William The Conqueror

William the Conqueror was a man who gained great power throughout his time on earth. He was put into a leadership position and took great pride in fulfilling the duties that were required of him. The following paper will examine the life of William and will focus on his childhood education, how he came into power, the reformations he made as the King of England, the influence he had on both the Churches of Normandy and England, his role in the Domesday Survey, and finally how his reign came to an end.
To begin, William was born in a great castle at Falaise which is situated west of Rouen. At the age of eleven William was sent to Paris where he received a careful education and was a very prepossessing and accomplished young prince. At this time he was under the care of a military tutor whose name was Theroulde, a veteran soldier who had long been employed by the King of France. He taught him to ride and to practice all the evolutions of horsemanship which were required by the tactics of those days. He also trained him in the use of arms, the bow and arrow, the javelin, the sword, the spear, and accustomed him to exercise in the armor of those days which was made of steel which warriors used.
Next I’ll focus on how William came to power in both Normandy and England. Williams father was Robert 1, Duke of Normandy, who named him as heir to Normandy. He succeeded his father as Duke of Normandy at the age of eight. At this time William was supported by King Henry 1 of France who knighted him at the age of fifteen. The people of Normandy were very happy to see William as their new Duke, he was a man of good stature and men were more than willing to follow him as they were impressed with his outstanding equestrian skills and impressive use of arms. In the following years the English Throne became vacant when childless Edward the Confessor died and at this time the throne was fiercely disputed by three men. William, Harold Godwinson, the Earl of Wessex, and the Viking King Harald the 3rd of Norway. William had a blood claim, through his great aunt Emma who was the mother of Edward. William also claimed that Edward had promised William the throne when he visited Edward in London during the Danish occupation in England. Lastly, he claimed that Harold had pledged allegiance to him by having him swear loyalty to him over the concealed bones of a dead saint. But, in January 1066, Harold Godwinson was declared King of England due to Edward’s last will and the vote of the Witenagemot (which was a political institution in Anglo-Saxon England which operated between approximately the 7th century and 11th century) Godwinson was formally crowned King by Archbishop Aldred. Upon being crowned, the new king immediately put together a large fleet of ships and mobilized a militia force in preparation of being attacked from several directions. After defeating his brothers, he marched his army 241 miles to meet William in the south. While Godwinson was at battle William took the following actions. He submitted his claim to the English throne to Pope Alexander the 2nd who sent him a consecrated banner in support. He then assembled a council of war at Lillebonne and openly began assembling an army in Normandy. After offering promises of English lands and titles, he had built up a formidable force of 600 ships and 7,000 men that included Normans, French mercenaries, and numerous foreign knights. Harold was of course waiting with a very large fleet for William on the south coast of England guarding the English channel. However, William’s army couldn’t cross the channel for several weeks because of unfavorable winds and while William was able to keep his army assembled, Harold’s was diminished by lack of supplies and falling moral. While this was all happening he also returned his fleet of ships to London which left the English Channel unguarded. It turned even worse for Harold when news came that Harald the 3rd, had made an alliance with Tostig and their forces had landed ten miles from York. Harold was forced to move his army North where his army defeated Harald and Tostig in a bloody battle at Stamford Bridge on September the 25th. This all worked out perfectly for William because by the time Harold could return his army to the south the winds had changed and William’s forces had crossed the English Channel and landed at Pevensey Bay in Sussex on September the 28th. He even had time to move his army to Hastings where he assembled a pre-fabricated wooden castle as his base where he waited for Harold’s army to return from the north. On October the 13th William received the news that Harold’s weakened army was approaching from London and the next morning William left the castle with his army advancing towards the enemy. Harold took a defensive position on top of Senlac Hill which was located seven miles from Hastings. The numbers for both sides were about equal and the Battle of Hastings lasted the entire day. However, William’s army included both a calvary and infantry along with many archers. Harold’s army consisted of only and infantry and very few archers which gave William a distinct advantage. Harold’s men fought bravely and they formed a wall of shields atop the hill which forced back William’s army several times and took many casualties. At this time their were also rumors around both camps that William had been killed, but William squashed those rumors and rallied his troops when he raised his helmet and shouted of the victory that ensued his men. After pushing back William’s men, many of the English infantry began to chase the Norman’s on foot. This was the turning point of the battle as the Norman calvary was able to repeatedly attack the English forces from behind as the Norman infantry continued to pretend to be retreating. The Norman archers also began to have a large effect as their arrows began to weaken the line of shields atop the hill. With one final Calvary attack, William and the Normans claimed victory and this is when Harold was most likely killed along with two of his brothers, Gyrth and Leofwin Godwinson. By that evening the English men were retreating in fear of falling to the same fate. After his victory William waited for a formal surrender of the English throne. However instead of declaring William as the new king, the Witenagemot decided to give the thron to the very young Edward, also know as Etheling. When William heard of this he instanstly began marching his army toward London but when they reached the London Bridge his army was pushed back and he decided to move west and attack London from the northwest instead. After receiving large reinforcements William and his men attacked the city and in early December after conquering London, Edgar personally gave the English crown to William in the town of Berkhamsted. William’s next move was to be officially crowned King of England and on Christmas day of 1066 he was crowned in Westminister Abbey by Archbishop Aldred. All of the previous events described were instrumental occurences that led to William the Conqueror taking his role as the King of England.
Once William was in control, he proceeded to make several major changes. These changes included increasing the power of traditional English shires, decreasing the powers of the earls and he made sure that all administrative functions of his government were to remain at specific English towns except for the court itself. In order to decrease the power of the earls, William decided to only allow them one shire apiece whereas before earls could gain power by ruling over multiple shires. Another major change that the Conqueror made was replacing the English language with the French language, a change that remained effective for almost 300 years. Also the traditional Anglo-Saxon cultural influence of England began to mix with the Norman one and this is how the Anglo-Norman culture came into effect. After changing the culture William focused on eliminating the past English aristocracy. He did this very quickly by getting rid of all English aristocrats who either resisted or opposed the Normans. Some were lucky and fled to Scotland while others were killed or sold into slavery overseas. To ensure his support and help to eliminate future uprisings William gave the former English noblemen’s land to the new Norman noblemen and he did this widely which helped to gain the support of his country and strengthen his political standing as a monarch. One very interesting thing that the Conqueror had done was the depopulation of several miles of land and turned it into a royal New Forrest which he used for the enjoyment of one of his favorite hobbies which was hunting.
The next thing that struck me when looking at the life and rule of William the Conqueror was his role in the history of the western Church between 1066 and 1087. When William claimed his victory in 1066 he brought three different ecclesiastical provinces (Rouen, Canterbury, and York) under a single domination. He also brought Normandy and England together which had previously responded to different influences. William believed that Christendom wasn’t a devout aspiration nor a threat to national independence. Something that he felt very strongly about was replacing the former English prelates and bishops with Norman prelates and bishops, this is commonly known as the Normanization of the church of England, and he also proceeded to do the same thing with the English abbeys. Obviously these actions taken were a major feature of Williams rule and it is very understandable as to why he would do so. The prelates of England were some of the closest counselors to the king, and the bishops were of great importance to the king due to the role they played in their office. Now that William was in control the bishops and abbots were more closely involved with secular affairs than ever before. Even with the power recently gained by the bishops and abbots, William himself made major decisions when Episcopal justice at times became ineffective, also he had the final say on any court disputes between the prelates as well as disputes between the prelates and laymen. David Douglas described Williams role in the church with this quote, “The dominant position occupied by William in the Church throughout his conjoint realm, goes far to explain the special nature of his relations with the papacy between 1066 and 1087”. This meant that Williams’s new status in the church, which was consecrated, had to be proclaimed by papal legates. His role in the English church can clearly be traced back to the same role that he took in Norman once he became the duke. William firmly believed that his duty as king was to secure the welfare of the church and as king he would not accept or give into any division of loyalty among his people. In other words the king was in control of all religious affairs which included those of the pope. An elected pope would not be recognized without the king’s approval and papal letters couldn’t even be received without his permission. Some believe William’s action to be seen as anti-papal but when looking at the current time in history it is more accurately viewed as traditional. The king was simply accepting the special duties that he had involving the church and he was determined to fulfill them. Professor Z.N. Brooke described William’s ecclesiastical throughout his reign as, “entirely natural and regularly consistent”. After studying William’s role in the church it became clear that the churches in Normandy and England were brought together much more firmly under the control of a man who was set on raising the church discipline while under his control. While in rule he successfully was able to revive the Church in Normandy and gave the Church of England the integrity which remained with it throughout the Middle Ages. Douglas summed up the importance of William’s effect on the church with this, “His ecclesiastical policy must be regarded as sincere and constructive, for although he was of necessity occupied incessantly with the acquisition and retention of power, he never allowed himself to be wholly immersed in secularity. His motives were undoubtedly mixed, but he made his own enduring contribution to the movement of ecclesiastical reform that marked the age, and which was itself a potent factor in the formation of medieval Europe”.
After looking at the life of William the Conqueror I believe that it is imperative to look at one of William’s most amazing accomplishments during his reign of England which was his production of the Domesday Survey, which in turn resulted in the Domesday Book. In 1085, while being threatened of an invasion by King Canute of Denmark, William held a court at Gloucester where the topic of discussion with his council was how England was occupied and with what kind of people. This document is exceptionally important for our understanding of Norman England. The purpose of William taking this survey is widely disputed between three main theories. Most scholars believe that the reason for the survey was to discover the funds that William could raise through a land tax in order to pay for the defense of England against the Denmark invasion. It’s also believed that the survey was taken so that William could get an account of the lands held by his tenants in order to exercise his rights as a feudal overlord. The last main thought is that William wanted to know the burden of mercenaries on his vassals so the he could properly redistribute the burden fairly. What the king wanted to find out through this survey was how much land and cattle that he owned in the country, he wanted to know the same concerning his archbishops, bishops, abbots, and earls. In other words the king wanted to know how much or what everybody who occupied land had. The investigation was to be conducted so thoroughly that the king would not allow one piece of land, one cow or ox, and not one pig to be left out. It is believed that the king most likely divided England into several regions and had each one investigated by separate panels of royal commissioners. These panels were to find out not only who currently ruled the lands and the number of livestock, slaves, fisheries etc. that they had but also who previously owned the land while King Edward was in rule. The king wanted his survey to be as detailed as possible which is why each land was to be surveyed three times. The fact that the king wanted to not only know about the details of the English country since the time he came into power but also the well being of the country before his reign came across me as a man who wanted to be sure that he was improving the well being of his people. To William it was very important to know all that he could about England’s people, tradition, and tax-paying capacity so that he could effectively defend his new land. What struck me the most about the Domesday Book, other than the fact that it was actually a successful survey, which is amazing when considering the time it was conducted and the unbelievable amount of information it produced, is that the dedication and attention to detail strongly reflects on the great character possessed by King William.
After completing the Domesday Survey, William immediately focused his attention on the defense of England from the oncoming attack from the Denmark forces led by King Canute, who had built up a large army as well as a formidable fleet and was preparing to transport it to England. However, while final preparations were being made, Canute’s men became aggravated with the king and began to turn on him. Canute was eventually captured and was murdered in the church of Odensee in July of 1086, this led to the abandoning of the planned attack and the threat to England from Denmark was immediately gone. Even with this happening William continued to concentrate on the defense, he now focused on the French who in 1087 who began to raid Normandy. William planned an attack that was designed to retake the Vexin(a region of land on the border of France and Normandy) for Normandy which he was forced to sign over to French control in 1077. William and his men crossed the Epte river to overtake Mantes, this was not only his last campaign but possibly the most brutal. When the French came to meet William’s army they were stormed by a surprise attack and retreated to Mantes where William’s men chased after them. King William had the entire city burned down and still today evidence of the former cities buildings is almost non-existent. However, while the destruction of the city was taking place, it is recorded that while William was maneuvering through the city on horseback his horse was spooked by the distractions and it threw the king with great force into the high pommel of his saddle. King William suffered traumatic rupturing in his abdominal area. Although he was able to return to Normandy while enduring excruciating pain, the injuries eventually proved to be fatal as he believed to pass away in the early morning on September 9, 1087. Before passing, King William made his dispositions, was anointed, and received sacrament form the archbishop of Rouen while on his deathbed.
The life of William as Duke of Normandy and King of England has not, and will not be forgotten. The Norman Conquest of England was without a doubt one of the most revolutionary events in English history. The best way I can describe him would be as a man of great character who more than fulfilled his calling in life, which was to be a leader. He led in a constructive way which proved to better both Normandy and England by the time his reign had ended.

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

Allegory Of American Pie By Don Mc Lean

Ask anyone what was the defining moment in the rock history of the 1960s was and all you will get is a one word answer: Woodstock. The three day rock festival that defined an era was only one of many music festivals of the '60s. But Woodstock has come to symbolize, "an era of peaceful, free- loving, drug- taking hippie youth, carefree before harsher realities hit..." (Layman 40). The Woodstock festival ended a century filled with many metamorphoses of rock'n'roll, from the era of pop music to the rebirth of folk music to the invention of acid rock. But some cynics say that rock'n'roll died with the death of Buddy Holly before the 60s even began. One such person is Don McLean. The poet behind the haunting epic song about the death of 'danceable' music, McLean wrote the ever popular song, "American Pie" (appendix 1). The most important song in rock'n'roll history, "American Pie", is the song about the demise of rock'n'roll after Buddy Holly's death and the heathenism of rock that resulted. Although McLean himself won't reveal any symbolism in his songs, "American Pie" is one of the most analyzed pieces of literature in modern society. Although not all of its secrets have been revealed, many "scholars" of the sixties will agree that the mystery of this song is one of the reasons it has become so successful- everyone wants to know the meanings of its allegories. Proof of "American Pie's" truth lies in the allegory of the song. Many People enjoy the song but have no idea what it means- Who is the Jester? What is the levee? When the deeper story is found, the importance of the song is unearthed. "American Pie" is not only a song, it is an epic poem about the course of rock'n'roll...

Carl Orffs Philosophies In Music Education

While Carl Orff is a very seminal composer of the 20th century, his greatest success and influence has been in the field of Music Education. Born on July 10th in Munich, Germany in 1895, Orff refused to speak about his past almost as if he were ashamed of it. What we do know, however, is that Orff came from a Bavarian family who was very active in the German military. His father's regiment band would often play through some of the young Orff's first attempts at composing. Although Orff was adamant about the secrecy of his past, Moser's Musik Lexicon says that he studied in the Munich Academy of Music until 1914. Orff then served in the military in the first world war. After the war, he held various positions in the Mannheim and Darmstadt opera houses then returned home to Munich to further study music. In 1925, and for the rest of his life, Orff was the head of a department and co-founder of the Guenther School for gymnastics, music, and dance in Munich where he worked with musical beginners. This is where he developed his Music Education theories. In 1937, Orff's Carmina Burana premiered in Frankfurt, Germany. Needless to say, it was a great success. With the success of Carmina Burana, Orff orphaned all of his previous works except for Catulli Carmina and the En trata which were rewritten to be acceptable by Orff. One of Orff's most admired composers was Monteverdi. In fact, much of Orff's work was based on ancient material. Orff said: I am often asked why I nearly always select old material, fairy tales and legends for my stage works. I do not look upon them as old, but rather as valid material. The time element disappears, and only the spiritual power remains. My...

Johann Sebastian Bach Biography

Throughout the history of music, many great composers, theorists, and instrumentalists have left indelible marks and influences that people today look back on to admire and aspire to. No exception to this idiom is Johann Sebastian Bach, whose impact on music was unforgettable to say the least. People today look back to his writings and works to both learn and admire. He truly can be considered a music history great. Bach, who came from a family of over 53 musicians, was nothing short of a virtuosic instrumentalist as well as a masterful composer. Born in Eisenach, Germany, on March 21, 1685, he was the son of a masterful violinist, Johann Ambrosius Bach, who taught his son the basic skills for string playing. Along with this string playing, Bach began to play the organ which is the instrument he would later on be noted for in history. His instruction on the organ came from the player at Eisenach's most important church. He instructed the young boy rather rigorously until his skills surpassed anyone?s expectations for someone of such a young age. Bach suffered early trauma when his parents died in 1695. He went to go live with his older brother, Johann Christoph, who also was a professional organist at Ohrdruf. He continued his younger brother's education on that instrument, as well as introducing him to the harpsichord. The rigorous training on these instruments combined with Bach?s masterful skill paid off for him at an early age. After several years of studying with his older brother, he received a scholarship to study in Luneberg, Germany, which is located on the northern tip of the country. As a result, he left his brother?s tutelage and went to go and study there. The teenage years brought Bach to several parts of Germany where he...

Michelangelo

Michelangelo was pessimistic in his poetry and an optimist in his artwork. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo?s poetry was pessimistic in his response to Strazzi even though he was complementing him. Michelangelo?s sculpture brought out his optimism. Michelangelo was optimistic in completing The Tomb of Pope Julius II and persevered through it?s many revisions trying to complete his vision. Sculpture was Michelangelo?s main goal and the love of his life. Since his art portrayed both optimism and pessimism, Michelangelo was in touch with his positive and negative sides, showing that he had a great and stable personality. Michelangelo?s artwork consisted of paintings and sculptures that showed humanity in it?s natural state. Michelangelo Buonarroti was called to Rome in 1505 by Pope Julius II to create for him a monumental tomb. We have no clear sense of what the tomb was to look like, since over the years it went through at least five conceptual revisions. The tomb was to have three levels; the bottom level was to have sculpted figures representing Victory and bond slaves. The second level was to have statues of Moses and Saint Paul as well as symbolic figures of the active and contemplative life- representative of the human striving for, and reception of, knowledge. The third level, it is assumed, was to have an effigy of the deceased pope. The tomb of Pope Julius II was never finished. What was finished of the tomb represents a twenty-year span of frustrating delays and revised schemes. Michelangelo had hardly begun work on the pope?s tomb when Julius commanded him to fresco the ceiling of the Sistine Chapel to complete the work done in the previous century under Sixtus IV. The overall organization consists of four large triangles at...

Oscar Wilde

Oscar Fingal O'Flahertie Wills Wilde was born in Dublin Ireland on October 16, 1854. He is one of the most talented and most controversial writers of his time. He was well known for his wit, flamboyance, and creative genius and with his little dramatic training showing his natural talent for stage and theatre. He is termed a martyr by some and may be the first true self-publicist and was known for his style of dress and odd behavior. Wilde, 1882 His Father, William Wilde, was a highly accredited doctor and his mother, Jane Francesca Elgee, was a writer of revolutionary poems. Oscar had a brother William Charles Kingsbury along with his father's three illegitimate children, Henry, Emily, and Mary. His sister, Isola Emily Francesca died in 1867 at only ten years of age from a sudden fever, greatly affecting Oscar and his family. He kept a lock of her hair in an envelope and later wrote the poem 'Requiescat' in her memory. Oscar and his brother William both attended the Protora Royal School at Enniskillen. He had little in common with the other children. He disliked games and took more interest in flowers and sunsets. He was extremely passionate about anything that had to do with ancient Greece and with Classics. Wilde during school years In 1871, he was awarded a Royal School Scholarship to Trinity College in Dublin and received many awards and earned the highest honor the college offered to an undergraduate, the Foundation Scholarship. In 1874, he also won the College's Berkley Gold Medal for Greek and was awarded a Demyship to Magdalen College, Oxford. After graduating from Oxford, Oscar moved to London with his friend Frank Miles, a well-known portrait painter of the time. In 1878 his poem Ravenna was published, for which he won the...

The History Of Greek Theater

Theater and drama in Ancient Greece took form in about 5th century BCE, with the Sopocles, the great writer of tragedy. In his plays and those of the same genre, heroes and the ideals of life were depicted and glorified. It was believed that man should live for honor and fame, his action was courageous and glorious and his life would climax in a great and noble death. Originally, the hero's recognition was created by selfish behaviors and little thought of service to others. As the Greeks grew toward city-states and colonization, it became the destiny and ambition of the hero to gain honor by serving his city. The second major characteristic of the early Greek world was the supernatural. The two worlds were not separate, as the gods lived in the same world as the men, and they interfered in the men's lives as they chose to. It was the gods who sent suffering and evil to men. In the plays of Sophocles, the gods brought about the hero's downfall because of a tragic flaw in the character of the hero. In Greek tragedy, suffering brought knowledge of worldly matters and of the individual. Aristotle attempted to explain how an audience could observe tragic events and still have a pleasurable experience. Aristotle, by searching the works of writers of Greek tragedy, Aeschulus, Euripides and Sophocles (whose Oedipus Rex he considered the finest of all Greek tragedies), arrived at his definition of tragedy. This explanation has a profound influence for more than twenty centuries on those writing tragedies, most significantly Shakespeare. Aristotle's analysis of tragedy began with a description of the effect such a work had on the audience as a "catharsis" or purging of the emotions. He decided that catharsis was the purging of two specific emotions, pity and...

Scholarship Essay About Goals

Ever since I was a young kid I have always been interested with aircraft. I was so curious of how airplane's fly. I remember taking my toys apart to see how it works. As a kid I wanted to go to the airport to watch the airplanes land and fly and pondered how this happens. Other kids wanted to go to the amusement places. As I grew older I became more and more interested in aircraft and the technology behind it. I always involved myself with aviation early on. I read books and magazines on aviation, took museum tours, built model airplanes. When I was younger my father would take me to aircraft repair facilities where I would watch in great fascination. In my teens, went up to the military bases and befriended many soldiers involved with aircraft and asked them numerous questions. I got to meet many aeronautics engineers and borrowed their old textbooks and read them till the wee hours of the morning. As technology improved with information superhighway, I logged on the web. Stayed up for hours and hours searching through web pages and web pages of information about aircraft and technology. I started my elementary school in the Philippines, then we moved to U.S. and continued my high school education and graduated. Enrolled at the CCSF to pursue my college education and now I am in the 2nd year in CCSF taking aeronautics. My goal now is to obtain my AS degree from the City College of San Francisco (CCSF) so I can transfer to a University and get a Bachelors degree and to continue for my Masters degree in Aeronautics Engineering. I will strive hard to reach the peak level of my career which is a Professor and hopefully to be an aeronautic professor so...

Circus Circus Enterprises Case Studies

Executive Summary: Circus Circus Enterprises is a leader and will continue to be in the gaming industry. In recent years, they have seen a decline in profit and revenue; management tends to blame the decrease on continuing disruptions from remodeling, expansion, and increased competition. Consequently, Circus has reported decreases in its net income for 1997 and 1998 and management believes this trend will continue as competition heightens. Currently the company is involved in several joint ventures, its brand of casino entertainment has traditionally catered to the low rollers and family vacationers through its theme park. Circus should continue to expand its existing operations into new market segments. This shift will allow them to attract the up scale gambler. Overview Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc founded in 1974 is in the business of entertainment, with its core strength in casino gambling. The company?s asset base, operating cash flow, profit margin, multiple markets and customers, rank it as one of the gaming industry leaders. Partners William G. Bennett an aggressive cost cutter and William N. Pennington purchased Circus Circus in 1974 as a small and unprofitable casino. It went public in 1983, from 1993 to 1997; the average return on capital invested was 16.5%. Circus Circus operates several properties in Las Vegas, Reno, Laughlin, and one in Mississippi, as well as 50% ownership in three other casinos and a theme park. On January 31,1998 Circus reported net income of 89.9 million and revenues of 1.35 billion, this is a down from 100 million on 1.3 billion in 1997. Management sees this decline in revenue due to the rapid and extensive expansion and the increased competition that Circus is facing. Well established in the casino gaming industry the corporation has its focus in the entertainment business and has particularly a popular theme resort concept....

Effect Of Civil War On American Economy

The Economies of the North and South, 1861-1865 In 1861, a great war in American history began. It was a civil war between the north and south that was by no means civil. This war would have great repercussions upon the economy of this country and the states within it. The American Civil War began with secession, creating a divided union of sorts, and sparked an incredibly cataclysmic four years. Although the actual war began with secession, this was not the only driving force. The economy of the Southern states, the Confederacy, greatly if not entirely depended on the institution of slavery. The Confederacy was heavily reliant on agriculture, and they used the profits made from the sale of such raw materials to purchase finished goods to use and enjoy. Their major export was cotton, which thrived on the warm river deltas and could easily be shipped to major ocean ports from towns on the Mississippi and numerous river cities. Slavery was a key part of this, as slaves were the ones who harvested and planted the cotton. Being such an enormous unpaid work force, the profits made were extraordinarily high and the price for the unfinished goods drastically low in comparison; especially since he invention of the cotton gin in 1793 which made the work all that much easier and quicker. In contrast, the economical structure of the Northern states, the Union, was vastly dependent on industry. Slavery did not exist in most of the Union, as there was no demand for it due to the type of industrial development taking place. As the Union had a paid work force, the profits made were lower and the cost of the finished manufactured item higher. In turn, the Union used the profits and purchased raw materials to use. This cycle...

Evaluation Of The Effectiveness Of Trade Embargoes

Although I am a strong critic of the use and effectiveness of economic sanctions, such as trade embargoes, for the sake of this assignment, I will present both their theoretical advantages and their disadvantages based upon my research. Trade embargoes and blockades have traditionally been used to entice nations to alter their behavior or to punish them for certain behavior. The intentions behind these policies are generally noble, at least on the surface. However, these policies can have side effects. For example, FDR's blockade of raw materials against the Japanese in Manchuria in the 1930s arguably led to the bombing of Pearl Harbor, which resulted in U.S. involvement in World War II. The decades-long embargo against Cuba not only did not lead to the topple of the communist regime there, but may have strengthened Castro's hold on the island and has created animosity toward the United States in Latin America and much suffering by the people of Cuba. Various studies have concluded that embargoes and other economic sanctions generally have not been effective from a utilitarian or policy perspective, yet these policies continue. Evaluation of the effectiveness of Trade Embargoes Strengths Trade embargoes and other sanctions can give the sender government the appearance of taking strong measures in response to a given situation without resorting to violence. Sanctions can be imposed in conjunction with other measures to achieve conflict prevention and mitigation goals. Sanctions may be ineffective: goals may be too elusive, the means too gentle, or cooperation from other countries insufficient. It is usually difficult to determine whether embargoes were an effective deterrent against future misdeeds: embargoes may contribute to a successful outcome, but can rarely achieve ambitious objectives alone. Some regimes are highly resistant to external pressures to reform. At the same time, trade sanctions may narrow the...