To What Extent Was The Use Of Peaceful Tactics The Most Important Factor In The Achievement Of The Vote For Women Between 1880 And 1918

Word Count: 2785 |

The closure of WW1 marked a significant period in women’s history. The franchise was extended to women over 30 in 1918, enabling them to vote in national elections. However, this was less than the ‘universal adult suffrage’ they had sought, and even by 1918, it would take a further decade to achieve this. The key debate over this achievement, however, is over the contribution of peaceful tactics.
Even before the creation of a specific national suffrage movement, certain rights had already been gained by women. Women could stand as members of Boards of Poor Law Guardians and also on local School Boards under the (Forster) Education Act of 1870. This gave women a chance to prove their ability in areas of political decision making – involving a female presence in the ‘public sphere’ for the first time – diminishing the anti arguments that women were not intellectually fit to do so. Moreover, the Municipal Franchise Act of 1869 was extended female rate payers, initiating a female presence in the democratic process. Women were able, furthermore, to stand as candidates in local elections by 1888, enabling women to challenge opposition views that had always denied them their rights, and the increasing roles of women in society indicated greater social acceptance. However, limitations persisted in that these responsibilities were seen as ‘domestic’ and women were still openly denied the parliamentary franchise. In addition, these crucial changes remained restricted to only middle class women, thus losing crucial support from working class women who had already established highly developed unions.
Hence, the Radical Suffragist Party focused on working class women thus ‘radical’ for these views. These contributed to social reform through peaceful means and set up successful women’s trade unions which created equal rights for women in payment and working hours. Evidently, local suffrage, activism in council education and the formation of a network of unions had certainly illustrated the extent and rate at which women had progressed and broken out of the so called ‘separate spheres’, albeit only to some extent. Yet, these women faced hostility from both men and middle class women as middle class women sought suffrage on the same terms as men.
Although women did not have the right to vote in national elections they did however have an active role in politics. Undoubtedly, women were highly active in parties such as the Conservative’s Primrose League of 1883 which consisted of 49% women membership. Furthermore, in 1887, the Women’s Liberal Federation was established and different parties began to establish branches for women. Although women were a source of free labour which aided the parties, it did however once again challenge the ideas that women were emotional beings, incapable of making political decision and that politics corrupted both women and their chivalry. Nevertheless, although women were not engaging in Conservative politics to become candidates, they gained experience in organising and campaigning. Yet, in reality, what they were creating were Conservative MPs, who a vast majority were anti female suffrage and in the parliamentary voting regarding female suffrage, all Conservative MPs had voted against female suffrage.
Additionally, the increasing educational and job opportunities brought about further demolition of the ‘separate spheres’, showing through peaceful means widespread support was obtained. In 1837 there was “no High Schools for girls” but that by 1901, “every town of any size had a girls High School”. There were also by this stage “2000 women graduates and 8 women had received honorary degrees” . All this with social changes indicated that women had broken out of the separate spheres to some extent and proved their intellectual strength, being accepted by a stereotypical society. Nevertheless despite all these achievements aims still remained divided and focus lay on obtaining social rights rather than suffrage.
Finally through the merging of several minor parties in 1897, the NUWSS was established, resulting in a focused aim. This increase in membership and supporters allowed large scale demonstrations to initiate such as the Mud March in February 1907 which consisted of over 3,000 women and in June 1908, the ‘Women’s Sunday’ in Hyde Park was organised. Nevertheless, this raised much awareness and fixed women’s suffrage debate strongly on the political map and finally became a vital debate in Parliament. Moreover, the Mud March had a substantial impact because of the novelty of reputable women rallying through the streets which required a great courage beyond that needed for subsequent processions. The demonstrating women put their reputation and employment at risk and ridicule from the crowds. Important meetings such as what became known as the first ‘Women’s Parliament’ at Caxton Hall on February 13th 1907 were created, which attracted large audiences and were highly successful in raising awareness and gaining membership.
Nonetheless, by 1906 disillusionment grew as many felt that peaceful campaign was not having the impact which they hoped and thus a more militant approach was seen to be the key. Militancy within the Women’s Social and Political Union (WSPU) embarked in 1905 by Christabel Pankhurst and Annie Kenney, her right hand women, during the Liberal assembly in Manchester. Militancy itself began diminutive with the heckling and interruption of meetings such as that of the Christabel incident where the refusal of silence was made along with physical attack on a policemen, finally leading to her arrest. Although this is not seen as extreme today, the stereotypical boundaries and expectations of middle class women were broken therefore proclaimed as militant, shocking the nation, at first gaining sympathy. Emmeline Pankhurst described this in her book ‘In My Own Words’ writing ‘to be satisfied with nothing but action on our question. Deeds, not Words was to be our permanent motto’. This emphasises the extent to which Pankhurst felt militancy was crucial.
Indeed, 1908 and 1909 saw the escalation of intense militancy. Arson became a frequent weapon of the WSPU alongside pillar box bombing and window smashing, rooting through an incident in London 30th June 1908, where Mary Leigh and Edith New smashed the windows of the Prime Minister’s house during a riot that was developed through a peaceful rally. This provoked sympathy since the authorities retaliated ruthlessly, indicating militancy was a key part due to the reactions it provoked, attaining widespread support. Albeit initial sympathy and was gained alongside raising the profile of the female suffrage campaign, it did however turn them very supporters hostile against them.
Militancy increased as the Suffragettes became vilified by the government. Nevertheless, despite gaining initial publicity, militancy gave legitimate reasons not to give women the vote; reasons before their campaign were based solely upon prejudice because women never had undertaken roles outside the home. This meant that opposition to them became stronger and alienated the general public from their cause. Under the influence of the autocratic Pankhurst’s, influential individuals like the Pethick-Lawrence’s who raised £3,000,000 towards the WSPU were expelled in 1912. Additionally, all links with the working class and the Independent Labour Party were dismissed alongside the removal of Sylvia Pankhurst. By 1912, Militancy had become excessive and constant ratcheting was required to maintain attention such as in 1913, Emily Davidson gave her life by running in front of the king’s race horse. The attacks became spontaneous, sparking off without the consent of the leadership, reinforced by the riots of Black Friday where 300 women became involved in bloody fighting. Due to militancy the WSPU membership declined between 1912 and 1913, membership falling by 34% and in the following year a further 42%. Disillusionment led to party divisions such as that in 1907 where the WSPU spilt into the Women’s Freedom League (WFL), taking a third of the membership. These actions were criticized openly, arguing that the aim should be focused on the suffrage rather than raging a ‘sex-war’. Millicent Fawcett had criticised the WSPU of doing ‘more harm than good’. This turned many against the WSPU showing that militant thoughts were unpopular since divisions were created within the party itself. This evidently caused a unified aim to be lost in addition to sympathetic figures as Winston Churchill and Lloyd George.
Although, by exerting this pressure on the government, the government became more reluctant to give in and be highlighted as ‘inferior’, indicating the negative effects of militancy. Men saw militant women as enemies in a battle whereas pacifist women were being seen more and more as equals. Militancy undermined such perspective. Evidence of the nation’s resentment was seen after such extremes when the ‘Rokeby Venus’ was slashed in the National Gallery. The populace retaliated by assaulting WSPU members with cake. The press ridiculed the WSPU, portraying them as ‘wild’ and ‘sexually deviant’ with ‘mental disorders’. Women had argued that criminals should not be enfranchised, just because they were male, however their militant actions were no different to those of a criminal, thus not qualifying to vote, highlighting that militancy gave legal justification for the anti arguments which peaceful tactics had slowly deteriorated.
In spite of this, the NUWSS began to make real gains at this stage. The isolation of the NUWSS from the WSPU allowed them to regain their strengths lost due to militancy. The NUWSS had picked up the resigning members and membership between 1910 and 1913 inclined drastically as membership from the WSPU declined during this period. Clearly women themselves felt that militancy was undermining the cause. Moreover, the NUWSS aimed to process the first Conciliation Bill in 1911. The peaceful campaign was given much attention and understanding due to the disillusionment militancy had brought. 146 local councils gave their official confirmation to the Bill allowing the second reading to pass by 255 votes to 88. The second Bill in 1912 was defeated and the militancy of the Suffragettes was quick to be blamed, illustrating the resentment towards militancy. The NUWSS also recognised the reluctance of the Liberal government to push for female suffrage which repelled the party towards Labour. Thus in 1912, an electoral pact was soon signed in which the NUWSS would support Labour candidates in elections and in return, the Labour party would embrace women’s suffrage as an official party policy. This was a tremendous leap as now the Suffragists had an official well-established party and with a potentially greater number of labour MPs in Parliament, it now it seemed more than ever that female suffrage would be gained as the cause was to be taken on as a policy if Labour MPs were to be elected.
During the Great War, all militant activity ceased instantly when the war began in 1914 and the opportunity arose for women to prove themselves to being able to ‘defend the realm’. However, ironically the war had pushed suffrage off the political agenda after it had been finally been fixed after many years. The patriotic Pankhurst’s ceased their militancy and took on war work in factories to produce ammunition and other vital occupations such as the emergency services since all men were sent to the front due to conscription. Despite the long term, poisonous effects of the chemicals, turning the skin yellow and causing infertility, the women continued to work for the country, being named as the ‘canaries’. This signified the physical power of the women, a constant anti suffrage argument. However, despite the Suffragettes’ active and physical contribution, the Suffragists who although opposed the war due to their pacifist nature, did contribute such as home front farming. This activeness showed women as strong, patriotic and adaptable to the nation and most importantly the government. Doing these dangerous jobs helped break down the rigid concepts of what were seen as male activities. Women gained a large deal of pride and confidence through their new responsibilities and new standards of behaviour were established. This moment showed more clear than ever that women could defend the realm without the alleged physical and mental deficiencies. Women gained support through active and patriotic acts such as helping with the war effort rather than active and militant, clearly showing the insignificance of militancy.
The Representation of the Peoples Act (ROPA) passed on the closure of the war gave the national vote to all women over 30 however; these being only 8 million of the populace. Additionally, this was only a subsection to the ROPA, which was mainly built upon the enfranchisement of returning soldiers and sailors who would not have met residency requirements under the existing law. Women were added on as an amendment which was a compromise to prevent the initiation of militancy, therefore suggesting that militancy forced the government make a compromise, which can be seen as a delayed effect. However, not all women gained suffrage; women that had participated it war work and campaigning had mostly been below the age of thirty, who the Act did not include in enfranchisement. This means that militancy had a greater impact since at the time of high aggression, the government considered giving the vote to all middle class women, therefore including a greater percentage if not the total percentage of middle class women. This suggests that militancy was a key factor, in the question of anticipation of the suffrage. Whereas it can be argued that the vote was given due to the absence of militancy during the war, nonetheless it was indeed the fear of militancy returning which resulted in female suffrage.
Other factors such as international context also played a part in gaining the vote for women. Social breakthroughs had already occurred in other European countries such as Switzerland and Germany. Britain being a power did not want to have the humility of falling behind, pushing the debate for the vote towards the movement. Conversely, the women included had not generally participated in the war work.
In conclusion, suffrage was gained due to many interlinked factors for example, the contribution to the war effort, the fear of the return of militancy and the eradication of separate spheres, albeit to a certain extent, nonetheless it cannot be ignored that suffrage was awarded as a compromise as it was not granted on the same grounds as men. Certainly, militancy did raise mass awareness to the cause and it was due to militancy that the fear of returning militancy developed and allowed focal parliamentary and public attention to turn to the NUWSS. However, the successes of militancy were limited in that it gave justification to the arguments of the Anti’s which were coherent throughout the struggle which had in fact influenced not only parliament but also the general public, and peaceful campaigning had in reality deteriorated these ludicrous debates which militancy had once again proved truthful. Moreover, it seemed extremely likely women would have gained the vote earlier if it had not been for militancy since it is argued that the second Conciliation Bill had been rejected in 1912 solely due to the extreme militant activities, demonstrating the negative impact of militancy on the vote. Furthermore, women gained much knowledge of politics through peaceful demonstrations which aided them significantly in that they became aware of the reluctance of the Conservatives to promote female suffrage and hence moved towards the Labour Party who were more liberal. Militancy on the other hand had repelled important individuals such as Lloyd-George and Churchill. Additionally, war work it itself was indirectly a way of campaigning peacefully as it allowed women to prove they could ‘defend the realm’ in addition to being physically and mentally able as their male counterparts. Evidently, peaceful tactics were of a greater significance as progress was increasing and at an immense rate, for example social rights had already been achieved by the 1880s, and women were actively participation in local politics, it undoubtedly seemed women would have finally obtained the vote by 1900.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Allegory Of American Pie By Don Mc Lean

Ask anyone what was the defining moment in the rock history of the 1960s was and all you will get is a one word answer: Woodstock. The three day rock festival that defined an era was only one of many music festivals of the '60s. But Woodstock has come to symbolize, "an era of peaceful, free- loving, drug- taking hippie youth, carefree before harsher realities hit..." (Layman 40). The Woodstock festival ended a century filled with many metamorphoses of rock'n'roll, from the era of pop music to the rebirth of folk music to the invention of acid rock. But some cynics say that rock'n'roll died with the death of Buddy Holly before the 60s even began. One such person is Don McLean. The poet behind the haunting epic song about the death of 'danceable' music, McLean wrote the ever popular song, "American Pie" (appendix 1). The most important song in rock'n'roll history, "American Pie", is the song about the demise of rock'n'roll after Buddy Holly's death and the heathenism of rock that resulted. Although McLean himself won't reveal any symbolism in his songs, "American Pie" is one of the most analyzed pieces of literature in modern society. Although not all of its secrets have been revealed, many "scholars" of the sixties will agree that the mystery of this song is one of the reasons it has become so successful- everyone wants to know the meanings of its allegories. Proof of "American Pie's" truth lies in the allegory of the song. Many People enjoy the song but have no idea what it means- Who is the Jester? What is the levee? When the deeper story is found, the importance of the song is unearthed. "American Pie" is not only a song, it is an epic poem about the course of rock'n'roll...

Carl Orffs Philosophies In Music Education

While Carl Orff is a very seminal composer of the 20th century, his greatest success and influence has been in the field of Music Education. Born on July 10th in Munich, Germany in 1895, Orff refused to speak about his past almost as if he were ashamed of it. What we do know, however, is that Orff came from a Bavarian family who was very active in the German military. His father's regiment band would often play through some of the young Orff's first attempts at composing. Although Orff was adamant about the secrecy of his past, Moser's Musik Lexicon says that he studied in the Munich Academy of Music until 1914. Orff then served in the military in the first world war. After the war, he held various positions in the Mannheim and Darmstadt opera houses then returned home to Munich to further study music. In 1925, and for the rest of his life, Orff was the head of a department and co-founder of the Guenther School for gymnastics, music, and dance in Munich where he worked with musical beginners. This is where he developed his Music Education theories. In 1937, Orff's Carmina Burana premiered in Frankfurt, Germany. Needless to say, it was a great success. With the success of Carmina Burana, Orff orphaned all of his previous works except for Catulli Carmina and the En trata which were rewritten to be acceptable by Orff. One of Orff's most admired composers was Monteverdi. In fact, much of Orff's work was based on ancient material. Orff said: I am often asked why I nearly always select old material, fairy tales and legends for my stage works. I do not look upon them as old, but rather as valid material. The time element disappears, and only the spiritual power remains. My...

Johann Sebastian Bach Biography

Throughout the history of music, many great composers, theorists, and instrumentalists have left indelible marks and influences that people today look back on to admire and aspire to. No exception to this idiom is Johann Sebastian Bach, whose impact on music was unforgettable to say the least. People today look back to his writings and works to both learn and admire. He truly can be considered a music history great. Bach, who came from a family of over 53 musicians, was nothing short of a virtuosic instrumentalist as well as a masterful composer. Born in Eisenach, Germany, on March 21, 1685, he was the son of a masterful violinist, Johann Ambrosius Bach, who taught his son the basic skills for string playing. Along with this string playing, Bach began to play the organ which is the instrument he would later on be noted for in history. His instruction on the organ came from the player at Eisenach's most important church. He instructed the young boy rather rigorously until his skills surpassed anyone?s expectations for someone of such a young age. Bach suffered early trauma when his parents died in 1695. He went to go live with his older brother, Johann Christoph, who also was a professional organist at Ohrdruf. He continued his younger brother's education on that instrument, as well as introducing him to the harpsichord. The rigorous training on these instruments combined with Bach?s masterful skill paid off for him at an early age. After several years of studying with his older brother, he received a scholarship to study in Luneberg, Germany, which is located on the northern tip of the country. As a result, he left his brother?s tutelage and went to go and study there. The teenage years brought Bach to several parts of Germany where he...

Michelangelo

Michelangelo was pessimistic in his poetry and an optimist in his artwork. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo?s poetry was pessimistic in his response to Strazzi even though he was complementing him. Michelangelo?s sculpture brought out his optimism. Michelangelo was optimistic in completing The Tomb of Pope Julius II and persevered through it?s many revisions trying to complete his vision. Sculpture was Michelangelo?s main goal and the love of his life. Since his art portrayed both optimism and pessimism, Michelangelo was in touch with his positive and negative sides, showing that he had a great and stable personality. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo Buonarroti was called to Rome in 1505 by Pope Julius II to create for him a monumental tomb. We have no clear sense of what the tomb was to look like, since over the years it went through at least five conceptual revisions. The tomb was to have three levels; the bottom level was to have sculpted figures representing Victory and bond slaves. The second level was to have statues of Moses and Saint Paul as well as symbolic figures of the active and contemplative life- representative of the human striving for, and reception of, knowledge. The third level, it is assumed, was to have an effigy of the deceased pope. The tomb of Pope Julius II was never finished. What was finished of the tomb represents a twenty-year span of frustrating delays and revised schemes. Michelangelo had hardly begun work on the pope?s tomb when Julius commanded him to fresco the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to complete the work done in the previous century under Sixtus IV. The overall organization consists of four large triangles at...

Oscar Wilde

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde was born in Dublin Ireland on October 16, 1854. He is one of the most talented and most controversial writers of his time. He was well known for his wit, flamboyance, and creative genius and with his little dramatic training showing his natural talent for stage and theatre. He is termed a martyr by some and may be the first true self-publicist and was known for his style of dress and odd behavior. Wilde, 1882 His Father, William Wilde, was a highly accredited doctor and his mother, Jane Francesca Elgee, was a writer of revolutionary poems. Oscar had a brother William Charles Kingsbury along with his father's three illegitimate children, Henry, Emily, and Mary. His sister, Isola Emily Francesca died in 1867 at only ten years of age from a sudden fever, greatly affecting Oscar and his family. He kept a lock of her hair in an envelope and later wrote the poem 'Requiescat' in her memory. Oscar and his brother William both attended the Protora Royal School at Enniskillen. He had little in common with the other children. He disliked games and took more interest in flowers and sunsets. He was extremely passionate about anything that had to do with ancient Greece and with Classics. Wilde during school years In 1871, he was awarded a Royal School Scholarship to Trinity College in Dublin and received many awards and earned the highest honor the college offered to an undergraduate, the Foundation Scholarship. In 1874, he also won the College's Berkley Gold Medal for Greek and was awarded a Demyship to Magdalen College, Oxford. After graduating from Oxford, Oscar moved to London with his friend Frank Miles, a well-known portrait painter of the time. In 1878 his poem Ravenna was published, for which he won the...

The History Of Greek Theater

Theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century BCE, with the Sopocles, the great writer of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, heroes and the ideals of life were depicted and glorified. It was believed that man should live for honor and fame, his action was courageous and glorious and his life would climax in a great and noble death. Originally, the hero's recognition was created by selfish behaviors and little thought of service to others. As the Greeks grew toward city-states and colonization, it became the destiny and ambition of the hero to gain honor by serving his city. The second major characteristic of the early Greek world was the supernatural. The two worlds were not separate, as the gods lived in the same world as the men, and they interfered in the men's lives as they chose to. It was the gods who sent suffering and evil to men. In the plays of Sophocles, the gods brought about the hero's downfall because of a tragic flaw in the character of the hero. In Greek tragedy, suffering brought knowledge of worldly matters and of the individual. Aristotle attempted to explain how an audience could observe tragic events and still have a pleasurable experience. Aristotle, by searching the works of writers of Greek tragedy, Aeschulus, Euripides and Sophocles (whose Oedipus Rex he considered the finest of all Greek tragedies), arrived at his definition of tragedy. This explanation has a profound influence for more than twenty centuries on those writing tragedies, most significantly Shakespeare. Aristotle's analysis of tragedy began with a description of the effect such a work had on the audience as a "catharsis" or purging of the emotions. He decided that catharsis was the purging of two specific emotions, pity and...

Scholarship Essay About Goals

Ever since I was a young kid I have always been interested with aircraft. I was so curious of how airplane's fly. I remember taking my toys apart to see how it works. As a kid I wanted to go to the airport to watch the airplanes land and fly and pondered how this happens. Other kids wanted to go to the amusement places. As I grew older I became more and more interested in aircraft and the technology behind it. I always involved myself with aviation early on. I read books and magazines on aviation, took museum tours, built model airplanes. When I was younger my father would take me to aircraft repair facilities where I would watch in great fascination. In my teens, went up to the military bases and befriended many soldiers involved with aircraft and asked them numerous questions. I got to meet many aeronautics engineers and borrowed their old textbooks and read them till the wee hours of the morning. As technology improved with information superhighway, I logged on the web. Stayed up for hours and hours searching through web pages and web pages of information about aircraft and technology. I started my elementary school in the Philippines, then we moved to U.S. and continued my high school education and graduated. Enrolled at the CCSF to pursue my college education and now I am in the 2nd year in CCSF taking aeronautics. My goal now is to obtain my AS degree from the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) so I can transfer to a University and get a Bachelors degree and to continue for my Masters degree in Aeronautics Engineering. I will strive hard to reach the peak level of my career which is a Professor and hopefully to be an aeronautic professor so...

Circus Circus Enterprises Case Studies

Executive Summary: Circus Circus Enterprises is a leader and will continue to be in the gaming industry. In recent years, they have seen a decline in profit and revenue; management tends to blame the decrease on continuing disruptions from remodeling, expansion, and increased competition. Consequently, Circus has reported decreases in its net income for 1997 and 1998 and management believes this trend will continue as competition heightens. Currently the company is involved in several joint ventures, its brand of casino entertainment has traditionally catered to the low rollers and family vacationers through its theme park. Circus should continue to expand its existing operations into new market segments. This shift will allow them to attract the up scale gambler. Overview Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc founded in 1974 is in the business of entertainment, with its core strength in casino gambling. The company?s asset base, operating cash flow, profit margin, multiple markets and customers, rank it as one of the gaming industry leaders. Partners William G. Bennett an aggressive cost cutter and William N. Pennington purchased Circus Circus in 1974 as a small and unprofitable casino. It went public in 1983, from 1993 to 1997; the average return on capital invested was 16.5%. Circus Circus operates several properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Laughlin, and one in Mississippi, as well as 50% ownership in three other casinos and a theme park. On January 31,1998 Circus reported net income of 89.9 million and revenues of 1.35 billion, this is a down from 100 million on 1.3 billion in 1997. Management sees this decline in revenue due to the rapid and extensive expansion and the increased competition that Circus is facing. Well established in the casino gaming industry the corporation has its focus in the entertainment business and has particularly a popular theme resort concept....

Effect Of Civil War On American Economy

The Economies of the North and South, 1861-1865 In 1861, a great war in American history began. It was a civil war between the north and south that was by no means civil. This war would have great repercussions upon the economy of this country and the states within it. The American Civil War began with secession, creating a divided union of sorts, and sparked an incredibly cataclysmic four years. Although the actual war began with secession, this was not the only driving force. The economy of the Southern states, the Confederacy, greatly if not entirely depended on the institution of slavery. The Confederacy was heavily reliant on agriculture, and they used the profits made from the sale of such raw materials to purchase finished goods to use and enjoy. Their major export was cotton, which thrived on the warm river deltas and could easily be shipped to major ocean ports from towns on the Mississippi and numerous river cities. Slavery was a key part of this, as slaves were the ones who harvested and planted the cotton. Being such an enormous unpaid work force, the profits made were extraordinarily high and the price for the unfinished goods drastically low in comparison; especially since he invention of the cotton gin in 1793 which made the work all that much easier and quicker. In contrast, the economical structure of the Northern states, the Union, was vastly dependent on industry. Slavery did not exist in most of the Union, as there was no demand for it due to the type of industrial development taking place. As the Union had a paid work force, the profits made were lower and the cost of the finished manufactured item higher. In turn, the Union used the profits and purchased raw materials to use. This cycle...

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Trade Embargoes

Although I am a strong critic of the use and effectiveness of economic sanctions, such as trade embargoes, for the sake of this assignment, I will present both their theoretical advantages and their disadvantages based upon my research. Trade embargoes and blockades have traditionally been used to entice nations to alter their behavior or to punish them for certain behavior. The intentions behind these policies are generally noble, at least on the surface. However, these policies can have side effects. For example, FDR's blockade of raw materials against the Japanese in Manchuria in the 1930s arguably led to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which resulted in U.S. involvement in World War II. The decades-long embargo against Cuba not only did not lead to the topple of the communist regime there, but may have strengthened Castro's hold on the island and has created animosity toward the United States in Latin America and much suffering by the people of Cuba. Various studies have concluded that embargoes and other economic sanctions generally have not been effective from a utilitarian or policy perspective, yet these policies continue. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Trade Embargoes Strengths Trade embargoes and other sanctions can give the sender government the appearance of taking strong measures in response to a given situation without resorting to violence. Sanctions can be imposed in conjunction with other measures to achieve conflict prevention and mitigation goals. Sanctions may be ineffective: goals may be too elusive, the means too gentle, or cooperation from other countries insufficient. It is usually difficult to determine whether embargoes were an effective deterrent against future misdeeds: embargoes may contribute to a successful outcome, but can rarely achieve ambitious objectives alone. Some regimes are highly resistant to external pressures to reform. At the same time, trade sanctions may narrow the...