The Ethical Issue Of Cloning

The purpose of this assignment was to choose a contemporary ethical issue and analyse it using an agreed ethical framework, the ethical framework being Groom’s model (APPENDIX A). Groom’s model is used when discussing ethical and moral concerns. It will be used throughout this research assignment when analysing the ethical issue of human cloning. The three main authorities on cloning are Legal authority, Medical authority and Religious authority. These authorities have different attitudes, values and beliefs in relation to the subject of human cloning and will be used to shed light on the subject. It is shown by extensive research that cloning is not suitable in today’s society as there are too many ethical and moral codes attached to it. Ian Wilmut, the scientist who stunned the scientific world by leading the effort that produced Dolly the lamb, said in an interview: “To try cloning on humans today would be criminally irresponsible. The problems are far too serious.” (Palmer, P 2001, ‘Dolly’s Doctors Hit Cloning of Humans’, London Daily Telegraph) This quote, from debatably the most experienced cloner in the world, highlights the disapproval that society has of human cloning.

Specific Issue:
The issue of cloning is one that is debated around the world and has been since the cloning of dolly the lamb. Human cloning is seen as: “The process of making a genetically identical copy of a living organism.” (Author Unknown 2007, ‘Definition of Cloning’ from It is seen by many as an ethical issue because it means creating a child in an unnatural and unorthodox way. To have a stance on human cloning one must understand the considerations that need to be made to ensure a conclusion is arrived at, these being, technological considerations, economical considerations, social considerations and a consideration of ulterior motives. There are both positive and negative aspects to human cloning, but according to a report entitled The Ethics of Human Cloning, produced by the American Medical Association, “the potential harms of human cloning appear to outweigh the potential benefits at this time.” (APPENDIX B)

Sharing Experiences:
Before the commencement of research and study, the researcher had no direct experience in regards to human cloning. The researcher had heard some general stories on the topic, but had not heard enough to form opinions on the subject.
After research and study was completed, three articles from three different authorities were found outlining their views on human cloning. The legal authority: “Nissen, D 1998, ’Federal Government Against Human Cloning’; Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing Media Releases, vol. 1, Retrieved May 15, 2008, from” (APPENDIX B), the medical authority: “American Medical Association 1999, ‘The Ethics of Human Cloning’; Report of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the American Medical Association, vol. 1, Retrieved May 15, 2008, from” (APPENDIX B), and the religious authority: “Archbishop of Sydney 2007, ‘Cardinal Pell’s Response to Parliamentary Inquiry’; Zenit: The World Seen From Rome, vol. 1, Retrieved May 15, 2008, from” (APPENDIX B).
After the researcher had read the articles, a stance on the issue was attained. The researcher believed that human cloning was not a good idea as it was too dangerous for the time period. The three articles helped to mould the viewpoint as they all show a negative representation of human cloning.

Analysis of Authorities:
Throughout this investigation, the researcher considered all of the three authorities equally to avoid bias in each situation.
The legal authority, being the Federal Minister for Health and Family Services, Dr Michael Wooldridge, has always had the same view on human cloning. This authority states that human cloning should not be carried out because it is unethical. Wooldridge stated in a press conference on the January 14, 1998 that, “Any genetic manipulation which can be passed on to future generations is unethical,” (APPENDIX B). This illustrates an ethical concern for future generations, which thus proves their point about human cloning being unethical.
The medical authority is one of varying opinions and judgements when considering human cloning. Some doctors believe that human cloning should be legal while many disagree. This is why the researcher was forced to use the testimony from perhaps the most powerful medical body in the world, the American Medical Association (AMA). The AMA believes that human cloning is not a good idea at this point in time because of two factors: the physical harms attached to it and psychosocial harms attached to it. They stated that “techniques used for cloning humans could potentially endanger the developing individuals” and that, “Human cloning may diminish, at least psychologically, the seemingly unlimited potential of new human beings and may exacerbate disturbing motivations for having children” (APPENDIX B). This shows that the AMA, and in turn, the entire medical body, is against human cloning because of the ethical issues, such as the physical and psychosocial harms, tied in with it.
The religious authority, being the church, has an extremely strong view on human cloning. Cardinal Pell put forward the Church’s views on human cloning at a press conference on June 5th, 2007. Their views came across powerfully through his speech and it was apparent that they believe cloning is an act of evil. He stated, “The Church’s teaching on cloning states that the cloning of a human being is wrong and cannot be justified by any known or imagined effects.” He went on to say, “The Church also teaches that destructive experimentation on embryonic human beings – cloned or otherwise – is an intrinsically evil act, because experimentation involves their dismemberment and therefore mutilation and death” (APPENDIX B). Hence, the Church is shown to believe that cloning is bad because of the moral and ethical codes, such as physical harm, involved with it.

Values Analysis:
Out of the three authorities chosen, the legal authority demonstrates the weakest viewpoint on human cloning. It does state that cloning is bad and should not be carried out, but, it does not do this with enough conviction. For example, the article states, “The Commonwealth does not have complete power to legislate on human cloning – it’s a matter for the States and Territories.” This statement shows that the Federal Government, although they disagree with human cloning, would pass the problem off onto State Governments rather than handling it themselves. From the article, it can be shown, that certain ethical considerations surface. Dr Wooldridge stated in the article that, “The Australian Government agrees strongly with the UNESCO Declaration on the human genome and human rights.” Article eleven of this declaration states that, “Practices which are contrary to human dignity, such as reproductive cloning of human beings, shall not be permitted”. The fact that the Australian Government will not permit “Practices which are contrary to human dignity”, shows that they consider human cloning an ethical breach of human rights.
The medical authority has the second strongest viewpoint of the three authorities. The AMA released an article that stated four main ethical considerations in relation to human cloning. These ethical considerations are; physical harms introduced by cloning, psychosocial harms introduced by cloning, the impact of cloning on family and society and the effects of human cloning on the gene pool. These four ethical considerations put across a very strong point about the negative effects of human cloning. When compared to the legal authority, it is shown that the medical authority has a much stronger viewpoint. This viewpoint, even though the same as the legal authority, has a lot more emphasis and formation to it. For example, “Until the benefits of human cloning are thought by society to outweigh the harms, it would be inappropriate for physicians to participate in human cloning.” This statement, while putting across the AMA’s strong point of view, also outlines their viewpoint on the topic of human cloning. It shows that they believe cloning, under no circumstances, to be undertaken at this point in time.
The authority with the strongest viewpoint on human cloning is the religious authority. Throughout the entire press conference, Cardinal Pell stated the Church’s view on human cloning in a way that reflected the passion that they have for the topic. In relation to the others, the religious authority has more than they do. Cardinal Pell’s speech had emotive words, ethical considerations and an extremely strong stance on the issue. All this is shown through one statement in his speech,
“My task as a Catholic Archbishop is to point out that God judges human conduct, as well as pointing out the importance of Catholics following Church teaching on matters of faith and morals. The vast majority of political matters are for the prudential judgement of each individual Catholic, but the Church is unambiguous that there are certain choices which are intrinsically evil and cannot in good conscience be condemned or promoted by faithful Catholics – the evil being known through right reason itself, as well as through Catholic faith.”
This statement shows just how powerful this authority is in comparison to the others. Neither of the legal or medical authority use as powerful language or delve as deeply into the ethical consequences as this one does. It shows the concept of morality in a way that the others don’t by highlighting the concept of human cloning as an act of evil/immorality.

Taking Action:
After research and study was completed, the researcher reached a decision about which viewpoint they would accept and defend. Having researched all three authorities; legal, medical and religious, the researcher believes that human cloning is a procedure that should not be undertaken until the ethical considerations raised by the three authorities no longer exist. Pope John Paul II stated that, “Abortion, euthanasia, human cloning, for example, risk reducing the human person to a mere object: life and death to order, as it were!” Pope John Paul was right. Would anyone in their right mind reduce themselves to that because they believe in cloning one human being? Is it really worth it to break all ethical and moral codes for something that is dangerous and benefits society in no way at all?

Researched Reference Notes

1. “To try cloning on humans today would be criminally irresponsible. The problems are far too serious.” (Palmer, P 2001, ‘Dolly’s Doctors Hit Cloning of Humans’, London Daily Telegraph, Retrieved May 10, 2008, from – This was used in the research assignment to support the hypothesis.
2. “The process of making a genetically identical copy of a living organism.” (Author Unknown 2007, ‘Definition of Cloning’, Retrieved May 10, 2008 from – This was the definition of cloning that helped characterize the topic chosen for the assignment.
3. “Nissen, D 1998, ’Federal Government Against Human Cloning’; Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing Media Releases, vol. 1, Retrieved May 15, 2008, from” – This is the legal authority, it is also located in Appendix B.
4. “American Medical Association 1999, ‘The Ethics of Human Cloning’; Report of the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs of the American Medical Association, vol. 1, Retrieved May 15, 2008, from” – The medical authority, located in Appendix B.
5. “Archbishop of Sydney 2007, ‘Cardinal Pell’s Response to Parliamentary Inquiry’; Zenit: The World Seen From Rome, vol. 1, Retrieved May 15, 2008, from” – The religious authority, located in Appendix B.
6. “Abortion, euthanasia, human cloning, for example, risk reducing the human person to a mere object: life and death to order, as it were!” (Pope John Paul, 2003, ‘Speech’; Rome, Retrieved May 18, 2008 from – This was used in the research assignment as a quote in the conclusion.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Allegory Of American Pie By Don Mc Lean

Ask anyone what was the defining moment in the rock history of the 1960s was and all you will get is a one word answer: Woodstock. The three day rock festival that defined an era was only one of many music festivals of the '60s. But Woodstock has come to symbolize, "an era of peaceful, free- loving, drug- taking hippie youth, carefree before harsher realities hit..." (Layman 40). The Woodstock festival ended a century filled with many metamorphoses of rock'n'roll, from the era of pop music to the rebirth of folk music to the invention of acid rock. But some cynics say that rock'n'roll died with the death of Buddy Holly before the 60s even began. One such person is Don McLean. The poet behind the haunting epic song about the death of 'danceable' music, McLean wrote the ever popular song, "American Pie" (appendix 1). The most important song in rock'n'roll history, "American Pie", is the song about the demise of rock'n'roll after Buddy Holly's death and the heathenism of rock that resulted. Although McLean himself won't reveal any symbolism in his songs, "American Pie" is one of the most analyzed pieces of literature in modern society. Although not all of its secrets have been revealed, many "scholars" of the sixties will agree that the mystery of this song is one of the reasons it has become so successful- everyone wants to know the meanings of its allegories. Proof of "American Pie's" truth lies in the allegory of the song. Many People enjoy the song but have no idea what it means- Who is the Jester? What is the levee? When the deeper story is found, the importance of the song is unearthed. "American Pie" is not only a song, it is an epic poem about the course of rock'n'roll...

Carl Orffs Philosophies In Music Education

While Carl Orff is a very seminal composer of the 20th century, his greatest success and influence has been in the field of Music Education. Born on July 10th in Munich, Germany in 1895, Orff refused to speak about his past almost as if he were ashamed of it. What we do know, however, is that Orff came from a Bavarian family who was very active in the German military. His father's regiment band would often play through some of the young Orff's first attempts at composing. Although Orff was adamant about the secrecy of his past, Moser's Musik Lexicon says that he studied in the Munich Academy of Music until 1914. Orff then served in the military in the first world war. After the war, he held various positions in the Mannheim and Darmstadt opera houses then returned home to Munich to further study music. In 1925, and for the rest of his life, Orff was the head of a department and co-founder of the Guenther School for gymnastics, music, and dance in Munich where he worked with musical beginners. This is where he developed his Music Education theories. In 1937, Orff's Carmina Burana premiered in Frankfurt, Germany. Needless to say, it was a great success. With the success of Carmina Burana, Orff orphaned all of his previous works except for Catulli Carmina and the En trata which were rewritten to be acceptable by Orff. One of Orff's most admired composers was Monteverdi. In fact, much of Orff's work was based on ancient material. Orff said: I am often asked why I nearly always select old material, fairy tales and legends for my stage works. I do not look upon them as old, but rather as valid material. The time element disappears, and only the spiritual power remains. My...

Johann Sebastian Bach Biography

Throughout the history of music, many great composers, theorists, and instrumentalists have left indelible marks and influences that people today look back on to admire and aspire to. No exception to this idiom is Johann Sebastian Bach, whose impact on music was unforgettable to say the least. People today look back to his writings and works to both learn and admire. He truly can be considered a music history great. Bach, who came from a family of over 53 musicians, was nothing short of a virtuosic instrumentalist as well as a masterful composer. Born in Eisenach, Germany, on March 21, 1685, he was the son of a masterful violinist, Johann Ambrosius Bach, who taught his son the basic skills for string playing. Along with this string playing, Bach began to play the organ which is the instrument he would later on be noted for in history. His instruction on the organ came from the player at Eisenach's most important church. He instructed the young boy rather rigorously until his skills surpassed anyone?s expectations for someone of such a young age. Bach suffered early trauma when his parents died in 1695. He went to go live with his older brother, Johann Christoph, who also was a professional organist at Ohrdruf. He continued his younger brother's education on that instrument, as well as introducing him to the harpsichord. The rigorous training on these instruments combined with Bach?s masterful skill paid off for him at an early age. After several years of studying with his older brother, he received a scholarship to study in Luneberg, Germany, which is located on the northern tip of the country. As a result, he left his brother?s tutelage and went to go and study there. The teenage years brought Bach to several parts of Germany where he...


Michelangelo was pessimistic in his poetry and an optimist in his artwork. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo?s poetry was pessimistic in his response to Strazzi even though he was complementing him. Michelangelo?s sculpture brought out his optimism. Michelangelo was optimistic in completing The Tomb of Pope Julius II and persevered through it?s many revisions trying to complete his vision. Sculpture was Michelangelo?s main goal and the love of his life. Since his art portrayed both optimism and pessimism, Michelangelo was in touch with his positive and negative sides, showing that he had a great and stable personality. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo Buonarroti was called to Rome in 1505 by Pope Julius II to create for him a monumental tomb. We have no clear sense of what the tomb was to look like, since over the years it went through at least five conceptual revisions. The tomb was to have three levels; the bottom level was to have sculpted figures representing Victory and bond slaves. The second level was to have statues of Moses and Saint Paul as well as symbolic figures of the active and contemplative life- representative of the human striving for, and reception of, knowledge. The third level, it is assumed, was to have an effigy of the deceased pope. The tomb of Pope Julius II was never finished. What was finished of the tomb represents a twenty-year span of frustrating delays and revised schemes. Michelangelo had hardly begun work on the pope?s tomb when Julius commanded him to fresco the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to complete the work done in the previous century under Sixtus IV. The overall organization consists of four large triangles at...

Oscar Wilde

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde was born in Dublin Ireland on October 16, 1854. He is one of the most talented and most controversial writers of his time. He was well known for his wit, flamboyance, and creative genius and with his little dramatic training showing his natural talent for stage and theatre. He is termed a martyr by some and may be the first true self-publicist and was known for his style of dress and odd behavior. Wilde, 1882 His Father, William Wilde, was a highly accredited doctor and his mother, Jane Francesca Elgee, was a writer of revolutionary poems. Oscar had a brother William Charles Kingsbury along with his father's three illegitimate children, Henry, Emily, and Mary. His sister, Isola Emily Francesca died in 1867 at only ten years of age from a sudden fever, greatly affecting Oscar and his family. He kept a lock of her hair in an envelope and later wrote the poem 'Requiescat' in her memory. Oscar and his brother William both attended the Protora Royal School at Enniskillen. He had little in common with the other children. He disliked games and took more interest in flowers and sunsets. He was extremely passionate about anything that had to do with ancient Greece and with Classics. Wilde during school years In 1871, he was awarded a Royal School Scholarship to Trinity College in Dublin and received many awards and earned the highest honor the college offered to an undergraduate, the Foundation Scholarship. In 1874, he also won the College's Berkley Gold Medal for Greek and was awarded a Demyship to Magdalen College, Oxford. After graduating from Oxford, Oscar moved to London with his friend Frank Miles, a well-known portrait painter of the time. In 1878 his poem Ravenna was published, for which he won the...

The History Of Greek Theater

Theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century BCE, with the Sopocles, the great writer of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, heroes and the ideals of life were depicted and glorified. It was believed that man should live for honor and fame, his action was courageous and glorious and his life would climax in a great and noble death. Originally, the hero's recognition was created by selfish behaviors and little thought of service to others. As the Greeks grew toward city-states and colonization, it became the destiny and ambition of the hero to gain honor by serving his city. The second major characteristic of the early Greek world was the supernatural. The two worlds were not separate, as the gods lived in the same world as the men, and they interfered in the men's lives as they chose to. It was the gods who sent suffering and evil to men. In the plays of Sophocles, the gods brought about the hero's downfall because of a tragic flaw in the character of the hero. In Greek tragedy, suffering brought knowledge of worldly matters and of the individual. Aristotle attempted to explain how an audience could observe tragic events and still have a pleasurable experience. Aristotle, by searching the works of writers of Greek tragedy, Aeschulus, Euripides and Sophocles (whose Oedipus Rex he considered the finest of all Greek tragedies), arrived at his definition of tragedy. This explanation has a profound influence for more than twenty centuries on those writing tragedies, most significantly Shakespeare. Aristotle's analysis of tragedy began with a description of the effect such a work had on the audience as a "catharsis" or purging of the emotions. He decided that catharsis was the purging of two specific emotions, pity and...

Scholarship Essay About Goals

Ever since I was a young kid I have always been interested with aircraft. I was so curious of how airplane's fly. I remember taking my toys apart to see how it works. As a kid I wanted to go to the airport to watch the airplanes land and fly and pondered how this happens. Other kids wanted to go to the amusement places. As I grew older I became more and more interested in aircraft and the technology behind it. I always involved myself with aviation early on. I read books and magazines on aviation, took museum tours, built model airplanes. When I was younger my father would take me to aircraft repair facilities where I would watch in great fascination. In my teens, went up to the military bases and befriended many soldiers involved with aircraft and asked them numerous questions. I got to meet many aeronautics engineers and borrowed their old textbooks and read them till the wee hours of the morning. As technology improved with information superhighway, I logged on the web. Stayed up for hours and hours searching through web pages and web pages of information about aircraft and technology. I started my elementary school in the Philippines, then we moved to U.S. and continued my high school education and graduated. Enrolled at the CCSF to pursue my college education and now I am in the 2nd year in CCSF taking aeronautics. My goal now is to obtain my AS degree from the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) so I can transfer to a University and get a Bachelors degree and to continue for my Masters degree in Aeronautics Engineering. I will strive hard to reach the peak level of my career which is a Professor and hopefully to be an aeronautic professor so...

Circus Circus Enterprises Case Studies

Executive Summary: Circus Circus Enterprises is a leader and will continue to be in the gaming industry. In recent years, they have seen a decline in profit and revenue; management tends to blame the decrease on continuing disruptions from remodeling, expansion, and increased competition. Consequently, Circus has reported decreases in its net income for 1997 and 1998 and management believes this trend will continue as competition heightens. Currently the company is involved in several joint ventures, its brand of casino entertainment has traditionally catered to the low rollers and family vacationers through its theme park. Circus should continue to expand its existing operations into new market segments. This shift will allow them to attract the up scale gambler. Overview Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc founded in 1974 is in the business of entertainment, with its core strength in casino gambling. The company?s asset base, operating cash flow, profit margin, multiple markets and customers, rank it as one of the gaming industry leaders. Partners William G. Bennett an aggressive cost cutter and William N. Pennington purchased Circus Circus in 1974 as a small and unprofitable casino. It went public in 1983, from 1993 to 1997; the average return on capital invested was 16.5%. Circus Circus operates several properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Laughlin, and one in Mississippi, as well as 50% ownership in three other casinos and a theme park. On January 31,1998 Circus reported net income of 89.9 million and revenues of 1.35 billion, this is a down from 100 million on 1.3 billion in 1997. Management sees this decline in revenue due to the rapid and extensive expansion and the increased competition that Circus is facing. Well established in the casino gaming industry the corporation has its focus in the entertainment business and has particularly a popular theme resort concept....

Effect Of Civil War On American Economy

The Economies of the North and South, 1861-1865 In 1861, a great war in American history began. It was a civil war between the north and south that was by no means civil. This war would have great repercussions upon the economy of this country and the states within it. The American Civil War began with secession, creating a divided union of sorts, and sparked an incredibly cataclysmic four years. Although the actual war began with secession, this was not the only driving force. The economy of the Southern states, the Confederacy, greatly if not entirely depended on the institution of slavery. The Confederacy was heavily reliant on agriculture, and they used the profits made from the sale of such raw materials to purchase finished goods to use and enjoy. Their major export was cotton, which thrived on the warm river deltas and could easily be shipped to major ocean ports from towns on the Mississippi and numerous river cities. Slavery was a key part of this, as slaves were the ones who harvested and planted the cotton. Being such an enormous unpaid work force, the profits made were extraordinarily high and the price for the unfinished goods drastically low in comparison; especially since he invention of the cotton gin in 1793 which made the work all that much easier and quicker. In contrast, the economical structure of the Northern states, the Union, was vastly dependent on industry. Slavery did not exist in most of the Union, as there was no demand for it due to the type of industrial development taking place. As the Union had a paid work force, the profits made were lower and the cost of the finished manufactured item higher. In turn, the Union used the profits and purchased raw materials to use. This cycle...

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Trade Embargoes

Although I am a strong critic of the use and effectiveness of economic sanctions, such as trade embargoes, for the sake of this assignment, I will present both their theoretical advantages and their disadvantages based upon my research. Trade embargoes and blockades have traditionally been used to entice nations to alter their behavior or to punish them for certain behavior. The intentions behind these policies are generally noble, at least on the surface. However, these policies can have side effects. For example, FDR's blockade of raw materials against the Japanese in Manchuria in the 1930s arguably led to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which resulted in U.S. involvement in World War II. The decades-long embargo against Cuba not only did not lead to the topple of the communist regime there, but may have strengthened Castro's hold on the island and has created animosity toward the United States in Latin America and much suffering by the people of Cuba. Various studies have concluded that embargoes and other economic sanctions generally have not been effective from a utilitarian or policy perspective, yet these policies continue. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Trade Embargoes Strengths Trade embargoes and other sanctions can give the sender government the appearance of taking strong measures in response to a given situation without resorting to violence. Sanctions can be imposed in conjunction with other measures to achieve conflict prevention and mitigation goals. Sanctions may be ineffective: goals may be too elusive, the means too gentle, or cooperation from other countries insufficient. It is usually difficult to determine whether embargoes were an effective deterrent against future misdeeds: embargoes may contribute to a successful outcome, but can rarely achieve ambitious objectives alone. Some regimes are highly resistant to external pressures to reform. At the same time, trade sanctions may narrow the...