nonviolent dogma was the solution for the blacks’ desire for freedom, but was opposed to other leaders’ doctrines of violent and militant acts. Major struggles of civil rights took this form which resulted a victory. On the other hand, violent acts and streets riot could only put them in a critical situation with more hatred to them and to their cause. This non-violent movement compared to violent one could make the government accept the idea of almost a peaceful movement than a violent and militant one. And unless the movement gained the support of people especially white people, it would not success.

The nonviolent struggle was promoted before but was not taken seriously. Booker T. Washington realized that blacks should elevate themselves in education and start their economic strength instead of militant actions that was promoted at that time. Economic power and education could affect the long struggle for freedom where the armed struggle could only make it worse. His attitude was obvious in his famous saying “cast down your bucket where you are.”(Atlanta Exposition Address, 1895) Casting down the bucket used to maintain stability and planting the roots which make them stronger in facing white supremacy. His article The Awakening of the Negro shows his experience in Hampton when he had the opportunity to education, and the shift from a coal mine boy into a student who want to understand the dignity of labor which made him realize that he is a man instead of a property. The black had become self-awakened; this could happen through educating the Negro race. His attitudes were described as not militant, and he was portrayed as advocator for American government policy. On the other hand, Garvey disagreed with Washington policy and called it a betrayal to the black race because it would not help them or help their cause. He believed that armed struggle would make whites submit to their demands. Garvey presents in his essay Motives of the NAACP Exposed, (1923) his own interpretation of the motives of the NAACP and how this organization is a mere cover up in order to degrade the black race, starting by enforcing racism among blacks by dividing them into groups differ in their degree of blackness. He explained that this was Du Bois’ way of encouraging the advancement of Negroes by becoming whiter. Du Bios was the founder of the National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP); the largest and oldest civil right organization in America. He founded it on the base that nonviolent protests and legal actions were the best way to ensure equality for everyone. For instance, the NAACP won the ordinance case in Louisville, Kentucky, that obligated blacks to live in a certain places, because it violates the fourteenth Amendment of United States constitution.

The nonviolent movement for civil rights started with major effects when two black lawyers initiated the desegregation of schools. Both Houston and Marshal new the value of education and how it will help blacks’ endeavor to get their rights. The education of black people was promoted before by Du Bois and Washington. The two lawyers knew that legalizing the struggle was better than rioting in front of the court and this would reflect a good image about black as educated people and nonviolent opposed to their stereotyped image as violent. Brown v. Board of Education was a landmark in the passive journey, on May 17, 1954; the US Supreme Court declared school segregation illegal. This triumph was out of unity and determination of the African American people to gain their rights in a civilized way that portrayed their adoption of the nonviolent theory. Decisions of supreme court could only mean the success of nonviolent method in winning over the government which had no chance but to abide to law.

One figure who used and applied the nonviolent struggle that made a difference in the African American struggle for freedom and civil rights, was Martin Luther king. A Baptist minister and civil rights leader born in Atlanta, Georgia with his family long history in the Baptist church, he grew up on Christianity creed which later played a great role in establishing the SCLC to coordinate civil rights. He saw Christianity as potential force for the advancement of blacks. His doctrine of nonviolent struggle was the outcome of his family deep roots in the African American Baptist church, and his study of liberal theology of Christianity where he shaped his personality and beliefs. He believed that every one is entitled to the basic human rights given to him by God and Law. King’s election as the spokesperson of Montgomery Improvement Association was out of his ability to preach to the mass and affect them by his biblical theologies and philosophic texts which he gained from his religious background and academic training, in addition to his experience with his father. Montgomery became his first station to his nonviolent believes when Rosa Parks refused to give up her seat in the bus for a white person. This event was his first practical place to promote his doctrine. The boycott was a nonviolent form to resist whites’ prejudice actions towards black people.

King’s movement promoted blacks’ rights that the white people refused to acknowledge and fought to prohibit, but the form in which this struggle took made the government show a little cooperation with it. The government had a lot of meetings with leaders and activists such as Martin Luther King meeting with President Dwight Eisenhower in 1957. Another example was when king marched along with his fellow blacks and white sympathizers in a civil rights rally to segregated cities facing violent counterattacks by whites. This could only mean the determination black people to get their freedom will pay off and finally will “Let the freedom Ring” (king’s Address in Washington, 1963) A year Later President Lyndon Johnson signed the Civil Rights Bill in 1964.
King’s non-violent method was a result of his study and his belief in the Christian doctrine and the faith in the determination of the African Americans to obtain their freedom. His inspiration could also be maintained and enhanced by Gandhi’s methodology. King Visited India to study Mohandas Gandhi’s philosophy of nonviolence, which characterized the civil rights movement in bus boycotts. Gandhi’s fought the British with his nonviolent policy that united all Indians in a common cause. He tolerated the violence and vicious actions towards his people in order to get their freedom. His famous attitude was not to evoke the British troops even when he was jailed. King advocated this in his speech I have a Dream in 1963 at the Lincoln memorial in Washington,” In the process of gaining our rightful place we must not be guilty of wrongful deeds. Let us not seek to satisfy our thirst for freedom by drinking from the cup of bitterness and hatred.” The dream of the African American is to be equal with others and to have what whites have. This dream can only be accomplished by the peaceful march into the hearts and the minds of the white people. King’s bearing the cross and having faith in God in fulfilling this dream. He encouraged African Americans to neither become bitter in their struggle nor going back to the use of violence to achieve freedom. His ideas are likened to Cabral’s idea of cultural resistance in which people react against an oppressor by holding out to their culture. Cabral also encouraged his people to take a nonviolent approach in the pursuit of freedom. This approach by both Cabral and King were opposed by many activists in the journey of freeing the Negroes’ crippled freedom and rights. On the other hand Malcolm X insisted that violence was needed for a “real revolution.” Malcolm refuted King’s claim of a Negro revolution by insisting that a revolution requires bloodshed and fight for the ownership of land. Like Douglass, Nat Turner and Malcolm mocked the attempt of peaceful revolution and rallied blacks to use force to gain their rights. The government witnessed the effect of leaders as Malcolm on people which groups adopted such the Black Panthers. This group emerged after the assassination of Malcolm X in February 1965, and embraced the slogan “by any means necessary.” The government had no choice but to support the nonviolent movement with discretion to remain in control especially after the riots in the Watts section in Los Angeles ghettos where the real power of the blacks appeared and feared. The violent practice resulted fear which could contributed to the success of the opposed practice.
Major demonstrations were the product of king’s nonviolent movement which filled the journey of the civil rights with examples and marked its importance. The march in Selma, Ala to the state capital in Montgomery was one of the series of the nonviolent demonstrations by black that opposed the violent attitude of others which gave it a national wide support of both white and black all over the country and resulted the Voting Rights Act in 1965. The expansion of king’s dogma to other cities like Atlanta in Georgia launched the first massive campaign blacks’ freedom. Many groups were formed such as the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC) which was one of the associations that expanded from Montgomery. The SNCC increased the activists among students who could be a strong group if controlled, but this was difficult as the students grew more militant which could jeopardize the whole struggle. Activist of the SNCC wanted more militant action which opposed to king’s dogma. He came out of Atlanta without achieving anything.
The nonviolent mode of the civil rights movement had made all the difference in shaping the mold of their freedom. The southern peaceful cause was a success in the journey of the blacks’ struggle. Leaders could disagree with methods used but they sure would agree on one aim; which is the freedom of the African American people. King’s achievements led to his winning the Noble Peace Prize in December 1963 for his efforts of nonviolent and peaceful struggle which was not for him as a person but as leader of great people who this prize was the result of their efforts. The diplomatic approaches proved its efficiency refute others who think only of the armed and violent struggle as the way to accomplish aims.
All of these men were working toward the same goal; freedom for African peoples all over the world. Some like Malcolm and Turner insisted that revolution and force were necessary to gain freedom while King and Cabral both rallied for nonviolent ascertainment of freedom and equality, because that is the only way to gain the support and sympathy of both the government and the people. This sympathy which could force the government fear division in the country and their fear of bad publicity as a major democratic country. At the end the method proven to work was the nonviolent which resulted the success of the biggest civil rights movement in the history of the Afro-American people.
References
– Zinn, Howard. 1999. Peoples History of the United States .
– Bearing the Cross
– Williams, Juan.2001. Eyes on the Prize: America’s Civil rights Years, 1954-1965.
– Festle J. Mary. 2005. Listening to the Civil Rights Movement Essay of Dr. Festle. Elon University in Elon, North Carolina, USA.]

– Booker T. Washington. The Awakening of the Negro. Atlantic Monthly 78 (1896): 322-328.
– King, Martin. August 28, 1963. I Have A Dream. http://www.mecca.org/~crights/dream.html
– Carson, Clayborne. Martin Luther King, Jr. American National Biography. John A. Garraty and Mark C. Carnes, eds. (New York, Oxford University Press, 1999).
– King Papers Project. http://www.stanford.edu/group/King.htm
– Du Bois. (Nd) W.E.B. Du Bois and the NAACP. American Library
http://www.americaslibrary.gov/cgi-bin/page.cgi/aa/activists/dubois

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Allegory Of American Pie By Don Mc Lean

Ask anyone what was the defining moment in the rock history of the 1960s was and all you will get is a one word answer: Woodstock. The three day rock festival that defined an era was only one of many music festivals of the '60s. But Woodstock has come to symbolize, "an era of peaceful, free- loving, drug- taking hippie youth, carefree before harsher realities hit..." (Layman 40). The Woodstock festival ended a century filled with many metamorphoses of rock'n'roll, from the era of pop music to the rebirth of folk music to the invention of acid rock. But some cynics say that rock'n'roll died with the death of Buddy Holly before the 60s even began. One such person is Don McLean. The poet behind the haunting epic song about the death of 'danceable' music, McLean wrote the ever popular song, "American Pie" (appendix 1). The most important song in rock'n'roll history, "American Pie", is the song about the demise of rock'n'roll after Buddy Holly's death and the heathenism of rock that resulted. Although McLean himself won't reveal any symbolism in his songs, "American Pie" is one of the most analyzed pieces of literature in modern society. Although not all of its secrets have been revealed, many "scholars" of the sixties will agree that the mystery of this song is one of the reasons it has become so successful- everyone wants to know the meanings of its allegories. Proof of "American Pie's" truth lies in the allegory of the song. Many People enjoy the song but have no idea what it means- Who is the Jester? What is the levee? When the deeper story is found, the importance of the song is unearthed. "American Pie" is not only a song, it is an epic poem about the course of rock'n'roll...

Carl Orffs Philosophies In Music Education

While Carl Orff is a very seminal composer of the 20th century, his greatest success and influence has been in the field of Music Education. Born on July 10th in Munich, Germany in 1895, Orff refused to speak about his past almost as if he were ashamed of it. What we do know, however, is that Orff came from a Bavarian family who was very active in the German military. His father's regiment band would often play through some of the young Orff's first attempts at composing. Although Orff was adamant about the secrecy of his past, Moser's Musik Lexicon says that he studied in the Munich Academy of Music until 1914. Orff then served in the military in the first world war. After the war, he held various positions in the Mannheim and Darmstadt opera houses then returned home to Munich to further study music. In 1925, and for the rest of his life, Orff was the head of a department and co-founder of the Guenther School for gymnastics, music, and dance in Munich where he worked with musical beginners. This is where he developed his Music Education theories. In 1937, Orff's Carmina Burana premiered in Frankfurt, Germany. Needless to say, it was a great success. With the success of Carmina Burana, Orff orphaned all of his previous works except for Catulli Carmina and the En trata which were rewritten to be acceptable by Orff. One of Orff's most admired composers was Monteverdi. In fact, much of Orff's work was based on ancient material. Orff said: I am often asked why I nearly always select old material, fairy tales and legends for my stage works. I do not look upon them as old, but rather as valid material. The time element disappears, and only the spiritual power remains. My...

Johann Sebastian Bach Biography

Throughout the history of music, many great composers, theorists, and instrumentalists have left indelible marks and influences that people today look back on to admire and aspire to. No exception to this idiom is Johann Sebastian Bach, whose impact on music was unforgettable to say the least. People today look back to his writings and works to both learn and admire. He truly can be considered a music history great. Bach, who came from a family of over 53 musicians, was nothing short of a virtuosic instrumentalist as well as a masterful composer. Born in Eisenach, Germany, on March 21, 1685, he was the son of a masterful violinist, Johann Ambrosius Bach, who taught his son the basic skills for string playing. Along with this string playing, Bach began to play the organ which is the instrument he would later on be noted for in history. His instruction on the organ came from the player at Eisenach's most important church. He instructed the young boy rather rigorously until his skills surpassed anyone?s expectations for someone of such a young age. Bach suffered early trauma when his parents died in 1695. He went to go live with his older brother, Johann Christoph, who also was a professional organist at Ohrdruf. He continued his younger brother's education on that instrument, as well as introducing him to the harpsichord. The rigorous training on these instruments combined with Bach?s masterful skill paid off for him at an early age. After several years of studying with his older brother, he received a scholarship to study in Luneberg, Germany, which is located on the northern tip of the country. As a result, he left his brother?s tutelage and went to go and study there. The teenage years brought Bach to several parts of Germany where he...

Michelangelo

Michelangelo was pessimistic in his poetry and an optimist in his artwork. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo?s poetry was pessimistic in his response to Strazzi even though he was complementing him. Michelangelo?s sculpture brought out his optimism. Michelangelo was optimistic in completing The Tomb of Pope Julius II and persevered through it?s many revisions trying to complete his vision. Sculpture was Michelangelo?s main goal and the love of his life. Since his art portrayed both optimism and pessimism, Michelangelo was in touch with his positive and negative sides, showing that he had a great and stable personality. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo Buonarroti was called to Rome in 1505 by Pope Julius II to create for him a monumental tomb. We have no clear sense of what the tomb was to look like, since over the years it went through at least five conceptual revisions. The tomb was to have three levels; the bottom level was to have sculpted figures representing Victory and bond slaves. The second level was to have statues of Moses and Saint Paul as well as symbolic figures of the active and contemplative life- representative of the human striving for, and reception of, knowledge. The third level, it is assumed, was to have an effigy of the deceased pope. The tomb of Pope Julius II was never finished. What was finished of the tomb represents a twenty-year span of frustrating delays and revised schemes. Michelangelo had hardly begun work on the pope?s tomb when Julius commanded him to fresco the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to complete the work done in the previous century under Sixtus IV. The overall organization consists of four large triangles at...

Oscar Wilde

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde was born in Dublin Ireland on October 16, 1854. He is one of the most talented and most controversial writers of his time. He was well known for his wit, flamboyance, and creative genius and with his little dramatic training showing his natural talent for stage and theatre. He is termed a martyr by some and may be the first true self-publicist and was known for his style of dress and odd behavior. Wilde, 1882 His Father, William Wilde, was a highly accredited doctor and his mother, Jane Francesca Elgee, was a writer of revolutionary poems. Oscar had a brother William Charles Kingsbury along with his father's three illegitimate children, Henry, Emily, and Mary. His sister, Isola Emily Francesca died in 1867 at only ten years of age from a sudden fever, greatly affecting Oscar and his family. He kept a lock of her hair in an envelope and later wrote the poem 'Requiescat' in her memory. Oscar and his brother William both attended the Protora Royal School at Enniskillen. He had little in common with the other children. He disliked games and took more interest in flowers and sunsets. He was extremely passionate about anything that had to do with ancient Greece and with Classics. Wilde during school years In 1871, he was awarded a Royal School Scholarship to Trinity College in Dublin and received many awards and earned the highest honor the college offered to an undergraduate, the Foundation Scholarship. In 1874, he also won the College's Berkley Gold Medal for Greek and was awarded a Demyship to Magdalen College, Oxford. After graduating from Oxford, Oscar moved to London with his friend Frank Miles, a well-known portrait painter of the time. In 1878 his poem Ravenna was published, for which he won the...

The History Of Greek Theater

Theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century BCE, with the Sopocles, the great writer of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, heroes and the ideals of life were depicted and glorified. It was believed that man should live for honor and fame, his action was courageous and glorious and his life would climax in a great and noble death. Originally, the hero's recognition was created by selfish behaviors and little thought of service to others. As the Greeks grew toward city-states and colonization, it became the destiny and ambition of the hero to gain honor by serving his city. The second major characteristic of the early Greek world was the supernatural. The two worlds were not separate, as the gods lived in the same world as the men, and they interfered in the men's lives as they chose to. It was the gods who sent suffering and evil to men. In the plays of Sophocles, the gods brought about the hero's downfall because of a tragic flaw in the character of the hero. In Greek tragedy, suffering brought knowledge of worldly matters and of the individual. Aristotle attempted to explain how an audience could observe tragic events and still have a pleasurable experience. Aristotle, by searching the works of writers of Greek tragedy, Aeschulus, Euripides and Sophocles (whose Oedipus Rex he considered the finest of all Greek tragedies), arrived at his definition of tragedy. This explanation has a profound influence for more than twenty centuries on those writing tragedies, most significantly Shakespeare. Aristotle's analysis of tragedy began with a description of the effect such a work had on the audience as a "catharsis" or purging of the emotions. He decided that catharsis was the purging of two specific emotions, pity and...

Scholarship Essay About Goals

Ever since I was a young kid I have always been interested with aircraft. I was so curious of how airplane's fly. I remember taking my toys apart to see how it works. As a kid I wanted to go to the airport to watch the airplanes land and fly and pondered how this happens. Other kids wanted to go to the amusement places. As I grew older I became more and more interested in aircraft and the technology behind it. I always involved myself with aviation early on. I read books and magazines on aviation, took museum tours, built model airplanes. When I was younger my father would take me to aircraft repair facilities where I would watch in great fascination. In my teens, went up to the military bases and befriended many soldiers involved with aircraft and asked them numerous questions. I got to meet many aeronautics engineers and borrowed their old textbooks and read them till the wee hours of the morning. As technology improved with information superhighway, I logged on the web. Stayed up for hours and hours searching through web pages and web pages of information about aircraft and technology. I started my elementary school in the Philippines, then we moved to U.S. and continued my high school education and graduated. Enrolled at the CCSF to pursue my college education and now I am in the 2nd year in CCSF taking aeronautics. My goal now is to obtain my AS degree from the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) so I can transfer to a University and get a Bachelors degree and to continue for my Masters degree in Aeronautics Engineering. I will strive hard to reach the peak level of my career which is a Professor and hopefully to be an aeronautic professor so...

Circus Circus Enterprises Case Studies

Executive Summary: Circus Circus Enterprises is a leader and will continue to be in the gaming industry. In recent years, they have seen a decline in profit and revenue; management tends to blame the decrease on continuing disruptions from remodeling, expansion, and increased competition. Consequently, Circus has reported decreases in its net income for 1997 and 1998 and management believes this trend will continue as competition heightens. Currently the company is involved in several joint ventures, its brand of casino entertainment has traditionally catered to the low rollers and family vacationers through its theme park. Circus should continue to expand its existing operations into new market segments. This shift will allow them to attract the up scale gambler. Overview Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc founded in 1974 is in the business of entertainment, with its core strength in casino gambling. The company?s asset base, operating cash flow, profit margin, multiple markets and customers, rank it as one of the gaming industry leaders. Partners William G. Bennett an aggressive cost cutter and William N. Pennington purchased Circus Circus in 1974 as a small and unprofitable casino. It went public in 1983, from 1993 to 1997; the average return on capital invested was 16.5%. Circus Circus operates several properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Laughlin, and one in Mississippi, as well as 50% ownership in three other casinos and a theme park. On January 31,1998 Circus reported net income of 89.9 million and revenues of 1.35 billion, this is a down from 100 million on 1.3 billion in 1997. Management sees this decline in revenue due to the rapid and extensive expansion and the increased competition that Circus is facing. Well established in the casino gaming industry the corporation has its focus in the entertainment business and has particularly a popular theme resort concept....

Effect Of Civil War On American Economy

The Economies of the North and South, 1861-1865 In 1861, a great war in American history began. It was a civil war between the north and south that was by no means civil. This war would have great repercussions upon the economy of this country and the states within it. The American Civil War began with secession, creating a divided union of sorts, and sparked an incredibly cataclysmic four years. Although the actual war began with secession, this was not the only driving force. The economy of the Southern states, the Confederacy, greatly if not entirely depended on the institution of slavery. The Confederacy was heavily reliant on agriculture, and they used the profits made from the sale of such raw materials to purchase finished goods to use and enjoy. Their major export was cotton, which thrived on the warm river deltas and could easily be shipped to major ocean ports from towns on the Mississippi and numerous river cities. Slavery was a key part of this, as slaves were the ones who harvested and planted the cotton. Being such an enormous unpaid work force, the profits made were extraordinarily high and the price for the unfinished goods drastically low in comparison; especially since he invention of the cotton gin in 1793 which made the work all that much easier and quicker. In contrast, the economical structure of the Northern states, the Union, was vastly dependent on industry. Slavery did not exist in most of the Union, as there was no demand for it due to the type of industrial development taking place. As the Union had a paid work force, the profits made were lower and the cost of the finished manufactured item higher. In turn, the Union used the profits and purchased raw materials to use. This cycle...

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Trade Embargoes

Although I am a strong critic of the use and effectiveness of economic sanctions, such as trade embargoes, for the sake of this assignment, I will present both their theoretical advantages and their disadvantages based upon my research. Trade embargoes and blockades have traditionally been used to entice nations to alter their behavior or to punish them for certain behavior. The intentions behind these policies are generally noble, at least on the surface. However, these policies can have side effects. For example, FDR's blockade of raw materials against the Japanese in Manchuria in the 1930s arguably led to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which resulted in U.S. involvement in World War II. The decades-long embargo against Cuba not only did not lead to the topple of the communist regime there, but may have strengthened Castro's hold on the island and has created animosity toward the United States in Latin America and much suffering by the people of Cuba. Various studies have concluded that embargoes and other economic sanctions generally have not been effective from a utilitarian or policy perspective, yet these policies continue. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Trade Embargoes Strengths Trade embargoes and other sanctions can give the sender government the appearance of taking strong measures in response to a given situation without resorting to violence. Sanctions can be imposed in conjunction with other measures to achieve conflict prevention and mitigation goals. Sanctions may be ineffective: goals may be too elusive, the means too gentle, or cooperation from other countries insufficient. It is usually difficult to determine whether embargoes were an effective deterrent against future misdeeds: embargoes may contribute to a successful outcome, but can rarely achieve ambitious objectives alone. Some regimes are highly resistant to external pressures to reform. At the same time, trade sanctions may narrow the...