The World Despise The United States Why

Word Count: 1748 |

After the attacks on US soil on September 11, it was clear to all Americans that this country that we love so deeply is hated and despised by many in many countries. From this event many questions have been raised; however, none were so frustrating as the question as to why people hate us. According to some the reason as to why the United States is despised so intensely is due to our beliefs that we hold so dear such as freedom of religion and our passion for a representative government. Others have come to the conclusion that the main reason is due to our society that attempts to push itself upon other nations who don’t want to be Americanized through our products such as Coca-Cola and American movies. Others believe that the actions and events that we take part in speak the loudest to other nations which in turn invokes the greatest anger. Which of these three possibilities do foreigners believe to be the greatest threat to their society?

According to www.imdb.com the top-grossing movie while in American theaters is the Titanic (1997) with a gross of $600,779,824 while globally the same movie grossed a total of $1,835,300,000. The point of this data is that American companies do not go to other nations in an attempt to force the American way of life or beliefs onto other nations. No, they simple take their products to other nations in an attempt to make money. Also, America is by far the most diverse country in existence. Every day thousands of foreigners enter these borders in an attempt to become citizens of this great nation. Since we are so diverse, every ethnic group that is represented on this earth is also represented in the United States. Since the government is mainly appointed by the people to represent the people, then the ideas that the government sells to other nations is the idea of all ethnic groups in America and the world abroad. Even if the U.S. does not accurately represent their beliefs, their anger towards the United States should not stem from their hatred of our beliefs. After all, when was the last time an idea has harmed or benefited anyone? The harm or benefit of an idea comes into play when someone takes action upon his or her ideas. Therefore, the main reason why various groups of people hate this nation is due to the actions that we participate in — mainly our military actions.

This country has a long history of helping out other nations that we believe need our help. An excellent example of this is our ongoing help to Israel, which we consider to be one of our greatest allies. From the very second that we helped bring this nation into existence, the Arab community has condemned our actions, thus, bringing the deaths of many Americans and Israelites into the picture. Nonetheless we continue to help this country out by selling them American military might which has helped them out many times in the past. Israel, like America has never lost a war that it has taken part in. One can conclude that the reason why they have never lost a war is because of the equipment and the training that we, the United States, have provide them for many years. Even when every surrounding Arab nation attacks simultaneously, the Israelites have been able to repulse their repressors and defeat them in a matter of days. Probably the greatest example of this would include the Six Day War where Israel emerged victorious over the Arab nations. During a three-week period preceding June 5, 1967, the Egyptian military started building its military forces in the Sinai Peninsula. This new force was mainly supported by the former USSR, now known as Russia. Soon many nations came to the help of the Egyptian and Syrian governments during this three week period including, but not limited to: Jordan, Algeria, Kuwait, and Iraq. On June 5, 1967 a three-week tension between the Egyptian-Syrian military alliance and Israel could no longer be kept in check. Foreseeing its doom, Israel decided to strike all nations simultaneously that they viewed to be a threat to their well-being. Severely outnumbered, an air attack was executed with the code named Moked. This attack severely shattered all Arab air forces. Many were destroyed while their planes were still on the ground. From there they proceeded to push into hostile territory using their army to do the major part of the offensive. Eventually the threat was destroyed with the Israelites victorious. Mark Hertsgaard once hinted toward in his paper The Oblivious Empire that the only reason why the United States helps Israel is because the citizens of the United States are grossly ignorant to current day news. In her paper she states that the average citizen is under the influence that more Israel citizens die than Arab citizens in the bloody struggles between the two societies. Because of supposed belief, we feel that we are morally obligated to help the Israelite struggle against the Arab nations. Although this may be true about the general population in America, it can also be concluded that the United States public despises the way the Arab nations decide to attack the population of Israel through suicide bombings. We believe this method to cruel, unethical, and morally wrong. Therefore, it can also be concluded that the reason why we generally help Israel is due to this belief of ethics.

After World War II a power struggle broke out between the allied nations on what the best method is to govern the occupied territories. This struggle would later be known as the Cold War, which was between the two strongest nations in the world at the time, the United States and the Soviet Union. Unfortunately no two other nations could be farther apart in ideas than these two. The Soviets believed that the best way to govern the territories is through a Communist form of government while the Americans feared the spread of Communism with a strong passion. During this time period a clear line was drawn between the two apposing sides. Either you were for one idea or for the other. We viewed all nations that did not hold our values to be true as enemies. Although the Soviet Union has since fallen, and many of their territories that the Soviets grasped with a strong iron hand have since turned from their past Communist ways, we still attain our past fears. The United States does and will always fear all countries that use a dictator or a communist form of government. Therefore, it is only natural that we jump at all opportunities that present themselves where we can change a hostile government into a friendlier form. However, all Arab Nations before 2001 fit into the hostile category. Then one day on September 11, 2001 our country was attack surprisingly from an unknown enemy. However, we had a good idea that it was one of the Arab nations that despise the United States. Soon after the attack our beliefs were found out to be true. A man named Osama Bin Laden, who practically ruled the country of Afghanistan, had orchestrated and financed the operations that killed three thousand Americans. Outraged, we invaded this country, which had never before been successfully invaded, slaughtering the opposition, and installed a government that would be friendlier towards the United States both politically and morally. This action outraged the Arab community. Iraq’s response to this was a verbal reward to the family whose son could kill people in Israel or the United States through the method of suicide bombing. Knowing Iraq’s past actions, the United States went to the U.N. asking them to enforce action upon Iraq. This was the first time that the United States truly knew that the rest of the world was not on our side. Our request was met with hatred from all nations with the exception a few, mainly the British and Israel. We knew from that point on that we would have to act on our own without the help of the United Nations. Without further ado, President Bush gave Saddam Hussein (leader of Iraq) a 48-hour ultimatum that would ultimately expire leading to war with Iraq. On March 20, 2003 the ground war with Iraq was initiated. The war with Iraq lasted till May 1, 2003, one of the shortest in United States history. During the actual war section of Iraqi Freedom, a grand total of 110 U.S. soldiers paid the ultimate price for their country (according to http://www.antiwar.com). By all accounts the war was a huge success when compared to previous wars that the United States has taken part in. A leader who has killed thousand of his own people was removed from power by the United States. Nonetheless the war is met with skepticism from many in many nations. Some skepticism centers on the idea that America entered the war solely for oil; however, this idea and many more like it have been replaced due to insufficient proof. Unfortunately for the United States, even if all these ideas were to be proven wrong, people would still hate the United States for entering into this war.

From the Indians to the Arab communities, the United States has always been despised by other groups of people. One idea that many believe is that American companies attempt to infiltrate other nations to thrust the American way of life into their societies. This simply isn’t true. American companies see other nations as an extra source of income. Simply stated, if the profits stop rolling in then the company will move out. Another conclusion that people tend to reach is that people in other nations despise the idea that the United States stands for such as freedom of speech and religion. But when was the last time an idea has harmed someone? No, the only logical answer can be the actions that we, the United States, take part in. The main source of anger stems from the military actions that we have taken part in and are currently undergoing. There are many great examples of the American military might in action ranging from the World Wars that we have participated in to the current wars on terrorism. Probably one of the greatest examples is our involvement in Somalia. Our intentions were to simply help the general inhabitance by providing them with food and supplies. Ultimately we lost 44 men and the world shunned our involvement in that area. The United States is by far the most powerful nation in the world both through military might and economically. Because of this we feel the need to stretch our arm out to help other people in what we view as their time of need. Because of these actions that we have taken it is only natural that people despise the United States.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Allegory Of American Pie By Don Mc Lean

Ask anyone what was the defining moment in the rock history of the 1960s was and all you will get is a one word answer: Woodstock. The three day rock festival that defined an era was only one of many music festivals of the '60s. But Woodstock has come to symbolize, "an era of peaceful, free- loving, drug- taking hippie youth, carefree before harsher realities hit..." (Layman 40). The Woodstock festival ended a century filled with many metamorphoses of rock'n'roll, from the era of pop music to the rebirth of folk music to the invention of acid rock. But some cynics say that rock'n'roll died with the death of Buddy Holly before the 60s even began. One such person is Don McLean. The poet behind the haunting epic song about the death of 'danceable' music, McLean wrote the ever popular song, "American Pie" (appendix 1). The most important song in rock'n'roll history, "American Pie", is the song about the demise of rock'n'roll after Buddy Holly's death and the heathenism of rock that resulted. Although McLean himself won't reveal any symbolism in his songs, "American Pie" is one of the most analyzed pieces of literature in modern society. Although not all of its secrets have been revealed, many "scholars" of the sixties will agree that the mystery of this song is one of the reasons it has become so successful- everyone wants to know the meanings of its allegories. Proof of "American Pie's" truth lies in the allegory of the song. Many People enjoy the song but have no idea what it means- Who is the Jester? What is the levee? When the deeper story is found, the importance of the song is unearthed. "American Pie" is not only a song, it is an epic poem about the course of rock'n'roll...

Carl Orffs Philosophies In Music Education

While Carl Orff is a very seminal composer of the 20th century, his greatest success and influence has been in the field of Music Education. Born on July 10th in Munich, Germany in 1895, Orff refused to speak about his past almost as if he were ashamed of it. What we do know, however, is that Orff came from a Bavarian family who was very active in the German military. His father's regiment band would often play through some of the young Orff's first attempts at composing. Although Orff was adamant about the secrecy of his past, Moser's Musik Lexicon says that he studied in the Munich Academy of Music until 1914. Orff then served in the military in the first world war. After the war, he held various positions in the Mannheim and Darmstadt opera houses then returned home to Munich to further study music. In 1925, and for the rest of his life, Orff was the head of a department and co-founder of the Guenther School for gymnastics, music, and dance in Munich where he worked with musical beginners. This is where he developed his Music Education theories. In 1937, Orff's Carmina Burana premiered in Frankfurt, Germany. Needless to say, it was a great success. With the success of Carmina Burana, Orff orphaned all of his previous works except for Catulli Carmina and the En trata which were rewritten to be acceptable by Orff. One of Orff's most admired composers was Monteverdi. In fact, much of Orff's work was based on ancient material. Orff said: I am often asked why I nearly always select old material, fairy tales and legends for my stage works. I do not look upon them as old, but rather as valid material. The time element disappears, and only the spiritual power remains. My...

Johann Sebastian Bach Biography

Throughout the history of music, many great composers, theorists, and instrumentalists have left indelible marks and influences that people today look back on to admire and aspire to. No exception to this idiom is Johann Sebastian Bach, whose impact on music was unforgettable to say the least. People today look back to his writings and works to both learn and admire. He truly can be considered a music history great. Bach, who came from a family of over 53 musicians, was nothing short of a virtuosic instrumentalist as well as a masterful composer. Born in Eisenach, Germany, on March 21, 1685, he was the son of a masterful violinist, Johann Ambrosius Bach, who taught his son the basic skills for string playing. Along with this string playing, Bach began to play the organ which is the instrument he would later on be noted for in history. His instruction on the organ came from the player at Eisenach's most important church. He instructed the young boy rather rigorously until his skills surpassed anyone?s expectations for someone of such a young age. Bach suffered early trauma when his parents died in 1695. He went to go live with his older brother, Johann Christoph, who also was a professional organist at Ohrdruf. He continued his younger brother's education on that instrument, as well as introducing him to the harpsichord. The rigorous training on these instruments combined with Bach?s masterful skill paid off for him at an early age. After several years of studying with his older brother, he received a scholarship to study in Luneberg, Germany, which is located on the northern tip of the country. As a result, he left his brother?s tutelage and went to go and study there. The teenage years brought Bach to several parts of Germany where he...

Michelangelo

Michelangelo was pessimistic in his poetry and an optimist in his artwork. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo?s poetry was pessimistic in his response to Strazzi even though he was complementing him. Michelangelo?s sculpture brought out his optimism. Michelangelo was optimistic in completing The Tomb of Pope Julius II and persevered through it?s many revisions trying to complete his vision. Sculpture was Michelangelo?s main goal and the love of his life. Since his art portrayed both optimism and pessimism, Michelangelo was in touch with his positive and negative sides, showing that he had a great and stable personality. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo Buonarroti was called to Rome in 1505 by Pope Julius II to create for him a monumental tomb. We have no clear sense of what the tomb was to look like, since over the years it went through at least five conceptual revisions. The tomb was to have three levels; the bottom level was to have sculpted figures representing Victory and bond slaves. The second level was to have statues of Moses and Saint Paul as well as symbolic figures of the active and contemplative life- representative of the human striving for, and reception of, knowledge. The third level, it is assumed, was to have an effigy of the deceased pope. The tomb of Pope Julius II was never finished. What was finished of the tomb represents a twenty-year span of frustrating delays and revised schemes. Michelangelo had hardly begun work on the pope?s tomb when Julius commanded him to fresco the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to complete the work done in the previous century under Sixtus IV. The overall organization consists of four large triangles at...

Oscar Wilde

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde was born in Dublin Ireland on October 16, 1854. He is one of the most talented and most controversial writers of his time. He was well known for his wit, flamboyance, and creative genius and with his little dramatic training showing his natural talent for stage and theatre. He is termed a martyr by some and may be the first true self-publicist and was known for his style of dress and odd behavior. Wilde, 1882 His Father, William Wilde, was a highly accredited doctor and his mother, Jane Francesca Elgee, was a writer of revolutionary poems. Oscar had a brother William Charles Kingsbury along with his father's three illegitimate children, Henry, Emily, and Mary. His sister, Isola Emily Francesca died in 1867 at only ten years of age from a sudden fever, greatly affecting Oscar and his family. He kept a lock of her hair in an envelope and later wrote the poem 'Requiescat' in her memory. Oscar and his brother William both attended the Protora Royal School at Enniskillen. He had little in common with the other children. He disliked games and took more interest in flowers and sunsets. He was extremely passionate about anything that had to do with ancient Greece and with Classics. Wilde during school years In 1871, he was awarded a Royal School Scholarship to Trinity College in Dublin and received many awards and earned the highest honor the college offered to an undergraduate, the Foundation Scholarship. In 1874, he also won the College's Berkley Gold Medal for Greek and was awarded a Demyship to Magdalen College, Oxford. After graduating from Oxford, Oscar moved to London with his friend Frank Miles, a well-known portrait painter of the time. In 1878 his poem Ravenna was published, for which he won the...

The History Of Greek Theater

Theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century BCE, with the Sopocles, the great writer of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, heroes and the ideals of life were depicted and glorified. It was believed that man should live for honor and fame, his action was courageous and glorious and his life would climax in a great and noble death. Originally, the hero's recognition was created by selfish behaviors and little thought of service to others. As the Greeks grew toward city-states and colonization, it became the destiny and ambition of the hero to gain honor by serving his city. The second major characteristic of the early Greek world was the supernatural. The two worlds were not separate, as the gods lived in the same world as the men, and they interfered in the men's lives as they chose to. It was the gods who sent suffering and evil to men. In the plays of Sophocles, the gods brought about the hero's downfall because of a tragic flaw in the character of the hero. In Greek tragedy, suffering brought knowledge of worldly matters and of the individual. Aristotle attempted to explain how an audience could observe tragic events and still have a pleasurable experience. Aristotle, by searching the works of writers of Greek tragedy, Aeschulus, Euripides and Sophocles (whose Oedipus Rex he considered the finest of all Greek tragedies), arrived at his definition of tragedy. This explanation has a profound influence for more than twenty centuries on those writing tragedies, most significantly Shakespeare. Aristotle's analysis of tragedy began with a description of the effect such a work had on the audience as a "catharsis" or purging of the emotions. He decided that catharsis was the purging of two specific emotions, pity and...

Scholarship Essay About Goals

Ever since I was a young kid I have always been interested with aircraft. I was so curious of how airplane's fly. I remember taking my toys apart to see how it works. As a kid I wanted to go to the airport to watch the airplanes land and fly and pondered how this happens. Other kids wanted to go to the amusement places. As I grew older I became more and more interested in aircraft and the technology behind it. I always involved myself with aviation early on. I read books and magazines on aviation, took museum tours, built model airplanes. When I was younger my father would take me to aircraft repair facilities where I would watch in great fascination. In my teens, went up to the military bases and befriended many soldiers involved with aircraft and asked them numerous questions. I got to meet many aeronautics engineers and borrowed their old textbooks and read them till the wee hours of the morning. As technology improved with information superhighway, I logged on the web. Stayed up for hours and hours searching through web pages and web pages of information about aircraft and technology. I started my elementary school in the Philippines, then we moved to U.S. and continued my high school education and graduated. Enrolled at the CCSF to pursue my college education and now I am in the 2nd year in CCSF taking aeronautics. My goal now is to obtain my AS degree from the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) so I can transfer to a University and get a Bachelors degree and to continue for my Masters degree in Aeronautics Engineering. I will strive hard to reach the peak level of my career which is a Professor and hopefully to be an aeronautic professor so...

Circus Circus Enterprises Case Studies

Executive Summary: Circus Circus Enterprises is a leader and will continue to be in the gaming industry. In recent years, they have seen a decline in profit and revenue; management tends to blame the decrease on continuing disruptions from remodeling, expansion, and increased competition. Consequently, Circus has reported decreases in its net income for 1997 and 1998 and management believes this trend will continue as competition heightens. Currently the company is involved in several joint ventures, its brand of casino entertainment has traditionally catered to the low rollers and family vacationers through its theme park. Circus should continue to expand its existing operations into new market segments. This shift will allow them to attract the up scale gambler. Overview Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc founded in 1974 is in the business of entertainment, with its core strength in casino gambling. The company?s asset base, operating cash flow, profit margin, multiple markets and customers, rank it as one of the gaming industry leaders. Partners William G. Bennett an aggressive cost cutter and William N. Pennington purchased Circus Circus in 1974 as a small and unprofitable casino. It went public in 1983, from 1993 to 1997; the average return on capital invested was 16.5%. Circus Circus operates several properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Laughlin, and one in Mississippi, as well as 50% ownership in three other casinos and a theme park. On January 31,1998 Circus reported net income of 89.9 million and revenues of 1.35 billion, this is a down from 100 million on 1.3 billion in 1997. Management sees this decline in revenue due to the rapid and extensive expansion and the increased competition that Circus is facing. Well established in the casino gaming industry the corporation has its focus in the entertainment business and has particularly a popular theme resort concept....

Effect Of Civil War On American Economy

The Economies of the North and South, 1861-1865 In 1861, a great war in American history began. It was a civil war between the north and south that was by no means civil. This war would have great repercussions upon the economy of this country and the states within it. The American Civil War began with secession, creating a divided union of sorts, and sparked an incredibly cataclysmic four years. Although the actual war began with secession, this was not the only driving force. The economy of the Southern states, the Confederacy, greatly if not entirely depended on the institution of slavery. The Confederacy was heavily reliant on agriculture, and they used the profits made from the sale of such raw materials to purchase finished goods to use and enjoy. Their major export was cotton, which thrived on the warm river deltas and could easily be shipped to major ocean ports from towns on the Mississippi and numerous river cities. Slavery was a key part of this, as slaves were the ones who harvested and planted the cotton. Being such an enormous unpaid work force, the profits made were extraordinarily high and the price for the unfinished goods drastically low in comparison; especially since he invention of the cotton gin in 1793 which made the work all that much easier and quicker. In contrast, the economical structure of the Northern states, the Union, was vastly dependent on industry. Slavery did not exist in most of the Union, as there was no demand for it due to the type of industrial development taking place. As the Union had a paid work force, the profits made were lower and the cost of the finished manufactured item higher. In turn, the Union used the profits and purchased raw materials to use. This cycle...

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Trade Embargoes

Although I am a strong critic of the use and effectiveness of economic sanctions, such as trade embargoes, for the sake of this assignment, I will present both their theoretical advantages and their disadvantages based upon my research. Trade embargoes and blockades have traditionally been used to entice nations to alter their behavior or to punish them for certain behavior. The intentions behind these policies are generally noble, at least on the surface. However, these policies can have side effects. For example, FDR's blockade of raw materials against the Japanese in Manchuria in the 1930s arguably led to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which resulted in U.S. involvement in World War II. The decades-long embargo against Cuba not only did not lead to the topple of the communist regime there, but may have strengthened Castro's hold on the island and has created animosity toward the United States in Latin America and much suffering by the people of Cuba. Various studies have concluded that embargoes and other economic sanctions generally have not been effective from a utilitarian or policy perspective, yet these policies continue. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Trade Embargoes Strengths Trade embargoes and other sanctions can give the sender government the appearance of taking strong measures in response to a given situation without resorting to violence. Sanctions can be imposed in conjunction with other measures to achieve conflict prevention and mitigation goals. Sanctions may be ineffective: goals may be too elusive, the means too gentle, or cooperation from other countries insufficient. It is usually difficult to determine whether embargoes were an effective deterrent against future misdeeds: embargoes may contribute to a successful outcome, but can rarely achieve ambitious objectives alone. Some regimes are highly resistant to external pressures to reform. At the same time, trade sanctions may narrow the...